Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations
To determine the degree of food environment policies that have been implemented and supported by the Malaysian Government, in comparison to international best practice, and to establish prioritised recommendations for the government based on the identified implementation gaps. The Healthy Food-Envir...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public health nutrition 2018-12, Vol.21 (18), p.3395-3406 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3406 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 3395 |
container_title | Public health nutrition |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Ng, SeeHoe Swinburn, Boyd Kelly, Bridget Vandevijvere, Stefanie Yeatman, Heather Ismail, Mohd Noor Karupaiah, Tilakavati |
description | To determine the degree of food environment policies that have been implemented and supported by the Malaysian Government, in comparison to international best practice, and to establish prioritised recommendations for the government based on the identified implementation gaps.
The Healthy Food-Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) comprises forty-seven indicators of government policy practice. Local evidence of each indicator was compiled from government institutions and verified by related government stakeholders. The extent of implementation of the policies was rated by experts against international best practices. Rating results were used to identify and propose policy actions which were subsequently prioritised by the experts based on 'importance' and 'achievability' criteria. The policy actions with relatively higher 'achievability' and 'importance' were set as priority recommendations for government action.
Malaysia.
Twenty-six local experts.
Majority (62 %) of indicators was rated 'low' implementation with no indicator rated as either 'high' or 'very little, if any' in terms of implementation. The top five recommendations were (i) restrict unhealthy food marketing in children's settings and (ii) on broadcast media; (iii) mandatory nutrition labelling for added sugars; (iv) designation of priority research areas related to obesity prevention and diet-related non-communicable diseases; and (v) introduce energy labelling on menu boards for fast-food outlets.
This first policy study conducted in Malaysia identified a number of gaps in implementation of key policies to promote healthy food environments, compared with international best practices. Study findings could strengthen civil society advocacies for government accountability to create a healthier food environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1368980018002379 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10260876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980018002379</cupid><sourcerecordid>2157836944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-37e98110dabe039967570a80eb2fc8306495169ec24c9845a675845983c00de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi1ERUvhAbggS1x6CYztJLa5IFSVUqkVB3q3HGeydZXYwc6u2Levt10KBXGwxvb_zT8zGkLeMHjPgMkP35lolVYArBwupH5Gjlgtm4pLLp-Xe5GrnX5IXuZ8CwCNlPIFORTApWSqOSLL2c8Fw0LjQP00jziVh118DLufIcaeYtj4FMNOoHMcvfOYabelyw3SKzvabfY20PO4wXQPfaQrO2dqQ0_n5GPyy5YmdHEqYn9vnV-Rg8GOGV_v4zG5_nJ2ffq1uvx2fnH6-bJyteRLJSRqxRj0tkMQWreykWAVYMcHpwS0tW5Yq9Hx2mlVN7YAJWglHECP4ph8erCd192EvSvNJTua0tVk09ZE681TJfgbs4obw4C3oGRbHE72Din-WGNezOSzw3G0AeM6G85YI5tSURX03V_obVynUMYrVCOVaHVdF4o9UC7FnBMOj90wMLudmn92WnLe_jnGY8avJRZA7E3t1CXfr_B37f_b3gHe_a0y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157836944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ng, SeeHoe ; Swinburn, Boyd ; Kelly, Bridget ; Vandevijvere, Stefanie ; Yeatman, Heather ; Ismail, Mohd Noor ; Karupaiah, Tilakavati</creator><creatorcontrib>Ng, SeeHoe ; Swinburn, Boyd ; Kelly, Bridget ; Vandevijvere, Stefanie ; Yeatman, Heather ; Ismail, Mohd Noor ; Karupaiah, Tilakavati</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the degree of food environment policies that have been implemented and supported by the Malaysian Government, in comparison to international best practice, and to establish prioritised recommendations for the government based on the identified implementation gaps.
The Healthy Food-Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) comprises forty-seven indicators of government policy practice. Local evidence of each indicator was compiled from government institutions and verified by related government stakeholders. The extent of implementation of the policies was rated by experts against international best practices. Rating results were used to identify and propose policy actions which were subsequently prioritised by the experts based on 'importance' and 'achievability' criteria. The policy actions with relatively higher 'achievability' and 'importance' were set as priority recommendations for government action.
Malaysia.
Twenty-six local experts.
Majority (62 %) of indicators was rated 'low' implementation with no indicator rated as either 'high' or 'very little, if any' in terms of implementation. The top five recommendations were (i) restrict unhealthy food marketing in children's settings and (ii) on broadcast media; (iii) mandatory nutrition labelling for added sugars; (iv) designation of priority research areas related to obesity prevention and diet-related non-communicable diseases; and (v) introduce energy labelling on menu boards for fast-food outlets.
This first policy study conducted in Malaysia identified a number of gaps in implementation of key policies to promote healthy food environments, compared with international best practices. Study findings could strengthen civil society advocacies for government accountability to create a healthier food environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018002379</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30277185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Action ; Advertising ; Best practice ; Beverages ; Children ; Civil society ; Descriptive labeling ; Diabetes ; Diet ; Disease ; Environment ; Environmental policy ; Experts ; Fast food ; Fast Foods ; Food ; Food Industry ; Food Labeling ; Food Quality ; Food Services ; Food Supply ; Government ; Government policy ; Health care ; Health Priorities ; Health promotion ; Health Promotion - methods ; Humans ; Implementation ; Indicators ; Labeling ; Low income groups ; Malaysia ; Marketing ; Mass Media ; Medical research ; Mortality ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Policy ; Nutrition research ; Obesity ; Obesity - prevention & control ; Policies ; Public Health ; Public policy ; Research Paper ; Researchers ; Restaurants ; Sugar</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2018-12, Vol.21 (18), p.3395-3406</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2018</rights><rights>The Authors 2018 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (the “License”) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Authors 2018 2018 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-37e98110dabe039967570a80eb2fc8306495169ec24c9845a675845983c00de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-37e98110dabe039967570a80eb2fc8306495169ec24c9845a675845983c00de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260876/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260876/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27864,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ng, SeeHoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinburn, Boyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevijvere, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeatman, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Mohd Noor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karupaiah, Tilakavati</creatorcontrib><title>Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To determine the degree of food environment policies that have been implemented and supported by the Malaysian Government, in comparison to international best practice, and to establish prioritised recommendations for the government based on the identified implementation gaps.
The Healthy Food-Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) comprises forty-seven indicators of government policy practice. Local evidence of each indicator was compiled from government institutions and verified by related government stakeholders. The extent of implementation of the policies was rated by experts against international best practices. Rating results were used to identify and propose policy actions which were subsequently prioritised by the experts based on 'importance' and 'achievability' criteria. The policy actions with relatively higher 'achievability' and 'importance' were set as priority recommendations for government action.
Malaysia.
Twenty-six local experts.
Majority (62 %) of indicators was rated 'low' implementation with no indicator rated as either 'high' or 'very little, if any' in terms of implementation. The top five recommendations were (i) restrict unhealthy food marketing in children's settings and (ii) on broadcast media; (iii) mandatory nutrition labelling for added sugars; (iv) designation of priority research areas related to obesity prevention and diet-related non-communicable diseases; and (v) introduce energy labelling on menu boards for fast-food outlets.
This first policy study conducted in Malaysia identified a number of gaps in implementation of key policies to promote healthy food environments, compared with international best practices. Study findings could strengthen civil society advocacies for government accountability to create a healthier food environment.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Descriptive labeling</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Fast food</subject><subject>Fast Foods</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Industry</subject><subject>Food Labeling</subject><subject>Food Quality</subject><subject>Food Services</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Priorities</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - prevention & control</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi1ERUvhAbggS1x6CYztJLa5IFSVUqkVB3q3HGeydZXYwc6u2Levt10KBXGwxvb_zT8zGkLeMHjPgMkP35lolVYArBwupH5Gjlgtm4pLLp-Xe5GrnX5IXuZ8CwCNlPIFORTApWSqOSLL2c8Fw0LjQP00jziVh118DLufIcaeYtj4FMNOoHMcvfOYabelyw3SKzvabfY20PO4wXQPfaQrO2dqQ0_n5GPyy5YmdHEqYn9vnV-Rg8GOGV_v4zG5_nJ2ffq1uvx2fnH6-bJyteRLJSRqxRj0tkMQWreykWAVYMcHpwS0tW5Yq9Hx2mlVN7YAJWglHECP4ph8erCd192EvSvNJTua0tVk09ZE681TJfgbs4obw4C3oGRbHE72Din-WGNezOSzw3G0AeM6G85YI5tSURX03V_obVynUMYrVCOVaHVdF4o9UC7FnBMOj90wMLudmn92WnLe_jnGY8avJRZA7E3t1CXfr_B37f_b3gHe_a0y</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Ng, SeeHoe</creator><creator>Swinburn, Boyd</creator><creator>Kelly, Bridget</creator><creator>Vandevijvere, Stefanie</creator><creator>Yeatman, Heather</creator><creator>Ismail, Mohd Noor</creator><creator>Karupaiah, Tilakavati</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations</title><author>Ng, SeeHoe ; Swinburn, Boyd ; Kelly, Bridget ; Vandevijvere, Stefanie ; Yeatman, Heather ; Ismail, Mohd Noor ; Karupaiah, Tilakavati</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-37e98110dabe039967570a80eb2fc8306495169ec24c9845a675845983c00de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Descriptive labeling</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Fast food</topic><topic>Fast Foods</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Industry</topic><topic>Food Labeling</topic><topic>Food Quality</topic><topic>Food Services</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Priorities</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - prevention & control</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ng, SeeHoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinburn, Boyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandevijvere, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeatman, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Mohd Noor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karupaiah, Tilakavati</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ng, SeeHoe</au><au>Swinburn, Boyd</au><au>Kelly, Bridget</au><au>Vandevijvere, Stefanie</au><au>Yeatman, Heather</au><au>Ismail, Mohd Noor</au><au>Karupaiah, Tilakavati</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>3395</spage><epage>3406</epage><pages>3395-3406</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To determine the degree of food environment policies that have been implemented and supported by the Malaysian Government, in comparison to international best practice, and to establish prioritised recommendations for the government based on the identified implementation gaps.
The Healthy Food-Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) comprises forty-seven indicators of government policy practice. Local evidence of each indicator was compiled from government institutions and verified by related government stakeholders. The extent of implementation of the policies was rated by experts against international best practices. Rating results were used to identify and propose policy actions which were subsequently prioritised by the experts based on 'importance' and 'achievability' criteria. The policy actions with relatively higher 'achievability' and 'importance' were set as priority recommendations for government action.
Malaysia.
Twenty-six local experts.
Majority (62 %) of indicators was rated 'low' implementation with no indicator rated as either 'high' or 'very little, if any' in terms of implementation. The top five recommendations were (i) restrict unhealthy food marketing in children's settings and (ii) on broadcast media; (iii) mandatory nutrition labelling for added sugars; (iv) designation of priority research areas related to obesity prevention and diet-related non-communicable diseases; and (v) introduce energy labelling on menu boards for fast-food outlets.
This first policy study conducted in Malaysia identified a number of gaps in implementation of key policies to promote healthy food environments, compared with international best practices. Study findings could strengthen civil society advocacies for government accountability to create a healthier food environment.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30277185</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980018002379</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-9800 |
ispartof | Public health nutrition, 2018-12, Vol.21 (18), p.3395-3406 |
issn | 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10260876 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Action Advertising Best practice Beverages Children Civil society Descriptive labeling Diabetes Diet Disease Environment Environmental policy Experts Fast food Fast Foods Food Food Industry Food Labeling Food Quality Food Services Food Supply Government Government policy Health care Health Priorities Health promotion Health Promotion - methods Humans Implementation Indicators Labeling Low income groups Malaysia Marketing Mass Media Medical research Mortality Nutrition Nutrition Policy Nutrition research Obesity Obesity - prevention & control Policies Public Health Public policy Research Paper Researchers Restaurants Sugar |
title | Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A43%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extent%20of%20implementation%20of%20food%20environment%20policies%20by%20the%20Malaysian%20Government:%20gaps%20and%20priority%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Ng,%20SeeHoe&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=3395&rft.epage=3406&rft.pages=3395-3406&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980018002379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2157836944%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157836944&rft_id=info:pmid/30277185&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980018002379&rfr_iscdi=true |