Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back. Patients undergoing head and neck free flap re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of plastic surgery 2022-09, Vol.89 (3), p.295-300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 300 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 295 |
container_title | Annals of plastic surgery |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Elmer, Nicholas A. Baltodano, Pablo A. Webster, Theresa Deng, Mengying Egleston, Brian Massada, Karen Kaplunov, Briana Brebion, Rohan Araya, Sthefano Patel, Sameer A. |
description | Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back.
Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back.
Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P < 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P < 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back.
This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10103626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2705398234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-4d982b950e725a22b7937b3b9c8cea6b79625705ed66694787dbd86c859179783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkt9v0zAQxyMEYmXwHyDkR14yHDuxY15QVSibNI2xH8-W41xbMycOttOpfyH_Fs5axsCyZd_57nsf6S7L3hb4pMCCf7ieX57gJ4sShp9ls6KiLKcc18-zGS7KOue4pEfZqxB-YFyQumQvsyNaCUFZXc6yXwtvotHKorNucD6qXgNyKxQ3gJbGh4guXYhuAK-i2QL6rHYBzVcRPDoF1SLVt-gC9B1aekgZVg3oCrTrQ_Sjjsb1H9G8T1vZXTBhUr4xnenX0-sKDrquR7dhck5VLx4cCeh69OsHsu-jsibuJkLvttBBn6i8W3vVJZ6oGhXgdfZipWyAN4f7OLtdfrlZnObn376eLebnuaYVx3nZipo0osLASaUIabigvKGN0LUGxZLJSIqroGWMiZLXvG3amum6EgUXvKbH2ae97jA2HbQ6sXhl5eBNp_xOOmXkvz-92ci128oCF5gywpLC-4OCdz9HCFF2JmiwVvXgxiBJKk8TJS1TaLkP1d6F4GH1WKfAchoCmYZA_j8EKe3dU8bHpD9d_6t772zqZLiz4z14uQFl42avxyjPCSYEi2Tk6ST63_nXwAc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2705398234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Elmer, Nicholas A. ; Baltodano, Pablo A. ; Webster, Theresa ; Deng, Mengying ; Egleston, Brian ; Massada, Karen ; Kaplunov, Briana ; Brebion, Rohan ; Araya, Sthefano ; Patel, Sameer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Nicholas A. ; Baltodano, Pablo A. ; Webster, Theresa ; Deng, Mengying ; Egleston, Brian ; Massada, Karen ; Kaplunov, Briana ; Brebion, Rohan ; Araya, Sthefano ; Patel, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><description>Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back.
Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back.
Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P < 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P < 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back.
This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35993684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Free Tissue Flaps ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Plastic Surgery Procedures ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Quality Improvement ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2022-09, Vol.89 (3), p.295-300</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-4d982b950e725a22b7937b3b9c8cea6b79625705ed66694787dbd86c859179783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltodano, Pablo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Mengying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egleston, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massada, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplunov, Briana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brebion, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araya, Sthefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back.
Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back.
Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P < 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P < 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back.
This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.</description><subject>Free Tissue Flaps</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery Procedures</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkt9v0zAQxyMEYmXwHyDkR14yHDuxY15QVSibNI2xH8-W41xbMycOttOpfyH_Fs5axsCyZd_57nsf6S7L3hb4pMCCf7ieX57gJ4sShp9ls6KiLKcc18-zGS7KOue4pEfZqxB-YFyQumQvsyNaCUFZXc6yXwtvotHKorNucD6qXgNyKxQ3gJbGh4guXYhuAK-i2QL6rHYBzVcRPDoF1SLVt-gC9B1aekgZVg3oCrTrQ_Sjjsb1H9G8T1vZXTBhUr4xnenX0-sKDrquR7dhck5VLx4cCeh69OsHsu-jsibuJkLvttBBn6i8W3vVJZ6oGhXgdfZipWyAN4f7OLtdfrlZnObn376eLebnuaYVx3nZipo0osLASaUIabigvKGN0LUGxZLJSIqroGWMiZLXvG3amum6EgUXvKbH2ae97jA2HbQ6sXhl5eBNp_xOOmXkvz-92ci128oCF5gywpLC-4OCdz9HCFF2JmiwVvXgxiBJKk8TJS1TaLkP1d6F4GH1WKfAchoCmYZA_j8EKe3dU8bHpD9d_6t772zqZLiz4z14uQFl42avxyjPCSYEi2Tk6ST63_nXwAc</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Elmer, Nicholas A.</creator><creator>Baltodano, Pablo A.</creator><creator>Webster, Theresa</creator><creator>Deng, Mengying</creator><creator>Egleston, Brian</creator><creator>Massada, Karen</creator><creator>Kaplunov, Briana</creator><creator>Brebion, Rohan</creator><creator>Araya, Sthefano</creator><creator>Patel, Sameer A.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</title><author>Elmer, Nicholas A. ; Baltodano, Pablo A. ; Webster, Theresa ; Deng, Mengying ; Egleston, Brian ; Massada, Karen ; Kaplunov, Briana ; Brebion, Rohan ; Araya, Sthefano ; Patel, Sameer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-4d982b950e725a22b7937b3b9c8cea6b79625705ed66694787dbd86c859179783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Free Tissue Flaps</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery Procedures</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltodano, Pablo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Theresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Mengying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egleston, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massada, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplunov, Briana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brebion, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araya, Sthefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmer, Nicholas A.</au><au>Baltodano, Pablo A.</au><au>Webster, Theresa</au><au>Deng, Mengying</au><au>Egleston, Brian</au><au>Massada, Karen</au><au>Kaplunov, Briana</au><au>Brebion, Rohan</au><au>Araya, Sthefano</au><au>Patel, Sameer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>295-300</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>Head and neck free flaps remain associated with considerable rates of take-back and prolonged hospital length of stay. However, there have been no studies on a national level benchmarking the timeline and predictors of head and neck free flap take-back.
Patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2019 database were analyzed to determine the rates of take-back. Timing and rates of unplanned head and neck free flap take-backs were stratified by tissue type and postoperative day (POD) over the first month. Weibull survival models were used to compare rates of take-backs among time intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of take-back.
Three thousand nine hundred six head and neck free flaps were analyzed. The mean daily proportion of patients experiencing take-back during PODs 0 to 1 was 0.95%; this dropped significantly to a mean daily proportion of 0.54% during POD 2 (P < 0.01). In addition, there were significant drops in take-back when comparing POD 2 (0.54%) to POD 3 (0.26%) and also when comparing POD 4 (0.20%) with PODs 5 to 30 (0.032% per day) (P < 0.05). The soft tissue and osseous flap populations demonstrated a similar trend in unplanned take-back.
This is the first national study to specifically analyze the timing of take-back in the head and neck reconstruction population. These data highlight the importance of flap monitoring during the first 5 PODs, with ERAS pathway optimization aiming for discharge by the end of the first postoperative week.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>35993684</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-7043 |
ispartof | Annals of plastic surgery, 2022-09, Vol.89 (3), p.295-300 |
issn | 0148-7043 1536-3708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10103626 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Free Tissue Flaps Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery Humans Plastic Surgery Procedures Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Quality Improvement Reoperation Retrospective Studies Risk Factors |
title | Critical Importance of the First Postoperative Days After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: An Analysis of Timing of Reoperation Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A50%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Importance%20of%20the%20First%20Postoperative%20Days%20After%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Free%20Flap%20Reconstruction:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Timing%20of%20Reoperation%20Using%20the%20National%20Surgical%20Quality%20Improvement%20Program%20Database&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Elmer,%20Nicholas%20A.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=295-300&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2705398234%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2705398234&rft_id=info:pmid/35993684&rfr_iscdi=true |