Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis

Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in B...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online) 2023-06, Vol.22, p.100506-100506, Article 100506
Hauptverfasser: Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M., Marciniuk, Fernanda L., Wagner, Anita K., Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S., Vogler, Sabine, Mossialos, Elias, Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L., Naci, Huseyin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100506
container_issue
container_start_page 100506
container_title Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online)
container_volume 22
creator Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.
Marciniuk, Fernanda L.
Wagner, Anita K.
Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.
Vogler, Sabine
Mossialos, Elias
Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.
Naci, Huseyin
description Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries. All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared. Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit. High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US. None.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10206192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2667193X23000807</els_id><sourcerecordid>2820023375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS0EolXpH-CAfOSyYWzH3g1CQqVQQCriAhI3a2KPU4fNerF3I5Vfj6OUqlw42fK8eeN5H2PPBSwECPNqu-hxwIUEqeoDaDCP2Kk0pm3ESv14_OB-ws5L2QKA7FqlYPWUnahWKg1de8r8F8w_aYrDhuM83aQcC04xDRwHz8cc3aGSAr96f9HgOOa0J88dDo4y93neFB4H_i7j79i_5sgzTTmVkdwU91Q9sL8tsTxjTwL2hc7vzjP2_erDt8tPzfXXj58vL64bt9RmaoLpjIGlCEELj7Ba6yUSegAnhOqMEhqcWwqSGgJIQt0GAFpL8EiSAqgz9vboO87rHXlHw5Sxt3WNHeZbmzDafytDvLGbtLcCJBixktXh5Z1DTr9mKpPdxeKor1lTmouVnaw5KtXqKpVHqasbl0zhfo4Ae0Bkt_aAyB4Q2SOi2vTi4Q_vW_4CqYI3RwHVnPaRsi0uUo3bx1xTtT7F__n_Adtwo_Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2820023375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M. ; Marciniuk, Fernanda L. ; Wagner, Anita K. ; Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S. ; Vogler, Sabine ; Mossialos, Elias ; Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. ; Naci, Huseyin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M. ; Marciniuk, Fernanda L. ; Wagner, Anita K. ; Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S. ; Vogler, Sabine ; Mossialos, Elias ; Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. ; Naci, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><description>Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries. All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared. Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit. High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US. None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2667-193X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2667-193X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37235087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Brazil ; Cancer ; Drug legislation ; Health technology assessment ; Pharmaceutical preparations ; United States</subject><ispartof>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online), 2023-06, Vol.22, p.100506-100506, Article 100506</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>2023 The Authors.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0255-5910 ; 0000-0001-8664-9297 ; 0000-0003-0999-3822 ; 0000-0002-7192-5751 ; 0000-0003-3232-0917 ; 0000-0003-4853-4397 ; 0000-0002-1069-6668 ; 0000-0003-4875-7216</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206192/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10206192/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Anita K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogler, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossialos, Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naci, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><title>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</title><title>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online)</title><addtitle>Lancet Reg Health Am</addtitle><description>Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries. All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared. Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit. High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US. None.</description><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Drug legislation</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical preparations</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2667-193X</issn><issn>2667-193X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhS0EolXpH-CAfOSyYWzH3g1CQqVQQCriAhI3a2KPU4fNerF3I5Vfj6OUqlw42fK8eeN5H2PPBSwECPNqu-hxwIUEqeoDaDCP2Kk0pm3ESv14_OB-ws5L2QKA7FqlYPWUnahWKg1de8r8F8w_aYrDhuM83aQcC04xDRwHz8cc3aGSAr96f9HgOOa0J88dDo4y93neFB4H_i7j79i_5sgzTTmVkdwU91Q9sL8tsTxjTwL2hc7vzjP2_erDt8tPzfXXj58vL64bt9RmaoLpjIGlCEELj7Ba6yUSegAnhOqMEhqcWwqSGgJIQt0GAFpL8EiSAqgz9vboO87rHXlHw5Sxt3WNHeZbmzDafytDvLGbtLcCJBixktXh5Z1DTr9mKpPdxeKor1lTmouVnaw5KtXqKpVHqasbl0zhfo4Ae0Bkt_aAyB4Q2SOi2vTi4Q_vW_4CqYI3RwHVnPaRsi0uUo3bx1xTtT7F__n_Adtwo_Y</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</creator><creator>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</creator><creator>Wagner, Anita K.</creator><creator>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</creator><creator>Vogler, Sabine</creator><creator>Mossialos, Elias</creator><creator>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</creator><creator>Naci, Huseyin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0255-5910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-9297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-3822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-5751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-0917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-4397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-6668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-7216</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</title><author>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M. ; Marciniuk, Fernanda L. ; Wagner, Anita K. ; Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S. ; Vogler, Sabine ; Mossialos, Elias ; Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L. ; Naci, Huseyin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f6866041ff51da09b54aead00c113863150cc41e250f02ea57f00eb20dae2ef03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Drug legislation</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical preparations</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Anita K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogler, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossialos, Elias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naci, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ivama-Brummell, Adriana M.</au><au>Marciniuk, Fernanda L.</au><au>Wagner, Anita K.</au><au>Osorio-de-Castro, Claudia G.S.</au><au>Vogler, Sabine</au><au>Mossialos, Elias</au><au>Tavares-de-Andrade, Carla L.</au><au>Naci, Huseyin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis</atitle><jtitle>Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Reg Health Am</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><spage>100506</spage><epage>100506</epage><pages>100506-100506</pages><artnum>100506</artnum><issn>2667-193X</issn><eissn>2667-193X</eissn><abstract>Most cancer drugs enter the US market first. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of new cancer drugs may influence regulatory decisions in other settings. The study examined whether characteristics of available evidence at FDA approval influenced time-to-marketing authorisation (MA) in Brazil, and price differences between the two countries. All new FDA-approved cancer drugs from 2010 to 2019 were matched to drugs with MA and prices approved in Brazil by December 2020. Characteristics of main studies, availability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), overall survival (OS) benefit, added therapeutic benefit, and prices were compared. Fifty-six FDA-approved cancer drugs with matching indications received a MA at the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) after a median of 522 days following US approval (IQR: 351–932). Earlier authorisation in Brazil was associated with availability of RCT (median: 506 vs 760 days, p = 0.031) and evidence of OS benefit (390 vs 543 days, p = 0.019) at FDA approval. At Brazilian marketing authorisation, a greater proportion of cancer drugs had main RCTs (75% vs 60.7%) and OS benefit (42.9% vs 21.4%) than that in the US. Twenty-eight (50%) drugs did not demonstrate added therapeutic benefit over drugs for the same indication in Brazil. Median approved prices of new cancer drugs were 12.9% lower in Brazil compared to the US (adjusted by Purchasing Power Parity). However, for drugs with added therapeutic benefit median prices were 5.9% higher in Brazil compared to the US, while 17.9% lower for those without added benefit. High-quality clinical evidence accelerated the availability of cancer medicines in Brazil. The combination of marketing and pricing authorisation in Brazil may favour the approval of cancer drugs with better supporting evidence, and more meaningful clinical benefit albeit with variable degree of success in achieving lower prices compared to the US. None.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37235087</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0255-5910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-9297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-3822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-5751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-0917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-4397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-6668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-7216</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2667-193X
ispartof Lancet Regional Health - Americas (Online), 2023-06, Vol.22, p.100506-100506, Article 100506
issn 2667-193X
2667-193X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10206192
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Brazil
Cancer
Drug legislation
Health technology assessment
Pharmaceutical preparations
United States
title Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A32%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marketing%20authorisation%20and%20pricing%20of%20FDA-approved%20cancer%20drugs%20in%20Brazil:%20a%20retrospective%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Lancet%20Regional%20Health%20-%20Americas%20(Online)&rft.au=Ivama-Brummell,%20Adriana%20M.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=100506&rft.epage=100506&rft.pages=100506-100506&rft.artnum=100506&rft.issn=2667-193X&rft.eissn=2667-193X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2820023375%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2820023375&rft_id=info:pmid/37235087&rft_els_id=S2667193X23000807&rfr_iscdi=true