Safety and Efficacy of Nemonoxacin vs Levofloxacin in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, which incurs significant healthcare costs. The aim of his meta-analysis is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel non-fluorinated quinolone, nemonoxacin, compared with levofloxacin in trea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37650-e37650 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e37650 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e37650 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Khan, Alina S Iqbal, Arham Muhammad, Alina A Mazhar, Fariha Lodhi, Muniba F Ahmed, Komal F Kumar, Satesh Varrassi, Giustino Khatri, Mahima |
description | Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, which incurs significant healthcare costs. The aim of his meta-analysis is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel non-fluorinated quinolone, nemonoxacin, compared with levofloxacin in treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A recursive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2022. All randomized clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia were included. The patients selected for this study had mild to moderate CAP. Each individual received treatment with either nemonoxacin (500 mg or 750 mg) or levofloxacin (500 mg) for a duration of 3-10 days. Four randomized control trials with a total of 1955 patients were included. Nemonoxacin and levofloxacin were found to have similar clinical cure rates in the treatment of CAP. There were no significant differences reported in the treatment-emergent adverse events between the two drugs (RR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.08, I
=0%). However, the most frequent symptoms exhibited were gastrointestinal system-related. Both the dosages (500 mg and 750 mg) of nemonoxacin were found to have similar efficacy as that of levofloxacin. Our meta-analysis indicates that nemonoxacin is a well-tolerated and effective antibiotic therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with clinical success rates comparable to those of levofloxacin. Furthermore, the adverse effects associated with nemonoxacin are generally mild. Therefore, both the 500 mg and 750 mg dosages of nemonoxacin can be recommended as appropriate antibiotic therapy regimens for the treatment of CAP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.37650 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10188129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2821269297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2580-c8a1d8e7cbc5f0f4a582743b679b9880d93e83fc9c229f1413da568f1866d24e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdklFPFDEQxzdGIwR589k08cUHFtvubrf1xVwuCCaHEsD42PS6UynZbaHdnqyfxw9KjzsImjSZafub_3Q6UxRvCT5s20Z81ClAiodVyxr8otilhPGSE16_fObvFPsxXmOMCW4pbvHrYqfKDmYN3S3-XigD44SU69CRMVYrPSFv0DcYvPN3SluHVhEtYOVNv93ndaZGC26M6Kcdr9DcD0NydpzKmb5NNkCHzhykrGDVJzRDF1McYcghGp3DysLvh3SnMKpy5lQ_RRvXOc_zqR_snxw-924MvkeXwao-vilemWxgf2v3ih9fji7nJ-Xi-_HX-WxRatpwXGquSMeh1UvdGGxq1XDa1tWStWIpOMedqIBXRgtNqTCkJlWnGsYN4Yx1tIZqr_i80b1JywE6nSsMqpc3wQ4qTNIrK_-9cfZK_vIrSTDhnFCRFT5sFYK_TRBHOdiooe-VA5-ipJyw3KtarNH3_6HXPoX8HWuKEsoEFW2mDjaUDj7GAObpNQTL9QjIzQjIhxHI-LvnFTzBjw2v7gFctrCG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821269297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and Efficacy of Nemonoxacin vs Levofloxacin in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Khan, Alina S ; Iqbal, Arham ; Muhammad, Alina A ; Mazhar, Fariha ; Lodhi, Muniba F ; Ahmed, Komal F ; Kumar, Satesh ; Varrassi, Giustino ; Khatri, Mahima</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Alina S ; Iqbal, Arham ; Muhammad, Alina A ; Mazhar, Fariha ; Lodhi, Muniba F ; Ahmed, Komal F ; Kumar, Satesh ; Varrassi, Giustino ; Khatri, Mahima</creatorcontrib><description>Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, which incurs significant healthcare costs. The aim of his meta-analysis is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel non-fluorinated quinolone, nemonoxacin, compared with levofloxacin in treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A recursive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2022. All randomized clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia were included. The patients selected for this study had mild to moderate CAP. Each individual received treatment with either nemonoxacin (500 mg or 750 mg) or levofloxacin (500 mg) for a duration of 3-10 days. Four randomized control trials with a total of 1955 patients were included. Nemonoxacin and levofloxacin were found to have similar clinical cure rates in the treatment of CAP. There were no significant differences reported in the treatment-emergent adverse events between the two drugs (RR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.08, I
=0%). However, the most frequent symptoms exhibited were gastrointestinal system-related. Both the dosages (500 mg and 750 mg) of nemonoxacin were found to have similar efficacy as that of levofloxacin. Our meta-analysis indicates that nemonoxacin is a well-tolerated and effective antibiotic therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with clinical success rates comparable to those of levofloxacin. Furthermore, the adverse effects associated with nemonoxacin are generally mild. Therefore, both the 500 mg and 750 mg dosages of nemonoxacin can be recommended as appropriate antibiotic therapy regimens for the treatment of CAP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37650</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37200652</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Drug dosages ; Drug resistance ; Ethnicity ; Infectious Disease ; Internal Medicine ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Neutropenia ; Pathogens ; Penicillin ; Pneumonia ; Prescription drugs ; Pulmonology ; Staphylococcus infections ; Streptococcus infections ; Systematic review ; Thrombocytopenia ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37650-e37650</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Khan et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Khan et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Khan et al. 2023 Khan et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2580-c8a1d8e7cbc5f0f4a582743b679b9880d93e83fc9c229f1413da568f1866d24e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2580-c8a1d8e7cbc5f0f4a582743b679b9880d93e83fc9c229f1413da568f1866d24e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188129/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10188129/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Alina S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Arham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhammad, Alina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazhar, Fariha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodhi, Muniba F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Komal F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Satesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varrassi, Giustino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatri, Mahima</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and Efficacy of Nemonoxacin vs Levofloxacin in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, which incurs significant healthcare costs. The aim of his meta-analysis is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel non-fluorinated quinolone, nemonoxacin, compared with levofloxacin in treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A recursive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2022. All randomized clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia were included. The patients selected for this study had mild to moderate CAP. Each individual received treatment with either nemonoxacin (500 mg or 750 mg) or levofloxacin (500 mg) for a duration of 3-10 days. Four randomized control trials with a total of 1955 patients were included. Nemonoxacin and levofloxacin were found to have similar clinical cure rates in the treatment of CAP. There were no significant differences reported in the treatment-emergent adverse events between the two drugs (RR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.08, I
=0%). However, the most frequent symptoms exhibited were gastrointestinal system-related. Both the dosages (500 mg and 750 mg) of nemonoxacin were found to have similar efficacy as that of levofloxacin. Our meta-analysis indicates that nemonoxacin is a well-tolerated and effective antibiotic therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with clinical success rates comparable to those of levofloxacin. Furthermore, the adverse effects associated with nemonoxacin are generally mild. Therefore, both the 500 mg and 750 mg dosages of nemonoxacin can be recommended as appropriate antibiotic therapy regimens for the treatment of CAP.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neutropenia</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Pulmonology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thrombocytopenia</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdklFPFDEQxzdGIwR589k08cUHFtvubrf1xVwuCCaHEsD42PS6UynZbaHdnqyfxw9KjzsImjSZafub_3Q6UxRvCT5s20Z81ClAiodVyxr8otilhPGSE16_fObvFPsxXmOMCW4pbvHrYqfKDmYN3S3-XigD44SU69CRMVYrPSFv0DcYvPN3SluHVhEtYOVNv93ndaZGC26M6Kcdr9DcD0NydpzKmb5NNkCHzhykrGDVJzRDF1McYcghGp3DysLvh3SnMKpy5lQ_RRvXOc_zqR_snxw-924MvkeXwao-vilemWxgf2v3ih9fji7nJ-Xi-_HX-WxRatpwXGquSMeh1UvdGGxq1XDa1tWStWIpOMedqIBXRgtNqTCkJlWnGsYN4Yx1tIZqr_i80b1JywE6nSsMqpc3wQ4qTNIrK_-9cfZK_vIrSTDhnFCRFT5sFYK_TRBHOdiooe-VA5-ipJyw3KtarNH3_6HXPoX8HWuKEsoEFW2mDjaUDj7GAObpNQTL9QjIzQjIhxHI-LvnFTzBjw2v7gFctrCG</recordid><startdate>20230416</startdate><enddate>20230416</enddate><creator>Khan, Alina S</creator><creator>Iqbal, Arham</creator><creator>Muhammad, Alina A</creator><creator>Mazhar, Fariha</creator><creator>Lodhi, Muniba F</creator><creator>Ahmed, Komal F</creator><creator>Kumar, Satesh</creator><creator>Varrassi, Giustino</creator><creator>Khatri, Mahima</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230416</creationdate><title>Safety and Efficacy of Nemonoxacin vs Levofloxacin in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials</title><author>Khan, Alina S ; Iqbal, Arham ; Muhammad, Alina A ; Mazhar, Fariha ; Lodhi, Muniba F ; Ahmed, Komal F ; Kumar, Satesh ; Varrassi, Giustino ; Khatri, Mahima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2580-c8a1d8e7cbc5f0f4a582743b679b9880d93e83fc9c229f1413da568f1866d24e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neutropenia</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Pulmonology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thrombocytopenia</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Alina S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Arham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhammad, Alina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazhar, Fariha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodhi, Muniba F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Komal F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Satesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varrassi, Giustino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatri, Mahima</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Alina S</au><au>Iqbal, Arham</au><au>Muhammad, Alina A</au><au>Mazhar, Fariha</au><au>Lodhi, Muniba F</au><au>Ahmed, Komal F</au><au>Kumar, Satesh</au><au>Varrassi, Giustino</au><au>Khatri, Mahima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and Efficacy of Nemonoxacin vs Levofloxacin in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2023-04-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e37650</spage><epage>e37650</epage><pages>e37650-e37650</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, which incurs significant healthcare costs. The aim of his meta-analysis is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel non-fluorinated quinolone, nemonoxacin, compared with levofloxacin in treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A recursive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2022. All randomized clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia were included. The patients selected for this study had mild to moderate CAP. Each individual received treatment with either nemonoxacin (500 mg or 750 mg) or levofloxacin (500 mg) for a duration of 3-10 days. Four randomized control trials with a total of 1955 patients were included. Nemonoxacin and levofloxacin were found to have similar clinical cure rates in the treatment of CAP. There were no significant differences reported in the treatment-emergent adverse events between the two drugs (RR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.08, I
=0%). However, the most frequent symptoms exhibited were gastrointestinal system-related. Both the dosages (500 mg and 750 mg) of nemonoxacin were found to have similar efficacy as that of levofloxacin. Our meta-analysis indicates that nemonoxacin is a well-tolerated and effective antibiotic therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with clinical success rates comparable to those of levofloxacin. Furthermore, the adverse effects associated with nemonoxacin are generally mild. Therefore, both the 500 mg and 750 mg dosages of nemonoxacin can be recommended as appropriate antibiotic therapy regimens for the treatment of CAP.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>37200652</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.37650</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37650-e37650 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10188129 |
source | PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Antibiotics Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Drug dosages Drug resistance Ethnicity Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Meta-analysis Mortality Neutropenia Pathogens Penicillin Pneumonia Prescription drugs Pulmonology Staphylococcus infections Streptococcus infections Systematic review Thrombocytopenia Tuberculosis |
title | Safety and Efficacy of Nemonoxacin vs Levofloxacin in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A54%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20Nemonoxacin%20vs%20Levofloxacin%20in%20Patients%20With%20Community-Acquired%20Pneumonia:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Control%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Khan,%20Alina%20S&rft.date=2023-04-16&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e37650&rft.epage=e37650&rft.pages=e37650-e37650&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.37650&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2821269297%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821269297&rft_id=info:pmid/37200652&rfr_iscdi=true |