Assessing general public and policy influencer support for healthy public policies to promote healthy eating at the population level in two Canadian provinces
To assess and compare the favourability of healthy public policy options to promote healthy eating from the perspective of members of the general public and policy influencers in two Canadian provinces. The Chronic Disease Prevention Survey, administered in 2016, required participants to rank their...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public health nutrition 2019-06, Vol.22 (8), p.1492-1502 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1502 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1492 |
| container_title | Public health nutrition |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Kongats, Krystyna McGetrick, Jennifer Ann Raine, Kim D Voyer, Corinne Nykiforuk, Candace IJ |
| description | To assess and compare the favourability of healthy public policy options to promote healthy eating from the perspective of members of the general public and policy influencers in two Canadian provinces.
The Chronic Disease Prevention Survey, administered in 2016, required participants to rank their level of support for different evidence-based policy options to promote healthy eating at the population level. Pearson's χ 2 significance testing was used to compare support between groups for each policy option and results were interpreted using the Nuffield Council on Bioethics' intervention ladder framework.
Alberta and Québec, Canada.ParticipantsMembers of the general public (n 2400) and policy influencers (n 302) in Alberta and Québec.
General public and policy influencer survey respondents were more supportive of healthy eating policies if they were less intrusive on individual autonomy. However, in comparing levels of support between groups, we found policy influencers indicated significantly stronger support overall for healthy eating policy options. We also found that policy influencers in Québec tended to show more support for more restrictive policy options than their counterparts from Alberta.
These results suggest that additional knowledge brokering may be required to increase support for more intrusive yet impactful evidence-based policy interventions; and that the overall lower levels of support among members of the public may impede policy influencers from taking action on policies to promote healthy eating. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1368980018004068 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10260847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980018004068</cupid><sourcerecordid>2216660273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-99c6a82871ec8de969bb0bd9afee78b3ec480011fd9aa5e90abe4b80ba9331413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFyQJS5cAv6Tje0TqlZQkCpxoD1bjjPZdeXYwXYW7cvwrDjtdilFHCxbM7_5Ps9MVb0m-D3BhH_4TlgrpMCYlNPgVjypTknDVzXllD8t75Kul_xJ9SKlG4zxinP-vDphmAtKGT6tfp2nBClZv0Eb8BC1Q9PcOWuQ9j2aQnntkfWDm8EbiCjN0xRiRkOIaAva5e3-vuAWtpBQDmiKYQwZjgjovFjojPIWCjnNrkSCRw524IoByj8DWmuve6v9Ur6zxS-9rJ4N2iV4dbjPquvPn67WX-rLbxdf1-eXtWk4zbWUptWCCk7AiB5kK7sOd73UAwAXHQPTLFMiQwnpFUisO2g6gTstGSMNYWfVxzvd0ssIvQGfyyjUFO2o414FbdXfGW-3ahN2imDaYtHwovDuoBDDjxlSVqNNBpzTHsKcFCWi-EhJWEHfPkJvwhx96U9RStq2xZQvFLmjTAwpRRiOvyFYLetX_6y_1Lx52Max4n7fBWAHUT120fYb-OP9f9nfpOm-5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216660273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing general public and policy influencer support for healthy public policies to promote healthy eating at the population level in two Canadian provinces</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kongats, Krystyna ; McGetrick, Jennifer Ann ; Raine, Kim D ; Voyer, Corinne ; Nykiforuk, Candace IJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Kongats, Krystyna ; McGetrick, Jennifer Ann ; Raine, Kim D ; Voyer, Corinne ; Nykiforuk, Candace IJ</creatorcontrib><description>To assess and compare the favourability of healthy public policy options to promote healthy eating from the perspective of members of the general public and policy influencers in two Canadian provinces.
The Chronic Disease Prevention Survey, administered in 2016, required participants to rank their level of support for different evidence-based policy options to promote healthy eating at the population level. Pearson's χ 2 significance testing was used to compare support between groups for each policy option and results were interpreted using the Nuffield Council on Bioethics' intervention ladder framework.
Alberta and Québec, Canada.ParticipantsMembers of the general public (n 2400) and policy influencers (n 302) in Alberta and Québec.
General public and policy influencer survey respondents were more supportive of healthy eating policies if they were less intrusive on individual autonomy. However, in comparing levels of support between groups, we found policy influencers indicated significantly stronger support overall for healthy eating policy options. We also found that policy influencers in Québec tended to show more support for more restrictive policy options than their counterparts from Alberta.
These results suggest that additional knowledge brokering may be required to increase support for more intrusive yet impactful evidence-based policy interventions; and that the overall lower levels of support among members of the public may impede policy influencers from taking action on policies to promote healthy eating.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018004068</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30782230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alberta ; Autonomy ; Beverages ; Bioethics ; Censuses ; Chronic Disease - prevention & control ; Chronic Disease - psychology ; Chronic illnesses ; Climate change ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision making ; Diabetes ; Diet, Healthy - psychology ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Eating ; Eating behavior ; Environmental policy ; Female ; Food ; General public ; Health care ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health promotion ; Health Promotion - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Policy ; Obesity ; Political economy ; Politics ; Population ; Population policy ; Public health ; Public Opinion ; Public Policies ; Public policy ; Quebec ; Research Paper ; Respondents ; Sociodemographics ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teenagers</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2019-06, Vol.22 (8), p.1492-1502</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2019</rights><rights>The Authors 2019 2019 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-99c6a82871ec8de969bb0bd9afee78b3ec480011fd9aa5e90abe4b80ba9331413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-99c6a82871ec8de969bb0bd9afee78b3ec480011fd9aa5e90abe4b80ba9331413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260847/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10260847/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27847,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kongats, Krystyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGetrick, Jennifer Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Kim D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voyer, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nykiforuk, Candace IJ</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing general public and policy influencer support for healthy public policies to promote healthy eating at the population level in two Canadian provinces</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To assess and compare the favourability of healthy public policy options to promote healthy eating from the perspective of members of the general public and policy influencers in two Canadian provinces.
The Chronic Disease Prevention Survey, administered in 2016, required participants to rank their level of support for different evidence-based policy options to promote healthy eating at the population level. Pearson's χ 2 significance testing was used to compare support between groups for each policy option and results were interpreted using the Nuffield Council on Bioethics' intervention ladder framework.
Alberta and Québec, Canada.ParticipantsMembers of the general public (n 2400) and policy influencers (n 302) in Alberta and Québec.
General public and policy influencer survey respondents were more supportive of healthy eating policies if they were less intrusive on individual autonomy. However, in comparing levels of support between groups, we found policy influencers indicated significantly stronger support overall for healthy eating policy options. We also found that policy influencers in Québec tended to show more support for more restrictive policy options than their counterparts from Alberta.
These results suggest that additional knowledge brokering may be required to increase support for more intrusive yet impactful evidence-based policy interventions; and that the overall lower levels of support among members of the public may impede policy influencers from taking action on policies to promote healthy eating.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - prevention & control</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diet, Healthy - psychology</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>General public</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Public Policies</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFyQJS5cAv6Tje0TqlZQkCpxoD1bjjPZdeXYwXYW7cvwrDjtdilFHCxbM7_5Ps9MVb0m-D3BhH_4TlgrpMCYlNPgVjypTknDVzXllD8t75Kul_xJ9SKlG4zxinP-vDphmAtKGT6tfp2nBClZv0Eb8BC1Q9PcOWuQ9j2aQnntkfWDm8EbiCjN0xRiRkOIaAva5e3-vuAWtpBQDmiKYQwZjgjovFjojPIWCjnNrkSCRw524IoByj8DWmuve6v9Ur6zxS-9rJ4N2iV4dbjPquvPn67WX-rLbxdf1-eXtWk4zbWUptWCCk7AiB5kK7sOd73UAwAXHQPTLFMiQwnpFUisO2g6gTstGSMNYWfVxzvd0ssIvQGfyyjUFO2o414FbdXfGW-3ahN2imDaYtHwovDuoBDDjxlSVqNNBpzTHsKcFCWi-EhJWEHfPkJvwhx96U9RStq2xZQvFLmjTAwpRRiOvyFYLetX_6y_1Lx52Max4n7fBWAHUT120fYb-OP9f9nfpOm-5A</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Kongats, Krystyna</creator><creator>McGetrick, Jennifer Ann</creator><creator>Raine, Kim D</creator><creator>Voyer, Corinne</creator><creator>Nykiforuk, Candace IJ</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Assessing general public and policy influencer support for healthy public policies to promote healthy eating at the population level in two Canadian provinces</title><author>Kongats, Krystyna ; McGetrick, Jennifer Ann ; Raine, Kim D ; Voyer, Corinne ; Nykiforuk, Candace IJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-99c6a82871ec8de969bb0bd9afee78b3ec480011fd9aa5e90abe4b80ba9331413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - prevention & control</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diet, Healthy - psychology</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>General public</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Public Policies</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kongats, Krystyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGetrick, Jennifer Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Kim D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voyer, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nykiforuk, Candace IJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kongats, Krystyna</au><au>McGetrick, Jennifer Ann</au><au>Raine, Kim D</au><au>Voyer, Corinne</au><au>Nykiforuk, Candace IJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing general public and policy influencer support for healthy public policies to promote healthy eating at the population level in two Canadian provinces</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1492</spage><epage>1502</epage><pages>1492-1502</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To assess and compare the favourability of healthy public policy options to promote healthy eating from the perspective of members of the general public and policy influencers in two Canadian provinces.
The Chronic Disease Prevention Survey, administered in 2016, required participants to rank their level of support for different evidence-based policy options to promote healthy eating at the population level. Pearson's χ 2 significance testing was used to compare support between groups for each policy option and results were interpreted using the Nuffield Council on Bioethics' intervention ladder framework.
Alberta and Québec, Canada.ParticipantsMembers of the general public (n 2400) and policy influencers (n 302) in Alberta and Québec.
General public and policy influencer survey respondents were more supportive of healthy eating policies if they were less intrusive on individual autonomy. However, in comparing levels of support between groups, we found policy influencers indicated significantly stronger support overall for healthy eating policy options. We also found that policy influencers in Québec tended to show more support for more restrictive policy options than their counterparts from Alberta.
These results suggest that additional knowledge brokering may be required to increase support for more intrusive yet impactful evidence-based policy interventions; and that the overall lower levels of support among members of the public may impede policy influencers from taking action on policies to promote healthy eating.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30782230</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980018004068</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1368-9800 |
| ispartof | Public health nutrition, 2019-06, Vol.22 (8), p.1492-1502 |
| issn | 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10260847 |
| source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Adult Alberta Autonomy Beverages Bioethics Censuses Chronic Disease - prevention & control Chronic Disease - psychology Chronic illnesses Climate change Cross-Sectional Studies Decision making Diabetes Diet, Healthy - psychology Disease control Disease prevention Eating Eating behavior Environmental policy Female Food General public Health care Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health promotion Health Promotion - statistics & numerical data Humans Intervention Male Nutrition Nutrition Policy Obesity Political economy Politics Population Population policy Public health Public Opinion Public Policies Public policy Quebec Research Paper Respondents Sociodemographics Surveys and Questionnaires Teenagers |
| title | Assessing general public and policy influencer support for healthy public policies to promote healthy eating at the population level in two Canadian provinces |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A18%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20general%20public%20and%20policy%20influencer%20support%20for%20healthy%20public%20policies%20to%20promote%20healthy%20eating%20at%20the%20population%20level%20in%20two%20Canadian%20provinces&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Kongats,%20Krystyna&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1492&rft.epage=1502&rft.pages=1492-1502&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980018004068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2216660273%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216660273&rft_id=info:pmid/30782230&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980018004068&rfr_iscdi=true |