Co‐creation of a student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community of East Arnhem Land, Australia
Objectives To co‐create a culturally responsive student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community and to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the service. Design Co‐creation involved a pragmatic iterative process, based on participatory action research approache...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of rural health 2022-12, Vol.30 (6), p.782-794 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 794 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 782 |
container_title | The Australian journal of rural health |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Barker, Ruth Witt, Susan Bird, Katrina Stothers, Kylie Armstrong, Emily Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu Brown, Louise Moore, Renae Campbell, Narelle |
description | Objectives
To co‐create a culturally responsive student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community and to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the service.
Design
Co‐creation involved a pragmatic iterative process, based on participatory action research approaches. Feasibility and acceptability were determined using a mixed‐method pre/postdesign.
Setting
The service was in Nhulunbuy, Yirrkala and surrounding remote First Nations communities of East Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia.
Participants
Co‐creation of the service was facilitated by the Northern Australia Research Network, guided by Indigenous Allied Health Australia leadership, with East Arnhem local community organisations and community members. Co‐creation of the day‐to‐day service model involved local cultural consultants, service users and their families, staff of community organisations, students, supervisors, placement coordinators and a site administrator.
Findings
A reciprocal learning service model was co‐created in which culturally responsive practice was embedded. The service was feasible and acceptable: it was delivered as intended; resources were adequate; the service management system was workable; and the service was acceptable. Health outcome measures, however, were not appropriate to demonstrate impact, particularly through the lens of the people of East Arnhem. Recommendations for the service included: continuing the reciprocal learning service model in the long term; expanding to include all age groups; and connecting with visiting and community‐based services.
Conclusion
The co‐created service was feasible and acceptable. To demonstrate the impact of the service, measures of health service impact that are important to First Nations people living in remote communities of northern Australia are required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajr.12938 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10099895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736665510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-f3393b3b8c4e69aa5a68518e612ef4fed422d4fa68d3b462b8b8c389bf314f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEQx4Mo7jp68AUk4EXB3u10PjZ9kmHY9YNBQfQc0t0VJ0OnMybplbnpG_iMPom1O-uigrlUUfnln6r6E_KY1ScMz6ndphPWtFzfIcdMiLpiUou7mNdcV7LRzRF5kPO2ruu2ZuI-OeKKn2kh9TH5voo_v_3oE9ji40Sjo5bmMg8wFaz7sBshYA4DtePoMWzAjmVDM6RL3wP1Ez648CkX-u5aItMEIRagfQxhnnzZX4meWwSWadpAoGs7DS_ocs4l2dHbh-Ses2OGRzdxQT5dnH9cva7W71-9WS3XVS-E0JXjvOUd73QvQLXWSqu0ZBoUa8AJB4NomkE4rA68E6rpNKJct53jTDjV8gV5edDdzV2Aocep8H-zSz7YtDfRevP3zeQ35nO8NAzX1upWosKzG4UUv8yQiwk-9zCOdoI4Z9OccaWUlLj2BXn6D7qNc5pwPqSkVC0yAqnnB6pPMecE7rYbVpsrZw06a66dRfbJn-3fkr-tROD0AHz1I-z_r2SWbz8cJH8Bn3iw9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755691034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Co‐creation of a student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community of East Arnhem Land, Australia</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Barker, Ruth ; Witt, Susan ; Bird, Katrina ; Stothers, Kylie ; Armstrong, Emily ; Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra ; Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu ; Brown, Louise ; Moore, Renae ; Campbell, Narelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Barker, Ruth ; Witt, Susan ; Bird, Katrina ; Stothers, Kylie ; Armstrong, Emily ; Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra ; Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu ; Brown, Louise ; Moore, Renae ; Campbell, Narelle</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To co‐create a culturally responsive student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community and to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the service.
Design
Co‐creation involved a pragmatic iterative process, based on participatory action research approaches. Feasibility and acceptability were determined using a mixed‐method pre/postdesign.
Setting
The service was in Nhulunbuy, Yirrkala and surrounding remote First Nations communities of East Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia.
Participants
Co‐creation of the service was facilitated by the Northern Australia Research Network, guided by Indigenous Allied Health Australia leadership, with East Arnhem local community organisations and community members. Co‐creation of the day‐to‐day service model involved local cultural consultants, service users and their families, staff of community organisations, students, supervisors, placement coordinators and a site administrator.
Findings
A reciprocal learning service model was co‐created in which culturally responsive practice was embedded. The service was feasible and acceptable: it was delivered as intended; resources were adequate; the service management system was workable; and the service was acceptable. Health outcome measures, however, were not appropriate to demonstrate impact, particularly through the lens of the people of East Arnhem. Recommendations for the service included: continuing the reciprocal learning service model in the long term; expanding to include all age groups; and connecting with visiting and community‐based services.
Conclusion
The co‐created service was feasible and acceptable. To demonstrate the impact of the service, measures of health service impact that are important to First Nations people living in remote communities of northern Australia are required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1038-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12938</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36378458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Community ; Community organizations ; Consultants ; Coordinators ; cultural consultants ; Cultural sensitivity ; culturally responsive ; Feasibility ; health equity ; Health services ; Health Services, Indigenous ; Humans ; Iterative methods ; Leadership ; Learning ; Northern Territory ; Original Research ; Participatory action research ; Population Groups ; reciprocal learning ; Remote areas ; Rural health care ; Special Issue: Co Design ; Students ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of rural health, 2022-12, Vol.30 (6), p.782-794</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Australian Journal of Rural Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-f3393b3b8c4e69aa5a68518e612ef4fed422d4fa68d3b462b8b8c389bf314f693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-f3393b3b8c4e69aa5a68518e612ef4fed422d4fa68d3b462b8b8c389bf314f693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2546-2581 ; 0000-0001-7017-6683 ; 0000-0002-0815-1730 ; 0000-0003-1088-1828</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajr.12938$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajr.12938$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barker, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stothers, Kylie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Renae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Narelle</creatorcontrib><title>Co‐creation of a student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community of East Arnhem Land, Australia</title><title>The Australian journal of rural health</title><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Objectives
To co‐create a culturally responsive student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community and to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the service.
Design
Co‐creation involved a pragmatic iterative process, based on participatory action research approaches. Feasibility and acceptability were determined using a mixed‐method pre/postdesign.
Setting
The service was in Nhulunbuy, Yirrkala and surrounding remote First Nations communities of East Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia.
Participants
Co‐creation of the service was facilitated by the Northern Australia Research Network, guided by Indigenous Allied Health Australia leadership, with East Arnhem local community organisations and community members. Co‐creation of the day‐to‐day service model involved local cultural consultants, service users and their families, staff of community organisations, students, supervisors, placement coordinators and a site administrator.
Findings
A reciprocal learning service model was co‐created in which culturally responsive practice was embedded. The service was feasible and acceptable: it was delivered as intended; resources were adequate; the service management system was workable; and the service was acceptable. Health outcome measures, however, were not appropriate to demonstrate impact, particularly through the lens of the people of East Arnhem. Recommendations for the service included: continuing the reciprocal learning service model in the long term; expanding to include all age groups; and connecting with visiting and community‐based services.
Conclusion
The co‐created service was feasible and acceptable. To demonstrate the impact of the service, measures of health service impact that are important to First Nations people living in remote communities of northern Australia are required.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community organizations</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Coordinators</subject><subject>cultural consultants</subject><subject>Cultural sensitivity</subject><subject>culturally responsive</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>health equity</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Services, Indigenous</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Northern Territory</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Participatory action research</subject><subject>Population Groups</subject><subject>reciprocal learning</subject><subject>Remote areas</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>Special Issue: Co Design</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>1038-5282</issn><issn>1440-1584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEQx4Mo7jp68AUk4EXB3u10PjZ9kmHY9YNBQfQc0t0VJ0OnMybplbnpG_iMPom1O-uigrlUUfnln6r6E_KY1ScMz6ndphPWtFzfIcdMiLpiUou7mNdcV7LRzRF5kPO2ruu2ZuI-OeKKn2kh9TH5voo_v_3oE9ji40Sjo5bmMg8wFaz7sBshYA4DtePoMWzAjmVDM6RL3wP1Ez648CkX-u5aItMEIRagfQxhnnzZX4meWwSWadpAoGs7DS_ocs4l2dHbh-Ses2OGRzdxQT5dnH9cva7W71-9WS3XVS-E0JXjvOUd73QvQLXWSqu0ZBoUa8AJB4NomkE4rA68E6rpNKJct53jTDjV8gV5edDdzV2Aocep8H-zSz7YtDfRevP3zeQ35nO8NAzX1upWosKzG4UUv8yQiwk-9zCOdoI4Z9OccaWUlLj2BXn6D7qNc5pwPqSkVC0yAqnnB6pPMecE7rYbVpsrZw06a66dRfbJn-3fkr-tROD0AHz1I-z_r2SWbz8cJH8Bn3iw9A</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Barker, Ruth</creator><creator>Witt, Susan</creator><creator>Bird, Katrina</creator><creator>Stothers, Kylie</creator><creator>Armstrong, Emily</creator><creator>Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra</creator><creator>Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu</creator><creator>Brown, Louise</creator><creator>Moore, Renae</creator><creator>Campbell, Narelle</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-6683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-1730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1088-1828</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Co‐creation of a student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community of East Arnhem Land, Australia</title><author>Barker, Ruth ; Witt, Susan ; Bird, Katrina ; Stothers, Kylie ; Armstrong, Emily ; Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra ; Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu ; Brown, Louise ; Moore, Renae ; Campbell, Narelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4448-f3393b3b8c4e69aa5a68518e612ef4fed422d4fa68d3b462b8b8c389bf314f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community organizations</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Coordinators</topic><topic>cultural consultants</topic><topic>Cultural sensitivity</topic><topic>culturally responsive</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>health equity</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Services, Indigenous</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Northern Territory</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Participatory action research</topic><topic>Population Groups</topic><topic>reciprocal learning</topic><topic>Remote areas</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>Special Issue: Co Design</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barker, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bird, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stothers, Kylie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Renae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Narelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barker, Ruth</au><au>Witt, Susan</au><au>Bird, Katrina</au><au>Stothers, Kylie</au><au>Armstrong, Emily</au><au>Yunupingu, Murphy Dhayirra</au><au>Marika, Eunice Djerrkŋu</au><au>Brown, Louise</au><au>Moore, Renae</au><au>Campbell, Narelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Co‐creation of a student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community of East Arnhem Land, Australia</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>782</spage><epage>794</epage><pages>782-794</pages><issn>1038-5282</issn><eissn>1440-1584</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To co‐create a culturally responsive student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community and to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the service.
Design
Co‐creation involved a pragmatic iterative process, based on participatory action research approaches. Feasibility and acceptability were determined using a mixed‐method pre/postdesign.
Setting
The service was in Nhulunbuy, Yirrkala and surrounding remote First Nations communities of East Arnhem Land, Northern Territory, Australia.
Participants
Co‐creation of the service was facilitated by the Northern Australia Research Network, guided by Indigenous Allied Health Australia leadership, with East Arnhem local community organisations and community members. Co‐creation of the day‐to‐day service model involved local cultural consultants, service users and their families, staff of community organisations, students, supervisors, placement coordinators and a site administrator.
Findings
A reciprocal learning service model was co‐created in which culturally responsive practice was embedded. The service was feasible and acceptable: it was delivered as intended; resources were adequate; the service management system was workable; and the service was acceptable. Health outcome measures, however, were not appropriate to demonstrate impact, particularly through the lens of the people of East Arnhem. Recommendations for the service included: continuing the reciprocal learning service model in the long term; expanding to include all age groups; and connecting with visiting and community‐based services.
Conclusion
The co‐created service was feasible and acceptable. To demonstrate the impact of the service, measures of health service impact that are important to First Nations people living in remote communities of northern Australia are required.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36378458</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajr.12938</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-6683</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-1730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1088-1828</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1038-5282 |
ispartof | The Australian journal of rural health, 2022-12, Vol.30 (6), p.782-794 |
issn | 1038-5282 1440-1584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10099895 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Acceptability Community Community organizations Consultants Coordinators cultural consultants Cultural sensitivity culturally responsive Feasibility health equity Health services Health Services, Indigenous Humans Iterative methods Leadership Learning Northern Territory Original Research Participatory action research Population Groups reciprocal learning Remote areas Rural health care Special Issue: Co Design Students Supervisors |
title | Co‐creation of a student‐implemented allied health service in a First Nations remote community of East Arnhem Land, Australia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Co%E2%80%90creation%20of%20a%20student%E2%80%90implemented%20allied%20health%20service%20in%20a%20First%20Nations%20remote%20community%20of%20East%20Arnhem%20Land,%20Australia&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Barker,%20Ruth&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=782&rft.epage=794&rft.pages=782-794&rft.issn=1038-5282&rft.eissn=1440-1584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajr.12938&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2736665510%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755691034&rft_id=info:pmid/36378458&rfr_iscdi=true |