Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury

In the early phase of severe acute brain injury (SABI), surrogate decision-makers must make treatment decisions in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Evidence-based strategies to communicate uncertainty and support decision-making are lacking. Our objective was to better understand surrogate experi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2023-07, Vol.51 (7), p.924-935
Hauptverfasser: Goss, Adeline L., Voumard, Rachel Rutz, Engelberg, Ruth A., Curtis, J. Randall, Creutzfeldt, Claire J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 935
container_issue 7
container_start_page 924
container_title Critical care medicine
container_volume 51
creator Goss, Adeline L.
Voumard, Rachel Rutz
Engelberg, Ruth A.
Curtis, J. Randall
Creutzfeldt, Claire J.
description In the early phase of severe acute brain injury (SABI), surrogate decision-makers must make treatment decisions in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Evidence-based strategies to communicate uncertainty and support decision-making are lacking. Our objective was to better understand surrogate experiences and needs during the period of active decision-making in SABI, to inform interventions to support SABI patients and families and improve clinician-surrogate communication. We interviewed surrogate decision-makers during patients' acute hospitalization for SABI, as part of a larger ( n = 222) prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with SABI and their family members. Constructivist grounded theory informed data collection and analysis. One U.S. academic medical center. We iteratively collected and analyzed semistructured interviews with 22 surrogates for 19 patients. None. Through several rounds of coding, interview notes, reflexive memos, and group discussion, we developed a thematic model describing the relationship between surrogate perspectives on decision-making and surrogate experiences of prognostic uncertainty. Patients ranged from 20 to 79 years of age (mean = 55 years) and had primary diagnoses of stroke ( n = 13; 68%), traumatic brain injury ( n = 5; 26%), and anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest ( n = 1; 5%). Patients were predominantly male ( n = 12; 63%), whereas surrogates were predominantly female ( n = 13; 68%). Two distinct perspectives on decision-making emerged: one group of surrogates felt a clear sense of agency around decision-making, whereas the other group reported a more passive role in decision-making, such that they did not even perceive there being a decision to make. Surrogates in both groups identified prognostic uncertainty as the central challenge in SABI, but they managed it differently. Only surrogates who felt they were actively deciding described time-limited trials as helpful. In this qualitative study, not all surrogate "decision-makers" viewed themselves as making decisions. Nearly all struggled with prognostic uncertainty. Our findings underline the need for longitudinal prognostic communication strategies in SABI targeted at surrogates' current perspectives on decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005850
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10271970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2826216195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-94484c90b2a5f343899da6e102b19611b6629958adfdd28560027ff2abee2353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qVVlov0FV-dhL6Phv7BPahlKQQFRi75aTTDaBbEztZNF--2YLpRRfLI9nfm_0HiGfGBwzsPnXorg6hhdHGQVvyIIpARlwK96SBYCFTEgrDshhSrcATKpcvCcHQttccSYW5OdpoKsWd_Tcb5F6WrShq_CE3kwxhrUfkZ5i1aUuDNmVv-uGNV02I0Z6g1uMSJfVNLd8i74b6MVwO8XdB_Ku8X3Cj0_3EVmdfV8V59nl9Y-LYnmZVRKMyayURlYWSu5VI6Qw1tZeIwNeMqsZK7Xm1irj66auuVEagOdNw32JyIUSR-TkEXs_lRusKxzG6Ht3H7uNjzsXfOf-_xm61q3D1s0KObM5zIQvT4QYfk2YRrfpUoV97wcMU3LccM2ZZnYvJh9bqxhSitg86zBw-zDcHIZ7HcY89vnljs9Df93_x30I_WxquuunB4yuRd-P7R-e4FJnHLiAfH5l-5IRvwEsiJL9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2826216195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Goss, Adeline L. ; Voumard, Rachel Rutz ; Engelberg, Ruth A. ; Curtis, J. Randall ; Creutzfeldt, Claire J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goss, Adeline L. ; Voumard, Rachel Rutz ; Engelberg, Ruth A. ; Curtis, J. Randall ; Creutzfeldt, Claire J.</creatorcontrib><description>In the early phase of severe acute brain injury (SABI), surrogate decision-makers must make treatment decisions in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Evidence-based strategies to communicate uncertainty and support decision-making are lacking. Our objective was to better understand surrogate experiences and needs during the period of active decision-making in SABI, to inform interventions to support SABI patients and families and improve clinician-surrogate communication. We interviewed surrogate decision-makers during patients' acute hospitalization for SABI, as part of a larger ( n = 222) prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with SABI and their family members. Constructivist grounded theory informed data collection and analysis. One U.S. academic medical center. We iteratively collected and analyzed semistructured interviews with 22 surrogates for 19 patients. None. Through several rounds of coding, interview notes, reflexive memos, and group discussion, we developed a thematic model describing the relationship between surrogate perspectives on decision-making and surrogate experiences of prognostic uncertainty. Patients ranged from 20 to 79 years of age (mean = 55 years) and had primary diagnoses of stroke ( n = 13; 68%), traumatic brain injury ( n = 5; 26%), and anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest ( n = 1; 5%). Patients were predominantly male ( n = 12; 63%), whereas surrogates were predominantly female ( n = 13; 68%). Two distinct perspectives on decision-making emerged: one group of surrogates felt a clear sense of agency around decision-making, whereas the other group reported a more passive role in decision-making, such that they did not even perceive there being a decision to make. Surrogates in both groups identified prognostic uncertainty as the central challenge in SABI, but they managed it differently. Only surrogates who felt they were actively deciding described time-limited trials as helpful. In this qualitative study, not all surrogate "decision-makers" viewed themselves as making decisions. Nearly all struggled with prognostic uncertainty. Our findings underline the need for longitudinal prognostic communication strategies in SABI targeted at surrogates' current perspectives on decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005850</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36975213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - therapy ; Communication ; Decision Making ; Female ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2023-07, Vol.51 (7), p.924-935</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-94484c90b2a5f343899da6e102b19611b6629958adfdd28560027ff2abee2353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-94484c90b2a5f343899da6e102b19611b6629958adfdd28560027ff2abee2353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36975213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goss, Adeline L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voumard, Rachel Rutz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelberg, Ruth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, J. Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creutzfeldt, Claire J.</creatorcontrib><title>Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>In the early phase of severe acute brain injury (SABI), surrogate decision-makers must make treatment decisions in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Evidence-based strategies to communicate uncertainty and support decision-making are lacking. Our objective was to better understand surrogate experiences and needs during the period of active decision-making in SABI, to inform interventions to support SABI patients and families and improve clinician-surrogate communication. We interviewed surrogate decision-makers during patients' acute hospitalization for SABI, as part of a larger ( n = 222) prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with SABI and their family members. Constructivist grounded theory informed data collection and analysis. One U.S. academic medical center. We iteratively collected and analyzed semistructured interviews with 22 surrogates for 19 patients. None. Through several rounds of coding, interview notes, reflexive memos, and group discussion, we developed a thematic model describing the relationship between surrogate perspectives on decision-making and surrogate experiences of prognostic uncertainty. Patients ranged from 20 to 79 years of age (mean = 55 years) and had primary diagnoses of stroke ( n = 13; 68%), traumatic brain injury ( n = 5; 26%), and anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest ( n = 1; 5%). Patients were predominantly male ( n = 12; 63%), whereas surrogates were predominantly female ( n = 13; 68%). Two distinct perspectives on decision-making emerged: one group of surrogates felt a clear sense of agency around decision-making, whereas the other group reported a more passive role in decision-making, such that they did not even perceive there being a decision to make. Surrogates in both groups identified prognostic uncertainty as the central challenge in SABI, but they managed it differently. Only surrogates who felt they were actively deciding described time-limited trials as helpful. In this qualitative study, not all surrogate "decision-makers" viewed themselves as making decisions. Nearly all struggled with prognostic uncertainty. Our findings underline the need for longitudinal prognostic communication strategies in SABI targeted at surrogates' current perspectives on decision-making.</description><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - therapy</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qVVlov0FV-dhL6Phv7BPahlKQQFRi75aTTDaBbEztZNF--2YLpRRfLI9nfm_0HiGfGBwzsPnXorg6hhdHGQVvyIIpARlwK96SBYCFTEgrDshhSrcATKpcvCcHQttccSYW5OdpoKsWd_Tcb5F6WrShq_CE3kwxhrUfkZ5i1aUuDNmVv-uGNV02I0Z6g1uMSJfVNLd8i74b6MVwO8XdB_Ku8X3Cj0_3EVmdfV8V59nl9Y-LYnmZVRKMyayURlYWSu5VI6Qw1tZeIwNeMqsZK7Xm1irj66auuVEagOdNw32JyIUSR-TkEXs_lRusKxzG6Ht3H7uNjzsXfOf-_xm61q3D1s0KObM5zIQvT4QYfk2YRrfpUoV97wcMU3LccM2ZZnYvJh9bqxhSitg86zBw-zDcHIZ7HcY89vnljs9Df93_x30I_WxquuunB4yuRd-P7R-e4FJnHLiAfH5l-5IRvwEsiJL9</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Goss, Adeline L.</creator><creator>Voumard, Rachel Rutz</creator><creator>Engelberg, Ruth A.</creator><creator>Curtis, J. Randall</creator><creator>Creutzfeldt, Claire J.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury</title><author>Goss, Adeline L. ; Voumard, Rachel Rutz ; Engelberg, Ruth A. ; Curtis, J. Randall ; Creutzfeldt, Claire J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4088-94484c90b2a5f343899da6e102b19611b6629958adfdd28560027ff2abee2353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - therapy</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goss, Adeline L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voumard, Rachel Rutz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelberg, Ruth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, J. Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creutzfeldt, Claire J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goss, Adeline L.</au><au>Voumard, Rachel Rutz</au><au>Engelberg, Ruth A.</au><au>Curtis, J. Randall</au><au>Creutzfeldt, Claire J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>924</spage><epage>935</epage><pages>924-935</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><abstract>In the early phase of severe acute brain injury (SABI), surrogate decision-makers must make treatment decisions in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Evidence-based strategies to communicate uncertainty and support decision-making are lacking. Our objective was to better understand surrogate experiences and needs during the period of active decision-making in SABI, to inform interventions to support SABI patients and families and improve clinician-surrogate communication. We interviewed surrogate decision-makers during patients' acute hospitalization for SABI, as part of a larger ( n = 222) prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with SABI and their family members. Constructivist grounded theory informed data collection and analysis. One U.S. academic medical center. We iteratively collected and analyzed semistructured interviews with 22 surrogates for 19 patients. None. Through several rounds of coding, interview notes, reflexive memos, and group discussion, we developed a thematic model describing the relationship between surrogate perspectives on decision-making and surrogate experiences of prognostic uncertainty. Patients ranged from 20 to 79 years of age (mean = 55 years) and had primary diagnoses of stroke ( n = 13; 68%), traumatic brain injury ( n = 5; 26%), and anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest ( n = 1; 5%). Patients were predominantly male ( n = 12; 63%), whereas surrogates were predominantly female ( n = 13; 68%). Two distinct perspectives on decision-making emerged: one group of surrogates felt a clear sense of agency around decision-making, whereas the other group reported a more passive role in decision-making, such that they did not even perceive there being a decision to make. Surrogates in both groups identified prognostic uncertainty as the central challenge in SABI, but they managed it differently. Only surrogates who felt they were actively deciding described time-limited trials as helpful. In this qualitative study, not all surrogate "decision-makers" viewed themselves as making decisions. Nearly all struggled with prognostic uncertainty. Our findings underline the need for longitudinal prognostic communication strategies in SABI targeted at surrogates' current perspectives on decision-making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>36975213</pmid><doi>10.1097/CCM.0000000000005850</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3493
ispartof Critical care medicine, 2023-07, Vol.51 (7), p.924-935
issn 0090-3493
1530-0293
1530-0293
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10271970
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Brain Injuries, Traumatic - therapy
Communication
Decision Making
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
title Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A59%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20They%20Have%20a%20Choice?%20Surrogate%20Decision-Making%20After%20Severe%20Acute%20Brain%20Injury&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Goss,%20Adeline%20L.&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=924&rft.epage=935&rft.pages=924-935&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005850&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2826216195%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2826216195&rft_id=info:pmid/36975213&rfr_iscdi=true