Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits of Novel Diabetes Drugs by Baseline Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression
Eligibility for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been expanded to patients with diabetes at lower cardiovascular risk, but whether treatment benefits differ by risk levels is not clear. To investigate whether patients with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2023-06, Vol.46 (6), p.1300-1310 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1310 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1300 |
container_title | Diabetes care |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Rodriguez-Valadez, José M Tahsin, Malak Fleischmann, Kirsten E Masharani, Umesh Yeboah, Joseph Park, Meyeon Li, Lihua Weber, Ellerie Li, Yan Berkalieva, Asem Max, Wendy Hunink, M G Myriam Ferket, Bart S |
description | Eligibility for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been expanded to patients with diabetes at lower cardiovascular risk, but whether treatment benefits differ by risk levels is not clear.
To investigate whether patients with varying risks differ in cardiovascular and renal benefits from GLP-1RA and SGLT2i with use of meta-analysis and meta-regression.
We performed a systematic review using PubMed through 7 November 2022.
We included reports of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i confirmatory randomized trials in adult patients with safety or efficacy end point data.
Hazard ratio (HR) and event rate data were extracted for mortality, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes.
We analyzed 9 GLP-1RA and 13 SGLT2i trials comprising 154,649 patients. Summary HRs were significant for cardiovascular mortality (GLP-1RA 0.87 and SGLT2i 0.86), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.87 and 0.88), heart failure (0.89 and 0.70), and renal (0.84 and 0.65) outcomes. For stroke, efficacy was significant for GLP-1RA (0.84) but not for SGLT2i (0.92). Associations between control arm cardiovascular mortality rates and HRs were nonsignificant. Five-year absolute risk reductions (0.80-4.25%) increased to 11.6% for heart failure in SGLT2i trials in patients with high risk (Pslope < 0.001). For GLP1-RAs, associations were nonsignificant.
Analyses were limited by lack of patient-level data, consistency in end point definitions, and variation in cardiovascular mortality rates for GLP-1RA trials.
Relative effects of novel diabetes drugs are preserved across baseline cardiovascular risk, whereas absolute benefits increase at higher risks, particularly regarding heart failure. Our findings suggest a need for baseline risk assessment tools to identify variation in absolute treatment benefits and improve decision-making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2337/dc22-0772 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10234755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2818749898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-51b758c8e5e604cd4a5bbe0712564ca2ed54c70cb86f8053dc1d8239f1c8b4683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQRi0EokvLBS-ALHEDUgP-jR1uULsFitSCVODacpzJ4pKNiydZtK_RJybZlgp6NZLn6Hwjf4Q84-y1kNK8aYIQBTNGPCALXkldaK3sQ7JgXFWFriqxR54gXjLGlLL2MdmTRggmSrkg10ufm5g2HsPY-Ux939AL6H1Hj6GHNg5IU0s_pw109CT6GgZAepLHFdJ6S489Qhd7oPcsFxF_vqVH9OsWB1j7IYZJuonw-5Cew-ALPwVsMeLhLm_3lGGVATGm_oA8an2H8PR27pPvH95_W54WZ18-floenRVBMTUUmtdG22BBQ8lUaJTXdQ3McKFLFbyARqtgWKht2VqmZRN4Y4WsWh5srUor98m7G-_VWK-hCdAP2XfuKse1z1uXfHT_b_r4w63SxnEmpDJaT4aXt4acfo2Ag1tHDNB1voc0ohOWW6MqW81hL-6hl2nM0zfsqKq0RptZ-OqGCjkhZmjvruHMzVW7uWo3Vz2xz_89_4782638AyFEpag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819687575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits of Novel Diabetes Drugs by Baseline Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rodriguez-Valadez, José M ; Tahsin, Malak ; Fleischmann, Kirsten E ; Masharani, Umesh ; Yeboah, Joseph ; Park, Meyeon ; Li, Lihua ; Weber, Ellerie ; Li, Yan ; Berkalieva, Asem ; Max, Wendy ; Hunink, M G Myriam ; Ferket, Bart S</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Valadez, José M ; Tahsin, Malak ; Fleischmann, Kirsten E ; Masharani, Umesh ; Yeboah, Joseph ; Park, Meyeon ; Li, Lihua ; Weber, Ellerie ; Li, Yan ; Berkalieva, Asem ; Max, Wendy ; Hunink, M G Myriam ; Ferket, Bart S</creatorcontrib><description>Eligibility for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been expanded to patients with diabetes at lower cardiovascular risk, but whether treatment benefits differ by risk levels is not clear.
To investigate whether patients with varying risks differ in cardiovascular and renal benefits from GLP-1RA and SGLT2i with use of meta-analysis and meta-regression.
We performed a systematic review using PubMed through 7 November 2022.
We included reports of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i confirmatory randomized trials in adult patients with safety or efficacy end point data.
Hazard ratio (HR) and event rate data were extracted for mortality, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes.
We analyzed 9 GLP-1RA and 13 SGLT2i trials comprising 154,649 patients. Summary HRs were significant for cardiovascular mortality (GLP-1RA 0.87 and SGLT2i 0.86), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.87 and 0.88), heart failure (0.89 and 0.70), and renal (0.84 and 0.65) outcomes. For stroke, efficacy was significant for GLP-1RA (0.84) but not for SGLT2i (0.92). Associations between control arm cardiovascular mortality rates and HRs were nonsignificant. Five-year absolute risk reductions (0.80-4.25%) increased to 11.6% for heart failure in SGLT2i trials in patients with high risk (Pslope < 0.001). For GLP1-RAs, associations were nonsignificant.
Analyses were limited by lack of patient-level data, consistency in end point definitions, and variation in cardiovascular mortality rates for GLP-1RA trials.
Relative effects of novel diabetes drugs are preserved across baseline cardiovascular risk, whereas absolute benefits increase at higher risks, particularly regarding heart failure. Our findings suggest a need for baseline risk assessment tools to identify variation in absolute treatment benefits and improve decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-5992</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-5548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-5548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/dc22-0772</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37220263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; Cardiovascular System ; Clinical trials ; Congestive heart failure ; Data analysis ; Decision making ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Drugs ; Effectiveness ; GLP-1 receptor agonists ; Glucagon ; Glucagon-like peptide 1 ; Health risks ; Heart Disease Risk Factors ; Heart Failure ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; Kidneys ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Risk assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk levels ; Sodium-glucose cotransporter ; Systematic review ; Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses</subject><ispartof>Diabetes care, 2023-06, Vol.46 (6), p.1300-1310</ispartof><rights>2023 by the American Diabetes Association.</rights><rights>Copyright American Diabetes Association Jun 2023</rights><rights>2023 by the American Diabetes Association 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-51b758c8e5e604cd4a5bbe0712564ca2ed54c70cb86f8053dc1d8239f1c8b4683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-51b758c8e5e604cd4a5bbe0712564ca2ed54c70cb86f8053dc1d8239f1c8b4683</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2754-545X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37220263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Valadez, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahsin, Malak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Kirsten E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masharani, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Meyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Ellerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkalieva, Asem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Max, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunink, M G Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferket, Bart S</creatorcontrib><title>Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits of Novel Diabetes Drugs by Baseline Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression</title><title>Diabetes care</title><addtitle>Diabetes Care</addtitle><description>Eligibility for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been expanded to patients with diabetes at lower cardiovascular risk, but whether treatment benefits differ by risk levels is not clear.
To investigate whether patients with varying risks differ in cardiovascular and renal benefits from GLP-1RA and SGLT2i with use of meta-analysis and meta-regression.
We performed a systematic review using PubMed through 7 November 2022.
We included reports of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i confirmatory randomized trials in adult patients with safety or efficacy end point data.
Hazard ratio (HR) and event rate data were extracted for mortality, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes.
We analyzed 9 GLP-1RA and 13 SGLT2i trials comprising 154,649 patients. Summary HRs were significant for cardiovascular mortality (GLP-1RA 0.87 and SGLT2i 0.86), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.87 and 0.88), heart failure (0.89 and 0.70), and renal (0.84 and 0.65) outcomes. For stroke, efficacy was significant for GLP-1RA (0.84) but not for SGLT2i (0.92). Associations between control arm cardiovascular mortality rates and HRs were nonsignificant. Five-year absolute risk reductions (0.80-4.25%) increased to 11.6% for heart failure in SGLT2i trials in patients with high risk (Pslope < 0.001). For GLP1-RAs, associations were nonsignificant.
Analyses were limited by lack of patient-level data, consistency in end point definitions, and variation in cardiovascular mortality rates for GLP-1RA trials.
Relative effects of novel diabetes drugs are preserved across baseline cardiovascular risk, whereas absolute benefits increase at higher risks, particularly regarding heart failure. Our findings suggest a need for baseline risk assessment tools to identify variation in absolute treatment benefits and improve decision-making.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases</subject><subject>Cardiovascular System</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>GLP-1 receptor agonists</subject><subject>Glucagon</subject><subject>Glucagon-like peptide 1</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Heart Disease Risk Factors</subject><subject>Heart Failure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk levels</subject><subject>Sodium-glucose cotransporter</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses</subject><issn>0149-5992</issn><issn>1935-5548</issn><issn>1935-5548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQRi0EokvLBS-ALHEDUgP-jR1uULsFitSCVODacpzJ4pKNiydZtK_RJybZlgp6NZLn6Hwjf4Q84-y1kNK8aYIQBTNGPCALXkldaK3sQ7JgXFWFriqxR54gXjLGlLL2MdmTRggmSrkg10ufm5g2HsPY-Ux939AL6H1Hj6GHNg5IU0s_pw109CT6GgZAepLHFdJ6S489Qhd7oPcsFxF_vqVH9OsWB1j7IYZJuonw-5Cew-ALPwVsMeLhLm_3lGGVATGm_oA8an2H8PR27pPvH95_W54WZ18-floenRVBMTUUmtdG22BBQ8lUaJTXdQ3McKFLFbyARqtgWKht2VqmZRN4Y4WsWh5srUor98m7G-_VWK-hCdAP2XfuKse1z1uXfHT_b_r4w63SxnEmpDJaT4aXt4acfo2Ag1tHDNB1voc0ohOWW6MqW81hL-6hl2nM0zfsqKq0RptZ-OqGCjkhZmjvruHMzVW7uWo3Vz2xz_89_4782638AyFEpag</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Rodriguez-Valadez, José M</creator><creator>Tahsin, Malak</creator><creator>Fleischmann, Kirsten E</creator><creator>Masharani, Umesh</creator><creator>Yeboah, Joseph</creator><creator>Park, Meyeon</creator><creator>Li, Lihua</creator><creator>Weber, Ellerie</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Berkalieva, Asem</creator><creator>Max, Wendy</creator><creator>Hunink, M G Myriam</creator><creator>Ferket, Bart S</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2754-545X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits of Novel Diabetes Drugs by Baseline Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression</title><author>Rodriguez-Valadez, José M ; Tahsin, Malak ; Fleischmann, Kirsten E ; Masharani, Umesh ; Yeboah, Joseph ; Park, Meyeon ; Li, Lihua ; Weber, Ellerie ; Li, Yan ; Berkalieva, Asem ; Max, Wendy ; Hunink, M G Myriam ; Ferket, Bart S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-51b758c8e5e604cd4a5bbe0712564ca2ed54c70cb86f8053dc1d8239f1c8b4683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases</topic><topic>Cardiovascular System</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>GLP-1 receptor agonists</topic><topic>Glucagon</topic><topic>Glucagon-like peptide 1</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Heart Disease Risk Factors</topic><topic>Heart Failure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk levels</topic><topic>Sodium-glucose cotransporter</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Valadez, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahsin, Malak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Kirsten E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masharani, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeboah, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Meyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Ellerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkalieva, Asem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Max, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunink, M G Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferket, Bart S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodriguez-Valadez, José M</au><au>Tahsin, Malak</au><au>Fleischmann, Kirsten E</au><au>Masharani, Umesh</au><au>Yeboah, Joseph</au><au>Park, Meyeon</au><au>Li, Lihua</au><au>Weber, Ellerie</au><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Berkalieva, Asem</au><au>Max, Wendy</au><au>Hunink, M G Myriam</au><au>Ferket, Bart S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits of Novel Diabetes Drugs by Baseline Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes care</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Care</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1300</spage><epage>1310</epage><pages>1300-1310</pages><issn>0149-5992</issn><issn>1935-5548</issn><eissn>1935-5548</eissn><abstract>Eligibility for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been expanded to patients with diabetes at lower cardiovascular risk, but whether treatment benefits differ by risk levels is not clear.
To investigate whether patients with varying risks differ in cardiovascular and renal benefits from GLP-1RA and SGLT2i with use of meta-analysis and meta-regression.
We performed a systematic review using PubMed through 7 November 2022.
We included reports of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i confirmatory randomized trials in adult patients with safety or efficacy end point data.
Hazard ratio (HR) and event rate data were extracted for mortality, cardiovascular, and renal outcomes.
We analyzed 9 GLP-1RA and 13 SGLT2i trials comprising 154,649 patients. Summary HRs were significant for cardiovascular mortality (GLP-1RA 0.87 and SGLT2i 0.86), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.87 and 0.88), heart failure (0.89 and 0.70), and renal (0.84 and 0.65) outcomes. For stroke, efficacy was significant for GLP-1RA (0.84) but not for SGLT2i (0.92). Associations between control arm cardiovascular mortality rates and HRs were nonsignificant. Five-year absolute risk reductions (0.80-4.25%) increased to 11.6% for heart failure in SGLT2i trials in patients with high risk (Pslope < 0.001). For GLP1-RAs, associations were nonsignificant.
Analyses were limited by lack of patient-level data, consistency in end point definitions, and variation in cardiovascular mortality rates for GLP-1RA trials.
Relative effects of novel diabetes drugs are preserved across baseline cardiovascular risk, whereas absolute benefits increase at higher risks, particularly regarding heart failure. Our findings suggest a need for baseline risk assessment tools to identify variation in absolute treatment benefits and improve decision-making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><pmid>37220263</pmid><doi>10.2337/dc22-0772</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2754-545X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-5992 |
ispartof | Diabetes care, 2023-06, Vol.46 (6), p.1300-1310 |
issn | 0149-5992 1935-5548 1935-5548 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10234755 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Cardiovascular Diseases Cardiovascular System Clinical trials Congestive heart failure Data analysis Decision making Diabetes Diabetes Mellitus Drugs Effectiveness GLP-1 receptor agonists Glucagon Glucagon-like peptide 1 Health risks Heart Disease Risk Factors Heart Failure Humans Hypoglycemic Agents Kidneys Meta-analysis Mortality Risk assessment Risk Factors Risk levels Sodium-glucose cotransporter Systematic review Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses |
title | Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits of Novel Diabetes Drugs by Baseline Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T07%3A59%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cardiovascular%20and%20Renal%20Benefits%20of%20Novel%20Diabetes%20Drugs%20by%20Baseline%20Cardiovascular%20Risk:%20A%20Systematic%20Review,%20Meta-analysis,%20and%20Meta-regression&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20care&rft.au=Rodriguez-Valadez,%20Jos%C3%A9%20M&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1300&rft.epage=1310&rft.pages=1300-1310&rft.issn=0149-5992&rft.eissn=1935-5548&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/dc22-0772&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2818749898%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819687575&rft_id=info:pmid/37220263&rfr_iscdi=true |