Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey

Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zoonoses and public health 2023-02, Vol.70 (1), p.69-80
Hauptverfasser: Mathews, Karen O., Savage, Cathie, Norris, Jacqueline M., Phalen, David, Malikides, Nick, Sheehy, Paul A., Bosward, Katrina L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Zoonoses and public health
container_volume 70
creator Mathews, Karen O.
Savage, Cathie
Norris, Jacqueline M.
Phalen, David
Malikides, Nick
Sheehy, Paul A.
Bosward, Katrina L.
description Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged >50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/zph.13002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10091799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760791029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEohdY8ALIEhu6mNaX-MYGVVVLK1XiItiwsRznpOOSsad2MtV0xSPwjDxJHWaoAAlvjmV_-vQf_VX1guBDUs7R3XJ-SBjG9FG1S5RgM8qkery9E831TrWX8zXGnGssn1Y7TFDKsWa71d0nn7-hzrohpoxsztF5O0CLbv0wRxn67uf3HwmWMU2PH1EHK0jIB3Q85iHZ3ttQ0L7tfQcowdw2vveDnWxv0JkPrQ9XGXUpLlAhY-h9AJTHtIL1s-pJZ_sMz7dzv_pydvr55Hx2-f7dxcnx5cwxWdOZo7qEloK3qtW1YJRBQ0QjOXNOWSGVcg0VXAPDXc1cLbiSUtbOcu6kVJbtV2833uXYLKB1EKbgZpn8wqa1idabv3-Cn5uruDIEY02k1sXwemtI8WaEPJiFzw763gaIYzZU0porJuSEvvoHvY5jCmW_QgksNcF0og42lEsx5wTdQxqCzVSpKZWaX5UW9uWf8R_I3x0W4GgDlB5g_X-T-frhfKO8B9D2rXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760791029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mathews, Karen O. ; Savage, Cathie ; Norris, Jacqueline M. ; Phalen, David ; Malikides, Nick ; Sheehy, Paul A. ; Bosward, Katrina L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Karen O. ; Savage, Cathie ; Norris, Jacqueline M. ; Phalen, David ; Malikides, Nick ; Sheehy, Paul A. ; Bosward, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><description>Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged &gt;50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.13002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36225093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Animals, Wild ; At risk populations ; Australia ; Australia - epidemiology ; Coxiella burnetii ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease control ; Domestic animals ; Exposure ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infections ; Livestock ; Original ; Population studies ; Q fever ; Q Fever - microbiology ; Q Fever - veterinary ; Rehabilitation ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Ruminants ; Self Report ; Surveying ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Uptake ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Wildlife ; wildlife rehabilitators ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2023-02, Vol.70 (1), p.69-80</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Zoonoses and Public Health published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8320-5244 ; 0000-0002-0003-6930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fzph.13002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fzph.13002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Karen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savage, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Jacqueline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phalen, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malikides, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehy, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosward, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged &gt;50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coxiella burnetii</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Q fever</subject><subject>Q Fever - microbiology</subject><subject>Q Fever - veterinary</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ruminants</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>wildlife rehabilitators</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEohdY8ALIEhu6mNaX-MYGVVVLK1XiItiwsRznpOOSsad2MtV0xSPwjDxJHWaoAAlvjmV_-vQf_VX1guBDUs7R3XJ-SBjG9FG1S5RgM8qkery9E831TrWX8zXGnGssn1Y7TFDKsWa71d0nn7-hzrohpoxsztF5O0CLbv0wRxn67uf3HwmWMU2PH1EHK0jIB3Q85iHZ3ttQ0L7tfQcowdw2vveDnWxv0JkPrQ9XGXUpLlAhY-h9AJTHtIL1s-pJZ_sMz7dzv_pydvr55Hx2-f7dxcnx5cwxWdOZo7qEloK3qtW1YJRBQ0QjOXNOWSGVcg0VXAPDXc1cLbiSUtbOcu6kVJbtV2833uXYLKB1EKbgZpn8wqa1idabv3-Cn5uruDIEY02k1sXwemtI8WaEPJiFzw763gaIYzZU0porJuSEvvoHvY5jCmW_QgksNcF0og42lEsx5wTdQxqCzVSpKZWaX5UW9uWf8R_I3x0W4GgDlB5g_X-T-frhfKO8B9D2rXA</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Mathews, Karen O.</creator><creator>Savage, Cathie</creator><creator>Norris, Jacqueline M.</creator><creator>Phalen, David</creator><creator>Malikides, Nick</creator><creator>Sheehy, Paul A.</creator><creator>Bosward, Katrina L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-5244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-6930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</title><author>Mathews, Karen O. ; Savage, Cathie ; Norris, Jacqueline M. ; Phalen, David ; Malikides, Nick ; Sheehy, Paul A. ; Bosward, Katrina L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coxiella burnetii</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Q fever</topic><topic>Q Fever - microbiology</topic><topic>Q Fever - veterinary</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ruminants</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>wildlife rehabilitators</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Karen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savage, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Jacqueline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phalen, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malikides, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehy, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosward, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathews, Karen O.</au><au>Savage, Cathie</au><au>Norris, Jacqueline M.</au><au>Phalen, David</au><au>Malikides, Nick</au><au>Sheehy, Paul A.</au><au>Bosward, Katrina L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>69-80</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged &gt;50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36225093</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.13002</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-5244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-6930</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-1959
ispartof Zoonoses and public health, 2023-02, Vol.70 (1), p.69-80
issn 1863-1959
1863-2378
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10091799
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Animals, Wild
At risk populations
Australia
Australia - epidemiology
Coxiella burnetii
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease control
Domestic animals
Exposure
Humans
Immunization
Infections
Livestock
Original
Population studies
Q fever
Q Fever - microbiology
Q Fever - veterinary
Rehabilitation
Risk
Risk analysis
Risk Factors
Ruminants
Self Report
Surveying
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Uptake
Vaccination
Vaccines
Wildlife
wildlife rehabilitators
Zoonoses
title Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T18%3A27%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20associated%20with%20self%E2%80%90reported%20Q%20fever%20in%20Australian%20wildlife%20rehabilitators:%20Findings%20from%20an%20online%20survey&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Mathews,%20Karen%20O.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=69-80&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.13002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2760791029%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760791029&rft_id=info:pmid/36225093&rfr_iscdi=true