Relative validity of a computer-based semi-quantitative FFQ for use in the Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Studies
To assess the relative validity of a FFQ developed for the Pelotas Birth Cohort Studies. Participants completed a ninety-two-food-item FFQ and then answered two 24-h recalls (24HR), one in-person interview and a second one by telephone, administered 14-28 d apart. Median and relative differences of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public health nutrition 2021-01, Vol.24 (1), p.34-42 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 42 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 34 |
| container_title | Public health nutrition |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Vaz, Juliana S Buffarini, Romina Schneider, Bruna C Bielemann, Renata M Gonçalves, Helen Assunção, Maria Cecilia F |
| description | To assess the relative validity of a FFQ developed for the Pelotas Birth Cohort Studies.
Participants completed a ninety-two-food-item FFQ and then answered two 24-h recalls (24HR), one in-person interview and a second one by telephone, administered 14-28 d apart. Median and relative differences of energy, fifteen nutrients and eleven food groups were estimated based on the FFQ and the average of two 24HR. Nutrients were log-transformed and energy-adjusted using residual method. Validity was assessed by crude, energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients. Agreement of quartiles and weighted κ were performed. Differences in energy and nutrient estimations between methods were plotted in Bland-Altman graphs.
Pelotas, southern Brazil.
Two hundred fifty-four participants randomly selected from the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort during the 22-year follow-up (2015).
The FFQ overestimated energy and most nutrients and food groups compared with the two 24HR. Energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0·21 to 0·66. The highest energy-adjusted and de-attenuated concordance correlation coefficients were observed for Ca (0·48), niacin (0·32), Na (0·29), vitamin C (0·28) and riboflavin (0·25). The percentage of nutrients classified into the same and opposite quartiles ranged from 36·5 to 60·3 %, and from 4·8 to 19·1 %, respectively. Weighted κ was moderate for Ca (0·51), beans and legumes (0·50) and milk and dairies (0·49).
The FFQ provides a reasonable dietary intake assessment for habitual food consumption. However, the relative validity was weak for specific nutrients and food groups. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1368980020001196 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10195633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980020001196</cupid><sourcerecordid>2418728389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-7f7bede925fb6d9bd7b5230eb42c682a4efef158d3fe14861769ce7cebe5ed243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQRlsIRELgB3BBlriEQ4OX9nZCZMQAUiSWwLllt8sZR93tie0eKfx6HM0QNnGype_VK5eraZ4S_JJgIl9dECaUVhhTjDEhWtxrjkkneUsllffrvcbtbX7UPMr5qkJcSvmwOWKUayk7ctxsv8BoStgB2pkxuFBuUPTIoCFO26VAaq3J4FCGKbTXi5lLKHt8vf6MfExoyYDCjMoG0CcYYzEZnZ4l8z2ML9BZSGWDVnETU0EXZXEB8uPmgTdjhieH86T5tn77dfW-Pf_47sPqzXk7dJKWVnppwYGm3FvhtHXScsow2I4OQlHTgQdPuHLMA-mUIFLoAeQAFjg42rGT5vXeu13sBG6AuSQz9tsUJpNu-mhC_2cyh01_GXd9_VnNBWPVcHowpHi9QC79FPIA42hmiEvuaUeUpIopXdHnf6FXcUlzna9SkggqNFeVIntqSDHnBP7uNQTftpX9PwutNc9-H-Ou4ucGK8AOUjPZFNwl_Or9f-0PxhOsKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471626958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative validity of a computer-based semi-quantitative FFQ for use in the Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vaz, Juliana S ; Buffarini, Romina ; Schneider, Bruna C ; Bielemann, Renata M ; Gonçalves, Helen ; Assunção, Maria Cecilia F</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Juliana S ; Buffarini, Romina ; Schneider, Bruna C ; Bielemann, Renata M ; Gonçalves, Helen ; Assunção, Maria Cecilia F</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the relative validity of a FFQ developed for the Pelotas Birth Cohort Studies.
Participants completed a ninety-two-food-item FFQ and then answered two 24-h recalls (24HR), one in-person interview and a second one by telephone, administered 14-28 d apart. Median and relative differences of energy, fifteen nutrients and eleven food groups were estimated based on the FFQ and the average of two 24HR. Nutrients were log-transformed and energy-adjusted using residual method. Validity was assessed by crude, energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients. Agreement of quartiles and weighted κ were performed. Differences in energy and nutrient estimations between methods were plotted in Bland-Altman graphs.
Pelotas, southern Brazil.
Two hundred fifty-four participants randomly selected from the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort during the 22-year follow-up (2015).
The FFQ overestimated energy and most nutrients and food groups compared with the two 24HR. Energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0·21 to 0·66. The highest energy-adjusted and de-attenuated concordance correlation coefficients were observed for Ca (0·48), niacin (0·32), Na (0·29), vitamin C (0·28) and riboflavin (0·25). The percentage of nutrients classified into the same and opposite quartiles ranged from 36·5 to 60·3 %, and from 4·8 to 19·1 %, respectively. Weighted κ was moderate for Ca (0·51), beans and legumes (0·50) and milk and dairies (0·49).
The FFQ provides a reasonable dietary intake assessment for habitual food consumption. However, the relative validity was weak for specific nutrients and food groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020001196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32597741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ascorbic acid ; Assessment and Methodology ; Attenuation ; Beans ; Brazil ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Computers ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Dairies ; Dairy products ; Diet ; Diet Records ; Diet Surveys ; Dietary intake ; Energy ; Energy Intake ; Epidemiology ; Food ; Food consumption ; Food groups ; Food intake ; Humans ; Interviews ; Legumes ; Milk ; Nutrients ; Population ; Quartiles ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research methodology ; Research Paper ; Riboflavin ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2021-01, Vol.24 (1), p.34-42</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2020</rights><rights>The Authors 2020 2020 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-7f7bede925fb6d9bd7b5230eb42c682a4efef158d3fe14861769ce7cebe5ed243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-7f7bede925fb6d9bd7b5230eb42c682a4efef158d3fe14861769ce7cebe5ed243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195633/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195633/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32597741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Juliana S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffarini, Romina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Bruna C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielemann, Renata M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assunção, Maria Cecilia F</creatorcontrib><title>Relative validity of a computer-based semi-quantitative FFQ for use in the Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Studies</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To assess the relative validity of a FFQ developed for the Pelotas Birth Cohort Studies.
Participants completed a ninety-two-food-item FFQ and then answered two 24-h recalls (24HR), one in-person interview and a second one by telephone, administered 14-28 d apart. Median and relative differences of energy, fifteen nutrients and eleven food groups were estimated based on the FFQ and the average of two 24HR. Nutrients were log-transformed and energy-adjusted using residual method. Validity was assessed by crude, energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients. Agreement of quartiles and weighted κ were performed. Differences in energy and nutrient estimations between methods were plotted in Bland-Altman graphs.
Pelotas, southern Brazil.
Two hundred fifty-four participants randomly selected from the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort during the 22-year follow-up (2015).
The FFQ overestimated energy and most nutrients and food groups compared with the two 24HR. Energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0·21 to 0·66. The highest energy-adjusted and de-attenuated concordance correlation coefficients were observed for Ca (0·48), niacin (0·32), Na (0·29), vitamin C (0·28) and riboflavin (0·25). The percentage of nutrients classified into the same and opposite quartiles ranged from 36·5 to 60·3 %, and from 4·8 to 19·1 %, respectively. Weighted κ was moderate for Ca (0·51), beans and legumes (0·50) and milk and dairies (0·49).
The FFQ provides a reasonable dietary intake assessment for habitual food consumption. However, the relative validity was weak for specific nutrients and food groups.</description><subject>Ascorbic acid</subject><subject>Assessment and Methodology</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Beans</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Dairies</subject><subject>Dairy products</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Diet Surveys</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food groups</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Quartiles</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Riboflavin</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUlvFDEQRlsIRELgB3BBlriEQ4OX9nZCZMQAUiSWwLllt8sZR93tie0eKfx6HM0QNnGype_VK5eraZ4S_JJgIl9dECaUVhhTjDEhWtxrjkkneUsllffrvcbtbX7UPMr5qkJcSvmwOWKUayk7ctxsv8BoStgB2pkxuFBuUPTIoCFO26VAaq3J4FCGKbTXi5lLKHt8vf6MfExoyYDCjMoG0CcYYzEZnZ4l8z2ML9BZSGWDVnETU0EXZXEB8uPmgTdjhieH86T5tn77dfW-Pf_47sPqzXk7dJKWVnppwYGm3FvhtHXScsow2I4OQlHTgQdPuHLMA-mUIFLoAeQAFjg42rGT5vXeu13sBG6AuSQz9tsUJpNu-mhC_2cyh01_GXd9_VnNBWPVcHowpHi9QC79FPIA42hmiEvuaUeUpIopXdHnf6FXcUlzna9SkggqNFeVIntqSDHnBP7uNQTftpX9PwutNc9-H-Ou4ucGK8AOUjPZFNwl_Or9f-0PxhOsKw</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Vaz, Juliana S</creator><creator>Buffarini, Romina</creator><creator>Schneider, Bruna C</creator><creator>Bielemann, Renata M</creator><creator>Gonçalves, Helen</creator><creator>Assunção, Maria Cecilia F</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Relative validity of a computer-based semi-quantitative FFQ for use in the Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Studies</title><author>Vaz, Juliana S ; Buffarini, Romina ; Schneider, Bruna C ; Bielemann, Renata M ; Gonçalves, Helen ; Assunção, Maria Cecilia F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-7f7bede925fb6d9bd7b5230eb42c682a4efef158d3fe14861769ce7cebe5ed243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ascorbic acid</topic><topic>Assessment and Methodology</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Beans</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Dairies</topic><topic>Dairy products</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Diet Surveys</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food groups</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Quartiles</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Riboflavin</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Juliana S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffarini, Romina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Bruna C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bielemann, Renata M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assunção, Maria Cecilia F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaz, Juliana S</au><au>Buffarini, Romina</au><au>Schneider, Bruna C</au><au>Bielemann, Renata M</au><au>Gonçalves, Helen</au><au>Assunção, Maria Cecilia F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative validity of a computer-based semi-quantitative FFQ for use in the Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Studies</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>34-42</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To assess the relative validity of a FFQ developed for the Pelotas Birth Cohort Studies.
Participants completed a ninety-two-food-item FFQ and then answered two 24-h recalls (24HR), one in-person interview and a second one by telephone, administered 14-28 d apart. Median and relative differences of energy, fifteen nutrients and eleven food groups were estimated based on the FFQ and the average of two 24HR. Nutrients were log-transformed and energy-adjusted using residual method. Validity was assessed by crude, energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients. Agreement of quartiles and weighted κ were performed. Differences in energy and nutrient estimations between methods were plotted in Bland-Altman graphs.
Pelotas, southern Brazil.
Two hundred fifty-four participants randomly selected from the 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohort during the 22-year follow-up (2015).
The FFQ overestimated energy and most nutrients and food groups compared with the two 24HR. Energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0·21 to 0·66. The highest energy-adjusted and de-attenuated concordance correlation coefficients were observed for Ca (0·48), niacin (0·32), Na (0·29), vitamin C (0·28) and riboflavin (0·25). The percentage of nutrients classified into the same and opposite quartiles ranged from 36·5 to 60·3 %, and from 4·8 to 19·1 %, respectively. Weighted κ was moderate for Ca (0·51), beans and legumes (0·50) and milk and dairies (0·49).
The FFQ provides a reasonable dietary intake assessment for habitual food consumption. However, the relative validity was weak for specific nutrients and food groups.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32597741</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980020001196</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1368-9800 |
| ispartof | Public health nutrition, 2021-01, Vol.24 (1), p.34-42 |
| issn | 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10195633 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Ascorbic acid Assessment and Methodology Attenuation Beans Brazil Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Computers Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Dairies Dairy products Diet Diet Records Diet Surveys Dietary intake Energy Energy Intake Epidemiology Food Food consumption Food groups Food intake Humans Interviews Legumes Milk Nutrients Population Quartiles Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Research methodology Research Paper Riboflavin Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Validation studies Validity |
| title | Relative validity of a computer-based semi-quantitative FFQ for use in the Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Studies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A21%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20validity%20of%20a%20computer-based%20semi-quantitative%20FFQ%20for%20use%20in%20the%20Pelotas%20(Brazil)%20Birth%20Cohort%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Vaz,%20Juliana%20S&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=34-42&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980020001196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2418728389%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471626958&rft_id=info:pmid/32597741&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980020001196&rfr_iscdi=true |