Self‐enhancement and physical health: A meta‐analysis
A prior meta‐analysis yielded a positive relation between self‐enhancement and psychological health. This article presents the first meta‐analysis of the association between self‐enhancement and physical health (k = 87; N = 22,415). The meta‐analysis relied predominantly on social desirability as an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of social psychology 2023-01, Vol.62 (1), p.583-599 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 599 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 583 |
| container_title | British journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 62 |
| creator | Sedikides, Constantine |
| description | A prior meta‐analysis yielded a positive relation between self‐enhancement and psychological health. This article presents the first meta‐analysis of the association between self‐enhancement and physical health (k = 87; N = 22,415). The meta‐analysis relied predominantly on social desirability as an operationalization of self‐enhancement and secondarily on comparative judgement and narcissism. Further, the meta‐analysis operationalized physical health in terms of self‐rated health, symptoms and biomarkers. Overall, self‐enhancement yielded a near‐zero association with physical health, r = .01. However, this association was more pronounced for comparative judgement (r = .18, k = 6) than social desirability (r = .03, k = 41) or narcissism (r = −.0001, k = 8), and for self‐rated health (r = .09, k = 9) than symptoms (r = .01, k = 29) or biomarkers (r = −.13, k = 17). The association between self‐enhancement and physical health fluctuates across measures of both constructs calling for more focussed and nuanced investigations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjso.12577 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10087604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2761082218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-e4ca70a808bd52512134fade55cba9c1de2ec2c44e7632359655ad3da97634693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMoWi8bH0AG3IhQzUkmmRk3ouIVoQt1HU4zp86UzEydtEp3PoLP6JOY2irqwmyScD4-_uRnbBv4AYR12B_65gCESpIl1hE8jrup5Nky63AIZ621WmPr3g85Byl5ssrWpOY61Ro6LLsjN3h_faO6wNpSRfU4wjqPRsXUlxZdVBC6cXEUnUQVjTGQWKMLM7_JVgboPG0t9g32cHF-f3bVve1dXp-d3HZtHGdJl2KLCceUp_1cCQUCZDzAnJSyfcws5CTIisBSoqWQKtNKYS5zzMI91pncYMdz72jSryi3IWGLzozassJ2ahosze9JXRbmsXk2wHmaaB4Hw97C0DZPE_JjU5XeknNYUzPxRiQA4V8yDQHd_YMOm0kbXjyjNPBUCEgDtT-nbNt439LgOw1wM6vEzCoxn5UEeOdn_m_0q4MAwBx4KR1N_1GZ05u73lz6AfAql70</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2761082218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self‐enhancement and physical health: A meta‐analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sedikides, Constantine</creator><creatorcontrib>Sedikides, Constantine</creatorcontrib><description>A prior meta‐analysis yielded a positive relation between self‐enhancement and psychological health. This article presents the first meta‐analysis of the association between self‐enhancement and physical health (k = 87; N = 22,415). The meta‐analysis relied predominantly on social desirability as an operationalization of self‐enhancement and secondarily on comparative judgement and narcissism. Further, the meta‐analysis operationalized physical health in terms of self‐rated health, symptoms and biomarkers. Overall, self‐enhancement yielded a near‐zero association with physical health, r = .01. However, this association was more pronounced for comparative judgement (r = .18, k = 6) than social desirability (r = .03, k = 41) or narcissism (r = −.0001, k = 8), and for self‐rated health (r = .09, k = 9) than symptoms (r = .01, k = 29) or biomarkers (r = −.13, k = 17). The association between self‐enhancement and physical health fluctuates across measures of both constructs calling for more focussed and nuanced investigations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-6665</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12577</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36068661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; comparative judgement ; Diagnostic Self Evaluation ; Health ; Health Status ; Humans ; Mental health ; Meta-analysis ; Narcissism ; Operational definitions ; physical health ; Psychological well being ; Self Care ; self‐enhancement ; Social Comparison ; Social Desirability ; Symptoms</subject><ispartof>British journal of social psychology, 2023-01, Vol.62 (1), p.583-599</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-e4ca70a808bd52512134fade55cba9c1de2ec2c44e7632359655ad3da97634693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-e4ca70a808bd52512134fade55cba9c1de2ec2c44e7632359655ad3da97634693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4036-889X ; 0000-0002-8363-8418</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjso.12577$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjso.12577$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,30978,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sedikides, Constantine</creatorcontrib><title>Self‐enhancement and physical health: A meta‐analysis</title><title>British journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>A prior meta‐analysis yielded a positive relation between self‐enhancement and psychological health. This article presents the first meta‐analysis of the association between self‐enhancement and physical health (k = 87; N = 22,415). The meta‐analysis relied predominantly on social desirability as an operationalization of self‐enhancement and secondarily on comparative judgement and narcissism. Further, the meta‐analysis operationalized physical health in terms of self‐rated health, symptoms and biomarkers. Overall, self‐enhancement yielded a near‐zero association with physical health, r = .01. However, this association was more pronounced for comparative judgement (r = .18, k = 6) than social desirability (r = .03, k = 41) or narcissism (r = −.0001, k = 8), and for self‐rated health (r = .09, k = 9) than symptoms (r = .01, k = 29) or biomarkers (r = −.13, k = 17). The association between self‐enhancement and physical health fluctuates across measures of both constructs calling for more focussed and nuanced investigations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>comparative judgement</subject><subject>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Narcissism</subject><subject>Operational definitions</subject><subject>physical health</subject><subject>Psychological well being</subject><subject>Self Care</subject><subject>self‐enhancement</subject><subject>Social Comparison</subject><subject>Social Desirability</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><issn>0144-6665</issn><issn>2044-8309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMoWi8bH0AG3IhQzUkmmRk3ouIVoQt1HU4zp86UzEydtEp3PoLP6JOY2irqwmyScD4-_uRnbBv4AYR12B_65gCESpIl1hE8jrup5Nky63AIZ621WmPr3g85Byl5ssrWpOY61Ro6LLsjN3h_faO6wNpSRfU4wjqPRsXUlxZdVBC6cXEUnUQVjTGQWKMLM7_JVgboPG0t9g32cHF-f3bVve1dXp-d3HZtHGdJl2KLCceUp_1cCQUCZDzAnJSyfcws5CTIisBSoqWQKtNKYS5zzMI91pncYMdz72jSryi3IWGLzozassJ2ahosze9JXRbmsXk2wHmaaB4Hw97C0DZPE_JjU5XeknNYUzPxRiQA4V8yDQHd_YMOm0kbXjyjNPBUCEgDtT-nbNt439LgOw1wM6vEzCoxn5UEeOdn_m_0q4MAwBx4KR1N_1GZ05u73lz6AfAql70</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Sedikides, Constantine</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-8418</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Self‐enhancement and physical health: A meta‐analysis</title><author>Sedikides, Constantine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-e4ca70a808bd52512134fade55cba9c1de2ec2c44e7632359655ad3da97634693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>comparative judgement</topic><topic>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Narcissism</topic><topic>Operational definitions</topic><topic>physical health</topic><topic>Psychological well being</topic><topic>Self Care</topic><topic>self‐enhancement</topic><topic>Social Comparison</topic><topic>Social Desirability</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sedikides, Constantine</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sedikides, Constantine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self‐enhancement and physical health: A meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>583-599</pages><issn>0144-6665</issn><eissn>2044-8309</eissn><abstract>A prior meta‐analysis yielded a positive relation between self‐enhancement and psychological health. This article presents the first meta‐analysis of the association between self‐enhancement and physical health (k = 87; N = 22,415). The meta‐analysis relied predominantly on social desirability as an operationalization of self‐enhancement and secondarily on comparative judgement and narcissism. Further, the meta‐analysis operationalized physical health in terms of self‐rated health, symptoms and biomarkers. Overall, self‐enhancement yielded a near‐zero association with physical health, r = .01. However, this association was more pronounced for comparative judgement (r = .18, k = 6) than social desirability (r = .03, k = 41) or narcissism (r = −.0001, k = 8), and for self‐rated health (r = .09, k = 9) than symptoms (r = .01, k = 29) or biomarkers (r = −.13, k = 17). The association between self‐enhancement and physical health fluctuates across measures of both constructs calling for more focussed and nuanced investigations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36068661</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjso.12577</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-8418</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-6665 |
| ispartof | British journal of social psychology, 2023-01, Vol.62 (1), p.583-599 |
| issn | 0144-6665 2044-8309 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10087604 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Analysis Biological markers Biomarkers comparative judgement Diagnostic Self Evaluation Health Health Status Humans Mental health Meta-analysis Narcissism Operational definitions physical health Psychological well being Self Care self‐enhancement Social Comparison Social Desirability Symptoms |
| title | Self‐enhancement and physical health: A meta‐analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A53%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self%E2%80%90enhancement%20and%20physical%20health:%20A%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Sedikides,%20Constantine&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=583-599&rft.issn=0144-6665&rft.eissn=2044-8309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjso.12577&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2761082218%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2761082218&rft_id=info:pmid/36068661&rfr_iscdi=true |