Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography

•Investigation of columns coupled to compact absorbance detector module.•Kinetic plot characterization of columns in 200–300 µm diameter range.•Effects of column length, particle type, and pressure limits are examined. Recent years have seen significant advances in compact, portable capillary LC ins...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Chromatography A 2023-07, Vol.1701, p.464067-464067, Article 464067
Hauptverfasser: Foster, Samuel W., Gates, Elisabeth P., Peaden, Paul A., Calugaru, Serguei V., West, W. Raymond, Lee, Milton L., Grinias, James P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464067
container_issue
container_start_page 464067
container_title Journal of Chromatography A
container_volume 1701
creator Foster, Samuel W.
Gates, Elisabeth P.
Peaden, Paul A.
Calugaru, Serguei V.
West, W. Raymond
Lee, Milton L.
Grinias, James P.
description •Investigation of columns coupled to compact absorbance detector module.•Kinetic plot characterization of columns in 200–300 µm diameter range.•Effects of column length, particle type, and pressure limits are examined. Recent years have seen significant advances in compact, portable capillary LC instrumentation. This study explores the performances of several commercially available columns within the pressure and flow limits of both the columns and one of these compact LC instruments. The commercially available compact capillary LC system with UV-absorbance detector used in this study is typically operated using columns in the 0.15–0.3 mm internal diameter (i.d.) range. Efficiency measurements (i.e., theoretical plates, N) for six columns with i.d.s in this range and of varying lengths and pressure limits, packed with stationary phases of different particle diameters and morphologies, were made using a mixture of standard alkylphenones. Kinetic plot comparisons between columns that vary by one (or more) of these parameters are described, along with calculated kinetic performance and Knox-Saleem limits. These theoretical performance descriptions provide insight into optimal operating conditions when using capillary LC systems. Based on kinetic plot evaluation of available capillary columns in the 0.2–0.3 mm i.d. range with a conservative upper pressure limit of 330 bar packed with superficially porous particles, a 25 cm column could generate ∼47,000 plates in 7.85 min when operated at 2.4 µL/min. For comparison, more robust 0.3 mm i.d. columns (packed with fully porous particles) that can be operated at higher pressures than can be provided by the pumping system (conservative pump upper pressure limit of 570 bar), a ∼20 cm column could generate nearly 40,000 plates in 5.9 min if operated at 6 µL/min. Across all capillary LC columns measured, higher pressure limits and shorter columns can provide the best throughput when considering both speed and efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10259062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021967323002935</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0021967323002935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ef96278adb6d6225fada110016e6d3282f812e4c5b3ee7493884e9aa5482a66e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwjlBxL8SGxnA0IVT1ViA2vLtSetqyQOdorUvydVoIINq5HHc-_cOQhdEpwRTPj1JjPr4BudUUxZlvMcc3GEpkQKljIh5DGaYkxJWnLBJugsxg3GRGBBT9GECUq4LMgUvcx9vW3aJEINpne-TYxvo7MQ9P4VE7fvNJ02fWJ05-pah11Su4-ts8kYoPeroLv17hydVLqOcPFdZ-j94f5t_pQuXh-f53eL1OSE9SlUJadCarvkllNaVNpqQoZsHLhlVNJKEgq5KZYMQOQlkzKHUusil1RzDmyGbkffbrtswBpo-6Br1QXXDNmU1079_WndWq38pyKYFiXmdHDIRwcTfIwBqoOYYLWHqzZqvE3t4aoR7iC7-r34IPqhOQzcjAMwnP_pIKhoHLQGrAsDXWW9-3_DFyS9j3U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Foster, Samuel W. ; Gates, Elisabeth P. ; Peaden, Paul A. ; Calugaru, Serguei V. ; West, W. Raymond ; Lee, Milton L. ; Grinias, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Foster, Samuel W. ; Gates, Elisabeth P. ; Peaden, Paul A. ; Calugaru, Serguei V. ; West, W. Raymond ; Lee, Milton L. ; Grinias, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>•Investigation of columns coupled to compact absorbance detector module.•Kinetic plot characterization of columns in 200–300 µm diameter range.•Effects of column length, particle type, and pressure limits are examined. Recent years have seen significant advances in compact, portable capillary LC instrumentation. This study explores the performances of several commercially available columns within the pressure and flow limits of both the columns and one of these compact LC instruments. The commercially available compact capillary LC system with UV-absorbance detector used in this study is typically operated using columns in the 0.15–0.3 mm internal diameter (i.d.) range. Efficiency measurements (i.e., theoretical plates, N) for six columns with i.d.s in this range and of varying lengths and pressure limits, packed with stationary phases of different particle diameters and morphologies, were made using a mixture of standard alkylphenones. Kinetic plot comparisons between columns that vary by one (or more) of these parameters are described, along with calculated kinetic performance and Knox-Saleem limits. These theoretical performance descriptions provide insight into optimal operating conditions when using capillary LC systems. Based on kinetic plot evaluation of available capillary columns in the 0.2–0.3 mm i.d. range with a conservative upper pressure limit of 330 bar packed with superficially porous particles, a 25 cm column could generate ∼47,000 plates in 7.85 min when operated at 2.4 µL/min. For comparison, more robust 0.3 mm i.d. columns (packed with fully porous particles) that can be operated at higher pressures than can be provided by the pumping system (conservative pump upper pressure limit of 570 bar), a ∼20 cm column could generate nearly 40,000 plates in 5.9 min if operated at 6 µL/min. Across all capillary LC columns measured, higher pressure limits and shorter columns can provide the best throughput when considering both speed and efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464067</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37216851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Capillary liquid chromatography ; Chromatographic efficiency ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Compact ; Kinetic plot ; Kinetics ; Particle Size ; Porosity ; Portable</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chromatography A, 2023-07, Vol.1701, p.464067-464067, Article 464067</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ef96278adb6d6225fada110016e6d3282f812e4c5b3ee7493884e9aa5482a66e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5124-1347</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37216851$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foster, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Elisabeth P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaden, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calugaru, Serguei V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, W. Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Milton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinias, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography</title><title>Journal of Chromatography A</title><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><description>•Investigation of columns coupled to compact absorbance detector module.•Kinetic plot characterization of columns in 200–300 µm diameter range.•Effects of column length, particle type, and pressure limits are examined. Recent years have seen significant advances in compact, portable capillary LC instrumentation. This study explores the performances of several commercially available columns within the pressure and flow limits of both the columns and one of these compact LC instruments. The commercially available compact capillary LC system with UV-absorbance detector used in this study is typically operated using columns in the 0.15–0.3 mm internal diameter (i.d.) range. Efficiency measurements (i.e., theoretical plates, N) for six columns with i.d.s in this range and of varying lengths and pressure limits, packed with stationary phases of different particle diameters and morphologies, were made using a mixture of standard alkylphenones. Kinetic plot comparisons between columns that vary by one (or more) of these parameters are described, along with calculated kinetic performance and Knox-Saleem limits. These theoretical performance descriptions provide insight into optimal operating conditions when using capillary LC systems. Based on kinetic plot evaluation of available capillary columns in the 0.2–0.3 mm i.d. range with a conservative upper pressure limit of 330 bar packed with superficially porous particles, a 25 cm column could generate ∼47,000 plates in 7.85 min when operated at 2.4 µL/min. For comparison, more robust 0.3 mm i.d. columns (packed with fully porous particles) that can be operated at higher pressures than can be provided by the pumping system (conservative pump upper pressure limit of 570 bar), a ∼20 cm column could generate nearly 40,000 plates in 5.9 min if operated at 6 µL/min. Across all capillary LC columns measured, higher pressure limits and shorter columns can provide the best throughput when considering both speed and efficiency.</description><subject>Capillary liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatographic efficiency</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Compact</subject><subject>Kinetic plot</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Portable</subject><issn>0021-9673</issn><issn>1873-3778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwjlBxL8SGxnA0IVT1ViA2vLtSetqyQOdorUvydVoIINq5HHc-_cOQhdEpwRTPj1JjPr4BudUUxZlvMcc3GEpkQKljIh5DGaYkxJWnLBJugsxg3GRGBBT9GECUq4LMgUvcx9vW3aJEINpne-TYxvo7MQ9P4VE7fvNJ02fWJ05-pah11Su4-ts8kYoPeroLv17hydVLqOcPFdZ-j94f5t_pQuXh-f53eL1OSE9SlUJadCarvkllNaVNpqQoZsHLhlVNJKEgq5KZYMQOQlkzKHUusil1RzDmyGbkffbrtswBpo-6Br1QXXDNmU1079_WndWq38pyKYFiXmdHDIRwcTfIwBqoOYYLWHqzZqvE3t4aoR7iC7-r34IPqhOQzcjAMwnP_pIKhoHLQGrAsDXWW9-3_DFyS9j3U</recordid><startdate>20230719</startdate><enddate>20230719</enddate><creator>Foster, Samuel W.</creator><creator>Gates, Elisabeth P.</creator><creator>Peaden, Paul A.</creator><creator>Calugaru, Serguei V.</creator><creator>West, W. Raymond</creator><creator>Lee, Milton L.</creator><creator>Grinias, James P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-1347</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230719</creationdate><title>Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography</title><author>Foster, Samuel W. ; Gates, Elisabeth P. ; Peaden, Paul A. ; Calugaru, Serguei V. ; West, W. Raymond ; Lee, Milton L. ; Grinias, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ef96278adb6d6225fada110016e6d3282f812e4c5b3ee7493884e9aa5482a66e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Capillary liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatographic efficiency</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Compact</topic><topic>Kinetic plot</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Portable</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foster, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Elisabeth P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaden, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calugaru, Serguei V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, W. Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Milton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinias, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foster, Samuel W.</au><au>Gates, Elisabeth P.</au><au>Peaden, Paul A.</au><au>Calugaru, Serguei V.</au><au>West, W. Raymond</au><au>Lee, Milton L.</au><au>Grinias, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><date>2023-07-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>1701</volume><spage>464067</spage><epage>464067</epage><pages>464067-464067</pages><artnum>464067</artnum><issn>0021-9673</issn><eissn>1873-3778</eissn><abstract>•Investigation of columns coupled to compact absorbance detector module.•Kinetic plot characterization of columns in 200–300 µm diameter range.•Effects of column length, particle type, and pressure limits are examined. Recent years have seen significant advances in compact, portable capillary LC instrumentation. This study explores the performances of several commercially available columns within the pressure and flow limits of both the columns and one of these compact LC instruments. The commercially available compact capillary LC system with UV-absorbance detector used in this study is typically operated using columns in the 0.15–0.3 mm internal diameter (i.d.) range. Efficiency measurements (i.e., theoretical plates, N) for six columns with i.d.s in this range and of varying lengths and pressure limits, packed with stationary phases of different particle diameters and morphologies, were made using a mixture of standard alkylphenones. Kinetic plot comparisons between columns that vary by one (or more) of these parameters are described, along with calculated kinetic performance and Knox-Saleem limits. These theoretical performance descriptions provide insight into optimal operating conditions when using capillary LC systems. Based on kinetic plot evaluation of available capillary columns in the 0.2–0.3 mm i.d. range with a conservative upper pressure limit of 330 bar packed with superficially porous particles, a 25 cm column could generate ∼47,000 plates in 7.85 min when operated at 2.4 µL/min. For comparison, more robust 0.3 mm i.d. columns (packed with fully porous particles) that can be operated at higher pressures than can be provided by the pumping system (conservative pump upper pressure limit of 570 bar), a ∼20 cm column could generate nearly 40,000 plates in 5.9 min if operated at 6 µL/min. Across all capillary LC columns measured, higher pressure limits and shorter columns can provide the best throughput when considering both speed and efficiency.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37216851</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464067</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-1347</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9673
ispartof Journal of Chromatography A, 2023-07, Vol.1701, p.464067-464067, Article 464067
issn 0021-9673
1873-3778
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10259062
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Capillary liquid chromatography
Chromatographic efficiency
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods
Chromatography, Liquid - methods
Compact
Kinetic plot
Kinetics
Particle Size
Porosity
Portable
title Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T21%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Column%20selection%20considerations%20in%20compact%20capillary%20liquid%20chromatography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.au=Foster,%20Samuel%20W.&rft.date=2023-07-19&rft.volume=1701&rft.spage=464067&rft.epage=464067&rft.pages=464067-464067&rft.artnum=464067&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft.eissn=1873-3778&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464067&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES0021967323002935%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/37216851&rft_els_id=S0021967323002935&rfr_iscdi=true