Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis
Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in B...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online) 2023-06, Vol.22, p.100506-100506, Article 100506 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100506 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100506 |
container_title | Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M. Marciniuk, Fernanda L. Wagner, Anita K. Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S. Vogler, Sabine Mossialos, Elias Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. Naci, Huseyin |
description | Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries.
All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared.
Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit.
High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US.
None. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10206192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2667193X23000807</els_id><sourcerecordid>2820023375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS0EolXpH-CAfOSyYWzH3g1CQqVQQCriAhI3a2KPU4fNerF3I5Vfj6OUqlw42fK8eeN5H2PPBSwECPNqu-hxwIUEqeoDaDCP2Kk0pm3ESv14_OB-ws5L2QKA7FqlYPWUnahWKg1de8r8F8w_aYrDhuM83aQcC04xDRwHz8cc3aGSAr96f9HgOOa0J88dDo4y93neFB4H_i7j79i_5sgzTTmVkdwU91Q9sL8tsTxjTwL2hc7vzjP2_erDt8tPzfXXj58vL64bt9RmaoLpjIGlCEELj7Ba6yUSegAnhOqMEhqcWwqSGgJIQt0GAFpL8EiSAqgz9vboO87rHXlHw5Sxt3WNHeZbmzDafytDvLGbtLcCJBixktXh5Z1DTr9mKpPdxeKor1lTmouVnaw5KtXqKpVHqasbl0zhfo4Ae0Bkt_aAyB4Q2SOi2vTi4Q_vW_4CqYI3RwHVnPaRsi0uUo3bx1xTtT7F__n_Adtwo_Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2820023375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M. ; Marciniuk, Fernanda L. ; Wagner, Anita K. ; Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S. ; Vogler, Sabine ; Mossialos, Elias ; Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. ; Naci, Huseyin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M. ; Marciniuk, Fernanda L. ; Wagner, Anita K. ; Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S. ; Vogler, Sabine ; Mossialos, Elias ; Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. ; Naci, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><description>Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries.
All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared.
Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit.
High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US.
None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2667-193X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2667-193X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37235087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Brazil ; Cancer ; Drug legislation ; Health technology assessment ; Pharmaceutical preparations ; United States</subject><ispartof>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online), 2023-06, Vol.22, p.100506-100506, Article 100506</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>2023 The Authors.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0255-5910 ; 0000-0001-8664-9297 ; 0000-0003-0999-3822 ; 0000-0002-7192-5751 ; 0000-0003-3232-0917 ; 0000-0003-4853-4397 ; 0000-0002-1069-6668 ; 0000-0003-4875-7216</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206192/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206192/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Anita K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogler, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossialos, Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naci, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><title>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</title><title>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online)</title><addtitle>Lancet Reg Health Am</addtitle><description>Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries.
All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared.
Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit.
High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US.
None.</description><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Drug legislation</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical preparations</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2667-193X</issn><issn>2667-193X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS0EolXpH-CAfOSyYWzH3g1CQqVQQCriAhI3a2KPU4fNerF3I5Vfj6OUqlw42fK8eeN5H2PPBSwECPNqu-hxwIUEqeoDaDCP2Kk0pm3ESv14_OB-ws5L2QKA7FqlYPWUnahWKg1de8r8F8w_aYrDhuM83aQcC04xDRwHz8cc3aGSAr96f9HgOOa0J88dDo4y93neFB4H_i7j79i_5sgzTTmVkdwU91Q9sL8tsTxjTwL2hc7vzjP2_erDt8tPzfXXj58vL64bt9RmaoLpjIGlCEELj7Ba6yUSegAnhOqMEhqcWwqSGgJIQt0GAFpL8EiSAqgz9vboO87rHXlHw5Sxt3WNHeZbmzDafytDvLGbtLcCJBixktXh5Z1DTr9mKpPdxeKor1lTmouVnaw5KtXqKpVHqasbl0zhfo4Ae0Bkt_aAyB4Q2SOi2vTi4Q_vW_4CqYI3RwHVnPaRsi0uUo3bx1xTtT7F__n_Adtwo_Y</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</creator><creator>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</creator><creator>Wagner, Anita K.</creator><creator>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</creator><creator>Vogler, Sabine</creator><creator>Mossialos, Elias</creator><creator>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</creator><creator>Naci, Huseyin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0255-5910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-9297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-3822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-5751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-0917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-4397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-6668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-7216</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</title><author>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M. ; Marciniuk, Fernanda L. ; Wagner, Anita K. ; Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S. ; Vogler, Sabine ; Mossialos, Elias ; Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. ; Naci, Huseyin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Drug legislation</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical preparations</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Anita K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogler, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossialos, Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naci, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</au><au>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</au><au>Wagner, Anita K.</au><au>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</au><au>Vogler, Sabine</au><au>Mossialos, Elias</au><au>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</au><au>Naci, Huseyin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</atitle><jtitle>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Reg Health Am</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><spage>100506</spage><epage>100506</epage><pages>100506-100506</pages><artnum>100506</artnum><issn>2667-193X</issn><eissn>2667-193X</eissn><abstract>Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries.
All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared.
Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit.
High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US.
None.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37235087</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0255-5910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-9297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-3822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-5751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-0917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-4397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-6668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-7216</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2667-193X |
ispartof | Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online), 2023-06, Vol.22, p.100506-100506, Article 100506 |
issn | 2667-193X 2667-193X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10206192 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Brazil Cancer Drug legislation Health technology assessment Pharmaceutical preparations United States |
title | Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A32%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marketing%20authorisation%20and%20pricing%20of%20FDA-approved%20cancer%20drugs%20in%20Brazil:%20a%20retrospective%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Lancet%20Regional%20Health%20-%20Americas%20(Online)&rft.au=Ivama-Brummell,%20Adriana%20M.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=100506&rft.epage=100506&rft.pages=100506-100506&rft.artnum=100506&rft.issn=2667-193X&rft.eissn=2667-193X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2820023375%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2820023375&rft_id=info:pmid/37235087&rft_els_id=S2667193X23000807&rfr_iscdi=true |