Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure

Aortic valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft offers patients a living valve substitute that provides excellent haemodynamics, freedom from long-term use of anticoagulation, minimal valve-related complications and the ability to grow. Abstract OBJECTIVES After a Ross procedure, autograft failu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2023-05, Vol.63 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Abeln, Karen B, Ehrlich, Tristan, Souko, Idriss, Brenner, Friederike, Schäfers, Hans-Joachim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery
container_volume 63
creator Abeln, Karen B
Ehrlich, Tristan
Souko, Idriss
Brenner, Friederike
Schäfers, Hans-Joachim
description Aortic valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft offers patients a living valve substitute that provides excellent haemodynamics, freedom from long-term use of anticoagulation, minimal valve-related complications and the ability to grow. Abstract OBJECTIVES After a Ross procedure, autograft failure can occur. At reoperation, repair of the autograft preserves the advantages of the Ross procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess mid-term results after reoperation of a failed autograft. METHODS Between 1997 and 2022, 30 consecutive patients (83% male; age 41 ± 11 years) underwent autograft reintervention between 60 days and 24 years (median 10 years) after a Ross procedure. The initial technique varied, full-root replacement (n = 25) being the most frequent. The indication for reoperation was isolated autograft regurgitation (n = 7), root dilatation (>43 mm) with (n = 17) or without (n = 2) autograft regurgitation, mixed dysfunction (n = 2) and endocarditis (n = 2). In 4 instances, the valve was replaced by valve (n = 1) or combined valve and root replacement (n = 3). Valve-sparing procedures consisted of isolated valve repair (n = 7) or root replacement (n = 19), and tubular aortic replacement. Cusp repair was performed in all but 2. Mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 6 years (35 days to 24 years). RESULTS Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 74 ± 26 and 132 ± 64 min. There were 2 perioperative deaths (7%; both valve replacement) and 2 patients died late (32 days to 1.2 years postoperatively). Freedom from cardiac death at 10 years was 96% after valve repair and 50% after replacement. Two patients required reoperation (1.68 and 16 years) following repair. One underwent valve replacement for cusp perforation, the other, root remodelling for dilatation. Freedom from autograft reintervention at 15 years was 95%. CONCLUSIONS Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure can be performed as valve-sparing operations in the majority of cases. With valve-sparing, long-term survival and freedom from reoperation are excellent.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ejcts/ezad117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10162808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ejcts/ezad117</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2791704993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-16f8227e5516fc12c7640b34c0de890d6531e16d1c16067bc89354e8f2894d3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AUXESxWj16lRy9xO5Hsh8nKcUvKAii4G3Zbl7alDQbdzeC_nqjrbWePL3hvWFm3iB0RvAlwYqNYGljGMGHKQgRe-iISMFSwbKX_R08QMchLDHGnFFxiAaMK0E4pkdoNO6im3tTxsSDa8GbWLkmJP0CfBIXkDy6EJLWOwtF5-EEHZSmDnC6mUP0fHP9NLlLpw-395PxNLUZJTElvJSUCsjzHllCreAZnrHM4gKkwgXPGQHCC2L7GFzMrFQsz0CWVKqsYIYN0dVat-1mKygsNNGbWre-Whn_rp2p9N9LUy303L1pggmnEste4WKj4N1rByHqVRUs1LVpwHVBU6GIwJlSrKema6r1_bMeyq0PwfqrZf3dst603PPPd8Nt2T-1_nq7rv1H6xPiYIhY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791704993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Abeln, Karen B ; Ehrlich, Tristan ; Souko, Idriss ; Brenner, Friederike ; Schäfers, Hans-Joachim</creator><creatorcontrib>Abeln, Karen B ; Ehrlich, Tristan ; Souko, Idriss ; Brenner, Friederike ; Schäfers, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><description>Aortic valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft offers patients a living valve substitute that provides excellent haemodynamics, freedom from long-term use of anticoagulation, minimal valve-related complications and the ability to grow. Abstract OBJECTIVES After a Ross procedure, autograft failure can occur. At reoperation, repair of the autograft preserves the advantages of the Ross procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess mid-term results after reoperation of a failed autograft. METHODS Between 1997 and 2022, 30 consecutive patients (83% male; age 41 ± 11 years) underwent autograft reintervention between 60 days and 24 years (median 10 years) after a Ross procedure. The initial technique varied, full-root replacement (n = 25) being the most frequent. The indication for reoperation was isolated autograft regurgitation (n = 7), root dilatation (&gt;43 mm) with (n = 17) or without (n = 2) autograft regurgitation, mixed dysfunction (n = 2) and endocarditis (n = 2). In 4 instances, the valve was replaced by valve (n = 1) or combined valve and root replacement (n = 3). Valve-sparing procedures consisted of isolated valve repair (n = 7) or root replacement (n = 19), and tubular aortic replacement. Cusp repair was performed in all but 2. Mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 6 years (35 days to 24 years). RESULTS Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 74 ± 26 and 132 ± 64 min. There were 2 perioperative deaths (7%; both valve replacement) and 2 patients died late (32 days to 1.2 years postoperatively). Freedom from cardiac death at 10 years was 96% after valve repair and 50% after replacement. Two patients required reoperation (1.68 and 16 years) following repair. One underwent valve replacement for cusp perforation, the other, root remodelling for dilatation. Freedom from autograft reintervention at 15 years was 95%. CONCLUSIONS Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure can be performed as valve-sparing operations in the majority of cases. With valve-sparing, long-term survival and freedom from reoperation are excellent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1873-734X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1010-7940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-734X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36971602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Autografts ; Conventional Valve Operations ; Dilatation, Pathologic - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Pulmonary Valve - transplantation ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2023-05, Vol.63 (5)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-16f8227e5516fc12c7640b34c0de890d6531e16d1c16067bc89354e8f2894d3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-16f8227e5516fc12c7640b34c0de890d6531e16d1c16067bc89354e8f2894d3a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0251-9100 ; 0000-0001-6110-3124 ; 0000-0001-6217-5963</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36971602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abeln, Karen B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souko, Idriss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Friederike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfers, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><title>Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure</title><title>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><description>Aortic valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft offers patients a living valve substitute that provides excellent haemodynamics, freedom from long-term use of anticoagulation, minimal valve-related complications and the ability to grow. Abstract OBJECTIVES After a Ross procedure, autograft failure can occur. At reoperation, repair of the autograft preserves the advantages of the Ross procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess mid-term results after reoperation of a failed autograft. METHODS Between 1997 and 2022, 30 consecutive patients (83% male; age 41 ± 11 years) underwent autograft reintervention between 60 days and 24 years (median 10 years) after a Ross procedure. The initial technique varied, full-root replacement (n = 25) being the most frequent. The indication for reoperation was isolated autograft regurgitation (n = 7), root dilatation (&gt;43 mm) with (n = 17) or without (n = 2) autograft regurgitation, mixed dysfunction (n = 2) and endocarditis (n = 2). In 4 instances, the valve was replaced by valve (n = 1) or combined valve and root replacement (n = 3). Valve-sparing procedures consisted of isolated valve repair (n = 7) or root replacement (n = 19), and tubular aortic replacement. Cusp repair was performed in all but 2. Mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 6 years (35 days to 24 years). RESULTS Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 74 ± 26 and 132 ± 64 min. There were 2 perioperative deaths (7%; both valve replacement) and 2 patients died late (32 days to 1.2 years postoperatively). Freedom from cardiac death at 10 years was 96% after valve repair and 50% after replacement. Two patients required reoperation (1.68 and 16 years) following repair. One underwent valve replacement for cusp perforation, the other, root remodelling for dilatation. Freedom from autograft reintervention at 15 years was 95%. CONCLUSIONS Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure can be performed as valve-sparing operations in the majority of cases. With valve-sparing, long-term survival and freedom from reoperation are excellent.</description><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Conventional Valve Operations</subject><subject>Dilatation, Pathologic - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pulmonary Valve - transplantation</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1873-734X</issn><issn>1010-7940</issn><issn>1873-734X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AUXESxWj16lRy9xO5Hsh8nKcUvKAii4G3Zbl7alDQbdzeC_nqjrbWePL3hvWFm3iB0RvAlwYqNYGljGMGHKQgRe-iISMFSwbKX_R08QMchLDHGnFFxiAaMK0E4pkdoNO6im3tTxsSDa8GbWLkmJP0CfBIXkDy6EJLWOwtF5-EEHZSmDnC6mUP0fHP9NLlLpw-395PxNLUZJTElvJSUCsjzHllCreAZnrHM4gKkwgXPGQHCC2L7GFzMrFQsz0CWVKqsYIYN0dVat-1mKygsNNGbWre-Whn_rp2p9N9LUy303L1pggmnEste4WKj4N1rByHqVRUs1LVpwHVBU6GIwJlSrKema6r1_bMeyq0PwfqrZf3dst603PPPd8Nt2T-1_nq7rv1H6xPiYIhY</recordid><startdate>20230502</startdate><enddate>20230502</enddate><creator>Abeln, Karen B</creator><creator>Ehrlich, Tristan</creator><creator>Souko, Idriss</creator><creator>Brenner, Friederike</creator><creator>Schäfers, Hans-Joachim</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-9100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-3124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6217-5963</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230502</creationdate><title>Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure</title><author>Abeln, Karen B ; Ehrlich, Tristan ; Souko, Idriss ; Brenner, Friederike ; Schäfers, Hans-Joachim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-16f8227e5516fc12c7640b34c0de890d6531e16d1c16067bc89354e8f2894d3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Conventional Valve Operations</topic><topic>Dilatation, Pathologic - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pulmonary Valve - transplantation</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abeln, Karen B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Tristan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souko, Idriss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Friederike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfers, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abeln, Karen B</au><au>Ehrlich, Tristan</au><au>Souko, Idriss</au><au>Brenner, Friederike</au><au>Schäfers, Hans-Joachim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><date>2023-05-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>1873-734X</issn><issn>1010-7940</issn><eissn>1873-734X</eissn><abstract>Aortic valve replacement with a pulmonary autograft offers patients a living valve substitute that provides excellent haemodynamics, freedom from long-term use of anticoagulation, minimal valve-related complications and the ability to grow. Abstract OBJECTIVES After a Ross procedure, autograft failure can occur. At reoperation, repair of the autograft preserves the advantages of the Ross procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess mid-term results after reoperation of a failed autograft. METHODS Between 1997 and 2022, 30 consecutive patients (83% male; age 41 ± 11 years) underwent autograft reintervention between 60 days and 24 years (median 10 years) after a Ross procedure. The initial technique varied, full-root replacement (n = 25) being the most frequent. The indication for reoperation was isolated autograft regurgitation (n = 7), root dilatation (&gt;43 mm) with (n = 17) or without (n = 2) autograft regurgitation, mixed dysfunction (n = 2) and endocarditis (n = 2). In 4 instances, the valve was replaced by valve (n = 1) or combined valve and root replacement (n = 3). Valve-sparing procedures consisted of isolated valve repair (n = 7) or root replacement (n = 19), and tubular aortic replacement. Cusp repair was performed in all but 2. Mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 6 years (35 days to 24 years). RESULTS Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 74 ± 26 and 132 ± 64 min. There were 2 perioperative deaths (7%; both valve replacement) and 2 patients died late (32 days to 1.2 years postoperatively). Freedom from cardiac death at 10 years was 96% after valve repair and 50% after replacement. Two patients required reoperation (1.68 and 16 years) following repair. One underwent valve replacement for cusp perforation, the other, root remodelling for dilatation. Freedom from autograft reintervention at 15 years was 95%. CONCLUSIONS Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure can be performed as valve-sparing operations in the majority of cases. With valve-sparing, long-term survival and freedom from reoperation are excellent.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36971602</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejcts/ezad117</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-9100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-3124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6217-5963</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1873-734X
ispartof European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2023-05, Vol.63 (5)
issn 1873-734X
1010-7940
1873-734X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10162808
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Autografts
Conventional Valve Operations
Dilatation, Pathologic - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
Male
Pulmonary Valve - transplantation
Reoperation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Transplantation, Autologous
Treatment Outcome
title Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autograft%20reoperations%20after%20the%20Ross%20procedure&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cardio-thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Abeln,%20Karen%20B&rft.date=2023-05-02&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=1873-734X&rft.eissn=1873-734X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezad117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2791704993%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791704993&rft_id=info:pmid/36971602&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ejcts/ezad117&rfr_iscdi=true