The nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals: an update

To compare the nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals in 2013 and 2017. Nutrition Information Panel data were collected from all cereals available from two large supermarket chains in 2017 and compared with earlier published data collected in 2013. Urban New Zealand supermarkets. The n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health nutrition 2017-12, Vol.20 (18), p.3234-3237
Hauptverfasser: Chepulis, Lynne, Hill, Shaunie, Mearns, Gael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3237
container_issue 18
container_start_page 3234
container_title Public health nutrition
container_volume 20
creator Chepulis, Lynne
Hill, Shaunie
Mearns, Gael
description To compare the nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals in 2013 and 2017. Nutrition Information Panel data were collected from all cereals available from two large supermarket chains in 2017 and compared with earlier published data collected in 2013. Urban New Zealand supermarkets. The nutritional content of breakfast cereals ('biscuits and bites', 'brans', 'bubbles, flakes and puffs', 'children's cereals', 'muesli' and 'oats') was analysed for total energy, protein, fat (total and saturated), carbohydrate, sugar, fibre and Na. The Nutrient Profile Scoring Criterion (NPSC) for each cereal was calculated to determine the proportion of 'less healthy' cereals (NPSC≥4) in each product category. The energy and fat content of bubbles, flakes and puffs, muesli and oats were significantly higher in 2017 compared with 2013 (all P≤0·01). However, there was a small reduction in Na overall in 2017 (P
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1368980017002397
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10261574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980017002397</cupid><sourcerecordid>1936621844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d32de2b6232b438d8ac617ecbe5f7762096cc2e29dec4368e2c5facc678a48c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwA1iQR5aAX7EdFoQqXlIFA2VhsRznBlLSpLUTUP89rigIhMTkI59zP18fhA4pOaGEqtMHyqXONImaEMYztYWGVKg0YYqp7aijnaz9AdoLYUYISZVSu2jAtFaZ5ukQjacvgJu-81VXtY2t8bK3ddWtcFviO3jHT2Br2xQ492BfSxs67CDKOpxh2-B-UdgO9tFOGW_gYHOO0OPV5XR8k0zur2_HF5PECSG6pOCsAJZLxlkuuC60dZIqcDmkpVKSkUw6x4BlBTgRNwfm0tI6J5W2QjvOR-j8k7vo8zkUDprO29osfDW3fmVaW5nfTlO9mOf2zVDCJE2ViITjDcG3yx5CZ-ZVcFDHL0LbB0MzLiWjWqyj9DPqfBuCh_L7HUrMun3zp_04c_Rzwe-Jr7pjgG-gdp77qngGM2t7H3sP_2A_AM1ikAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1936621844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals: an update</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chepulis, Lynne ; Hill, Shaunie ; Mearns, Gael</creator><creatorcontrib>Chepulis, Lynne ; Hill, Shaunie ; Mearns, Gael</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals in 2013 and 2017. Nutrition Information Panel data were collected from all cereals available from two large supermarket chains in 2017 and compared with earlier published data collected in 2013. Urban New Zealand supermarkets. The nutritional content of breakfast cereals ('biscuits and bites', 'brans', 'bubbles, flakes and puffs', 'children's cereals', 'muesli' and 'oats') was analysed for total energy, protein, fat (total and saturated), carbohydrate, sugar, fibre and Na. The Nutrient Profile Scoring Criterion (NPSC) for each cereal was calculated to determine the proportion of 'less healthy' cereals (NPSC≥4) in each product category. The energy and fat content of bubbles, flakes and puffs, muesli and oats were significantly higher in 2017 compared with 2013 (all P≤0·01). However, there was a small reduction in Na overall in 2017 (P&lt;0·05). There was no change between 2013 and 2017 in the proportion of 'healthy' or 'less healthy' breakfast cereals available. The nutrient profile of breakfast cereals has not improved since 2013, suggesting that industry self-regulation of the nutritional composition of cereals in New Zealand is not working and needs urgent reconsideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017002397</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28879835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Breakfast ; Diet ; Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis ; Dietary Fats - analysis ; Dietary Fiber - analysis ; Dietary Proteins - analysis ; Dietary Sugars - analysis ; Edible Grain - chemistry ; Food Labeling ; Monitoring and Surveillance ; New Zealand ; Nutritive Value ; Serving Size ; Short Communications ; Sodium, Dietary - analysis</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2017-12, Vol.20 (18), p.3234-3237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2017</rights><rights>The Authors 2017 2017 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d32de2b6232b438d8ac617ecbe5f7762096cc2e29dec4368e2c5facc678a48c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d32de2b6232b438d8ac617ecbe5f7762096cc2e29dec4368e2c5facc678a48c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261574/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10261574/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28879835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chepulis, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Shaunie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mearns, Gael</creatorcontrib><title>The nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals: an update</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To compare the nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals in 2013 and 2017. Nutrition Information Panel data were collected from all cereals available from two large supermarket chains in 2017 and compared with earlier published data collected in 2013. Urban New Zealand supermarkets. The nutritional content of breakfast cereals ('biscuits and bites', 'brans', 'bubbles, flakes and puffs', 'children's cereals', 'muesli' and 'oats') was analysed for total energy, protein, fat (total and saturated), carbohydrate, sugar, fibre and Na. The Nutrient Profile Scoring Criterion (NPSC) for each cereal was calculated to determine the proportion of 'less healthy' cereals (NPSC≥4) in each product category. The energy and fat content of bubbles, flakes and puffs, muesli and oats were significantly higher in 2017 compared with 2013 (all P≤0·01). However, there was a small reduction in Na overall in 2017 (P&lt;0·05). There was no change between 2013 and 2017 in the proportion of 'healthy' or 'less healthy' breakfast cereals available. The nutrient profile of breakfast cereals has not improved since 2013, suggesting that industry self-regulation of the nutritional composition of cereals in New Zealand is not working and needs urgent reconsideration.</description><subject>Breakfast</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Dietary Sugars - analysis</subject><subject>Edible Grain - chemistry</subject><subject>Food Labeling</subject><subject>Monitoring and Surveillance</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>Serving Size</subject><subject>Short Communications</subject><subject>Sodium, Dietary - analysis</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwA1iQR5aAX7EdFoQqXlIFA2VhsRznBlLSpLUTUP89rigIhMTkI59zP18fhA4pOaGEqtMHyqXONImaEMYztYWGVKg0YYqp7aijnaz9AdoLYUYISZVSu2jAtFaZ5ukQjacvgJu-81VXtY2t8bK3ddWtcFviO3jHT2Br2xQ492BfSxs67CDKOpxh2-B-UdgO9tFOGW_gYHOO0OPV5XR8k0zur2_HF5PECSG6pOCsAJZLxlkuuC60dZIqcDmkpVKSkUw6x4BlBTgRNwfm0tI6J5W2QjvOR-j8k7vo8zkUDprO29osfDW3fmVaW5nfTlO9mOf2zVDCJE2ViITjDcG3yx5CZ-ZVcFDHL0LbB0MzLiWjWqyj9DPqfBuCh_L7HUrMun3zp_04c_Rzwe-Jr7pjgG-gdp77qngGM2t7H3sP_2A_AM1ikAI</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Chepulis, Lynne</creator><creator>Hill, Shaunie</creator><creator>Mearns, Gael</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>The nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals: an update</title><author>Chepulis, Lynne ; Hill, Shaunie ; Mearns, Gael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d32de2b6232b438d8ac617ecbe5f7762096cc2e29dec4368e2c5facc678a48c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Breakfast</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Dietary Sugars - analysis</topic><topic>Edible Grain - chemistry</topic><topic>Food Labeling</topic><topic>Monitoring and Surveillance</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>Serving Size</topic><topic>Short Communications</topic><topic>Sodium, Dietary - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chepulis, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Shaunie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mearns, Gael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chepulis, Lynne</au><au>Hill, Shaunie</au><au>Mearns, Gael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals: an update</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>3234</spage><epage>3237</epage><pages>3234-3237</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To compare the nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals in 2013 and 2017. Nutrition Information Panel data were collected from all cereals available from two large supermarket chains in 2017 and compared with earlier published data collected in 2013. Urban New Zealand supermarkets. The nutritional content of breakfast cereals ('biscuits and bites', 'brans', 'bubbles, flakes and puffs', 'children's cereals', 'muesli' and 'oats') was analysed for total energy, protein, fat (total and saturated), carbohydrate, sugar, fibre and Na. The Nutrient Profile Scoring Criterion (NPSC) for each cereal was calculated to determine the proportion of 'less healthy' cereals (NPSC≥4) in each product category. The energy and fat content of bubbles, flakes and puffs, muesli and oats were significantly higher in 2017 compared with 2013 (all P≤0·01). However, there was a small reduction in Na overall in 2017 (P&lt;0·05). There was no change between 2013 and 2017 in the proportion of 'healthy' or 'less healthy' breakfast cereals available. The nutrient profile of breakfast cereals has not improved since 2013, suggesting that industry self-regulation of the nutritional composition of cereals in New Zealand is not working and needs urgent reconsideration.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28879835</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980017002397</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-9800
ispartof Public health nutrition, 2017-12, Vol.20 (18), p.3234-3237
issn 1368-9800
1475-2727
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10261574
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Breakfast
Diet
Dietary Carbohydrates - analysis
Dietary Fats - analysis
Dietary Fiber - analysis
Dietary Proteins - analysis
Dietary Sugars - analysis
Edible Grain - chemistry
Food Labeling
Monitoring and Surveillance
New Zealand
Nutritive Value
Serving Size
Short Communications
Sodium, Dietary - analysis
title The nutritional quality of New Zealand breakfast cereals: an update
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T22%3A05%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20nutritional%20quality%20of%20New%20Zealand%20breakfast%20cereals:%20an%20update&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Chepulis,%20Lynne&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=3234&rft.epage=3237&rft.pages=3234-3237&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980017002397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1936621844%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1936621844&rft_id=info:pmid/28879835&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980017002397&rfr_iscdi=true