Excessive gestational weight gain in the first trimester is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study from Southwest China

To evaluate the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) in the first trimester (GWG-F) and the rate of gestational weight gain in the second trimester (RGWG-S) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), exploring the optimal GWG ranges for the avoidance of GDM in Chinese women. A population-based pros...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health nutrition 2020-02, Vol.23 (3), p.394-401
Hauptverfasser: Lan, Xi, Zhang, Yi-Qi, Dong, Hong-Li, Zhang, Ju, Zhou, Feng-Ming, Bao, Yan-Hong, Zhao, Rong-Ping, Cai, Cong-Jie, Bai, Dan, Pang, Xin-Xin, Zeng, Guo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 401
container_issue 3
container_start_page 394
container_title Public health nutrition
container_volume 23
creator Lan, Xi
Zhang, Yi-Qi
Dong, Hong-Li
Zhang, Ju
Zhou, Feng-Ming
Bao, Yan-Hong
Zhao, Rong-Ping
Cai, Cong-Jie
Bai, Dan
Pang, Xin-Xin
Zeng, Guo
description To evaluate the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) in the first trimester (GWG-F) and the rate of gestational weight gain in the second trimester (RGWG-S) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), exploring the optimal GWG ranges for the avoidance of GDM in Chinese women. A population-based prospective study was conducted. Gestational weight was measured regularly in every antenatal visit and assessed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria (2009). GDM was assessed with the 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of GWG-F and RGWG-S on GDM, stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI. In each BMI category, the GWG values corresponding to the lowest prevalence of GDM were defined as the optimal GWG range. Southwest China. Pregnant women (n 1910) in 2017. After adjusting for confounders, GWG-F above IOM recommendations increased the risk of GDM (OR; 95 % CI) among underweight (2·500; 1·106, 5·655), normal-weight (1·396; 1·023, 1·906) and overweight/obese women (3·017; 1·118, 8·138) compared with women within IOM recommendations. No significant difference was observed between RGWG-S and GDM (P > 0·05) after adjusting for GWG-F based on the previous model. The optimal GWG-F ranges for the avoidance of GDM were 0·8-1·2, 0·8-1·2 and 0·35-0·70 kg for underweight, normal-weight and overweight/obese women, respectively. Excessive GWG in the first trimester, rather than the second trimester, is associated with increased risk of GDM regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI. Obstetricians should provide more pre-emptive guidance in achieving adequate GWG-F.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1368980019003513
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10200587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354615218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-6a617cf41689685f79abf56fa262dc7cb40e8db9d2c56035b7d7a6ad560031e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUV1rFDEUDaLYWv0BvkjA59EkM0lmfBFZ6gcUfKg-h0xys5M6O1lzM137W_yzZmktFiGQXO495-acQ8hLzt5wxvXbS96qfugZ4wNjreTtI3LKOy0boYV-XN-13Rz7J-QZ4hVjTGqtn5KTlveyHyQ_Jb_PfzlAjNdAt4DFlpgWO9MDxO1U6NbGhdZTJqAhZiy05Lirc5BpRGoRk4u2gKeHWCaaI_6gKTxg8tGOUADpDuY5lhXfUUv3OeEeXDmuxbL6Gxpy2tHLtJbpUMF0M8XFPidPgp0RXtzdZ-T7x_Nvm8_NxddPXzYfLhrXaVUaZRXXLnS8eqF6GfRgxyBVsEIJ77QbOwa9HwcvnFTVplF7bZX1tWAtB9Gekfe3vPt13IF3sJRsZ7OvUm2-MclG87CzxMls07XhTFRLe10ZXt8x5PRzrQLMVVpzlY9GtLJTXAre1yl-O-WqfMwQ7ldwZo6Bmv8CrZhX__7tHvE3wfYPMpqgIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354615218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Excessive gestational weight gain in the first trimester is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study from Southwest China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lan, Xi ; Zhang, Yi-Qi ; Dong, Hong-Li ; Zhang, Ju ; Zhou, Feng-Ming ; Bao, Yan-Hong ; Zhao, Rong-Ping ; Cai, Cong-Jie ; Bai, Dan ; Pang, Xin-Xin ; Zeng, Guo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lan, Xi ; Zhang, Yi-Qi ; Dong, Hong-Li ; Zhang, Ju ; Zhou, Feng-Ming ; Bao, Yan-Hong ; Zhao, Rong-Ping ; Cai, Cong-Jie ; Bai, Dan ; Pang, Xin-Xin ; Zeng, Guo</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) in the first trimester (GWG-F) and the rate of gestational weight gain in the second trimester (RGWG-S) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), exploring the optimal GWG ranges for the avoidance of GDM in Chinese women. A population-based prospective study was conducted. Gestational weight was measured regularly in every antenatal visit and assessed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria (2009). GDM was assessed with the 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of GWG-F and RGWG-S on GDM, stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI. In each BMI category, the GWG values corresponding to the lowest prevalence of GDM were defined as the optimal GWG range. Southwest China. Pregnant women (n 1910) in 2017. After adjusting for confounders, GWG-F above IOM recommendations increased the risk of GDM (OR; 95 % CI) among underweight (2·500; 1·106, 5·655), normal-weight (1·396; 1·023, 1·906) and overweight/obese women (3·017; 1·118, 8·138) compared with women within IOM recommendations. No significant difference was observed between RGWG-S and GDM (P &gt; 0·05) after adjusting for GWG-F based on the previous model. The optimal GWG-F ranges for the avoidance of GDM were 0·8-1·2, 0·8-1·2 and 0·35-0·70 kg for underweight, normal-weight and overweight/obese women, respectively. Excessive GWG in the first trimester, rather than the second trimester, is associated with increased risk of GDM regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI. Obstetricians should provide more pre-emptive guidance in achieving adequate GWG-F.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019003513</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31858951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Avoidance ; Body Mass Index ; Body weight ; China ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology ; Exercise ; Family medical history ; Female ; Gestation ; Gestational diabetes ; Gestational Weight Gain ; Glucose tolerance ; Glucose Tolerance Test ; Health risk assessment ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Multiple births ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Personal income ; Physical fitness ; Population studies ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Pregnancy Trimester, Second ; Prospective Studies ; Questionnaires ; Research Paper ; Risk ; Studies ; Thinness ; Thyroid diseases ; Underweight ; Weight Gain ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2020-02, Vol.23 (3), p.394-401</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2019</rights><rights>The Authors 2019 2019 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-6a617cf41689685f79abf56fa262dc7cb40e8db9d2c56035b7d7a6ad560031e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-6a617cf41689685f79abf56fa262dc7cb40e8db9d2c56035b7d7a6ad560031e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200587/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10200587/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yi-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hong-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Feng-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Yan-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rong-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Cong-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Xin-Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Guo</creatorcontrib><title>Excessive gestational weight gain in the first trimester is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study from Southwest China</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To evaluate the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) in the first trimester (GWG-F) and the rate of gestational weight gain in the second trimester (RGWG-S) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), exploring the optimal GWG ranges for the avoidance of GDM in Chinese women. A population-based prospective study was conducted. Gestational weight was measured regularly in every antenatal visit and assessed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria (2009). GDM was assessed with the 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of GWG-F and RGWG-S on GDM, stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI. In each BMI category, the GWG values corresponding to the lowest prevalence of GDM were defined as the optimal GWG range. Southwest China. Pregnant women (n 1910) in 2017. After adjusting for confounders, GWG-F above IOM recommendations increased the risk of GDM (OR; 95 % CI) among underweight (2·500; 1·106, 5·655), normal-weight (1·396; 1·023, 1·906) and overweight/obese women (3·017; 1·118, 8·138) compared with women within IOM recommendations. No significant difference was observed between RGWG-S and GDM (P &gt; 0·05) after adjusting for GWG-F based on the previous model. The optimal GWG-F ranges for the avoidance of GDM were 0·8-1·2, 0·8-1·2 and 0·35-0·70 kg for underweight, normal-weight and overweight/obese women, respectively. Excessive GWG in the first trimester, rather than the second trimester, is associated with increased risk of GDM regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI. Obstetricians should provide more pre-emptive guidance in achieving adequate GWG-F.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Avoidance</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Gestational Weight Gain</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Glucose Tolerance Test</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multiple births</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Personal income</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, First</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Thinness</subject><subject>Thyroid diseases</subject><subject>Underweight</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNplUV1rFDEUDaLYWv0BvkjA59EkM0lmfBFZ6gcUfKg-h0xys5M6O1lzM137W_yzZmktFiGQXO495-acQ8hLzt5wxvXbS96qfugZ4wNjreTtI3LKOy0boYV-XN-13Rz7J-QZ4hVjTGqtn5KTlveyHyQ_Jb_PfzlAjNdAt4DFlpgWO9MDxO1U6NbGhdZTJqAhZiy05Lirc5BpRGoRk4u2gKeHWCaaI_6gKTxg8tGOUADpDuY5lhXfUUv3OeEeXDmuxbL6Gxpy2tHLtJbpUMF0M8XFPidPgp0RXtzdZ-T7x_Nvm8_NxddPXzYfLhrXaVUaZRXXLnS8eqF6GfRgxyBVsEIJ77QbOwa9HwcvnFTVplF7bZX1tWAtB9Gekfe3vPt13IF3sJRsZ7OvUm2-MclG87CzxMls07XhTFRLe10ZXt8x5PRzrQLMVVpzlY9GtLJTXAre1yl-O-WqfMwQ7ldwZo6Bmv8CrZhX__7tHvE3wfYPMpqgIQ</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Lan, Xi</creator><creator>Zhang, Yi-Qi</creator><creator>Dong, Hong-Li</creator><creator>Zhang, Ju</creator><creator>Zhou, Feng-Ming</creator><creator>Bao, Yan-Hong</creator><creator>Zhao, Rong-Ping</creator><creator>Cai, Cong-Jie</creator><creator>Bai, Dan</creator><creator>Pang, Xin-Xin</creator><creator>Zeng, Guo</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Excessive gestational weight gain in the first trimester is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study from Southwest China</title><author>Lan, Xi ; Zhang, Yi-Qi ; Dong, Hong-Li ; Zhang, Ju ; Zhou, Feng-Ming ; Bao, Yan-Hong ; Zhao, Rong-Ping ; Cai, Cong-Jie ; Bai, Dan ; Pang, Xin-Xin ; Zeng, Guo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-6a617cf41689685f79abf56fa262dc7cb40e8db9d2c56035b7d7a6ad560031e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Avoidance</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Gestational Weight Gain</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Glucose Tolerance Test</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multiple births</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Personal income</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, First</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Second</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Thinness</topic><topic>Thyroid diseases</topic><topic>Underweight</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yi-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Hong-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Feng-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Yan-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rong-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Cong-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Xin-Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Guo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lan, Xi</au><au>Zhang, Yi-Qi</au><au>Dong, Hong-Li</au><au>Zhang, Ju</au><au>Zhou, Feng-Ming</au><au>Bao, Yan-Hong</au><au>Zhao, Rong-Ping</au><au>Cai, Cong-Jie</au><au>Bai, Dan</au><au>Pang, Xin-Xin</au><au>Zeng, Guo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Excessive gestational weight gain in the first trimester is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study from Southwest China</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>394-401</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) in the first trimester (GWG-F) and the rate of gestational weight gain in the second trimester (RGWG-S) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), exploring the optimal GWG ranges for the avoidance of GDM in Chinese women. A population-based prospective study was conducted. Gestational weight was measured regularly in every antenatal visit and assessed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria (2009). GDM was assessed with the 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of GWG-F and RGWG-S on GDM, stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI. In each BMI category, the GWG values corresponding to the lowest prevalence of GDM were defined as the optimal GWG range. Southwest China. Pregnant women (n 1910) in 2017. After adjusting for confounders, GWG-F above IOM recommendations increased the risk of GDM (OR; 95 % CI) among underweight (2·500; 1·106, 5·655), normal-weight (1·396; 1·023, 1·906) and overweight/obese women (3·017; 1·118, 8·138) compared with women within IOM recommendations. No significant difference was observed between RGWG-S and GDM (P &gt; 0·05) after adjusting for GWG-F based on the previous model. The optimal GWG-F ranges for the avoidance of GDM were 0·8-1·2, 0·8-1·2 and 0·35-0·70 kg for underweight, normal-weight and overweight/obese women, respectively. Excessive GWG in the first trimester, rather than the second trimester, is associated with increased risk of GDM regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI. Obstetricians should provide more pre-emptive guidance in achieving adequate GWG-F.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>31858951</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980019003513</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-9800
ispartof Public health nutrition, 2020-02, Vol.23 (3), p.394-401
issn 1368-9800
1475-2727
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10200587
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Avoidance
Body Mass Index
Body weight
China
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetes, Gestational - epidemiology
Exercise
Family medical history
Female
Gestation
Gestational diabetes
Gestational Weight Gain
Glucose tolerance
Glucose Tolerance Test
Health risk assessment
Hospitals
Humans
Multiple births
Obesity
Overweight
Personal income
Physical fitness
Population studies
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
Pregnancy Trimester, First
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Prospective Studies
Questionnaires
Research Paper
Risk
Studies
Thinness
Thyroid diseases
Underweight
Weight Gain
Womens health
title Excessive gestational weight gain in the first trimester is associated with risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective study from Southwest China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T20%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Excessive%20gestational%20weight%20gain%20in%20the%20first%20trimester%20is%20associated%20with%20risk%20of%20gestational%20diabetes%20mellitus:%20a%20prospective%20study%20from%20Southwest%20China&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Lan,%20Xi&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=394-401&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980019003513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2354615218%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354615218&rft_id=info:pmid/31858951&rfr_iscdi=true