Improved survival in real‐world patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score‐matched cohort study comparing a period before the introduction of pembrolizumab (2003–2011) and a more recent period (2016–2020)

Objectives Although the treatment strategy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has drastically changed since pembrolizumab was introduced in 2017, studies revealing current survival rates in aUC are lacking. This study aimed to assess (1) the improvement in survival among real‐world patients with aUC after the introduction of pembrolizumab and (2) the direct survival‐prolonging effect of pembrolizumab. Methods This multicenter retrospective study included 531 patients with aUC undergoing salvage chemotherapy, including 200 patients treated in the pre‐pembrolizumab era (2003–2011; earlier era) and 331 patients treated in a recent 5‐year period (2016–2020; recent era). Using propensity score matching (PSM), cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the earlier and recent eras, in addition to between the recent era, both with and without pembrolizumab use, and the earlier era. Results After PSM, the recent era cohort had significantly longer CSS (21 months) and OS (19 months) than the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 12 months). In secondary analyses using PSM, patients treated with pembrolizumab had significantly longer CSS (25 months) and OS (24 months) than those in the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 11 months), whereas patients who did not receive pembrolizumab in the recent era had similar outcomes (CSS and OS: 14 months) as the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 12 months). Conclusions Patients with aUC treated in the recent era exhibited significantly longer survival than those treated before the introduction of pembrolizumab. The improved survival was primarily attributable to the use of pembrolizumab.