Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey
Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoonoses and public health 2023-02, Vol.70 (1), p.69-80 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 80 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Zoonoses and public health |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Mathews, Karen O. Savage, Cathie Norris, Jacqueline M. Phalen, David Malikides, Nick Sheehy, Paul A. Bosward, Katrina L. |
description | Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged >50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/zph.13002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10091799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2760791029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEohdY8ALIEhu6mNaX-MYGVVVLK1XiItiwsRznpOOSsad2MtV0xSPwjDxJHWaoAAlvjmV_-vQf_VX1guBDUs7R3XJ-SBjG9FG1S5RgM8qkery9E831TrWX8zXGnGssn1Y7TFDKsWa71d0nn7-hzrohpoxsztF5O0CLbv0wRxn67uf3HwmWMU2PH1EHK0jIB3Q85iHZ3ttQ0L7tfQcowdw2vveDnWxv0JkPrQ9XGXUpLlAhY-h9AJTHtIL1s-pJZ_sMz7dzv_pydvr55Hx2-f7dxcnx5cwxWdOZo7qEloK3qtW1YJRBQ0QjOXNOWSGVcg0VXAPDXc1cLbiSUtbOcu6kVJbtV2833uXYLKB1EKbgZpn8wqa1idabv3-Cn5uruDIEY02k1sXwemtI8WaEPJiFzw763gaIYzZU0porJuSEvvoHvY5jCmW_QgksNcF0og42lEsx5wTdQxqCzVSpKZWaX5UW9uWf8R_I3x0W4GgDlB5g_X-T-frhfKO8B9D2rXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760791029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mathews, Karen O. ; Savage, Cathie ; Norris, Jacqueline M. ; Phalen, David ; Malikides, Nick ; Sheehy, Paul A. ; Bosward, Katrina L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Karen O. ; Savage, Cathie ; Norris, Jacqueline M. ; Phalen, David ; Malikides, Nick ; Sheehy, Paul A. ; Bosward, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><description>Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged >50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.13002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36225093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Animals, Wild ; At risk populations ; Australia ; Australia - epidemiology ; Coxiella burnetii ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease control ; Domestic animals ; Exposure ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infections ; Livestock ; Original ; Population studies ; Q fever ; Q Fever - microbiology ; Q Fever - veterinary ; Rehabilitation ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Ruminants ; Self Report ; Surveying ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Uptake ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Wildlife ; wildlife rehabilitators ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2023-02, Vol.70 (1), p.69-80</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Zoonoses and Public Health published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8320-5244 ; 0000-0002-0003-6930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fzph.13002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fzph.13002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36225093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Karen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savage, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Jacqueline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phalen, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malikides, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehy, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosward, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged >50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coxiella burnetii</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Q fever</subject><subject>Q Fever - microbiology</subject><subject>Q Fever - veterinary</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ruminants</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>wildlife rehabilitators</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEohdY8ALIEhu6mNaX-MYGVVVLK1XiItiwsRznpOOSsad2MtV0xSPwjDxJHWaoAAlvjmV_-vQf_VX1guBDUs7R3XJ-SBjG9FG1S5RgM8qkery9E831TrWX8zXGnGssn1Y7TFDKsWa71d0nn7-hzrohpoxsztF5O0CLbv0wRxn67uf3HwmWMU2PH1EHK0jIB3Q85iHZ3ttQ0L7tfQcowdw2vveDnWxv0JkPrQ9XGXUpLlAhY-h9AJTHtIL1s-pJZ_sMz7dzv_pydvr55Hx2-f7dxcnx5cwxWdOZo7qEloK3qtW1YJRBQ0QjOXNOWSGVcg0VXAPDXc1cLbiSUtbOcu6kVJbtV2833uXYLKB1EKbgZpn8wqa1idabv3-Cn5uruDIEY02k1sXwemtI8WaEPJiFzw763gaIYzZU0porJuSEvvoHvY5jCmW_QgksNcF0og42lEsx5wTdQxqCzVSpKZWaX5UW9uWf8R_I3x0W4GgDlB5g_X-T-frhfKO8B9D2rXA</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Mathews, Karen O.</creator><creator>Savage, Cathie</creator><creator>Norris, Jacqueline M.</creator><creator>Phalen, David</creator><creator>Malikides, Nick</creator><creator>Sheehy, Paul A.</creator><creator>Bosward, Katrina L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-5244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-6930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</title><author>Mathews, Karen O. ; Savage, Cathie ; Norris, Jacqueline M. ; Phalen, David ; Malikides, Nick ; Sheehy, Paul A. ; Bosward, Katrina L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3742-c29907765d8d946323eb16b753cc8a6788cb2659e30f43c46587774ca55c778a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coxiella burnetii</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Q fever</topic><topic>Q Fever - microbiology</topic><topic>Q Fever - veterinary</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ruminants</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>wildlife rehabilitators</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Karen O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savage, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norris, Jacqueline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phalen, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malikides, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehy, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosward, Katrina L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathews, Karen O.</au><au>Savage, Cathie</au><au>Norris, Jacqueline M.</au><au>Phalen, David</au><au>Malikides, Nick</au><au>Sheehy, Paul A.</au><au>Bosward, Katrina L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>69-80</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self‐reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross‐sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self‐reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self‐reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self‐reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09–110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91–57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13–84.03) and be aged >50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60–38.35). No association was found between self‐reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at‐risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36225093</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.13002</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8320-5244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-6930</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-1959 |
ispartof | Zoonoses and public health, 2023-02, Vol.70 (1), p.69-80 |
issn | 1863-1959 1863-2378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10091799 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Animals, Wild At risk populations Australia Australia - epidemiology Coxiella burnetii Cross-Sectional Studies Disease control Domestic animals Exposure Humans Immunization Infections Livestock Original Population studies Q fever Q Fever - microbiology Q Fever - veterinary Rehabilitation Risk Risk analysis Risk Factors Ruminants Self Report Surveying Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Uptake Vaccination Vaccines Wildlife wildlife rehabilitators Zoonoses |
title | Risk factors associated with self‐reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T18%3A27%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20associated%20with%20self%E2%80%90reported%20Q%20fever%20in%20Australian%20wildlife%20rehabilitators:%20Findings%20from%20an%20online%20survey&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Mathews,%20Karen%20O.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=69-80&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.13002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2760791029%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760791029&rft_id=info:pmid/36225093&rfr_iscdi=true |