Autonomy in the context of cognitive demands—is the resource becoming a stressor?
Objective Autonomy is often associated with positive linear effects on health whereas non-linear correlations have received only sporadic attention. Assuming that the use of autonomy also represents a cognitive demand, this study examines whether health effects of autonomy change depending on furthe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International archives of occupational and environmental health 2023-07, Vol.96 (5), p.685-714 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 714 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 685 |
container_title | International archives of occupational and environmental health |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Zolg, Sabrina Herbig, Britta |
description | Objective
Autonomy is often associated with positive linear effects on health whereas non-linear correlations have received only sporadic attention. Assuming that the use of autonomy also represents a cognitive demand, this study examines whether health effects of autonomy change depending on further cognitive demands and whether curvilinear relationships can be identified.
Methods
A survey was carried out in three SMEs with established work analysis questionnaires. 197 Employees were classified into groups with high and with low cognitive demands by means of a two-step cluster analysis. This was modeled as moderator together with curvilinear effects of autonomy in regression analyses.
Results
Curvilinear associations were found for emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and anxiety. They were strongest for anxiety. No moderating effects of cognitive demands and no consistently significant modeled relations were found.
Conclusion
The results confirm that autonomy has a positive influence on the health of employees. However, autonomy should not be seen as an isolated resource but embedded in the organizational and societal context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00420-023-01966-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10219893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2819537964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-c3680010e05dda5b18cd74fb8b92eb8fa80e8decb4fc146ea5481c7904a31fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9OHSEUxolpU6_aF-iimaSbbsZygMvAyhjTqomJC90ThjlzxdwBC4zRXR-iT9gnKfVa_3TRFYTvd75zDh8hH4DuA6Xdl0ypYLSljLcUtJSt3iILEJy1wIR8QxaUiyoDh22yk_M1pdDJjr8j21xqplmnFuTicC4xxOm-8aEpV9i4GArelSaO9boKvvhbbAacbBjyrx8_fX6gEuY4J4dNjy5OPqwa2-RSX3NMB3vk7WjXGd8_nrvk8tvXy6OT9uz8-PTo8Kx1gsnSOi5VHYkiXQ6DXfag3NCJsVe9Ztir0SqKakDXi9GBkGiXQoHrNBWWw2j5LjnY2N7M_YSDw1CSXZub5Ceb7k203rxWgr8yq3hrgDLQSvPq8PnRIcXvM-ZiJp8drtc2YJyzYYrVASUAq-inf9Dr-gGhrlcp0EveaSkqxTaUSzHnhOPTNEDNn8zMJjNTMzMPmRldiz6-3OOp5G9IFeAbIFcprDA99_6P7W8pgaRZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819537964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autonomy in the context of cognitive demands—is the resource becoming a stressor?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Zolg, Sabrina ; Herbig, Britta</creator><creatorcontrib>Zolg, Sabrina ; Herbig, Britta</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Autonomy is often associated with positive linear effects on health whereas non-linear correlations have received only sporadic attention. Assuming that the use of autonomy also represents a cognitive demand, this study examines whether health effects of autonomy change depending on further cognitive demands and whether curvilinear relationships can be identified.
Methods
A survey was carried out in three SMEs with established work analysis questionnaires. 197 Employees were classified into groups with high and with low cognitive demands by means of a two-step cluster analysis. This was modeled as moderator together with curvilinear effects of autonomy in regression analyses.
Results
Curvilinear associations were found for emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and anxiety. They were strongest for anxiety. No moderating effects of cognitive demands and no consistently significant modeled relations were found.
Conclusion
The results confirm that autonomy has a positive influence on the health of employees. However, autonomy should not be seen as an isolated resource but embedded in the organizational and societal context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-0131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00420-023-01966-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36929278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Archives & records ; Autonomy ; Cluster analysis ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Context ; Decision making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Employees ; Environment ; Environmental Health ; Humans ; Job satisfaction ; Occupational health ; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine ; Organizational aspects ; Original ; Original Article ; Regression Analysis ; Rehabilitation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Work measurement ; Working conditions ; Workload - psychology</subject><ispartof>International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2023-07, Vol.96 (5), p.685-714</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-c3680010e05dda5b18cd74fb8b92eb8fa80e8decb4fc146ea5481c7904a31fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00420-023-01966-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00420-023-01966-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36929278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zolg, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbig, Britta</creatorcontrib><title>Autonomy in the context of cognitive demands—is the resource becoming a stressor?</title><title>International archives of occupational and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><description>Objective
Autonomy is often associated with positive linear effects on health whereas non-linear correlations have received only sporadic attention. Assuming that the use of autonomy also represents a cognitive demand, this study examines whether health effects of autonomy change depending on further cognitive demands and whether curvilinear relationships can be identified.
Methods
A survey was carried out in three SMEs with established work analysis questionnaires. 197 Employees were classified into groups with high and with low cognitive demands by means of a two-step cluster analysis. This was modeled as moderator together with curvilinear effects of autonomy in regression analyses.
Results
Curvilinear associations were found for emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and anxiety. They were strongest for anxiety. No moderating effects of cognitive demands and no consistently significant modeled relations were found.
Conclusion
The results confirm that autonomy has a positive influence on the health of employees. However, autonomy should not be seen as an isolated resource but embedded in the organizational and societal context.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Work measurement</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Workload - psychology</subject><issn>0340-0131</issn><issn>1432-1246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9OHSEUxolpU6_aF-iimaSbbsZygMvAyhjTqomJC90ThjlzxdwBC4zRXR-iT9gnKfVa_3TRFYTvd75zDh8hH4DuA6Xdl0ypYLSljLcUtJSt3iILEJy1wIR8QxaUiyoDh22yk_M1pdDJjr8j21xqplmnFuTicC4xxOm-8aEpV9i4GArelSaO9boKvvhbbAacbBjyrx8_fX6gEuY4J4dNjy5OPqwa2-RSX3NMB3vk7WjXGd8_nrvk8tvXy6OT9uz8-PTo8Kx1gsnSOi5VHYkiXQ6DXfag3NCJsVe9Ztir0SqKakDXi9GBkGiXQoHrNBWWw2j5LjnY2N7M_YSDw1CSXZub5Ceb7k203rxWgr8yq3hrgDLQSvPq8PnRIcXvM-ZiJp8drtc2YJyzYYrVASUAq-inf9Dr-gGhrlcp0EveaSkqxTaUSzHnhOPTNEDNn8zMJjNTMzMPmRldiz6-3OOp5G9IFeAbIFcprDA99_6P7W8pgaRZ</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Zolg, Sabrina</creator><creator>Herbig, Britta</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Autonomy in the context of cognitive demands—is the resource becoming a stressor?</title><author>Zolg, Sabrina ; Herbig, Britta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-c3680010e05dda5b18cd74fb8b92eb8fa80e8decb4fc146ea5481c7904a31fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Work measurement</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Workload - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zolg, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbig, Britta</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zolg, Sabrina</au><au>Herbig, Britta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autonomy in the context of cognitive demands—is the resource becoming a stressor?</atitle><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle><stitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</stitle><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>685-714</pages><issn>0340-0131</issn><eissn>1432-1246</eissn><abstract>Objective
Autonomy is often associated with positive linear effects on health whereas non-linear correlations have received only sporadic attention. Assuming that the use of autonomy also represents a cognitive demand, this study examines whether health effects of autonomy change depending on further cognitive demands and whether curvilinear relationships can be identified.
Methods
A survey was carried out in three SMEs with established work analysis questionnaires. 197 Employees were classified into groups with high and with low cognitive demands by means of a two-step cluster analysis. This was modeled as moderator together with curvilinear effects of autonomy in regression analyses.
Results
Curvilinear associations were found for emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and anxiety. They were strongest for anxiety. No moderating effects of cognitive demands and no consistently significant modeled relations were found.
Conclusion
The results confirm that autonomy has a positive influence on the health of employees. However, autonomy should not be seen as an isolated resource but embedded in the organizational and societal context.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36929278</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00420-023-01966-9</doi><tpages>30</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-0131 |
ispartof | International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2023-07, Vol.96 (5), p.685-714 |
issn | 0340-0131 1432-1246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10219893 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Anxiety Archives & records Autonomy Cluster analysis Cognition Cognitive ability Context Decision making Earth and Environmental Science Employees Environment Environmental Health Humans Job satisfaction Occupational health Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine Organizational aspects Original Original Article Regression Analysis Rehabilitation Surveys and Questionnaires Work measurement Working conditions Workload - psychology |
title | Autonomy in the context of cognitive demands—is the resource becoming a stressor? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T10%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autonomy%20in%20the%20context%20of%20cognitive%20demands%E2%80%94is%20the%20resource%20becoming%20a%20stressor?&rft.jtitle=International%20archives%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=Zolg,%20Sabrina&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=685-714&rft.issn=0340-0131&rft.eissn=1432-1246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00420-023-01966-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2819537964%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819537964&rft_id=info:pmid/36929278&rfr_iscdi=true |