A Case of Placenta Accreta Infection Managed by Hysterectomy After Treatment for Retained Products of Conception With Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysteroscopy

Retained products of conception (RPOC) are frequently associated with previous cesarean section (C-section), abortion, and intrauterine operations, which may affect subsequent pregnancies. A 38-year-old female had a history of C-section and two abortions. After the second abortion, she underwent eva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37854
Hauptverfasser: Fukuoka, Hinata, Sato, Hirokazu, Okabe, Motonari, Togashi, Kazue, Oyama, Noriaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page e37854
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 15
creator Fukuoka, Hinata
Sato, Hirokazu
Okabe, Motonari
Togashi, Kazue
Oyama, Noriaki
description Retained products of conception (RPOC) are frequently associated with previous cesarean section (C-section), abortion, and intrauterine operations, which may affect subsequent pregnancies. A 38-year-old female had a history of C-section and two abortions. After the second abortion, she underwent evacuation of RPOC and was treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) and hysteroscopic resection. She became pregnant again and vaginally delivered an infant at full term. After delivery, RPOC was suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the patient was discharged for follow-up. She was rehospitalized with a diagnosis of infection and a placental remnant. Antibiotics did not improve the infection; therefore, she underwent a total hysterectomy. After the operation, signs of infection rapidly improved. The pathological diagnosis was placenta accreta. This case was considered a high-risk group for RPOC. In such rare and complicated cases, it is important to consider the possibility of recurrent RPOC and provide sufficient explanations before delivery for subsequent intensive management.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.37854
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10202672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821273363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-5e9a75f4a473a3b99f1bcb92198b3aac4f7bcdaf96028fd1f5a7259a761db3023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1L5DAUhsPi4sisd14vAW8dNx9t014tZXAdwUURBy_DSZpoZZqMSbtQf46_1MzHil6dQ_K87znJi9AJJedC5NUvPQQzxHMuyjz7ho4YLcpZScvs4FM_QccxPhNCKBGMCHKIJlwwxmlBjtBbjecQDfYW365AG9cDrrUOJtUrZ43uW-_wX3DwaBqsRrwYY29COvfdiGubenwfDPRdkmLrA75L0tYl-Db4ZtB93HjPvdNmvfV6aPsnvEy6BOE6pGbEF53yq_YVtgC4Zj_FR-3X4w_03cIqmuN9naLln4v7-WJ2fXN5Na-vZ5oVop_lpgKR2wwywYGrqrJUaVUxWpWKA-jMCqUbsFVBWGkbanMQLE-agjaKE8an6PfOdz2ozjSbvwiwkuvQdhBG6aGVX29c-yQf_T9JCSNphY3D6d4h-JfBxF4--yG4tLRkJaNMcF7wRJ3tKJ0eGIOxHyMokZtU5S5VuU014T8_r_UB_8-QvwPOn6MA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821273363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Case of Placenta Accreta Infection Managed by Hysterectomy After Treatment for Retained Products of Conception With Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysteroscopy</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Fukuoka, Hinata ; Sato, Hirokazu ; Okabe, Motonari ; Togashi, Kazue ; Oyama, Noriaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Fukuoka, Hinata ; Sato, Hirokazu ; Okabe, Motonari ; Togashi, Kazue ; Oyama, Noriaki</creatorcontrib><description>Retained products of conception (RPOC) are frequently associated with previous cesarean section (C-section), abortion, and intrauterine operations, which may affect subsequent pregnancies. A 38-year-old female had a history of C-section and two abortions. After the second abortion, she underwent evacuation of RPOC and was treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) and hysteroscopic resection. She became pregnant again and vaginally delivered an infant at full term. After delivery, RPOC was suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the patient was discharged for follow-up. She was rehospitalized with a diagnosis of infection and a placental remnant. Antibiotics did not improve the infection; therefore, she underwent a total hysterectomy. After the operation, signs of infection rapidly improved. The pathological diagnosis was placenta accreta. This case was considered a high-risk group for RPOC. In such rare and complicated cases, it is important to consider the possibility of recurrent RPOC and provide sufficient explanations before delivery for subsequent intensive management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37854</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37223160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adhesion ; Antibiotics ; Case reports ; Cesarean section ; Embolization ; Fever ; Hysterectomy ; Infections ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Miscarriage ; Obstetrics/Gynecology ; Placenta ; Pregnancy ; Suctioning ; Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37854</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Fukuoka et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Fukuoka et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Fukuoka et al. 2023 Fukuoka et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-5e9a75f4a473a3b99f1bcb92198b3aac4f7bcdaf96028fd1f5a7259a761db3023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202672/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202672/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37223160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fukuoka, Hinata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okabe, Motonari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Togashi, Kazue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Noriaki</creatorcontrib><title>A Case of Placenta Accreta Infection Managed by Hysterectomy After Treatment for Retained Products of Conception With Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysteroscopy</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Retained products of conception (RPOC) are frequently associated with previous cesarean section (C-section), abortion, and intrauterine operations, which may affect subsequent pregnancies. A 38-year-old female had a history of C-section and two abortions. After the second abortion, she underwent evacuation of RPOC and was treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) and hysteroscopic resection. She became pregnant again and vaginally delivered an infant at full term. After delivery, RPOC was suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the patient was discharged for follow-up. She was rehospitalized with a diagnosis of infection and a placental remnant. Antibiotics did not improve the infection; therefore, she underwent a total hysterectomy. After the operation, signs of infection rapidly improved. The pathological diagnosis was placenta accreta. This case was considered a high-risk group for RPOC. In such rare and complicated cases, it is important to consider the possibility of recurrent RPOC and provide sufficient explanations before delivery for subsequent intensive management.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Embolization</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Gynecology</subject><subject>Placenta</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Suctioning</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkV1L5DAUhsPi4sisd14vAW8dNx9t014tZXAdwUURBy_DSZpoZZqMSbtQf46_1MzHil6dQ_K87znJi9AJJedC5NUvPQQzxHMuyjz7ho4YLcpZScvs4FM_QccxPhNCKBGMCHKIJlwwxmlBjtBbjecQDfYW365AG9cDrrUOJtUrZ43uW-_wX3DwaBqsRrwYY29COvfdiGubenwfDPRdkmLrA75L0tYl-Db4ZtB93HjPvdNmvfV6aPsnvEy6BOE6pGbEF53yq_YVtgC4Zj_FR-3X4w_03cIqmuN9naLln4v7-WJ2fXN5Na-vZ5oVop_lpgKR2wwywYGrqrJUaVUxWpWKA-jMCqUbsFVBWGkbanMQLE-agjaKE8an6PfOdz2ozjSbvwiwkuvQdhBG6aGVX29c-yQf_T9JCSNphY3D6d4h-JfBxF4--yG4tLRkJaNMcF7wRJ3tKJ0eGIOxHyMokZtU5S5VuU014T8_r_UB_8-QvwPOn6MA</recordid><startdate>20230419</startdate><enddate>20230419</enddate><creator>Fukuoka, Hinata</creator><creator>Sato, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Okabe, Motonari</creator><creator>Togashi, Kazue</creator><creator>Oyama, Noriaki</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230419</creationdate><title>A Case of Placenta Accreta Infection Managed by Hysterectomy After Treatment for Retained Products of Conception With Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysteroscopy</title><author>Fukuoka, Hinata ; Sato, Hirokazu ; Okabe, Motonari ; Togashi, Kazue ; Oyama, Noriaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-5e9a75f4a473a3b99f1bcb92198b3aac4f7bcdaf96028fd1f5a7259a761db3023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Embolization</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Gynecology</topic><topic>Placenta</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Suctioning</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fukuoka, Hinata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okabe, Motonari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Togashi, Kazue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Noriaki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fukuoka, Hinata</au><au>Sato, Hirokazu</au><au>Okabe, Motonari</au><au>Togashi, Kazue</au><au>Oyama, Noriaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Case of Placenta Accreta Infection Managed by Hysterectomy After Treatment for Retained Products of Conception With Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysteroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2023-04-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e37854</spage><pages>e37854-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Retained products of conception (RPOC) are frequently associated with previous cesarean section (C-section), abortion, and intrauterine operations, which may affect subsequent pregnancies. A 38-year-old female had a history of C-section and two abortions. After the second abortion, she underwent evacuation of RPOC and was treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) and hysteroscopic resection. She became pregnant again and vaginally delivered an infant at full term. After delivery, RPOC was suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but the patient was discharged for follow-up. She was rehospitalized with a diagnosis of infection and a placental remnant. Antibiotics did not improve the infection; therefore, she underwent a total hysterectomy. After the operation, signs of infection rapidly improved. The pathological diagnosis was placenta accreta. This case was considered a high-risk group for RPOC. In such rare and complicated cases, it is important to consider the possibility of recurrent RPOC and provide sufficient explanations before delivery for subsequent intensive management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>37223160</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.37854</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37854
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10202672
source PubMed Central (Open Access); PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Abdomen
Adhesion
Antibiotics
Case reports
Cesarean section
Embolization
Fever
Hysterectomy
Infections
Magnetic resonance imaging
Miscarriage
Obstetrics/Gynecology
Placenta
Pregnancy
Suctioning
Surgery
Ultrasonic imaging
Uterus
title A Case of Placenta Accreta Infection Managed by Hysterectomy After Treatment for Retained Products of Conception With Uterine Artery Embolization and Hysteroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Case%20of%20Placenta%20Accreta%20Infection%20Managed%20by%20Hysterectomy%20After%20Treatment%20for%20Retained%20Products%20of%20Conception%20With%20Uterine%20Artery%20Embolization%20and%20Hysteroscopy&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Fukuoka,%20Hinata&rft.date=2023-04-19&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e37854&rft.pages=e37854-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.37854&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2821273363%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821273363&rft_id=info:pmid/37223160&rfr_iscdi=true