Effects of Extended Cage Component Sanitation Interval on the Microenvironment, Health, and Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Rats (Rattus norvegicus)

Washing and sanitizing rodent cage components requires costly equipment, significant personnel effort, and use of natural resources. The benchmark frequency for sanitation of individually ventilated caging (IVC) has traditionally been every 2 wk. In this study, we investigated the effects of extendi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2023-05, Vol.62 (3), p.212-221
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Jazmyne Z, Fong, Derek L, Habenicht, Lauren M, Fink, Michael K, Leszczynski, Jori K, Frank, Daniel N, Kofonow, Jennifer M, Robertson, Charles E, Nicklawsky, Andrew G, Schurr, Michael J, Manuel, Christoper J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue 3
container_start_page 212
container_title Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
container_volume 62
creator Taylor, Jazmyne Z
Fong, Derek L
Habenicht, Lauren M
Fink, Michael K
Leszczynski, Jori K
Frank, Daniel N
Kofonow, Jennifer M
Robertson, Charles E
Nicklawsky, Andrew G
Schurr, Michael J
Manuel, Christoper J
description Washing and sanitizing rodent cage components requires costly equipment, significant personnel effort, and use of natural resources. The benchmark frequency for sanitation of individually ventilated caging (IVC) has traditionally been every 2 wk. In this study, we investigated the effects of extending this interval on the cage microenvironment, basic markers of health, and the gastrointestinal microbiota of rats. We compared our institutional standard of changing the sanitation interval for rat cage lids, box feeders, and enrichment devices from every 4 wk to an interval of 12 wk. The cage bottom and bedding continued to be changed every 2 wk for both groups. We hypothesized that we would find no significant difference between our current practice of 4 wks and continuous use for 12 wk. Our data showed that intracage ammonia levels remained below 5 ppm for most cages in both groups, with the exception of cages that experienced a cage flood. We found no significant difference between groups in bacterial colony forming units (CFU) on cage components. We used 3 novel methods of assessing cleanliness of enrichment devices and found no significant effect of continuous use for 12 wk on the number of CFU. In addition, we found no significant differences between groups for animal weight, routine blood work, or fecal and cecal microbiomes. These data indicate that a sanitation interval of up to 12 wk for components of rat IVC caging has no significant effects on the microenvironment or health of rats. Using the longer interval will improve efficiency, reduce the use of natural resources, and decrease costs while maintaining high-quality animal care.
doi_str_mv 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10230543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>aalas/jaalas/10.30802/aalas-jaalas-22-000113</ingid><sourcerecordid>2803330279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-9edae3924c253edc4f55987f46d0b8bd1e0a03e657fab9870b735592f69afb763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ksGO0zAQhiMEYsvCK4CPi7QBx27i5ISqUnYXFSGxcB45ybh1ldjFdrrAa_DCuE0pLBIX2_J8M__8HifJi4y-4rSk7PVstpzdpu_HjbGUUppl_EEyYaKo0qIQ4mEyyfI8njNanSVPvN9Qmoucs8fJGRdUsKzMJsnPhVLYBE-sIotvAU2LLZnLFZK57bfWoAnkVhodZNDWkBsT0O1kR-I5rJF80I2zaHbaWdNH9pJco-zC-pJI05Ir6YOzOub4oE3MOuC1tj3u9T7JqHsR1zB4Yqzb4Uo3g3_5NHmkZOfx2XE_T768W3yeX6fLj1c389kybfKyCGmFrUResWnDco5tM1XRbinUtGhpXdZthlRSjkUulKxjgNaCR4KpopKqFgU_T96MdbdD3ccCsX8nO9g63Uv3HazUcD9i9BpWdgcZZZzmUx4rXBwrOPt1iC6h177BrpMG7eCBlZRzTpmoIipGNL6A9w7VSSejcJgpHIYJ40yBMRhnGjOf_93mKe_3ECPgRkCbVexUwsYOLj63B92AlJ30sP8J-48ABu-2Dnca7zxsxhhjoxCwva1pVgEtaA4tKjl0AYJ0sPrxLxxF3_5HdASP_Mncvds_5n4BuY7f_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2803330279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Extended Cage Component Sanitation Interval on the Microenvironment, Health, and Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Rats (Rattus norvegicus)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Taylor, Jazmyne Z ; Fong, Derek L ; Habenicht, Lauren M ; Fink, Michael K ; Leszczynski, Jori K ; Frank, Daniel N ; Kofonow, Jennifer M ; Robertson, Charles E ; Nicklawsky, Andrew G ; Schurr, Michael J ; Manuel, Christoper J</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jazmyne Z ; Fong, Derek L ; Habenicht, Lauren M ; Fink, Michael K ; Leszczynski, Jori K ; Frank, Daniel N ; Kofonow, Jennifer M ; Robertson, Charles E ; Nicklawsky, Andrew G ; Schurr, Michael J ; Manuel, Christoper J</creatorcontrib><description>Washing and sanitizing rodent cage components requires costly equipment, significant personnel effort, and use of natural resources. The benchmark frequency for sanitation of individually ventilated caging (IVC) has traditionally been every 2 wk. In this study, we investigated the effects of extending this interval on the cage microenvironment, basic markers of health, and the gastrointestinal microbiota of rats. We compared our institutional standard of changing the sanitation interval for rat cage lids, box feeders, and enrichment devices from every 4 wk to an interval of 12 wk. The cage bottom and bedding continued to be changed every 2 wk for both groups. We hypothesized that we would find no significant difference between our current practice of 4 wks and continuous use for 12 wk. Our data showed that intracage ammonia levels remained below 5 ppm for most cages in both groups, with the exception of cages that experienced a cage flood. We found no significant difference between groups in bacterial colony forming units (CFU) on cage components. We used 3 novel methods of assessing cleanliness of enrichment devices and found no significant effect of continuous use for 12 wk on the number of CFU. In addition, we found no significant differences between groups for animal weight, routine blood work, or fecal and cecal microbiomes. These data indicate that a sanitation interval of up to 12 wk for components of rat IVC caging has no significant effects on the microenvironment or health of rats. Using the longer interval will improve efficiency, reduce the use of natural resources, and decrease costs while maintaining high-quality animal care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-6109</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2769-6677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37072181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for Laboratory Animal Science</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Housing, Animal ; Original Research ; Rats ; Sanitation</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 2023-05, Vol.62 (3), p.212-221</ispartof><rights>American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-9edae3924c253edc4f55987f46d0b8bd1e0a03e657fab9870b735592f69afb763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-9edae3924c253edc4f55987f46d0b8bd1e0a03e657fab9870b735592f69afb763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230543/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230543/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,288,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37072181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jazmyne Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Derek L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habenicht, Lauren M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leszczynski, Jori K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Daniel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kofonow, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Charles E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicklawsky, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurr, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel, Christoper J</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Extended Cage Component Sanitation Interval on the Microenvironment, Health, and Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Rats (Rattus norvegicus)</title><title>Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science</title><addtitle>J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Washing and sanitizing rodent cage components requires costly equipment, significant personnel effort, and use of natural resources. The benchmark frequency for sanitation of individually ventilated caging (IVC) has traditionally been every 2 wk. In this study, we investigated the effects of extending this interval on the cage microenvironment, basic markers of health, and the gastrointestinal microbiota of rats. We compared our institutional standard of changing the sanitation interval for rat cage lids, box feeders, and enrichment devices from every 4 wk to an interval of 12 wk. The cage bottom and bedding continued to be changed every 2 wk for both groups. We hypothesized that we would find no significant difference between our current practice of 4 wks and continuous use for 12 wk. Our data showed that intracage ammonia levels remained below 5 ppm for most cages in both groups, with the exception of cages that experienced a cage flood. We found no significant difference between groups in bacterial colony forming units (CFU) on cage components. We used 3 novel methods of assessing cleanliness of enrichment devices and found no significant effect of continuous use for 12 wk on the number of CFU. In addition, we found no significant differences between groups for animal weight, routine blood work, or fecal and cecal microbiomes. These data indicate that a sanitation interval of up to 12 wk for components of rat IVC caging has no significant effects on the microenvironment or health of rats. Using the longer interval will improve efficiency, reduce the use of natural resources, and decrease costs while maintaining high-quality animal care.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><issn>1559-6109</issn><issn>2769-6677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ksGO0zAQhiMEYsvCK4CPi7QBx27i5ISqUnYXFSGxcB45ybh1ldjFdrrAa_DCuE0pLBIX2_J8M__8HifJi4y-4rSk7PVstpzdpu_HjbGUUppl_EEyYaKo0qIQ4mEyyfI8njNanSVPvN9Qmoucs8fJGRdUsKzMJsnPhVLYBE-sIotvAU2LLZnLFZK57bfWoAnkVhodZNDWkBsT0O1kR-I5rJF80I2zaHbaWdNH9pJco-zC-pJI05Ir6YOzOub4oE3MOuC1tj3u9T7JqHsR1zB4Yqzb4Uo3g3_5NHmkZOfx2XE_T768W3yeX6fLj1c389kybfKyCGmFrUResWnDco5tM1XRbinUtGhpXdZthlRSjkUulKxjgNaCR4KpopKqFgU_T96MdbdD3ccCsX8nO9g63Uv3HazUcD9i9BpWdgcZZZzmUx4rXBwrOPt1iC6h177BrpMG7eCBlZRzTpmoIipGNL6A9w7VSSejcJgpHIYJ40yBMRhnGjOf_93mKe_3ECPgRkCbVexUwsYOLj63B92AlJ30sP8J-48ABu-2Dnca7zxsxhhjoxCwva1pVgEtaA4tKjl0AYJ0sPrxLxxF3_5HdASP_Mncvds_5n4BuY7f_g</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Taylor, Jazmyne Z</creator><creator>Fong, Derek L</creator><creator>Habenicht, Lauren M</creator><creator>Fink, Michael K</creator><creator>Leszczynski, Jori K</creator><creator>Frank, Daniel N</creator><creator>Kofonow, Jennifer M</creator><creator>Robertson, Charles E</creator><creator>Nicklawsky, Andrew G</creator><creator>Schurr, Michael J</creator><creator>Manuel, Christoper J</creator><general>American Association for Laboratory Animal Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Effects of Extended Cage Component Sanitation Interval on the Microenvironment, Health, and Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Rats (Rattus norvegicus)</title><author>Taylor, Jazmyne Z ; Fong, Derek L ; Habenicht, Lauren M ; Fink, Michael K ; Leszczynski, Jori K ; Frank, Daniel N ; Kofonow, Jennifer M ; Robertson, Charles E ; Nicklawsky, Andrew G ; Schurr, Michael J ; Manuel, Christoper J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c586t-9edae3924c253edc4f55987f46d0b8bd1e0a03e657fab9870b735592f69afb763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jazmyne Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Derek L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habenicht, Lauren M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Michael K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leszczynski, Jori K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Daniel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kofonow, Jennifer M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Charles E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicklawsky, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurr, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuel, Christoper J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Jazmyne Z</au><au>Fong, Derek L</au><au>Habenicht, Lauren M</au><au>Fink, Michael K</au><au>Leszczynski, Jori K</au><au>Frank, Daniel N</au><au>Kofonow, Jennifer M</au><au>Robertson, Charles E</au><au>Nicklawsky, Andrew G</au><au>Schurr, Michael J</au><au>Manuel, Christoper J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Extended Cage Component Sanitation Interval on the Microenvironment, Health, and Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Rats (Rattus norvegicus)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>212-221</pages><issn>1559-6109</issn><eissn>2769-6677</eissn><abstract>Washing and sanitizing rodent cage components requires costly equipment, significant personnel effort, and use of natural resources. The benchmark frequency for sanitation of individually ventilated caging (IVC) has traditionally been every 2 wk. In this study, we investigated the effects of extending this interval on the cage microenvironment, basic markers of health, and the gastrointestinal microbiota of rats. We compared our institutional standard of changing the sanitation interval for rat cage lids, box feeders, and enrichment devices from every 4 wk to an interval of 12 wk. The cage bottom and bedding continued to be changed every 2 wk for both groups. We hypothesized that we would find no significant difference between our current practice of 4 wks and continuous use for 12 wk. Our data showed that intracage ammonia levels remained below 5 ppm for most cages in both groups, with the exception of cages that experienced a cage flood. We found no significant difference between groups in bacterial colony forming units (CFU) on cage components. We used 3 novel methods of assessing cleanliness of enrichment devices and found no significant effect of continuous use for 12 wk on the number of CFU. In addition, we found no significant differences between groups for animal weight, routine blood work, or fecal and cecal microbiomes. These data indicate that a sanitation interval of up to 12 wk for components of rat IVC caging has no significant effects on the microenvironment or health of rats. Using the longer interval will improve efficiency, reduce the use of natural resources, and decrease costs while maintaining high-quality animal care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for Laboratory Animal Science</pub><pmid>37072181</pmid><doi>10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000113</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-6109
ispartof Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 2023-05, Vol.62 (3), p.212-221
issn 1559-6109
2769-6677
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10230543
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Ammonia
Animal Husbandry - methods
Animals
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Housing, Animal
Original Research
Rats
Sanitation
title Effects of Extended Cage Component Sanitation Interval on the Microenvironment, Health, and Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Rats (Rattus norvegicus)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Extended%20Cage%20Component%20Sanitation%20Interval%20on%20the%20Microenvironment,%20Health,%20and%20Gastrointestinal%20Microbiome%20of%20Rats%20(Rattus%20norvegicus)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Association%20for%20Laboratory%20Animal%20Science&rft.au=Taylor,%20Jazmyne%20Z&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=212-221&rft.issn=1559-6109&rft.eissn=2769-6677&rft_id=info:doi/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2803330279%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2803330279&rft_id=info:pmid/37072181&rft_ingid=aalas/jaalas/10.30802/aalas-jaalas-22-000113&rfr_iscdi=true