Impact of antigen retrieval protocols on the immunohistochemical detection of epigenetic DNA modifications

This study compares three different pretreatment protocols for the immunohistochemical detection of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) in nuclear DNA. The human biological samples analyzed included formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal squamous epithelium, ethan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Histochemistry and cell biology 2023-06, Vol.159 (6), p.513-526
Hauptverfasser: Moshi, Jobran M., Ummelen, Monique, Broers, Jos L. V., Ramaekers, Frans C. S., Hopman, Anton H. N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 526
container_issue 6
container_start_page 513
container_title Histochemistry and cell biology
container_volume 159
creator Moshi, Jobran M.
Ummelen, Monique
Broers, Jos L. V.
Ramaekers, Frans C. S.
Hopman, Anton H. N.
description This study compares three different pretreatment protocols for the immunohistochemical detection of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) in nuclear DNA. The human biological samples analyzed included formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal squamous epithelium, ethanol-fixed cultured cells, and metaphase chromosomes. The antigen retrieval methods included low pH Citrate and high pH Tris–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) protocols, as well as a method using Pepsin pretreatment combined with HCl for DNA denaturation. A gradual increase in the detection levels of 5-mC and 5-hmC was observed when going from Citrate via Tris/EDTA to Pepsin/HCl retrieval. While the Citrate retrieval protocol was the least efficient for the detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC, it did preserve nuclear morphology and enabled visualization of differences in intra- and internuclear distribution patterns in tissue and cell culture samples by single- and double-fluorescence detection. Quantification of (hydroxy)methylation levels in FFPE material demonstrated a significant heterogeneity and differences in 5-mC and 5-hmC levels within and between nuclei in the different compartments of normal squamous epithelium. It was concluded that immunohistochemical detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC enables the correlation of these DNA modifications with histomorphological features in heterogeneous tissues, but this is influenced by different pretreatment protocols that must be carefully chosen to allow an appropriate interpretation of these epigenetic switches.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00418-023-02187-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10247850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2824073334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ecb610ebd67726ae9c1bbd2a7218389dd20b6ac8fdc3828eed2a02f3db0d43723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIwI2b0ptHV1IrGcbXwKAbBXchldzqTlNVKZPUgP_etD2Oj4WLELjnuyc5HEKeMnjJANSrDCCZboCLephWjbxHNkwK3jDWfb1PNtBJ3bR1ckYe5XwAYNuO84fkTChgsJV6Qw5X02JdoXGgdi5hhzNNWFLAGzvSJcUSXRwzjTMte6RhmtY57kOu4z1OwVXIY0FXQiWqBy5HCyzB0TcfL-gUfRgqdZTzY_JgsGPGJ7f3Ofny7u3nyw_N9af3V5cX142TalsadH3LAHvfKsVbi51jfe-5VTWi0J33HPrWOj14JzTXiFUDPgjfg5dCcXFOXp98l7Wf0DucS7KjWVKYbPpuog3mb2UOe7OLN4YBl0pvoTq8uHVI8duKuZgpZIfjaGeMazZcdbLtuNSsos__QQ9xTXPNZ7jmEpQQQlaKnyiXYs4Jh7vfMDDHLs2pS1O7ND-7NMelZ3_muFv5VV4FxAnIVZp3mH6__R_bHy27rPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2824073334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of antigen retrieval protocols on the immunohistochemical detection of epigenetic DNA modifications</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Moshi, Jobran M. ; Ummelen, Monique ; Broers, Jos L. V. ; Ramaekers, Frans C. S. ; Hopman, Anton H. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moshi, Jobran M. ; Ummelen, Monique ; Broers, Jos L. V. ; Ramaekers, Frans C. S. ; Hopman, Anton H. N.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares three different pretreatment protocols for the immunohistochemical detection of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) in nuclear DNA. The human biological samples analyzed included formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal squamous epithelium, ethanol-fixed cultured cells, and metaphase chromosomes. The antigen retrieval methods included low pH Citrate and high pH Tris–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) protocols, as well as a method using Pepsin pretreatment combined with HCl for DNA denaturation. A gradual increase in the detection levels of 5-mC and 5-hmC was observed when going from Citrate via Tris/EDTA to Pepsin/HCl retrieval. While the Citrate retrieval protocol was the least efficient for the detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC, it did preserve nuclear morphology and enabled visualization of differences in intra- and internuclear distribution patterns in tissue and cell culture samples by single- and double-fluorescence detection. Quantification of (hydroxy)methylation levels in FFPE material demonstrated a significant heterogeneity and differences in 5-mC and 5-hmC levels within and between nuclei in the different compartments of normal squamous epithelium. It was concluded that immunohistochemical detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC enables the correlation of these DNA modifications with histomorphological features in heterogeneous tissues, but this is influenced by different pretreatment protocols that must be carefully chosen to allow an appropriate interpretation of these epigenetic switches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0948-6143</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-119X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00418-023-02187-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37010548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Antigens ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cell Biology ; Cell culture ; Chromosomes ; Citric acid ; Denaturation ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Developmental Biology ; DNA ; DNA methylation ; Edetic acid ; Epigenetics ; Epithelium ; Metaphase ; Original Paper ; Paraffin ; Pepsin ; Tissue culture</subject><ispartof>Histochemistry and cell biology, 2023-06, Vol.159 (6), p.513-526</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ecb610ebd67726ae9c1bbd2a7218389dd20b6ac8fdc3828eed2a02f3db0d43723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ecb610ebd67726ae9c1bbd2a7218389dd20b6ac8fdc3828eed2a02f3db0d43723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00418-023-02187-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00418-023-02187-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37010548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moshi, Jobran M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ummelen, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broers, Jos L. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaekers, Frans C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopman, Anton H. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of antigen retrieval protocols on the immunohistochemical detection of epigenetic DNA modifications</title><title>Histochemistry and cell biology</title><addtitle>Histochem Cell Biol</addtitle><addtitle>Histochem Cell Biol</addtitle><description>This study compares three different pretreatment protocols for the immunohistochemical detection of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) in nuclear DNA. The human biological samples analyzed included formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal squamous epithelium, ethanol-fixed cultured cells, and metaphase chromosomes. The antigen retrieval methods included low pH Citrate and high pH Tris–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) protocols, as well as a method using Pepsin pretreatment combined with HCl for DNA denaturation. A gradual increase in the detection levels of 5-mC and 5-hmC was observed when going from Citrate via Tris/EDTA to Pepsin/HCl retrieval. While the Citrate retrieval protocol was the least efficient for the detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC, it did preserve nuclear morphology and enabled visualization of differences in intra- and internuclear distribution patterns in tissue and cell culture samples by single- and double-fluorescence detection. Quantification of (hydroxy)methylation levels in FFPE material demonstrated a significant heterogeneity and differences in 5-mC and 5-hmC levels within and between nuclei in the different compartments of normal squamous epithelium. It was concluded that immunohistochemical detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC enables the correlation of these DNA modifications with histomorphological features in heterogeneous tissues, but this is influenced by different pretreatment protocols that must be carefully chosen to allow an appropriate interpretation of these epigenetic switches.</description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Citric acid</subject><subject>Denaturation</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA methylation</subject><subject>Edetic acid</subject><subject>Epigenetics</subject><subject>Epithelium</subject><subject>Metaphase</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Pepsin</subject><subject>Tissue culture</subject><issn>0948-6143</issn><issn>1432-119X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6B1xIwI2b0ptHV1IrGcbXwKAbBXchldzqTlNVKZPUgP_etD2Oj4WLELjnuyc5HEKeMnjJANSrDCCZboCLephWjbxHNkwK3jDWfb1PNtBJ3bR1ckYe5XwAYNuO84fkTChgsJV6Qw5X02JdoXGgdi5hhzNNWFLAGzvSJcUSXRwzjTMte6RhmtY57kOu4z1OwVXIY0FXQiWqBy5HCyzB0TcfL-gUfRgqdZTzY_JgsGPGJ7f3Ofny7u3nyw_N9af3V5cX142TalsadH3LAHvfKsVbi51jfe-5VTWi0J33HPrWOj14JzTXiFUDPgjfg5dCcXFOXp98l7Wf0DucS7KjWVKYbPpuog3mb2UOe7OLN4YBl0pvoTq8uHVI8duKuZgpZIfjaGeMazZcdbLtuNSsos__QQ9xTXPNZ7jmEpQQQlaKnyiXYs4Jh7vfMDDHLs2pS1O7ND-7NMelZ3_muFv5VV4FxAnIVZp3mH6__R_bHy27rPo</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Moshi, Jobran M.</creator><creator>Ummelen, Monique</creator><creator>Broers, Jos L. V.</creator><creator>Ramaekers, Frans C. S.</creator><creator>Hopman, Anton H. N.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Impact of antigen retrieval protocols on the immunohistochemical detection of epigenetic DNA modifications</title><author>Moshi, Jobran M. ; Ummelen, Monique ; Broers, Jos L. V. ; Ramaekers, Frans C. S. ; Hopman, Anton H. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-ecb610ebd67726ae9c1bbd2a7218389dd20b6ac8fdc3828eed2a02f3db0d43723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Citric acid</topic><topic>Denaturation</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA methylation</topic><topic>Edetic acid</topic><topic>Epigenetics</topic><topic>Epithelium</topic><topic>Metaphase</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Pepsin</topic><topic>Tissue culture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moshi, Jobran M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ummelen, Monique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broers, Jos L. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaekers, Frans C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopman, Anton H. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Histochemistry and cell biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moshi, Jobran M.</au><au>Ummelen, Monique</au><au>Broers, Jos L. V.</au><au>Ramaekers, Frans C. S.</au><au>Hopman, Anton H. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of antigen retrieval protocols on the immunohistochemical detection of epigenetic DNA modifications</atitle><jtitle>Histochemistry and cell biology</jtitle><stitle>Histochem Cell Biol</stitle><addtitle>Histochem Cell Biol</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>513-526</pages><issn>0948-6143</issn><eissn>1432-119X</eissn><abstract>This study compares three different pretreatment protocols for the immunohistochemical detection of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) in nuclear DNA. The human biological samples analyzed included formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) normal squamous epithelium, ethanol-fixed cultured cells, and metaphase chromosomes. The antigen retrieval methods included low pH Citrate and high pH Tris–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) protocols, as well as a method using Pepsin pretreatment combined with HCl for DNA denaturation. A gradual increase in the detection levels of 5-mC and 5-hmC was observed when going from Citrate via Tris/EDTA to Pepsin/HCl retrieval. While the Citrate retrieval protocol was the least efficient for the detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC, it did preserve nuclear morphology and enabled visualization of differences in intra- and internuclear distribution patterns in tissue and cell culture samples by single- and double-fluorescence detection. Quantification of (hydroxy)methylation levels in FFPE material demonstrated a significant heterogeneity and differences in 5-mC and 5-hmC levels within and between nuclei in the different compartments of normal squamous epithelium. It was concluded that immunohistochemical detection of 5-mC and 5-hmC enables the correlation of these DNA modifications with histomorphological features in heterogeneous tissues, but this is influenced by different pretreatment protocols that must be carefully chosen to allow an appropriate interpretation of these epigenetic switches.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37010548</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00418-023-02187-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0948-6143
ispartof Histochemistry and cell biology, 2023-06, Vol.159 (6), p.513-526
issn 0948-6143
1432-119X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10247850
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acetic acid
Antigens
Biochemistry
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cell Biology
Cell culture
Chromosomes
Citric acid
Denaturation
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Developmental Biology
DNA
DNA methylation
Edetic acid
Epigenetics
Epithelium
Metaphase
Original Paper
Paraffin
Pepsin
Tissue culture
title Impact of antigen retrieval protocols on the immunohistochemical detection of epigenetic DNA modifications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T23%3A13%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20antigen%20retrieval%20protocols%20on%20the%20immunohistochemical%20detection%20of%20epigenetic%20DNA%20modifications&rft.jtitle=Histochemistry%20and%20cell%20biology&rft.au=Moshi,%20Jobran%20M.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=513-526&rft.issn=0948-6143&rft.eissn=1432-119X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00418-023-02187-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2824073334%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2824073334&rft_id=info:pmid/37010548&rfr_iscdi=true