Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study

Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurosurgery 2023-08, Vol.139 (2), p.517-527
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Timothy R, Foley, Kevin T, Boruah, Sourabh, Slotkin, Jonathan R, Woodard, Eric, Lazor, John B, Cavaleri, Christy, Brown, Michael C, McDonough, Brittany, Hess, Brian, Van Citters, Douglas W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 527
container_issue 2
container_start_page 517
container_title Journal of neurosurgery
container_volume 139
creator Smith, Timothy R
Foley, Kevin T
Boruah, Sourabh
Slotkin, Jonathan R
Woodard, Eric
Lazor, John B
Cavaleri, Christy
Brown, Michael C
McDonough, Brittany
Hess, Brian
Van Citters, Douglas W
description Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound infection/dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel mineral-organic bone adhesive (Tetranite) for cranial bone flap fixation. Craniotomy bone flaps created in human cadaveric skulls were tested under quasistatic and impact loading in the following conditions: 1) uncut skull; 2) bone flaps fixated with TPS alone; and 3) bone flaps fixated with bone adhesive alone. All fixative surgical procedures were performed by a group of 16 neurosurgeons in a simulated surgical environment. The position of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps was measured using computed tomography and compared with their original native location. The resistance of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps to simulated CSF leakage was also evaluated. Because there was a gap around the circumference of the TPS-fixated specimens that was visible to the naked eye, pressurized CSF leak testing was not attempted on them. Adhesive-fixated bone flaps showed significantly stiffer and stronger quasistatic responses than TPS-fixated specimens. The strength and stiffness of the adhesive-fixated specimens were not significantly different from those of the uncut native skulls. Total and plastic deflections under 6-J impact were significantly less for adhesive-fixed bone flaps than TPS. There were no significant differences in any subthreshold impact metrics between the adhesive-fixed and native specimens at both 6-J and 12-J impact levels, with 1 exception. Plastic deflection at 6-J impact was significantly less in adhesive-fixated bone flaps than in native specimens. The energy to failure of the adhesive-fixated specimens was not significantly different from that of the native specimens. Time since fixation (20 minutes vs 10 days) did not significantly affect the impact failure properties of the adhesive-fixated specimens. Of the 16 adhesive-fixated craniotomy specimens tested, 14 did not leak at pressures as high as 40 mm Hg. The neurosurgeons in this study had no prior exposure or experience with the bone adhesive. Despite this, improved resistance to CSF egress, superior mechanical properties, and better cosmetic outcomes were demonstrated with bone adhesi
doi_str_mv 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221657
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10193477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2768231295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-68565c5b0c726d1a076b0259f773fba373216617c6051badff9f13eab9516a913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCILAsfwAX5yCEb_Ig9O1wQingqggPkPOrxtHcMHnuwPQn7YfwfXhJWcGi1StVV3eoi5ClnZ5I3_IVgQpxV8PHTFyG4Vs09suKtlBumW3mfrFjlN5Jt1Ql5lPM3xrg-1-IhOZFab3mrxYr8uspIo6UwjJjdNVKTIDjwtI8BqfUwU-t-QnEx0BtXxrgUOkIabiAhLZG6aU6xyiY0YxWaqswlYdiV8ZSmapkLNZiwTzHPLlTa-sUN1CN8hx2eUggDncCFUqsCKHH64wLe7cKEobykQD30MVUq7av7MuwfkwcWfMYnd31Nrt6--XrxfnP5-d2Hi9eXGyOVKBu9VVoZ1TPTCD1wYI3umVCtbRppe5CNrF_TvDGaKd7DYG1ruUToW8U1tFyuyatb33npJxxMPSeB7-bkJkj7LoLr_meCG7tdvO44qzmc1zVr8vzOIcUfC-bSTS4b9B4CxiV3otFbIbloVR3lt6Om_iontMc9nHWHvLtD3gdwzLtqnv174FHxN2D5G9MOq5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2768231295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Smith, Timothy R ; Foley, Kevin T ; Boruah, Sourabh ; Slotkin, Jonathan R ; Woodard, Eric ; Lazor, John B ; Cavaleri, Christy ; Brown, Michael C ; McDonough, Brittany ; Hess, Brian ; Van Citters, Douglas W</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Timothy R ; Foley, Kevin T ; Boruah, Sourabh ; Slotkin, Jonathan R ; Woodard, Eric ; Lazor, John B ; Cavaleri, Christy ; Brown, Michael C ; McDonough, Brittany ; Hess, Brian ; Van Citters, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><description>Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound infection/dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel mineral-organic bone adhesive (Tetranite) for cranial bone flap fixation. Craniotomy bone flaps created in human cadaveric skulls were tested under quasistatic and impact loading in the following conditions: 1) uncut skull; 2) bone flaps fixated with TPS alone; and 3) bone flaps fixated with bone adhesive alone. All fixative surgical procedures were performed by a group of 16 neurosurgeons in a simulated surgical environment. The position of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps was measured using computed tomography and compared with their original native location. The resistance of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps to simulated CSF leakage was also evaluated. Because there was a gap around the circumference of the TPS-fixated specimens that was visible to the naked eye, pressurized CSF leak testing was not attempted on them. Adhesive-fixated bone flaps showed significantly stiffer and stronger quasistatic responses than TPS-fixated specimens. The strength and stiffness of the adhesive-fixated specimens were not significantly different from those of the uncut native skulls. Total and plastic deflections under 6-J impact were significantly less for adhesive-fixed bone flaps than TPS. There were no significant differences in any subthreshold impact metrics between the adhesive-fixed and native specimens at both 6-J and 12-J impact levels, with 1 exception. Plastic deflection at 6-J impact was significantly less in adhesive-fixated bone flaps than in native specimens. The energy to failure of the adhesive-fixated specimens was not significantly different from that of the native specimens. Time since fixation (20 minutes vs 10 days) did not significantly affect the impact failure properties of the adhesive-fixated specimens. Of the 16 adhesive-fixated craniotomy specimens tested, 14 did not leak at pressures as high as 40 mm Hg. The neurosurgeons in this study had no prior exposure or experience with the bone adhesive. Despite this, improved resistance to CSF egress, superior mechanical properties, and better cosmetic outcomes were demonstrated with bone adhesive compared with TPS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1933-0693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221657</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36681962</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Neurological Surgeons</publisher><subject>Bone Cements ; Bone Plates ; Cadaver ; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - prevention &amp; control ; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - surgery ; Craniotomy - methods ; Humans ; Laboratory Investigation ; Skull - surgery ; Surgical Flaps</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurosurgery, 2023-08, Vol.139 (2), p.517-527</ispartof><rights>2022 The authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Timothy R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boruah, Sourabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotkin, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodard, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazor, John B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavaleri, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonough, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Citters, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><title>Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study</title><title>Journal of neurosurgery</title><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound infection/dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel mineral-organic bone adhesive (Tetranite) for cranial bone flap fixation. Craniotomy bone flaps created in human cadaveric skulls were tested under quasistatic and impact loading in the following conditions: 1) uncut skull; 2) bone flaps fixated with TPS alone; and 3) bone flaps fixated with bone adhesive alone. All fixative surgical procedures were performed by a group of 16 neurosurgeons in a simulated surgical environment. The position of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps was measured using computed tomography and compared with their original native location. The resistance of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps to simulated CSF leakage was also evaluated. Because there was a gap around the circumference of the TPS-fixated specimens that was visible to the naked eye, pressurized CSF leak testing was not attempted on them. Adhesive-fixated bone flaps showed significantly stiffer and stronger quasistatic responses than TPS-fixated specimens. The strength and stiffness of the adhesive-fixated specimens were not significantly different from those of the uncut native skulls. Total and plastic deflections under 6-J impact were significantly less for adhesive-fixed bone flaps than TPS. There were no significant differences in any subthreshold impact metrics between the adhesive-fixed and native specimens at both 6-J and 12-J impact levels, with 1 exception. Plastic deflection at 6-J impact was significantly less in adhesive-fixated bone flaps than in native specimens. The energy to failure of the adhesive-fixated specimens was not significantly different from that of the native specimens. Time since fixation (20 minutes vs 10 days) did not significantly affect the impact failure properties of the adhesive-fixated specimens. Of the 16 adhesive-fixated craniotomy specimens tested, 14 did not leak at pressures as high as 40 mm Hg. The neurosurgeons in this study had no prior exposure or experience with the bone adhesive. Despite this, improved resistance to CSF egress, superior mechanical properties, and better cosmetic outcomes were demonstrated with bone adhesive compared with TPS.</description><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - surgery</subject><subject>Craniotomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Investigation</subject><subject>Skull - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><issn>0022-3085</issn><issn>1933-0693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCILAsfwAX5yCEb_Ig9O1wQingqggPkPOrxtHcMHnuwPQn7YfwfXhJWcGi1StVV3eoi5ClnZ5I3_IVgQpxV8PHTFyG4Vs09suKtlBumW3mfrFjlN5Jt1Ql5lPM3xrg-1-IhOZFab3mrxYr8uspIo6UwjJjdNVKTIDjwtI8BqfUwU-t-QnEx0BtXxrgUOkIabiAhLZG6aU6xyiY0YxWaqswlYdiV8ZSmapkLNZiwTzHPLlTa-sUN1CN8hx2eUggDncCFUqsCKHH64wLe7cKEobykQD30MVUq7av7MuwfkwcWfMYnd31Nrt6--XrxfnP5-d2Hi9eXGyOVKBu9VVoZ1TPTCD1wYI3umVCtbRppe5CNrF_TvDGaKd7DYG1ruUToW8U1tFyuyatb33npJxxMPSeB7-bkJkj7LoLr_meCG7tdvO44qzmc1zVr8vzOIcUfC-bSTS4b9B4CxiV3otFbIbloVR3lt6Om_iontMc9nHWHvLtD3gdwzLtqnv174FHxN2D5G9MOq5M</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Smith, Timothy R</creator><creator>Foley, Kevin T</creator><creator>Boruah, Sourabh</creator><creator>Slotkin, Jonathan R</creator><creator>Woodard, Eric</creator><creator>Lazor, John B</creator><creator>Cavaleri, Christy</creator><creator>Brown, Michael C</creator><creator>McDonough, Brittany</creator><creator>Hess, Brian</creator><creator>Van Citters, Douglas W</creator><general>American Association of Neurological Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study</title><author>Smith, Timothy R ; Foley, Kevin T ; Boruah, Sourabh ; Slotkin, Jonathan R ; Woodard, Eric ; Lazor, John B ; Cavaleri, Christy ; Brown, Michael C ; McDonough, Brittany ; Hess, Brian ; Van Citters, Douglas W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-68565c5b0c726d1a076b0259f773fba373216617c6051badff9f13eab9516a913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - surgery</topic><topic>Craniotomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Investigation</topic><topic>Skull - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Timothy R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Kevin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boruah, Sourabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotkin, Jonathan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodard, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazor, John B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavaleri, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Michael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonough, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Citters, Douglas W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Timothy R</au><au>Foley, Kevin T</au><au>Boruah, Sourabh</au><au>Slotkin, Jonathan R</au><au>Woodard, Eric</au><au>Lazor, John B</au><au>Cavaleri, Christy</au><au>Brown, Michael C</au><au>McDonough, Brittany</au><au>Hess, Brian</au><au>Van Citters, Douglas W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>517-527</pages><issn>0022-3085</issn><eissn>1933-0693</eissn><abstract>Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound infection/dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel mineral-organic bone adhesive (Tetranite) for cranial bone flap fixation. Craniotomy bone flaps created in human cadaveric skulls were tested under quasistatic and impact loading in the following conditions: 1) uncut skull; 2) bone flaps fixated with TPS alone; and 3) bone flaps fixated with bone adhesive alone. All fixative surgical procedures were performed by a group of 16 neurosurgeons in a simulated surgical environment. The position of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps was measured using computed tomography and compared with their original native location. The resistance of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps to simulated CSF leakage was also evaluated. Because there was a gap around the circumference of the TPS-fixated specimens that was visible to the naked eye, pressurized CSF leak testing was not attempted on them. Adhesive-fixated bone flaps showed significantly stiffer and stronger quasistatic responses than TPS-fixated specimens. The strength and stiffness of the adhesive-fixated specimens were not significantly different from those of the uncut native skulls. Total and plastic deflections under 6-J impact were significantly less for adhesive-fixed bone flaps than TPS. There were no significant differences in any subthreshold impact metrics between the adhesive-fixed and native specimens at both 6-J and 12-J impact levels, with 1 exception. Plastic deflection at 6-J impact was significantly less in adhesive-fixated bone flaps than in native specimens. The energy to failure of the adhesive-fixated specimens was not significantly different from that of the native specimens. Time since fixation (20 minutes vs 10 days) did not significantly affect the impact failure properties of the adhesive-fixated specimens. Of the 16 adhesive-fixated craniotomy specimens tested, 14 did not leak at pressures as high as 40 mm Hg. The neurosurgeons in this study had no prior exposure or experience with the bone adhesive. Despite this, improved resistance to CSF egress, superior mechanical properties, and better cosmetic outcomes were demonstrated with bone adhesive compared with TPS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Neurological Surgeons</pub><pmid>36681962</pmid><doi>10.3171/2022.10.JNS221657</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3085
ispartof Journal of neurosurgery, 2023-08, Vol.139 (2), p.517-527
issn 0022-3085
1933-0693
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10193477
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bone Cements
Bone Plates
Cadaver
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - prevention & control
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak - surgery
Craniotomy - methods
Humans
Laboratory Investigation
Skull - surgery
Surgical Flaps
title Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20adhesive%20cranial%20bone%20flap%20fixation%20without%20hardware%20to%20improve%20mechanical%20strength,%20resist%20cerebrospinal%20fluid%20leakage,%20and%20maintain%20anatomical%20alignment:%20a%20laboratory%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Smith,%20Timothy%20R&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=517-527&rft.issn=0022-3085&rft.eissn=1933-0693&rft_id=info:doi/10.3171/2022.10.JNS221657&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2768231295%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2768231295&rft_id=info:pmid/36681962&rfr_iscdi=true