Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss
The purpose of this investigation was to determine if average concentric velocity (ACV) of a single repetition at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), ACV of the first repetition of a set to failure at 70% of 1RM, or the velocity loss during the set could predict the number of repetitions performed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human kinetics 2023-01, Vol.87, p.167-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | Journal of human kinetics |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Haischer, Michael H Carzoli, Joseph P Cooke, Daniel M Pelland, Joshua C Remmert, Jacob F Zourdos, Michael C |
description | The purpose of this investigation was to determine if average concentric velocity (ACV) of a single repetition at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), ACV of the first repetition of a set to failure at 70% of 1RM, or the velocity loss during the set could predict the number of repetitions performed in the back squat. Fifty-six resistance-trained individuals participated in the study (male = 41, age = 23 ± 3 yrs, 1RM = 162.0 ± 40.0 kg; female = 15, age = 21 ± 2 yrs, 1RM = 81.5 ± 12.5 kg). After 1RM testing, participants performed single repetition sets with 70% of 1RM and a set to failure with 70% of 1RM. ACV was recorded on all repetitions. Regression model comparisons were performed, and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) were calculated to determine the best model. Neither single repetition ACV at 70% of 1RM (R
= 0.004, p = 0.637) nor velocity loss (R
= 0.011, p = 0.445) were predictive of total repetitions performed in the set to failure. The simple quadratic model using the first repetition of the set to failure (
) was identified as the best and most parsimonious model (R
= 0.259, F = 9.247, p < 0.001) due to the lowest AIC value (311.086). A SEE of 2.21 repetitions was identified with this model. This average error of ~2 repetitions warrants only cautious utilization of this method to predict total repetitions an individual can perform in a set, with additional autoregulatory or individualization strategies being necessary to finalize the training prescription. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5114/jhk/162021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10203840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2820021059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-4a89010c40901dade56edfa81126e63ab9239d61d058934abb045f3cec8927a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUVtLwzAYDaI4mXvxB0gfRajLtW2eRIc3GChz-hrSNN2ytc3WpML-vZHNOb-X73Y43-UAcIHgDUOIDhfz5RAlGGJ0BM5QxnmcsgQfhzihMGaM0h4YOLeAwRKcUkJOQY-kGHOK0BmYvLW6MMqbZhZNrZdVdC_VMnpfd9JHE73S3nhjGxeVra0PCtGnrqwyfhPJpvhLxta5c3BSysrpwc73wcfjw3T0HI9fn15Gd-NYkZT7mMqMQwQVhcEVstAs0UUpM4RwohMic44JLxJUQJZxQmWeQ8pKorTKOE4lI31wu-VddXmtC6Ub38pKrFpTy3YjrDTif6cxczGzXwJBDElGYWC42jG0dt1p50VtnNJVJRttOydwhmF4LGQ8QK-3UNWGE1td7ucgKH6EEEEIsRUigC8PN9tDf99OvgEVRoRJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2820021059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Haischer, Michael H ; Carzoli, Joseph P ; Cooke, Daniel M ; Pelland, Joshua C ; Remmert, Jacob F ; Zourdos, Michael C</creator><creatorcontrib>Haischer, Michael H ; Carzoli, Joseph P ; Cooke, Daniel M ; Pelland, Joshua C ; Remmert, Jacob F ; Zourdos, Michael C</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this investigation was to determine if average concentric velocity (ACV) of a single repetition at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), ACV of the first repetition of a set to failure at 70% of 1RM, or the velocity loss during the set could predict the number of repetitions performed in the back squat. Fifty-six resistance-trained individuals participated in the study (male = 41, age = 23 ± 3 yrs, 1RM = 162.0 ± 40.0 kg; female = 15, age = 21 ± 2 yrs, 1RM = 81.5 ± 12.5 kg). After 1RM testing, participants performed single repetition sets with 70% of 1RM and a set to failure with 70% of 1RM. ACV was recorded on all repetitions. Regression model comparisons were performed, and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) were calculated to determine the best model. Neither single repetition ACV at 70% of 1RM (R
= 0.004, p = 0.637) nor velocity loss (R
= 0.011, p = 0.445) were predictive of total repetitions performed in the set to failure. The simple quadratic model using the first repetition of the set to failure (
) was identified as the best and most parsimonious model (R
= 0.259, F = 9.247, p < 0.001) due to the lowest AIC value (311.086). A SEE of 2.21 repetitions was identified with this model. This average error of ~2 repetitions warrants only cautious utilization of this method to predict total repetitions an individual can perform in a set, with additional autoregulatory or individualization strategies being necessary to finalize the training prescription.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1640-5544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1899-7562</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/jhk/162021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37229411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Journal of human kinetics, 2023-01, Vol.87, p.167-178</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © Academy of Physical Education in Katowice.</rights><rights>Copyright: © Academy of Physical Education in Katowice 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-4a89010c40901dade56edfa81126e63ab9239d61d058934abb045f3cec8927a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-4a89010c40901dade56edfa81126e63ab9239d61d058934abb045f3cec8927a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203840/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203840/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37229411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haischer, Michael H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carzoli, Joseph P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelland, Joshua C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remmert, Jacob F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zourdos, Michael C</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss</title><title>Journal of human kinetics</title><addtitle>J Hum Kinet</addtitle><description>The purpose of this investigation was to determine if average concentric velocity (ACV) of a single repetition at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), ACV of the first repetition of a set to failure at 70% of 1RM, or the velocity loss during the set could predict the number of repetitions performed in the back squat. Fifty-six resistance-trained individuals participated in the study (male = 41, age = 23 ± 3 yrs, 1RM = 162.0 ± 40.0 kg; female = 15, age = 21 ± 2 yrs, 1RM = 81.5 ± 12.5 kg). After 1RM testing, participants performed single repetition sets with 70% of 1RM and a set to failure with 70% of 1RM. ACV was recorded on all repetitions. Regression model comparisons were performed, and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) were calculated to determine the best model. Neither single repetition ACV at 70% of 1RM (R
= 0.004, p = 0.637) nor velocity loss (R
= 0.011, p = 0.445) were predictive of total repetitions performed in the set to failure. The simple quadratic model using the first repetition of the set to failure (
) was identified as the best and most parsimonious model (R
= 0.259, F = 9.247, p < 0.001) due to the lowest AIC value (311.086). A SEE of 2.21 repetitions was identified with this model. This average error of ~2 repetitions warrants only cautious utilization of this method to predict total repetitions an individual can perform in a set, with additional autoregulatory or individualization strategies being necessary to finalize the training prescription.</description><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>1640-5544</issn><issn>1899-7562</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUVtLwzAYDaI4mXvxB0gfRajLtW2eRIc3GChz-hrSNN2ytc3WpML-vZHNOb-X73Y43-UAcIHgDUOIDhfz5RAlGGJ0BM5QxnmcsgQfhzihMGaM0h4YOLeAwRKcUkJOQY-kGHOK0BmYvLW6MMqbZhZNrZdVdC_VMnpfd9JHE73S3nhjGxeVra0PCtGnrqwyfhPJpvhLxta5c3BSysrpwc73wcfjw3T0HI9fn15Gd-NYkZT7mMqMQwQVhcEVstAs0UUpM4RwohMic44JLxJUQJZxQmWeQ8pKorTKOE4lI31wu-VddXmtC6Ub38pKrFpTy3YjrDTif6cxczGzXwJBDElGYWC42jG0dt1p50VtnNJVJRttOydwhmF4LGQ8QK-3UNWGE1td7ucgKH6EEEEIsRUigC8PN9tDf99OvgEVRoRJ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Haischer, Michael H</creator><creator>Carzoli, Joseph P</creator><creator>Cooke, Daniel M</creator><creator>Pelland, Joshua C</creator><creator>Remmert, Jacob F</creator><creator>Zourdos, Michael C</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss</title><author>Haischer, Michael H ; Carzoli, Joseph P ; Cooke, Daniel M ; Pelland, Joshua C ; Remmert, Jacob F ; Zourdos, Michael C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-4a89010c40901dade56edfa81126e63ab9239d61d058934abb045f3cec8927a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haischer, Michael H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carzoli, Joseph P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelland, Joshua C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remmert, Jacob F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zourdos, Michael C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of human kinetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haischer, Michael H</au><au>Carzoli, Joseph P</au><au>Cooke, Daniel M</au><au>Pelland, Joshua C</au><au>Remmert, Jacob F</au><au>Zourdos, Michael C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human kinetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Kinet</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>167</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>167-178</pages><issn>1640-5544</issn><eissn>1899-7562</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this investigation was to determine if average concentric velocity (ACV) of a single repetition at 70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), ACV of the first repetition of a set to failure at 70% of 1RM, or the velocity loss during the set could predict the number of repetitions performed in the back squat. Fifty-six resistance-trained individuals participated in the study (male = 41, age = 23 ± 3 yrs, 1RM = 162.0 ± 40.0 kg; female = 15, age = 21 ± 2 yrs, 1RM = 81.5 ± 12.5 kg). After 1RM testing, participants performed single repetition sets with 70% of 1RM and a set to failure with 70% of 1RM. ACV was recorded on all repetitions. Regression model comparisons were performed, and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) were calculated to determine the best model. Neither single repetition ACV at 70% of 1RM (R
= 0.004, p = 0.637) nor velocity loss (R
= 0.011, p = 0.445) were predictive of total repetitions performed in the set to failure. The simple quadratic model using the first repetition of the set to failure (
) was identified as the best and most parsimonious model (R
= 0.259, F = 9.247, p < 0.001) due to the lowest AIC value (311.086). A SEE of 2.21 repetitions was identified with this model. This average error of ~2 repetitions warrants only cautious utilization of this method to predict total repetitions an individual can perform in a set, with additional autoregulatory or individualization strategies being necessary to finalize the training prescription.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>37229411</pmid><doi>10.5114/jhk/162021</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1640-5544 |
ispartof | Journal of human kinetics, 2023-01, Vol.87, p.167-178 |
issn | 1640-5544 1899-7562 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10203840 |
source | PubMed Central Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Research Paper |
title | Predicting Total Back Squat Repetitions from Repetition Velocity and Velocity Loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A49%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Total%20Back%20Squat%20Repetitions%20from%20Repetition%20Velocity%20and%20Velocity%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20kinetics&rft.au=Haischer,%20Michael%20H&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=167-178&rft.issn=1640-5544&rft.eissn=1899-7562&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/jhk/162021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2820021059%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2820021059&rft_id=info:pmid/37229411&rfr_iscdi=true |