A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo

Preoperative diagnosis of urinary infection stones is difficult, and accurate detection of stone composition can only be performed ex vivo. To provide guidance for better perioperative management and postoperative prevention of infection stones, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urolithiasis 2023-05, Vol.51 (1), p.84-84, Article 84
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Yukun, Mo, Qishan, Xie, Yun, Zhang, Junlong, Jiang, Shuangjian, Guan, Jianfeng, Qu, Canhui, Wu, Rongpei, Mo, Chengqiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 84
container_title Urolithiasis
container_volume 51
creator Wu, Yukun
Mo, Qishan
Xie, Yun
Zhang, Junlong
Jiang, Shuangjian
Guan, Jianfeng
Qu, Canhui
Wu, Rongpei
Mo, Chengqiang
description Preoperative diagnosis of urinary infection stones is difficult, and accurate detection of stone composition can only be performed ex vivo. To provide guidance for better perioperative management and postoperative prevention of infection stones, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative identification of infection stones in vivo. The clinical data of patients with urolithiasis who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 and January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 2565 patients were included in the study, and 1168 eligible patients with urinary calculi were randomly divided into training set (70%) and test set (30%). Five machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and Adaptive Boost (AdaBoost)) and 14 preoperative variables were used to construct the prediction model. The performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set. The importance of 14 features in each prediction model for predicting infection stones was analyzed. A total of 89 patients (5.34%) with infection stones were included in the validation set. All the five prediction models showed strong discrimination in the validation set (AUC: 0.689–0.772). AdaBoost model was selected as the final model (AUC: 0.772(95% confidence interval, 0.657–0.887); Sensitivity: 0.522; Specificity: 0.902), UC positivity, and urine pH value were two important predictors of infection stones. We developed a predictive model through machine learning that can quickly identify infection stones in vivo with good predictive performance. It can be used for risk assessment and decision support of infection stones, optimize the disease management of urinary calculi and improve the prognosis of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00240-023-01457-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10232574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821133712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d5c292f4239dd182f09cf40ae5d142b8d0b0ff79f0c28f8f0e747feb5865217a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1P3TAQjKpWBQF_oIfKUi-9hK4_8pycKoRaqITUCz1bfvb6YZTYqZ1Egl-PHwFKe6gvtnZnxrM7VfWBwikFkF8yABNQA-M1UNHI-v5NdchoJ2rJ-Obtq_dBdZLzLZTTdZ2g8L464JI1G0Hbw2o-IwmnFPOIZvILkjzN9o7M2YcdGbS58QFJjzqFfWGKxOKCfRzJmND6lTJEi_2-5y2GybtCTz7odEd8cHvZGIpsDJhLgSx-icfVO6f7jCdP91H16_u36_PL-urnxY_zs6vaCNlMtW0M65gTjHfW0pY56IwToLGxVLBta2ELzsnOgWGtax2gFNLhtmk3DaNS86Pq66o7ztsBrSn2ku7VmPxQ7Kmovfq7E_yN2sVF0bJX1khRFD4_KaT4e8Y8qcFng32vA8Y5K9YyygWVLRTop3-gt3FOocz3iKKcS8oKiq0oU5aeE7oXNxTUPlm1JquKA_WYrLovpI-v53ihPOdYAHwF5NIKO0x__v6P7ANdbbH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821133712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Yukun ; Mo, Qishan ; Xie, Yun ; Zhang, Junlong ; Jiang, Shuangjian ; Guan, Jianfeng ; Qu, Canhui ; Wu, Rongpei ; Mo, Chengqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yukun ; Mo, Qishan ; Xie, Yun ; Zhang, Junlong ; Jiang, Shuangjian ; Guan, Jianfeng ; Qu, Canhui ; Wu, Rongpei ; Mo, Chengqiang</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative diagnosis of urinary infection stones is difficult, and accurate detection of stone composition can only be performed ex vivo. To provide guidance for better perioperative management and postoperative prevention of infection stones, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative identification of infection stones in vivo. The clinical data of patients with urolithiasis who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 and January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 2565 patients were included in the study, and 1168 eligible patients with urinary calculi were randomly divided into training set (70%) and test set (30%). Five machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and Adaptive Boost (AdaBoost)) and 14 preoperative variables were used to construct the prediction model. The performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set. The importance of 14 features in each prediction model for predicting infection stones was analyzed. A total of 89 patients (5.34%) with infection stones were included in the validation set. All the five prediction models showed strong discrimination in the validation set (AUC: 0.689–0.772). AdaBoost model was selected as the final model (AUC: 0.772(95% confidence interval, 0.657–0.887); Sensitivity: 0.522; Specificity: 0.902), UC positivity, and urine pH value were two important predictors of infection stones. We developed a predictive model through machine learning that can quickly identify infection stones in vivo with good predictive performance. It can be used for risk assessment and decision support of infection stones, optimize the disease management of urinary calculi and improve the prognosis of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7228</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01457-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37256418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Humans ; Machine Learning ; Medical Biochemistry ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nephrology ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Calculi - diagnosis ; Urinary tract infections ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Urolithiasis, 2023-05, Vol.51 (1), p.84-84, Article 84</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d5c292f4239dd182f09cf40ae5d142b8d0b0ff79f0c28f8f0e747feb5865217a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d5c292f4239dd182f09cf40ae5d142b8d0b0ff79f0c28f8f0e747feb5865217a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00240-023-01457-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00240-023-01457-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Qishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Junlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuangjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Jianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Canhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Rongpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Chengqiang</creatorcontrib><title>A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo</title><title>Urolithiasis</title><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><description>Preoperative diagnosis of urinary infection stones is difficult, and accurate detection of stone composition can only be performed ex vivo. To provide guidance for better perioperative management and postoperative prevention of infection stones, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative identification of infection stones in vivo. The clinical data of patients with urolithiasis who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 and January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 2565 patients were included in the study, and 1168 eligible patients with urinary calculi were randomly divided into training set (70%) and test set (30%). Five machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and Adaptive Boost (AdaBoost)) and 14 preoperative variables were used to construct the prediction model. The performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set. The importance of 14 features in each prediction model for predicting infection stones was analyzed. A total of 89 patients (5.34%) with infection stones were included in the validation set. All the five prediction models showed strong discrimination in the validation set (AUC: 0.689–0.772). AdaBoost model was selected as the final model (AUC: 0.772(95% confidence interval, 0.657–0.887); Sensitivity: 0.522; Specificity: 0.902), UC positivity, and urine pH value were two important predictors of infection stones. We developed a predictive model through machine learning that can quickly identify infection stones in vivo with good predictive performance. It can be used for risk assessment and decision support of infection stones, optimize the disease management of urinary calculi and improve the prognosis of patients.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Medical Biochemistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Urinary Calculi - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><issn>2194-7236</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1P3TAQjKpWBQF_oIfKUi-9hK4_8pycKoRaqITUCz1bfvb6YZTYqZ1Egl-PHwFKe6gvtnZnxrM7VfWBwikFkF8yABNQA-M1UNHI-v5NdchoJ2rJ-Obtq_dBdZLzLZTTdZ2g8L464JI1G0Hbw2o-IwmnFPOIZvILkjzN9o7M2YcdGbS58QFJjzqFfWGKxOKCfRzJmND6lTJEi_2-5y2GybtCTz7odEd8cHvZGIpsDJhLgSx-icfVO6f7jCdP91H16_u36_PL-urnxY_zs6vaCNlMtW0M65gTjHfW0pY56IwToLGxVLBta2ELzsnOgWGtax2gFNLhtmk3DaNS86Pq66o7ztsBrSn2ku7VmPxQ7Kmovfq7E_yN2sVF0bJX1khRFD4_KaT4e8Y8qcFng32vA8Y5K9YyygWVLRTop3-gt3FOocz3iKKcS8oKiq0oU5aeE7oXNxTUPlm1JquKA_WYrLovpI-v53ihPOdYAHwF5NIKO0x__v6P7ANdbbH0</recordid><startdate>20230531</startdate><enddate>20230531</enddate><creator>Wu, Yukun</creator><creator>Mo, Qishan</creator><creator>Xie, Yun</creator><creator>Zhang, Junlong</creator><creator>Jiang, Shuangjian</creator><creator>Guan, Jianfeng</creator><creator>Qu, Canhui</creator><creator>Wu, Rongpei</creator><creator>Mo, Chengqiang</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230531</creationdate><title>A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo</title><author>Wu, Yukun ; Mo, Qishan ; Xie, Yun ; Zhang, Junlong ; Jiang, Shuangjian ; Guan, Jianfeng ; Qu, Canhui ; Wu, Rongpei ; Mo, Chengqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-d5c292f4239dd182f09cf40ae5d142b8d0b0ff79f0c28f8f0e747feb5865217a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Medical Biochemistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Urinary Calculi - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Qishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Junlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuangjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Jianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Canhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Rongpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Chengqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Yukun</au><au>Mo, Qishan</au><au>Xie, Yun</au><au>Zhang, Junlong</au><au>Jiang, Shuangjian</au><au>Guan, Jianfeng</au><au>Qu, Canhui</au><au>Wu, Rongpei</au><au>Mo, Chengqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo</atitle><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle><stitle>Urolithiasis</stitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><date>2023-05-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>84-84</pages><artnum>84</artnum><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><eissn>2194-7236</eissn><abstract>Preoperative diagnosis of urinary infection stones is difficult, and accurate detection of stone composition can only be performed ex vivo. To provide guidance for better perioperative management and postoperative prevention of infection stones, we developed a machine learning model for preoperative identification of infection stones in vivo. The clinical data of patients with urolithiasis who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2015 and January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 2565 patients were included in the study, and 1168 eligible patients with urinary calculi were randomly divided into training set (70%) and test set (30%). Five machine learning algorithms (Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and Adaptive Boost (AdaBoost)) and 14 preoperative variables were used to construct the prediction model. The performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the validation set. The importance of 14 features in each prediction model for predicting infection stones was analyzed. A total of 89 patients (5.34%) with infection stones were included in the validation set. All the five prediction models showed strong discrimination in the validation set (AUC: 0.689–0.772). AdaBoost model was selected as the final model (AUC: 0.772(95% confidence interval, 0.657–0.887); Sensitivity: 0.522; Specificity: 0.902), UC positivity, and urine pH value were two important predictors of infection stones. We developed a predictive model through machine learning that can quickly identify infection stones in vivo with good predictive performance. It can be used for risk assessment and decision support of infection stones, optimize the disease management of urinary calculi and improve the prognosis of patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37256418</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00240-023-01457-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2194-7236
ispartof Urolithiasis, 2023-05, Vol.51 (1), p.84-84, Article 84
issn 2194-7236
2194-7228
2194-7236
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10232574
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
Humans
Machine Learning
Medical Biochemistry
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nephrology
Neural Networks, Computer
Retrospective Studies
Urinary Calculi - diagnosis
Urinary tract infections
Urology
title A retrospective study using machine learning to develop predictive model to identify urinary infection stones in vivo
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T20%3A23%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20retrospective%20study%20using%20machine%20learning%20to%20develop%20predictive%20model%20to%20identify%20urinary%20infection%20stones%20in%20vivo&rft.jtitle=Urolithiasis&rft.au=Wu,%20Yukun&rft.date=2023-05-31&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=84-84&rft.artnum=84&rft.issn=2194-7236&rft.eissn=2194-7236&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00240-023-01457-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2821133712%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821133712&rft_id=info:pmid/37256418&rfr_iscdi=true