Effect of a Peer Health Coaching Intervention on Clinical Outcomes Among US Veterans With Cardiovascular Risks: The Vet-COACH Randomized Clinical Trial
Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the US, CVD risk factors remain suboptimally controlled. To test the effectiveness of a home-visit, peer health coaching intervention to improve health outcomes for veterans with multiple CVD risks. This 2-group, unblinded random...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA network open 2023-06, Vol.6 (6), p.e2317046-e2317046 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e2317046 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | e2317046 |
| container_title | JAMA network open |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Nelson, Karin M Taylor, Leslie Williams, Jennifer L Rao, Mayuree Gray, Kristen E Kramer, Charles Bradley Epler, Eric Fennell, Tiffanie |
| description | Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the US, CVD risk factors remain suboptimally controlled.
To test the effectiveness of a home-visit, peer health coaching intervention to improve health outcomes for veterans with multiple CVD risks.
This 2-group, unblinded randomized clinical trial, called Vet-COACH (Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health), used a novel geographic-based method to recruit a racially diverse population of veterans with low income. These veterans were enrolled at the Seattle or American Lake Veterans Health Affairs primary care clinics in Washington state. Veterans with a diagnosis of hypertension with at least 1 blood pressure reading of 150/90 mm Hg or higher in the past year, and 1 other CVD risk factor (current smoker, overweight or obesity, and/or hyperlipidemia), who resided in Census tracts with the highest prevalence of hypertension were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (n = 134) or control group (n = 130). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed from May 2017 to October 2021.
Participants in the intervention group received peer health coaching for 12 months with mandatory and optional educational materials, an automatic blood pressure monitor, a scale, a pill organizer, and healthy nutrition tools. Participants in the control group received usual care plus educational materials.
The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured using the 12-item Short Form survey's Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores), Framingham Risk Score, and overall CVD risk and health care use (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits).
The 264 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age of 60.6 [9.7] years) were predominantly male (229 [87%]) and 73 (28%) were Black individuals and 103 (44%) reported low annual income ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17046 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10245194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2831191647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-1683b687ea7deb0d0aa55c7077a4a93ff92fcd4cf85636967c2b8674a0d8a8a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkt1u1DAQhSMEolXpKyALbrjJ4p_ETnqDVlFhK1Xaqmzh0pp1nK63jr21k0XwIrwuDi1tqTSSR_I3R3M0J8veETwjGJOPW-jB6eGHDzd-p92MYspmROCCv8gOaSmKnFW4fPmkP8iOY9xijCkmrObl6-yACSqquq4Ps9-nXafVgHyHAF1oHdBCgx02qPGgNsZdozM36LDXbjDeoVSNNc4osGg5Dsr3OqJ57xN39RV90wkFF9F3MylAaI3fQ1SjhYAuTbyJJ2i10ROXN8t5s0CX4Frfm1-6fdRdBQP2TfaqAxv18f17lF19Pl01i_x8-eWsmZ_nwHg55IRXbM0roUG0eo1bDFCWSmAhoICadV1NO9UWqqtKznjNhaLriosCcFtBBYwdZZ_udHfjutetSj4DWLkLpofwU3ow8v8fZzby2u8lwbQoSV0khQ_3CsHfjjoOsjdRaWvTmfwYJa0owwUhZELfP0O3fgwu-UsUI6QmvBCJOrmjVPAxBt09bEOwnDIgn2VAThmQfzOQht8-9fMw-u_i7A9nELQL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2831191647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a Peer Health Coaching Intervention on Clinical Outcomes Among US Veterans With Cardiovascular Risks: The Vet-COACH Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nelson, Karin M ; Taylor, Leslie ; Williams, Jennifer L ; Rao, Mayuree ; Gray, Kristen E ; Kramer, Charles Bradley ; Epler, Eric ; Fennell, Tiffanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Karin M ; Taylor, Leslie ; Williams, Jennifer L ; Rao, Mayuree ; Gray, Kristen E ; Kramer, Charles Bradley ; Epler, Eric ; Fennell, Tiffanie</creatorcontrib><description>Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the US, CVD risk factors remain suboptimally controlled.
To test the effectiveness of a home-visit, peer health coaching intervention to improve health outcomes for veterans with multiple CVD risks.
This 2-group, unblinded randomized clinical trial, called Vet-COACH (Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health), used a novel geographic-based method to recruit a racially diverse population of veterans with low income. These veterans were enrolled at the Seattle or American Lake Veterans Health Affairs primary care clinics in Washington state. Veterans with a diagnosis of hypertension with at least 1 blood pressure reading of 150/90 mm Hg or higher in the past year, and 1 other CVD risk factor (current smoker, overweight or obesity, and/or hyperlipidemia), who resided in Census tracts with the highest prevalence of hypertension were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (n = 134) or control group (n = 130). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed from May 2017 to October 2021.
Participants in the intervention group received peer health coaching for 12 months with mandatory and optional educational materials, an automatic blood pressure monitor, a scale, a pill organizer, and healthy nutrition tools. Participants in the control group received usual care plus educational materials.
The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured using the 12-item Short Form survey's Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores), Framingham Risk Score, and overall CVD risk and health care use (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits).
The 264 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age of 60.6 [9.7] years) were predominantly male (229 [87%]) and 73 (28%) were Black individuals and 103 (44%) reported low annual income (<$40 000 per year). Seven peer health coaches were recruited. No difference was found in change in SBP between the intervention and control groups (-3.32 [95% CI, -6.88 to 0.23] mm Hg vs -0.40 [95% CI, -4.20 to 3.39] mm Hg; adjusted difference in differences, -2.05 [95% CI, -7.00 to 2.55] mm Hg; P = .40). Participants in the intervention vs control group reported greater improvements in mental HRQOL scores (2.19 [95% CI, 0.26-4.12] points vs -1.01 [95% CI, -2.91 to 0.88] points; adjusted difference in differences, 3.64 [95% CI, 0.66-6.63] points; P = .02). No difference was found in physical HRQOL scores, Framingham Risk Scores, and overall CVD risk or health care use.
This trial found that, although the peer health coaching program did not significantly decrease SBP, participants who received the intervention reported better mental HRQOL compared with the control group. The results suggest that a peer-support model that is integrated into primary care can create opportunities for well-being improvements beyond blood pressure control.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697422.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37278999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Blood pressure ; Cardiology ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Educational materials ; Hypertension ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Primary care</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2023-06, Vol.6 (6), p.e2317046-e2317046</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2023 Nelson KM et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-1683b687ea7deb0d0aa55c7077a4a93ff92fcd4cf85636967c2b8674a0d8a8a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Karin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Mayuree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Kristen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Charles Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epler, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennell, Tiffanie</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a Peer Health Coaching Intervention on Clinical Outcomes Among US Veterans With Cardiovascular Risks: The Vet-COACH Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the US, CVD risk factors remain suboptimally controlled.
To test the effectiveness of a home-visit, peer health coaching intervention to improve health outcomes for veterans with multiple CVD risks.
This 2-group, unblinded randomized clinical trial, called Vet-COACH (Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health), used a novel geographic-based method to recruit a racially diverse population of veterans with low income. These veterans were enrolled at the Seattle or American Lake Veterans Health Affairs primary care clinics in Washington state. Veterans with a diagnosis of hypertension with at least 1 blood pressure reading of 150/90 mm Hg or higher in the past year, and 1 other CVD risk factor (current smoker, overweight or obesity, and/or hyperlipidemia), who resided in Census tracts with the highest prevalence of hypertension were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (n = 134) or control group (n = 130). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed from May 2017 to October 2021.
Participants in the intervention group received peer health coaching for 12 months with mandatory and optional educational materials, an automatic blood pressure monitor, a scale, a pill organizer, and healthy nutrition tools. Participants in the control group received usual care plus educational materials.
The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured using the 12-item Short Form survey's Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores), Framingham Risk Score, and overall CVD risk and health care use (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits).
The 264 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age of 60.6 [9.7] years) were predominantly male (229 [87%]) and 73 (28%) were Black individuals and 103 (44%) reported low annual income (<$40 000 per year). Seven peer health coaches were recruited. No difference was found in change in SBP between the intervention and control groups (-3.32 [95% CI, -6.88 to 0.23] mm Hg vs -0.40 [95% CI, -4.20 to 3.39] mm Hg; adjusted difference in differences, -2.05 [95% CI, -7.00 to 2.55] mm Hg; P = .40). Participants in the intervention vs control group reported greater improvements in mental HRQOL scores (2.19 [95% CI, 0.26-4.12] points vs -1.01 [95% CI, -2.91 to 0.88] points; adjusted difference in differences, 3.64 [95% CI, 0.66-6.63] points; P = .02). No difference was found in physical HRQOL scores, Framingham Risk Scores, and overall CVD risk or health care use.
This trial found that, although the peer health coaching program did not significantly decrease SBP, participants who received the intervention reported better mental HRQOL compared with the control group. The results suggest that a peer-support model that is integrated into primary care can create opportunities for well-being improvements beyond blood pressure control.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697422.</description><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkt1u1DAQhSMEolXpKyALbrjJ4p_ETnqDVlFhK1Xaqmzh0pp1nK63jr21k0XwIrwuDi1tqTSSR_I3R3M0J8veETwjGJOPW-jB6eGHDzd-p92MYspmROCCv8gOaSmKnFW4fPmkP8iOY9xijCkmrObl6-yACSqquq4Ps9-nXafVgHyHAF1oHdBCgx02qPGgNsZdozM36LDXbjDeoVSNNc4osGg5Dsr3OqJ57xN39RV90wkFF9F3MylAaI3fQ1SjhYAuTbyJJ2i10ROXN8t5s0CX4Frfm1-6fdRdBQP2TfaqAxv18f17lF19Pl01i_x8-eWsmZ_nwHg55IRXbM0roUG0eo1bDFCWSmAhoICadV1NO9UWqqtKznjNhaLriosCcFtBBYwdZZ_udHfjutetSj4DWLkLpofwU3ow8v8fZzby2u8lwbQoSV0khQ_3CsHfjjoOsjdRaWvTmfwYJa0owwUhZELfP0O3fgwu-UsUI6QmvBCJOrmjVPAxBt09bEOwnDIgn2VAThmQfzOQht8-9fMw-u_i7A9nELQL</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Nelson, Karin M</creator><creator>Taylor, Leslie</creator><creator>Williams, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Rao, Mayuree</creator><creator>Gray, Kristen E</creator><creator>Kramer, Charles Bradley</creator><creator>Epler, Eric</creator><creator>Fennell, Tiffanie</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Effect of a Peer Health Coaching Intervention on Clinical Outcomes Among US Veterans With Cardiovascular Risks: The Vet-COACH Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Nelson, Karin M ; Taylor, Leslie ; Williams, Jennifer L ; Rao, Mayuree ; Gray, Kristen E ; Kramer, Charles Bradley ; Epler, Eric ; Fennell, Tiffanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a365t-1683b687ea7deb0d0aa55c7077a4a93ff92fcd4cf85636967c2b8674a0d8a8a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Karin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Mayuree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Kristen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Charles Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epler, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennell, Tiffanie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Karin M</au><au>Taylor, Leslie</au><au>Williams, Jennifer L</au><au>Rao, Mayuree</au><au>Gray, Kristen E</au><au>Kramer, Charles Bradley</au><au>Epler, Eric</au><au>Fennell, Tiffanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a Peer Health Coaching Intervention on Clinical Outcomes Among US Veterans With Cardiovascular Risks: The Vet-COACH Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e2317046</spage><epage>e2317046</epage><pages>e2317046-e2317046</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the US, CVD risk factors remain suboptimally controlled.
To test the effectiveness of a home-visit, peer health coaching intervention to improve health outcomes for veterans with multiple CVD risks.
This 2-group, unblinded randomized clinical trial, called Vet-COACH (Veteran Peer Coaches Optimizing and Advancing Cardiac Health), used a novel geographic-based method to recruit a racially diverse population of veterans with low income. These veterans were enrolled at the Seattle or American Lake Veterans Health Affairs primary care clinics in Washington state. Veterans with a diagnosis of hypertension with at least 1 blood pressure reading of 150/90 mm Hg or higher in the past year, and 1 other CVD risk factor (current smoker, overweight or obesity, and/or hyperlipidemia), who resided in Census tracts with the highest prevalence of hypertension were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized to the intervention group (n = 134) or control group (n = 130). An intention-to-treat analysis was performed from May 2017 to October 2021.
Participants in the intervention group received peer health coaching for 12 months with mandatory and optional educational materials, an automatic blood pressure monitor, a scale, a pill organizer, and healthy nutrition tools. Participants in the control group received usual care plus educational materials.
The primary outcome was a change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline to 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured using the 12-item Short Form survey's Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores), Framingham Risk Score, and overall CVD risk and health care use (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits).
The 264 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age of 60.6 [9.7] years) were predominantly male (229 [87%]) and 73 (28%) were Black individuals and 103 (44%) reported low annual income (<$40 000 per year). Seven peer health coaches were recruited. No difference was found in change in SBP between the intervention and control groups (-3.32 [95% CI, -6.88 to 0.23] mm Hg vs -0.40 [95% CI, -4.20 to 3.39] mm Hg; adjusted difference in differences, -2.05 [95% CI, -7.00 to 2.55] mm Hg; P = .40). Participants in the intervention vs control group reported greater improvements in mental HRQOL scores (2.19 [95% CI, 0.26-4.12] points vs -1.01 [95% CI, -2.91 to 0.88] points; adjusted difference in differences, 3.64 [95% CI, 0.66-6.63] points; P = .02). No difference was found in physical HRQOL scores, Framingham Risk Scores, and overall CVD risk or health care use.
This trial found that, although the peer health coaching program did not significantly decrease SBP, participants who received the intervention reported better mental HRQOL compared with the control group. The results suggest that a peer-support model that is integrated into primary care can create opportunities for well-being improvements beyond blood pressure control.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697422.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>37278999</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17046</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2574-3805 |
| ispartof | JAMA network open, 2023-06, Vol.6 (6), p.e2317046-e2317046 |
| issn | 2574-3805 2574-3805 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10245194 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Blood pressure Cardiology Clinical outcomes Clinical trials Educational materials Hypertension Online Only Original Investigation Primary care |
| title | Effect of a Peer Health Coaching Intervention on Clinical Outcomes Among US Veterans With Cardiovascular Risks: The Vet-COACH Randomized Clinical Trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20Peer%20Health%20Coaching%20Intervention%20on%20Clinical%20Outcomes%20Among%20US%20Veterans%20With%20Cardiovascular%20Risks:%20The%20Vet-COACH%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Nelson,%20Karin%20M&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e2317046&rft.epage=e2317046&rft.pages=e2317046-e2317046&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2831191647%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2831191647&rft_id=info:pmid/37278999&rfr_iscdi=true |