The Effect of Timing of Debridement and Surgical Intervention in Open Fractures on the Rate of Infection and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Setup
Introduction Open fractures remain one of the true orthopedic emergencies. Despite recent advances in orthopedic surgery, the management of compound fractures is still a challenge to an orthopedic surgeon. Open fractures are a result of high-speed injuries and are associated with several complicatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37204-e37204 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e37204 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e37204 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Singh, Arpit Agarwal, Ankur Mohan, Ravindra Singh, Shailendra Tewari, Prakash Srivastava, Shubham |
description | Introduction Open fractures remain one of the true orthopedic emergencies. Despite recent advances in orthopedic surgery, the management of compound fractures is still a challenge to an orthopedic surgeon. Open fractures are a result of high-speed injuries and are associated with several complications such as infections, non-unions, or sometimes an eventual amputation. Infection is the major problem associated with open fractures due to soft tissue damage, contamination, and neurovascular compromise. Presently, management of open fractures requires early aggressive debridement followed by limb salvage by definitive reconstruction or amputation, depending upon the extent and location of the injury. Early aggressive debridement of open fractures has always been the rule. However, it has been observed that open fractures managed even after six hours of injury fare well, and there are no definite guidelines available to decide the safe period of debridement following open fractures so as to prevent infection. The "six-hour rule" is a hotly debated topic with fervent perseverance of this dogma despite a gross lack of support from the literature. Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between the timing of operation/debridement on infection rates in open fractures, particularly if surgery is performed after six hours. Methods This is a prospective study of 124 patients (R=5-75 years) presenting with open fractures to the outpatient department (OPD) and emergency section of a tertiary care hospital from January 2019 to November 2020. Patients were divided into four groups based on the time to operation/debridement: groups A, B, C, and D, with patients operated within six hours, six to 12 hours, 12-24 hours, and 24-72 hours after injury, respectively. Infection rates were obtained based on the above data. ANOVA was applied using SPSS 20 software (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). Results This study concludes that the infection rate for fractures treated in less than six hours was 18.75%; in the six to 12 hours group, it was 18.50%, and in the 12-24 hours group, it was 14.28%. The infection rate increased to 38.8% if surgery was performed after 24 hours of injury. On statistical analysis, the time to debridement was not found to be a significant factor. The infection rate in Gustilo-Anderson classification compound grade I was 2.7%, grade II 9.8%, grade IIIA 45%, and grade IIIB 61%. Also, in this study, the union rate in grade I was 97.22% |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.37204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10163843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811938062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-cfd70f9cc47305009deef70f63f334896fd2e68413f1d963f9169740139482883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks9LHDEUx0OpVNl667kEeunBtclkNpP0UmSr7YKwottziJmXNTKTmebHgv9T_8hmulbUU8L3ffjwXvIQ-kDJadMs5BeTA-R4ypqK1G_QUUW5mAsq6rfP7ofoOMZ7QgglBWvIO3TIGrqQDedH6M_mDvC5tWASHizeuN757XT7DrfBtdCDT1j7Ft_ksHVGd3jlE4Rdid3gsfN4PYLHF0GbVHqJuISpKK91gkmz8pN6Ql9I1jmZoYf4FZ_hqzDEcYJ2gG9Sbh8mq8YbCMnp8ICXOpQCpDy-RwdWdxGOH88Z-nVxvln-nF-uf6yWZ5dzw2qW5sa2DbHSmLphZEGIbAFsSTizjNVCcttWwEVNmaWtLKmkXDY1oUzWohKCzdC3vXfMtz20pgwbdKfG4PrSkBq0Uy8r3t2p7bBTlFDORM2K4fOjIQy_M8SkehcNdJ32MOSoKkGpZILwqqCfXqH3Qw6-zFeoila8WhR0hk72lCmvFQPYp24oUdMqqP0qqH-rUPCPzyd4gv9_PPsL2ISxcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821262519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Timing of Debridement and Surgical Intervention in Open Fractures on the Rate of Infection and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Setup</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Singh, Arpit ; Agarwal, Ankur ; Mohan, Ravindra ; Singh, Shailendra ; Tewari, Prakash ; Srivastava, Shubham</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Arpit ; Agarwal, Ankur ; Mohan, Ravindra ; Singh, Shailendra ; Tewari, Prakash ; Srivastava, Shubham</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Open fractures remain one of the true orthopedic emergencies. Despite recent advances in orthopedic surgery, the management of compound fractures is still a challenge to an orthopedic surgeon. Open fractures are a result of high-speed injuries and are associated with several complications such as infections, non-unions, or sometimes an eventual amputation. Infection is the major problem associated with open fractures due to soft tissue damage, contamination, and neurovascular compromise. Presently, management of open fractures requires early aggressive debridement followed by limb salvage by definitive reconstruction or amputation, depending upon the extent and location of the injury. Early aggressive debridement of open fractures has always been the rule. However, it has been observed that open fractures managed even after six hours of injury fare well, and there are no definite guidelines available to decide the safe period of debridement following open fractures so as to prevent infection. The "six-hour rule" is a hotly debated topic with fervent perseverance of this dogma despite a gross lack of support from the literature. Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between the timing of operation/debridement on infection rates in open fractures, particularly if surgery is performed after six hours. Methods This is a prospective study of 124 patients (R=5-75 years) presenting with open fractures to the outpatient department (OPD) and emergency section of a tertiary care hospital from January 2019 to November 2020. Patients were divided into four groups based on the time to operation/debridement: groups A, B, C, and D, with patients operated within six hours, six to 12 hours, 12-24 hours, and 24-72 hours after injury, respectively. Infection rates were obtained based on the above data. ANOVA was applied using SPSS 20 software (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). Results This study concludes that the infection rate for fractures treated in less than six hours was 18.75%; in the six to 12 hours group, it was 18.50%, and in the 12-24 hours group, it was 14.28%. The infection rate increased to 38.8% if surgery was performed after 24 hours of injury. On statistical analysis, the time to debridement was not found to be a significant factor. The infection rate in Gustilo-Anderson classification compound grade I was 2.7%, grade II 9.8%, grade IIIA 45%, and grade IIIB 61%. Also, in this study, the union rate in grade I was 97.22%, grade II 96.07%, grade IIIA 85%, and grade IIIB 66.66%. Thus, the degree of wound contamination and compounding gives a prognostic indication regarding the final outcome of the compound fracture. Conclusion Time to debridement is not a significant factor in the management of compound fractures, and these fractures can be safely debrided up to 24 hours after injury. Gustilo and Anderson's classification provides a prognostic indicator of the outcome of a compound fracture. Infection rates and non-union rates increase with increasing grades of compound fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37204</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37159766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Debridement ; Developing countries ; Hail ; Infections ; Infectious Disease ; Injuries ; LDCs ; Medical prognosis ; Open fractures ; Orthopedics ; Patients ; Public Health ; Skin ; Surgical outcomes ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37204-e37204</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Singh et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Singh et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Singh et al. 2023 Singh et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-cfd70f9cc47305009deef70f63f334896fd2e68413f1d963f9169740139482883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-cfd70f9cc47305009deef70f63f334896fd2e68413f1d963f9169740139482883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163843/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10163843/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37159766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Arpit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ankur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Shailendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Shubham</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Timing of Debridement and Surgical Intervention in Open Fractures on the Rate of Infection and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Setup</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Introduction Open fractures remain one of the true orthopedic emergencies. Despite recent advances in orthopedic surgery, the management of compound fractures is still a challenge to an orthopedic surgeon. Open fractures are a result of high-speed injuries and are associated with several complications such as infections, non-unions, or sometimes an eventual amputation. Infection is the major problem associated with open fractures due to soft tissue damage, contamination, and neurovascular compromise. Presently, management of open fractures requires early aggressive debridement followed by limb salvage by definitive reconstruction or amputation, depending upon the extent and location of the injury. Early aggressive debridement of open fractures has always been the rule. However, it has been observed that open fractures managed even after six hours of injury fare well, and there are no definite guidelines available to decide the safe period of debridement following open fractures so as to prevent infection. The "six-hour rule" is a hotly debated topic with fervent perseverance of this dogma despite a gross lack of support from the literature. Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between the timing of operation/debridement on infection rates in open fractures, particularly if surgery is performed after six hours. Methods This is a prospective study of 124 patients (R=5-75 years) presenting with open fractures to the outpatient department (OPD) and emergency section of a tertiary care hospital from January 2019 to November 2020. Patients were divided into four groups based on the time to operation/debridement: groups A, B, C, and D, with patients operated within six hours, six to 12 hours, 12-24 hours, and 24-72 hours after injury, respectively. Infection rates were obtained based on the above data. ANOVA was applied using SPSS 20 software (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). Results This study concludes that the infection rate for fractures treated in less than six hours was 18.75%; in the six to 12 hours group, it was 18.50%, and in the 12-24 hours group, it was 14.28%. The infection rate increased to 38.8% if surgery was performed after 24 hours of injury. On statistical analysis, the time to debridement was not found to be a significant factor. The infection rate in Gustilo-Anderson classification compound grade I was 2.7%, grade II 9.8%, grade IIIA 45%, and grade IIIB 61%. Also, in this study, the union rate in grade I was 97.22%, grade II 96.07%, grade IIIA 85%, and grade IIIB 66.66%. Thus, the degree of wound contamination and compounding gives a prognostic indication regarding the final outcome of the compound fracture. Conclusion Time to debridement is not a significant factor in the management of compound fractures, and these fractures can be safely debrided up to 24 hours after injury. Gustilo and Anderson's classification provides a prognostic indicator of the outcome of a compound fracture. Infection rates and non-union rates increase with increasing grades of compound fractures.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Hail</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Open fractures</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks9LHDEUx0OpVNl667kEeunBtclkNpP0UmSr7YKwottziJmXNTKTmebHgv9T_8hmulbUU8L3ffjwXvIQ-kDJadMs5BeTA-R4ypqK1G_QUUW5mAsq6rfP7ofoOMZ7QgglBWvIO3TIGrqQDedH6M_mDvC5tWASHizeuN757XT7DrfBtdCDT1j7Ft_ksHVGd3jlE4Rdid3gsfN4PYLHF0GbVHqJuISpKK91gkmz8pN6Ql9I1jmZoYf4FZ_hqzDEcYJ2gG9Sbh8mq8YbCMnp8ICXOpQCpDy-RwdWdxGOH88Z-nVxvln-nF-uf6yWZ5dzw2qW5sa2DbHSmLphZEGIbAFsSTizjNVCcttWwEVNmaWtLKmkXDY1oUzWohKCzdC3vXfMtz20pgwbdKfG4PrSkBq0Uy8r3t2p7bBTlFDORM2K4fOjIQy_M8SkehcNdJ32MOSoKkGpZILwqqCfXqH3Qw6-zFeoila8WhR0hk72lCmvFQPYp24oUdMqqP0qqH-rUPCPzyd4gv9_PPsL2ISxcw</recordid><startdate>20230406</startdate><enddate>20230406</enddate><creator>Singh, Arpit</creator><creator>Agarwal, Ankur</creator><creator>Mohan, Ravindra</creator><creator>Singh, Shailendra</creator><creator>Tewari, Prakash</creator><creator>Srivastava, Shubham</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230406</creationdate><title>The Effect of Timing of Debridement and Surgical Intervention in Open Fractures on the Rate of Infection and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Setup</title><author>Singh, Arpit ; Agarwal, Ankur ; Mohan, Ravindra ; Singh, Shailendra ; Tewari, Prakash ; Srivastava, Shubham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-cfd70f9cc47305009deef70f63f334896fd2e68413f1d963f9169740139482883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Hail</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Open fractures</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Arpit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ankur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Shailendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Shubham</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Arpit</au><au>Agarwal, Ankur</au><au>Mohan, Ravindra</au><au>Singh, Shailendra</au><au>Tewari, Prakash</au><au>Srivastava, Shubham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Timing of Debridement and Surgical Intervention in Open Fractures on the Rate of Infection and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Setup</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2023-04-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e37204</spage><epage>e37204</epage><pages>e37204-e37204</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction Open fractures remain one of the true orthopedic emergencies. Despite recent advances in orthopedic surgery, the management of compound fractures is still a challenge to an orthopedic surgeon. Open fractures are a result of high-speed injuries and are associated with several complications such as infections, non-unions, or sometimes an eventual amputation. Infection is the major problem associated with open fractures due to soft tissue damage, contamination, and neurovascular compromise. Presently, management of open fractures requires early aggressive debridement followed by limb salvage by definitive reconstruction or amputation, depending upon the extent and location of the injury. Early aggressive debridement of open fractures has always been the rule. However, it has been observed that open fractures managed even after six hours of injury fare well, and there are no definite guidelines available to decide the safe period of debridement following open fractures so as to prevent infection. The "six-hour rule" is a hotly debated topic with fervent perseverance of this dogma despite a gross lack of support from the literature. Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between the timing of operation/debridement on infection rates in open fractures, particularly if surgery is performed after six hours. Methods This is a prospective study of 124 patients (R=5-75 years) presenting with open fractures to the outpatient department (OPD) and emergency section of a tertiary care hospital from January 2019 to November 2020. Patients were divided into four groups based on the time to operation/debridement: groups A, B, C, and D, with patients operated within six hours, six to 12 hours, 12-24 hours, and 24-72 hours after injury, respectively. Infection rates were obtained based on the above data. ANOVA was applied using SPSS 20 software (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). Results This study concludes that the infection rate for fractures treated in less than six hours was 18.75%; in the six to 12 hours group, it was 18.50%, and in the 12-24 hours group, it was 14.28%. The infection rate increased to 38.8% if surgery was performed after 24 hours of injury. On statistical analysis, the time to debridement was not found to be a significant factor. The infection rate in Gustilo-Anderson classification compound grade I was 2.7%, grade II 9.8%, grade IIIA 45%, and grade IIIB 61%. Also, in this study, the union rate in grade I was 97.22%, grade II 96.07%, grade IIIA 85%, and grade IIIB 66.66%. Thus, the degree of wound contamination and compounding gives a prognostic indication regarding the final outcome of the compound fracture. Conclusion Time to debridement is not a significant factor in the management of compound fractures, and these fractures can be safely debrided up to 24 hours after injury. Gustilo and Anderson's classification provides a prognostic indicator of the outcome of a compound fracture. Infection rates and non-union rates increase with increasing grades of compound fractures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>37159766</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.37204</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.e37204-e37204 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10163843 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibiotics Debridement Developing countries Hail Infections Infectious Disease Injuries LDCs Medical prognosis Open fractures Orthopedics Patients Public Health Skin Surgical outcomes Trauma |
title | The Effect of Timing of Debridement and Surgical Intervention in Open Fractures on the Rate of Infection and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Setup |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A27%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Timing%20of%20Debridement%20and%20Surgical%20Intervention%20in%20Open%20Fractures%20on%20the%20Rate%20of%20Infection%20and%20Surgical%20Outcomes:%20A%20Prospective%20Study%20in%20a%20Tertiary%20Care%20Setup&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Singh,%20Arpit&rft.date=2023-04-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e37204&rft.epage=e37204&rft.pages=e37204-e37204&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.37204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2811938062%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821262519&rft_id=info:pmid/37159766&rfr_iscdi=true |