Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back. Patients undergoing head and neck free flap re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2022-09, Vol.89 (3), p.295-300
Hauptverfasser: Elmer, Nicholas A., Baltodano, Pablo A., Webster, Theresa, Deng, Mengying, Egleston, Brian, Massada, Karen, Kaplunov, Briana, Brebion, Rohan, Araya, Sthefano, Patel, Sameer A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 3
container_start_page 295
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 89
creator Elmer, Nicholas A.
Baltodano, Pablo A.
Webster, Theresa
Deng, Mengying
Egleston, Brian
Massada, Karen
Kaplunov, Briana
Brebion, Rohan
Araya, Sthefano
Patel, Sameer A.
description Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back. Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back. Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P < 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P < 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back. This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10103626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2705398234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-4d982b950e725a22b7937b3b9c8cea6b79625705ed66694787dbd86c859179783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkt9v0zAQxyMEYmXwHyDkR14yHDuxY15QVSibNI2xH8-W41xbMycOttOpfyH_Fs5axsCyZd_57nsf6S7L3hb4pMCCf7ieX57gJ4sShp9ls6KiLKcc18-zGS7KOue4pEfZqxB-YFyQumQvsyNaCUFZXc6yXwtvotHKorNucD6qXgNyKxQ3gJbGh4guXYhuAK-i2QL6rHYBzVcRPDoF1SLVt-gC9B1aekgZVg3oCrTrQ_Sjjsb1H9G8T1vZXTBhUr4xnenX0-sKDrquR7dhck5VLx4cCeh69OsHsu-jsibuJkLvttBBn6i8W3vVJZ6oGhXgdfZipWyAN4f7OLtdfrlZnObn376eLebnuaYVx3nZipo0osLASaUIabigvKGN0LUGxZLJSIqroGWMiZLXvG3amum6EgUXvKbH2ae97jA2HbQ6sXhl5eBNp_xOOmXkvz-92ci128oCF5gywpLC-4OCdz9HCFF2JmiwVvXgxiBJKk8TJS1TaLkP1d6F4GH1WKfAchoCmYZA_j8EKe3dU8bHpD9d_6t772zqZLiz4z14uQFl42avxyjPCSYEi2Tk6ST63_nXwAc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2705398234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Elmer, Nicholas A. ; Baltodano, Pablo A. ; Webster, Theresa ; Deng, Mengying ; Egleston, Brian ; Massada, Karen ; Kaplunov, Briana ; Brebion, Rohan ; Araya, Sthefano ; Patel, Sameer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Nicholas A. ; Baltodano, Pablo A. ; Webster, Theresa ; Deng, Mengying ; Egleston, Brian ; Massada, Karen ; Kaplunov, Briana ; Brebion, Rohan ; Araya, Sthefano ; Patel, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><description>Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back. Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back. Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P &lt; 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P &lt; 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back. This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35993684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Free Tissue Flaps ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Plastic Surgery Procedures ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Quality Improvement ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2022-09, Vol.89 (3), p.295-300</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-4d982b950e725a22b7937b3b9c8cea6b79625705ed66694787dbd86c859179783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltodano, Pablo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Mengying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egleston, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massada, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplunov, Briana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brebion, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araya, Sthefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back. Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back. Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P &lt; 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P &lt; 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back. This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.</description><subject>Free Tissue Flaps</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery Procedures</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkt9v0zAQxyMEYmXwHyDkR14yHDuxY15QVSibNI2xH8-W41xbMycOttOpfyH_Fs5axsCyZd_57nsf6S7L3hb4pMCCf7ieX57gJ4sShp9ls6KiLKcc18-zGS7KOue4pEfZqxB-YFyQumQvsyNaCUFZXc6yXwtvotHKorNucD6qXgNyKxQ3gJbGh4guXYhuAK-i2QL6rHYBzVcRPDoF1SLVt-gC9B1aekgZVg3oCrTrQ_Sjjsb1H9G8T1vZXTBhUr4xnenX0-sKDrquR7dhck5VLx4cCeh69OsHsu-jsibuJkLvttBBn6i8W3vVJZ6oGhXgdfZipWyAN4f7OLtdfrlZnObn376eLebnuaYVx3nZipo0osLASaUIabigvKGN0LUGxZLJSIqroGWMiZLXvG3amum6EgUXvKbH2ae97jA2HbQ6sXhl5eBNp_xOOmXkvz-92ci128oCF5gywpLC-4OCdz9HCFF2JmiwVvXgxiBJKk8TJS1TaLkP1d6F4GH1WKfAchoCmYZA_j8EKe3dU8bHpD9d_6t772zqZLiz4z14uQFl42avxyjPCSYEi2Tk6ST63_nXwAc</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Elmer, Nicholas A.</creator><creator>Baltodano, Pablo A.</creator><creator>Webster, Theresa</creator><creator>Deng, Mengying</creator><creator>Egleston, Brian</creator><creator>Massada, Karen</creator><creator>Kaplunov, Briana</creator><creator>Brebion, Rohan</creator><creator>Araya, Sthefano</creator><creator>Patel, Sameer A.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</title><author>Elmer, Nicholas A. ; Baltodano, Pablo A. ; Webster, Theresa ; Deng, Mengying ; Egleston, Brian ; Massada, Karen ; Kaplunov, Briana ; Brebion, Rohan ; Araya, Sthefano ; Patel, Sameer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-4d982b950e725a22b7937b3b9c8cea6b79625705ed66694787dbd86c859179783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Free Tissue Flaps</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery Procedures</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltodano, Pablo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Mengying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egleston, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massada, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplunov, Briana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brebion, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araya, Sthefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmer, Nicholas A.</au><au>Baltodano, Pablo A.</au><au>Webster, Theresa</au><au>Deng, Mengying</au><au>Egleston, Brian</au><au>Massada, Karen</au><au>Kaplunov, Briana</au><au>Brebion, Rohan</au><au>Araya, Sthefano</au><au>Patel, Sameer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>295-300</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back. Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back. Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P &lt; 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P &lt; 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back. This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>35993684</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2022-09, Vol.89 (3), p.295-300
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10103626
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Free Tissue Flaps
Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery
Humans
Plastic Surgery Procedures
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Quality Improvement
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
title Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A50%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Importance%20of%20the%20First%20Postoperative%20Days%20After%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Free%20Flap%20Reconstruction:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Timing%20of%20Reoperation%20Using%20the%20National%20Surgical%20Quality%20Improvement%20Program%20Database&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Elmer,%20Nicholas%20A.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=295-300&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2705398234%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2705398234&rft_id=info:pmid/35993684&rfr_iscdi=true