Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain

In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to invest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of neuroscience 2023-04, Vol.43 (16), p.2973-2987
Hauptverfasser: Murty, Dinavahi V P S, Song, Songtao, Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda, Pessoa, Luiz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2987
container_issue 16
container_start_page 2973
container_title The Journal of neuroscience
container_volume 43
creator Murty, Dinavahi V P S
Song, Songtao
Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda
Pessoa, Luiz
description In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence, findings further supported by network analysis. In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive/appetitive processing while participants engaged in trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. We uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior in
doi_str_mv 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1778-22.2023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10124955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2805221582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-49208cd2dcccdcc8c7f9d5be8d64d6046dc7b1b817158a49c528be34270b490e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtP6zAQhS0EgvL4CygSGzYp44kdxyvErQoUIUA81pZjuzSocbh2cq_497gCKmAxmsWcOTpHHyGHFMaUY3FydTN9ur99mMzGVIgqRxwjYLFBRukqc2RAN8kIUEBeMsF2yG6MLwAggIptslOUEgUXdETk4yI43Wfa2-ze_dfBZrO2bbzzxmV3oTMuxsY_Z43P-oXLLodW--xP0I3fJ1tzvYzu4HPvkafz6ePkMr--vZhNzq5zw1jR50wiVMaiNcakqYyYS8trV9mS2RJYaY2oaV1RQXmlmTQcq9oVLEWvmQRX7JHTD9_XoW6dNc73QS_Va2haHd5Upxv18-KbhXru_ikKFJnkPDkcfzqE7u_gYq_aJhq3XGrvuiEqFBKAg-Q0SY9-SV-6IfjUT2EFHDGFxKQqP1QmdDEGN1-noaBWeNQaj1rhUYhqhSc9Hn7vsn774lG8A6-li7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2805221582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Murty, Dinavahi V P S ; Song, Songtao ; Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda ; Pessoa, Luiz</creator><creatorcontrib>Murty, Dinavahi V P S ; Song, Songtao ; Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda ; Pessoa, Luiz</creatorcontrib><description>In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence, findings further supported by network analysis. In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive/appetitive processing while participants engaged in trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. We uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Overall, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1778-22.2023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36927571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Amygdala ; Amygdala - physiology ; Arousal ; Brain ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Circuits ; Domains ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Neostriatum ; Network analysis ; Periaqueductal Gray ; Periaqueductal gray area ; Reinforcement ; Reward ; Stria terminalis</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2023-04, Vol.43 (16), p.2973-2987</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 the authors.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Neuroscience Apr 19, 2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 the authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-49208cd2dcccdcc8c7f9d5be8d64d6046dc7b1b817158a49c528be34270b490e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-49208cd2dcccdcc8c7f9d5be8d64d6046dc7b1b817158a49c528be34270b490e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1726-5171 ; 0000-0003-4696-6903</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124955/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124955/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36927571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murty, Dinavahi V P S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Songtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessoa, Luiz</creatorcontrib><title>Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence, findings further supported by network analysis. In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive/appetitive processing while participants engaged in trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. We uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Overall, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence.</description><subject>Amygdala</subject><subject>Amygdala - physiology</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neostriatum</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Periaqueductal Gray</subject><subject>Periaqueductal gray area</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Stria terminalis</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtP6zAQhS0EgvL4CygSGzYp44kdxyvErQoUIUA81pZjuzSocbh2cq_497gCKmAxmsWcOTpHHyGHFMaUY3FydTN9ur99mMzGVIgqRxwjYLFBRukqc2RAN8kIUEBeMsF2yG6MLwAggIptslOUEgUXdETk4yI43Wfa2-ze_dfBZrO2bbzzxmV3oTMuxsY_Z43P-oXLLodW--xP0I3fJ1tzvYzu4HPvkafz6ePkMr--vZhNzq5zw1jR50wiVMaiNcakqYyYS8trV9mS2RJYaY2oaV1RQXmlmTQcq9oVLEWvmQRX7JHTD9_XoW6dNc73QS_Va2haHd5Upxv18-KbhXru_ikKFJnkPDkcfzqE7u_gYq_aJhq3XGrvuiEqFBKAg-Q0SY9-SV-6IfjUT2EFHDGFxKQqP1QmdDEGN1-noaBWeNQaj1rhUYhqhSc9Hn7vsn774lG8A6-li7Y</recordid><startdate>20230419</startdate><enddate>20230419</enddate><creator>Murty, Dinavahi V P S</creator><creator>Song, Songtao</creator><creator>Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda</creator><creator>Pessoa, Luiz</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-5171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-6903</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230419</creationdate><title>Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain</title><author>Murty, Dinavahi V P S ; Song, Songtao ; Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda ; Pessoa, Luiz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-49208cd2dcccdcc8c7f9d5be8d64d6046dc7b1b817158a49c528be34270b490e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Amygdala</topic><topic>Amygdala - physiology</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neostriatum</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Periaqueductal Gray</topic><topic>Periaqueductal gray area</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Stria terminalis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murty, Dinavahi V P S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Songtao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessoa, Luiz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murty, Dinavahi V P S</au><au>Song, Songtao</au><au>Surampudi, Srinivas Govinda</au><au>Pessoa, Luiz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2023-04-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2973</spage><epage>2987</epage><pages>2973-2987</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. In addition, the extent to which aversive-related and appetitive-related processing engage distinct or overlapping circuits remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive and appetitive processing while male and female participants engaged in comparable trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. For example, in the aversive domain, we predicted that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), but not the amygdala, would exhibit anticipatory responses given the role of the former in anxious apprehension. We also predicted that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) would exhibit threat-proximity responses based on its involvement in proximal-threat processes, and that the ventral striatum would exhibit threat-imminence responses given its role in threat escape in rodents. Overall, we uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the BST, PAG, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Whereas the ventral striatum generated anticipatory responses in the proximity of reward as expected, it also exhibited threat-related imminence responses. In fact, across multiple brain regions, we observed a main effect of arousal. In other words, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence, findings further supported by network analysis. In the human brain, aversive and appetitive processing have been studied with controlled stimuli in rather static settings. Here, we sought to investigate the dynamics of aversive/appetitive processing while participants engaged in trials involving threat avoidance or reward seeking. A central goal was to characterize the temporal evolution of responses during periods of threat or reward imminence. We uncovered imminence-related temporally increasing ("ramping") responses in multiple brain regions, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and ventral striatum, subcortically, and dorsal anterior insula and anterior midcingulate, cortically. Overall, we uncovered extensive temporally evolving, imminence-related processing in both the aversive and appetitive domain, suggesting that distributed brain circuits are dynamically engaged during the processing of biologically relevant information regardless of valence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>36927571</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1778-22.2023</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-5171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-6903</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-6474
ispartof The Journal of neuroscience, 2023-04, Vol.43 (16), p.2973-2987
issn 0270-6474
1529-2401
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10124955
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Amygdala
Amygdala - physiology
Arousal
Brain
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
Circuits
Domains
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Neostriatum
Network analysis
Periaqueductal Gray
Periaqueductal gray area
Reinforcement
Reward
Stria terminalis
title Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Threat%20and%20Reward%20Imminence%20Processing%20in%20the%20Human%20Brain&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Murty,%20Dinavahi%20V%20P%20S&rft.date=2023-04-19&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2973&rft.epage=2987&rft.pages=2973-2987&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1778-22.2023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2805221582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2805221582&rft_id=info:pmid/36927571&rfr_iscdi=true