Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) deficiency is associated with colitis in animals and humans, and the mucosal metabolism of these compounds is decreased in ulcerative colitis. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of topical SCFA treatment in ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 103 patients wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 1997-04, Vol.40 (4), p.485-491
Hauptverfasser: Breuer, R I, Soergel, K H, Lashner, B A, Christ, M L, Hanauer, S B, Vanagunas, A, Harig, J M, Keshavarzian, A, Robinson, M, Sellin, J H, Weinberg, D, Vidican, D E, Flemal, K L, Rademaker, A W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 491
container_issue 4
container_start_page 485
container_title Gut
container_volume 40
creator Breuer, R I
Soergel, K H
Lashner, B A
Christ, M L
Hanauer, S B
Vanagunas, A
Harig, J M
Keshavarzian, A
Robinson, M
Sellin, J H
Weinberg, D
Vidican, D E
Flemal, K L
Rademaker, A W
description BACKGROUND: Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) deficiency is associated with colitis in animals and humans, and the mucosal metabolism of these compounds is decreased in ulcerative colitis. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of topical SCFA treatment in ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 103 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were entered into a six week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of rectal SCFA twice daily; patients who were unchanged on placebo were offered SCFA in an open-label extension trial. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients completing the trial, more patients in the SCFA treated than in the placebo treated group improved (33% v 20%, p = 0.14, NS). Those on SCFA also had larger, but statistically non-significant, reductions in every component of their clinical and histological activity scores. In patients with a relatively short current episode of colitis (< 6 months, n = 42), more responded to SCFA than to placebo (48% v 18%, p = 0.03). These patients also had larger, but statistically non-significant, decreases in their clinical activity index (p = 0.08 v placebo). Every patient who improved used at least five of six of the prescribed rectal SCFA irrigations, whereas only 37% who did not improve were as compliant. In the open-label extension trial, 65% improved on SCFA; these patients also had significant reductions (p < 0.02) in their clinical and histological activity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although SCFA enemas were not of therapeutic value in this controlled trial, the results suggest efficacy in subsets of patients with distal ulcerative colitis including those with short active episodes. Prolonged contact with rectal mucosa seems to be necessary for therapeutic benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gut.40.4.485
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1027123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79055146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-f37b7648fa57d0b210944bbcb2c11448171c43cdf24b33e23dcadb36370f27353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtvEzEUhS0EKqGwY4tkCVQ2neDX2DMskKqIp0opArq1_JrEqTMOtqei_x5XiSJgwcqL893jc-8B4ClGc4wpf7WcypyhOZuzrr0HZpjxrqGk6-6DGUJYNK1g_UPwKOc1QqjrenwEjnosOBJ8BtK3VUwFmpXyIxxUKbdQGW9hcqaoAH1KfqmKj1WMCQY3lCZ76yycgnGpKjcOmhh88fk1VDCp0caNz86ewm1QxulY5bGkGEIdKsmr8Bg8GFTI7sn-PQY_3r39vvjQnH95_3Fxdt7oFvHSDFRowVk3qFZYpAlGPWNaG00Mxox1WGDDqLEDYZpSR6g1ymrKqUADEbSlx-DNznc76Y2zxtUYKsht8huVbmVUXv6tjH4ll_FGYkQEJrQanOwNUvw5uVxk3cy4ENTo4pSl6FHb1nNX8Pk_4DpOaazLSSwEQq2ojpU63VEmxZyTGw5RMJJ3TcrapGRIMlmbrPizP-Mf4H11VX-x11U2Kgz19MbnA0Y4r9e7-7XZYT4X9-sgq3QtuaCilRdXC3lxefX18-WnTi4q_3LH6836_wF_A-IJxDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770057027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Breuer, R I ; Soergel, K H ; Lashner, B A ; Christ, M L ; Hanauer, S B ; Vanagunas, A ; Harig, J M ; Keshavarzian, A ; Robinson, M ; Sellin, J H ; Weinberg, D ; Vidican, D E ; Flemal, K L ; Rademaker, A W</creator><creatorcontrib>Breuer, R I ; Soergel, K H ; Lashner, B A ; Christ, M L ; Hanauer, S B ; Vanagunas, A ; Harig, J M ; Keshavarzian, A ; Robinson, M ; Sellin, J H ; Weinberg, D ; Vidican, D E ; Flemal, K L ; Rademaker, A W</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) deficiency is associated with colitis in animals and humans, and the mucosal metabolism of these compounds is decreased in ulcerative colitis. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of topical SCFA treatment in ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 103 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were entered into a six week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of rectal SCFA twice daily; patients who were unchanged on placebo were offered SCFA in an open-label extension trial. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients completing the trial, more patients in the SCFA treated than in the placebo treated group improved (33% v 20%, p = 0.14, NS). Those on SCFA also had larger, but statistically non-significant, reductions in every component of their clinical and histological activity scores. In patients with a relatively short current episode of colitis (&lt; 6 months, n = 42), more responded to SCFA than to placebo (48% v 18%, p = 0.03). These patients also had larger, but statistically non-significant, decreases in their clinical activity index (p = 0.08 v placebo). Every patient who improved used at least five of six of the prescribed rectal SCFA irrigations, whereas only 37% who did not improve were as compliant. In the open-label extension trial, 65% improved on SCFA; these patients also had significant reductions (p &lt; 0.02) in their clinical and histological activity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although SCFA enemas were not of therapeutic value in this controlled trial, the results suggest efficacy in subsets of patients with distal ulcerative colitis including those with short active episodes. Prolonged contact with rectal mucosa seems to be necessary for therapeutic benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1458-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.40.4.485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9176076</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GUTTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Administration, Topical ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Enema ; Fatty Acids, Volatile - administration &amp; dosage ; Fatty Acids, Volatile - therapeutic use ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Patient Compliance ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><ispartof>Gut, 1997-04, Vol.40 (4), p.485-491</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Apr 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-f37b7648fa57d0b210944bbcb2c11448171c43cdf24b33e23dcadb36370f27353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1027123/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1027123/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2667647$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9176076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breuer, R I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soergel, K H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lashner, B A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christ, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanauer, S B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanagunas, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harig, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keshavarzian, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellin, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidican, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flemal, K L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, A W</creatorcontrib><title>Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) deficiency is associated with colitis in animals and humans, and the mucosal metabolism of these compounds is decreased in ulcerative colitis. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of topical SCFA treatment in ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 103 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were entered into a six week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of rectal SCFA twice daily; patients who were unchanged on placebo were offered SCFA in an open-label extension trial. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients completing the trial, more patients in the SCFA treated than in the placebo treated group improved (33% v 20%, p = 0.14, NS). Those on SCFA also had larger, but statistically non-significant, reductions in every component of their clinical and histological activity scores. In patients with a relatively short current episode of colitis (&lt; 6 months, n = 42), more responded to SCFA than to placebo (48% v 18%, p = 0.03). These patients also had larger, but statistically non-significant, decreases in their clinical activity index (p = 0.08 v placebo). Every patient who improved used at least five of six of the prescribed rectal SCFA irrigations, whereas only 37% who did not improve were as compliant. In the open-label extension trial, 65% improved on SCFA; these patients also had significant reductions (p &lt; 0.02) in their clinical and histological activity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although SCFA enemas were not of therapeutic value in this controlled trial, the results suggest efficacy in subsets of patients with distal ulcerative colitis including those with short active episodes. Prolonged contact with rectal mucosa seems to be necessary for therapeutic benefit.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Enema</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Volatile - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Volatile - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><issn>1458-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtvEzEUhS0EKqGwY4tkCVQ2neDX2DMskKqIp0opArq1_JrEqTMOtqei_x5XiSJgwcqL893jc-8B4ClGc4wpf7WcypyhOZuzrr0HZpjxrqGk6-6DGUJYNK1g_UPwKOc1QqjrenwEjnosOBJ8BtK3VUwFmpXyIxxUKbdQGW9hcqaoAH1KfqmKj1WMCQY3lCZ76yycgnGpKjcOmhh88fk1VDCp0caNz86ewm1QxulY5bGkGEIdKsmr8Bg8GFTI7sn-PQY_3r39vvjQnH95_3Fxdt7oFvHSDFRowVk3qFZYpAlGPWNaG00Mxox1WGDDqLEDYZpSR6g1ymrKqUADEbSlx-DNznc76Y2zxtUYKsht8huVbmVUXv6tjH4ll_FGYkQEJrQanOwNUvw5uVxk3cy4ENTo4pSl6FHb1nNX8Pk_4DpOaazLSSwEQq2ojpU63VEmxZyTGw5RMJJ3TcrapGRIMlmbrPizP-Mf4H11VX-x11U2Kgz19MbnA0Y4r9e7-7XZYT4X9-sgq3QtuaCilRdXC3lxefX18-WnTi4q_3LH6836_wF_A-IJxDQ</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Breuer, R I</creator><creator>Soergel, K H</creator><creator>Lashner, B A</creator><creator>Christ, M L</creator><creator>Hanauer, S B</creator><creator>Vanagunas, A</creator><creator>Harig, J M</creator><creator>Keshavarzian, A</creator><creator>Robinson, M</creator><creator>Sellin, J H</creator><creator>Weinberg, D</creator><creator>Vidican, D E</creator><creator>Flemal, K L</creator><creator>Rademaker, A W</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial</title><author>Breuer, R I ; Soergel, K H ; Lashner, B A ; Christ, M L ; Hanauer, S B ; Vanagunas, A ; Harig, J M ; Keshavarzian, A ; Robinson, M ; Sellin, J H ; Weinberg, D ; Vidican, D E ; Flemal, K L ; Rademaker, A W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-f37b7648fa57d0b210944bbcb2c11448171c43cdf24b33e23dcadb36370f27353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Enema</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Volatile - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Volatile - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breuer, R I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soergel, K H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lashner, B A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christ, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanauer, S B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanagunas, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harig, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keshavarzian, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellin, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidican, D E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flemal, K L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, A W</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breuer, R I</au><au>Soergel, K H</au><au>Lashner, B A</au><au>Christ, M L</au><au>Hanauer, S B</au><au>Vanagunas, A</au><au>Harig, J M</au><au>Keshavarzian, A</au><au>Robinson, M</au><au>Sellin, J H</au><au>Weinberg, D</au><au>Vidican, D E</au><au>Flemal, K L</au><au>Rademaker, A W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>485-491</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><eissn>1458-3288</eissn><coden>GUTTAK</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) deficiency is associated with colitis in animals and humans, and the mucosal metabolism of these compounds is decreased in ulcerative colitis. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of topical SCFA treatment in ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 103 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were entered into a six week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of rectal SCFA twice daily; patients who were unchanged on placebo were offered SCFA in an open-label extension trial. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients completing the trial, more patients in the SCFA treated than in the placebo treated group improved (33% v 20%, p = 0.14, NS). Those on SCFA also had larger, but statistically non-significant, reductions in every component of their clinical and histological activity scores. In patients with a relatively short current episode of colitis (&lt; 6 months, n = 42), more responded to SCFA than to placebo (48% v 18%, p = 0.03). These patients also had larger, but statistically non-significant, decreases in their clinical activity index (p = 0.08 v placebo). Every patient who improved used at least five of six of the prescribed rectal SCFA irrigations, whereas only 37% who did not improve were as compliant. In the open-label extension trial, 65% improved on SCFA; these patients also had significant reductions (p &lt; 0.02) in their clinical and histological activity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although SCFA enemas were not of therapeutic value in this controlled trial, the results suggest efficacy in subsets of patients with distal ulcerative colitis including those with short active episodes. Prolonged contact with rectal mucosa seems to be necessary for therapeutic benefit.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>9176076</pmid><doi>10.1136/gut.40.4.485</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 1997-04, Vol.40 (4), p.485-491
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
1458-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1027123
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute Disease
Administration, Topical
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy
Double-Blind Method
Enema
Fatty Acids, Volatile - administration & dosage
Fatty Acids, Volatile - therapeutic use
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Other diseases. Semiology
Patient Compliance
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
title Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A24%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20chain%20fatty%20acid%20rectal%20irrigation%20for%20left-sided%20ulcerative%20colitis:%20a%20randomised,%20placebo%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Breuer,%20R%20I&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=485-491&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft.coden=GUTTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.40.4.485&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79055146%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770057027&rft_id=info:pmid/9176076&rfr_iscdi=true