Psycho-Oncological Care Provision in Highly Distressed Breast Cancer Patients
To evaluate the proportion of breast cancer (BC) patients with distress or psychological comorbidity as well as offer and use of psychological support in subgroups of BC patients with different extents of distress. 456 patients with BC were evaluated at baseline (t1) and until 5 years after diagnosi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2023-06, Vol.83 (6), p.702-707 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 707 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 702 |
container_title | Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Schlaiss, Tanja Singer, Susanne Herbert, Saskia-Laureen Diessner, Joachim Bartmann, Catharina Kiesel, Matthias Janni, Wolfgang Kuehn, Thorsten Flock, Felix Felberbaum, Ricardo Schwentner, Lukas Leinert, Elena Woeckel, Achim |
description | To evaluate the proportion of breast cancer (BC) patients with distress or psychological comorbidity as well as offer and use of psychological support in subgroups of BC patients with different extents of distress.
456 patients with BC were evaluated at baseline (t1) and until 5 years after diagnosis (t4) at the BRENDA certified BC centers. Logistic regression was used to analyze if patients with distress at t1 received offers and actual psychological support more often than patients without distress at t1. Regression analyses were used to examine if acute, emerging or chronic disease was associated with higher rates of offer and use of psychotherapy as well as intake of psychotropic drugs.
In 45% of BC patients psychological affection was detected at t4. The majority of patients with moderate or severe distress at t1 (77%) received the offer for psychological service, while 71% of those received the offer for support at t4. Patients, who were psychologically affected at t1, have not been offered psychological services more often than those without, but they significantly more often used services if offered. Especially patients with acute comorbidity received significantly more often an offer for psychotherapy compared to unimpaired patients, while those patients with emerging or chronic disease did not. 14% of BC patients took psychopharmaceuticals. This mainly concerns patients with chronic comorbidity.
Psychological services were offered to and used by a fair amount of BC patients. All subgroups of BC patients should be addressed, in order to improve the comprehensive supply with psychological services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/a-2044-0072 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10243917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2823988402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2cbc5c776ba6e1f7a12c98f9231ca9b2a95d27c4439e60b37e14deccc2559a8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMotlZP3mWPgqzmc5M9idaPCpX2oOeQnc22ke2mJttC_71bWouehmEenhnmReiS4FuChbgzKcWcpxhLeoT6hDOVKoX5MepjTLJUSEF66CzGr67lOclOUY9JqhTlqo_ep3EDc59OGvC1nzkwdTI0wSbT4NcuOt8krklGbjavN8mTi22wMdoyeQzWxLZDG7AhmZrW2aaN5-ikMnW0F_s6QJ8vzx_DUTqevL4NH8YpMCnalEIBAqTMCpNZUklDKOSqyikjYPKCmlyUVALnLLcZLpi0hJcWAKgQuVEVG6D7nXe5Kha2hG53MLVeBrcwYaO9cfr_pHFzPfNrTTDtpER2huu9IfjvlY2tXrgItq5NY_0qaqooy5XimHbozQ6F4GMMtjrsIVhvE9BGbxPQ2wQ6-urvaQf29-XsB5IhgjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2823988402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psycho-Oncological Care Provision in Highly Distressed Breast Cancer Patients</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schlaiss, Tanja ; Singer, Susanne ; Herbert, Saskia-Laureen ; Diessner, Joachim ; Bartmann, Catharina ; Kiesel, Matthias ; Janni, Wolfgang ; Kuehn, Thorsten ; Flock, Felix ; Felberbaum, Ricardo ; Schwentner, Lukas ; Leinert, Elena ; Woeckel, Achim</creator><creatorcontrib>Schlaiss, Tanja ; Singer, Susanne ; Herbert, Saskia-Laureen ; Diessner, Joachim ; Bartmann, Catharina ; Kiesel, Matthias ; Janni, Wolfgang ; Kuehn, Thorsten ; Flock, Felix ; Felberbaum, Ricardo ; Schwentner, Lukas ; Leinert, Elena ; Woeckel, Achim ; BRENDA study group ; for the BRENDA study group</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the proportion of breast cancer (BC) patients with distress or psychological comorbidity as well as offer and use of psychological support in subgroups of BC patients with different extents of distress.
456 patients with BC were evaluated at baseline (t1) and until 5 years after diagnosis (t4) at the BRENDA certified BC centers. Logistic regression was used to analyze if patients with distress at t1 received offers and actual psychological support more often than patients without distress at t1. Regression analyses were used to examine if acute, emerging or chronic disease was associated with higher rates of offer and use of psychotherapy as well as intake of psychotropic drugs.
In 45% of BC patients psychological affection was detected at t4. The majority of patients with moderate or severe distress at t1 (77%) received the offer for psychological service, while 71% of those received the offer for support at t4. Patients, who were psychologically affected at t1, have not been offered psychological services more often than those without, but they significantly more often used services if offered. Especially patients with acute comorbidity received significantly more often an offer for psychotherapy compared to unimpaired patients, while those patients with emerging or chronic disease did not. 14% of BC patients took psychopharmaceuticals. This mainly concerns patients with chronic comorbidity.
Psychological services were offered to and used by a fair amount of BC patients. All subgroups of BC patients should be addressed, in order to improve the comprehensive supply with psychological services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/a-2044-0072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37288248</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisher><subject>GebFra Science</subject><ispartof>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2023-06, Vol.83 (6), p.702-707</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).</rights><rights>The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( ) 2023 The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2cbc5c776ba6e1f7a12c98f9231ca9b2a95d27c4439e60b37e14deccc2559a8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243917/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243917/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schlaiss, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Saskia-Laureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diessner, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartmann, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiesel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janni, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehn, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flock, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felberbaum, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwentner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinert, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woeckel, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRENDA study group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the BRENDA study group</creatorcontrib><title>Psycho-Oncological Care Provision in Highly Distressed Breast Cancer Patients</title><title>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</title><addtitle>Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd</addtitle><description>To evaluate the proportion of breast cancer (BC) patients with distress or psychological comorbidity as well as offer and use of psychological support in subgroups of BC patients with different extents of distress.
456 patients with BC were evaluated at baseline (t1) and until 5 years after diagnosis (t4) at the BRENDA certified BC centers. Logistic regression was used to analyze if patients with distress at t1 received offers and actual psychological support more often than patients without distress at t1. Regression analyses were used to examine if acute, emerging or chronic disease was associated with higher rates of offer and use of psychotherapy as well as intake of psychotropic drugs.
In 45% of BC patients psychological affection was detected at t4. The majority of patients with moderate or severe distress at t1 (77%) received the offer for psychological service, while 71% of those received the offer for support at t4. Patients, who were psychologically affected at t1, have not been offered psychological services more often than those without, but they significantly more often used services if offered. Especially patients with acute comorbidity received significantly more often an offer for psychotherapy compared to unimpaired patients, while those patients with emerging or chronic disease did not. 14% of BC patients took psychopharmaceuticals. This mainly concerns patients with chronic comorbidity.
Psychological services were offered to and used by a fair amount of BC patients. All subgroups of BC patients should be addressed, in order to improve the comprehensive supply with psychological services.</description><subject>GebFra Science</subject><issn>0016-5751</issn><issn>1438-8804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMotlZP3mWPgqzmc5M9idaPCpX2oOeQnc22ke2mJttC_71bWouehmEenhnmReiS4FuChbgzKcWcpxhLeoT6hDOVKoX5MepjTLJUSEF66CzGr67lOclOUY9JqhTlqo_ep3EDc59OGvC1nzkwdTI0wSbT4NcuOt8krklGbjavN8mTi22wMdoyeQzWxLZDG7AhmZrW2aaN5-ikMnW0F_s6QJ8vzx_DUTqevL4NH8YpMCnalEIBAqTMCpNZUklDKOSqyikjYPKCmlyUVALnLLcZLpi0hJcWAKgQuVEVG6D7nXe5Kha2hG53MLVeBrcwYaO9cfr_pHFzPfNrTTDtpER2huu9IfjvlY2tXrgItq5NY_0qaqooy5XimHbozQ6F4GMMtjrsIVhvE9BGbxPQ2wQ6-urvaQf29-XsB5IhgjI</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Schlaiss, Tanja</creator><creator>Singer, Susanne</creator><creator>Herbert, Saskia-Laureen</creator><creator>Diessner, Joachim</creator><creator>Bartmann, Catharina</creator><creator>Kiesel, Matthias</creator><creator>Janni, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Kuehn, Thorsten</creator><creator>Flock, Felix</creator><creator>Felberbaum, Ricardo</creator><creator>Schwentner, Lukas</creator><creator>Leinert, Elena</creator><creator>Woeckel, Achim</creator><general>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Psycho-Oncological Care Provision in Highly Distressed Breast Cancer Patients</title><author>Schlaiss, Tanja ; Singer, Susanne ; Herbert, Saskia-Laureen ; Diessner, Joachim ; Bartmann, Catharina ; Kiesel, Matthias ; Janni, Wolfgang ; Kuehn, Thorsten ; Flock, Felix ; Felberbaum, Ricardo ; Schwentner, Lukas ; Leinert, Elena ; Woeckel, Achim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2cbc5c776ba6e1f7a12c98f9231ca9b2a95d27c4439e60b37e14deccc2559a8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>GebFra Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schlaiss, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Saskia-Laureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diessner, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartmann, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiesel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janni, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehn, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flock, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felberbaum, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwentner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinert, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woeckel, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRENDA study group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the BRENDA study group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schlaiss, Tanja</au><au>Singer, Susanne</au><au>Herbert, Saskia-Laureen</au><au>Diessner, Joachim</au><au>Bartmann, Catharina</au><au>Kiesel, Matthias</au><au>Janni, Wolfgang</au><au>Kuehn, Thorsten</au><au>Flock, Felix</au><au>Felberbaum, Ricardo</au><au>Schwentner, Lukas</au><au>Leinert, Elena</au><au>Woeckel, Achim</au><aucorp>BRENDA study group</aucorp><aucorp>for the BRENDA study group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psycho-Oncological Care Provision in Highly Distressed Breast Cancer Patients</atitle><jtitle>Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde</jtitle><addtitle>Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>702</spage><epage>707</epage><pages>702-707</pages><issn>0016-5751</issn><eissn>1438-8804</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the proportion of breast cancer (BC) patients with distress or psychological comorbidity as well as offer and use of psychological support in subgroups of BC patients with different extents of distress.
456 patients with BC were evaluated at baseline (t1) and until 5 years after diagnosis (t4) at the BRENDA certified BC centers. Logistic regression was used to analyze if patients with distress at t1 received offers and actual psychological support more often than patients without distress at t1. Regression analyses were used to examine if acute, emerging or chronic disease was associated with higher rates of offer and use of psychotherapy as well as intake of psychotropic drugs.
In 45% of BC patients psychological affection was detected at t4. The majority of patients with moderate or severe distress at t1 (77%) received the offer for psychological service, while 71% of those received the offer for support at t4. Patients, who were psychologically affected at t1, have not been offered psychological services more often than those without, but they significantly more often used services if offered. Especially patients with acute comorbidity received significantly more often an offer for psychotherapy compared to unimpaired patients, while those patients with emerging or chronic disease did not. 14% of BC patients took psychopharmaceuticals. This mainly concerns patients with chronic comorbidity.
Psychological services were offered to and used by a fair amount of BC patients. All subgroups of BC patients should be addressed, in order to improve the comprehensive supply with psychological services.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</pub><pmid>37288248</pmid><doi>10.1055/a-2044-0072</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5751 |
ispartof | Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2023-06, Vol.83 (6), p.702-707 |
issn | 0016-5751 1438-8804 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10243917 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | GebFra Science |
title | Psycho-Oncological Care Provision in Highly Distressed Breast Cancer Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A00%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psycho-Oncological%20Care%20Provision%20in%20Highly%20Distressed%20Breast%20Cancer%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Geburtshilfe%20und%20Frauenheilkunde&rft.au=Schlaiss,%20Tanja&rft.aucorp=BRENDA%20study%20group&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=707&rft.pages=702-707&rft.issn=0016-5751&rft.eissn=1438-8804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/a-2044-0072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2823988402%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2823988402&rft_id=info:pmid/37288248&rfr_iscdi=true |