Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal oncology 2023-04, Vol.14 (2), p.626-635
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Zhilan, Ma, Chunyan, Luo, Yanbing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 635
container_issue 2
container_start_page 626
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal oncology
container_volume 14
creator Zhang, Zhilan
Ma, Chunyan
Luo, Yanbing
description Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Technologies (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the bivariate mixed effects model, calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot. Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I >50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51-120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93-1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77-7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P>0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity. Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jgo-23-211
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10186536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2816763549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-74a49c4d32c2dd69cd8e87e7d2eac5b6e5bc0431d2359ec69cda7b04683079fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU2LFDEQhoMo7rLuybvkKEhrPrqTjheR9RMWvCh4CzVJzUyWdDIm3SNz8q-bdtdF65Kq5Km3UryEPOXspeBM6lc3u9wJ2QnOH5BzIbjplDbfH7ac6bFTo-Fn5LLWG9aiNwMbxGNyJrVgnGl9Tn69C7BLuc7B0SPEBWne0hiOWKjLaS5Q5w7THpJDT5e4XuQleRoSRSjxRPd4gDk7jHGJ0JqguJDyBK8p0HqqM06wahc8BvxJobVOOEMHCeKphvqEPNpCrHh5d16Qbx_ef7361F1_-fj56u115-Qo5k730BvXeymc8F4Z50ccNWovENywUThsHOsl90IOBt0KgN6wXo2SabNFeUHe3Ooels2E3uG6W7SHEiYoJ5sh2P9fUtjbXT5azvioBqmawvM7hZJ_LFhnO4W67g0J81KtGLnSSg69aeiLW9SVXGvB7f0czuwf22yzzQrZCt7oZ_9-7Z79a5L8DfDXl8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2816763549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhang, Zhilan ; Ma, Chunyan ; Luo, Yanbing</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhilan ; Ma, Chunyan ; Luo, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><description>Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Technologies (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the bivariate mixed effects model, calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot. Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I &gt;50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51-120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93-1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77-7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P&gt;0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity. Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2078-6891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2219-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37201077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023-04, Vol.14 (2), p.626-635</ispartof><rights>2023 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved. 2023 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-74a49c4d32c2dd69cd8e87e7d2eac5b6e5bc0431d2359ec69cda7b04683079fe3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186536/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10186536/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal oncology</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Oncol</addtitle><description>Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Technologies (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the bivariate mixed effects model, calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot. Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I &gt;50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51-120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93-1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77-7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P&gt;0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity. Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2078-6891</issn><issn>2219-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU2LFDEQhoMo7rLuybvkKEhrPrqTjheR9RMWvCh4CzVJzUyWdDIm3SNz8q-bdtdF65Kq5Km3UryEPOXspeBM6lc3u9wJ2QnOH5BzIbjplDbfH7ac6bFTo-Fn5LLWG9aiNwMbxGNyJrVgnGl9Tn69C7BLuc7B0SPEBWne0hiOWKjLaS5Q5w7THpJDT5e4XuQleRoSRSjxRPd4gDk7jHGJ0JqguJDyBK8p0HqqM06wahc8BvxJobVOOEMHCeKphvqEPNpCrHh5d16Qbx_ef7361F1_-fj56u115-Qo5k730BvXeymc8F4Z50ccNWovENywUThsHOsl90IOBt0KgN6wXo2SabNFeUHe3Ooels2E3uG6W7SHEiYoJ5sh2P9fUtjbXT5azvioBqmawvM7hZJ_LFhnO4W67g0J81KtGLnSSg69aeiLW9SVXGvB7f0czuwf22yzzQrZCt7oZ_9-7Z79a5L8DfDXl8g</recordid><startdate>20230429</startdate><enddate>20230429</enddate><creator>Zhang, Zhilan</creator><creator>Ma, Chunyan</creator><creator>Luo, Yanbing</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230429</creationdate><title>Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Zhang, Zhilan ; Ma, Chunyan ; Luo, Yanbing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-74a49c4d32c2dd69cd8e87e7d2eac5b6e5bc0431d2359ec69cda7b04683079fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Zhilan</au><au>Ma, Chunyan</au><au>Luo, Yanbing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Oncol</addtitle><date>2023-04-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>626-635</pages><issn>2078-6891</issn><eissn>2219-679X</eissn><abstract>Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and its incidence rate will continue to increase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is feasible as a rapid examination for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. However, considering the possible causes of false positives caused by ultrasound, its diagnostic value is still controversial. Therefore, the study conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the application value of CEUS in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Technologies (OVID), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Information (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched to retrieve articles on the use of CEUS for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The literature quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) quality assessment tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 to fit the bivariate mixed effects model, calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and corresponding 95% CI, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC), area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI). The publication bias of the included literature was evaluated using the DEEK funnel plot. Ultimately, 9 articles, comprising 1,434 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The heterogeneity test found that I &gt;50%, using a random effects model. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the CEUS had a combined sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95), a combined specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-0.99), a combined PLR of 13.47 (95% CI: 1.51-120.46), a combined NLR of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.14), a combined DOR of 154.16 (95% CI: 15.93-1,492.02), a diagnostic score of 5.04 (95% CI: 2.77-7.31), and a combined AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). The correlation coefficient of the threshold-effect analysis was 0.13 (P&gt;0.05). The results of the regression analysis showed that the country of publication (P=0.14) and the size of the lesion nodules (P=0.46) were not sources of heterogeneity. Liver CEUS has an advantage in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, with high sensitivity and specificity, and has clinical application value.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>37201077</pmid><doi>10.21037/jgo-23-211</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2078-6891
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023-04, Vol.14 (2), p.626-635
issn 2078-6891
2219-679X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10186536
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A23%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20value%20of%20liver%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20in%20early%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20oncology&rft.au=Zhang,%20Zhilan&rft.date=2023-04-29&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=626-635&rft.issn=2078-6891&rft.eissn=2219-679X&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jgo-23-211&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2816763549%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2816763549&rft_id=info:pmid/37201077&rfr_iscdi=true