Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (pss‐10) with breast cancer patients

Breast cancer diagnosis is one of the most difficult events that a woman can experience during her life and it usually produces high levels of stress. Global measures of perceived stress are useful for screening and for comparing stress levels between cancer patients and other clinical and nonclinic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stress and health 2023-02, Vol.39 (1), p.115-124
Hauptverfasser: Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M., Cerezo, M. Victoria, Alarcón, Rafael, Blanca, María J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title Stress and health
container_volume 39
creator Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M.
Cerezo, M. Victoria
Alarcón, Rafael
Blanca, María J.
description Breast cancer diagnosis is one of the most difficult events that a woman can experience during her life and it usually produces high levels of stress. Global measures of perceived stress are useful for screening and for comparing stress levels between cancer patients and other clinical and nonclinical populations. One such instrument that is widely used is the Perceived Stress Scale (pss‐10), but its psychometric properties have scarcely been analysed with breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to provide validity evidence regarding the use of the 10‐item version of the pss‐10 as a tool for measuring perceived stress in this context. Participants were 215 Spanish breast cancer patients who completed the PSS‐10 and the DASS‐21, a measure of affective distress (depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the PSS‐10 was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the reliability of test scores was estimated using McDonald's omega coefficient. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was also obtained using correlation analysis. The CFA supported a correlated two‐factor structure: perceived helplessness (six negatively worded items) and perceived self‐efficacy (four positively worded items). Reliability coefficients for scores on these two factors were 0.87 and 0.73, respectively. Scores on affective distress (DASS‐21) were strongly and positively correlated with perceived helplessness and moderately and negatively correlated with perceived self‐efficacy. The PSS‐10 is an adequate tool for measuring perceived stress in the breast cancer context and it may be useful for identifying women at risk of psychological maladjustment.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/smi.3170
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10084090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2673356572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-433f45fb1b943df815f51d1411b1a2f708eabb4352e6c7d170c678ae1bc137bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1KHDEUx0NpqR8V-gQl0Bu9GJuPyWbmSkS0FRQLbe-EkGTOdCMzkzFnVtm7PoLP6JM0dreLFnqVhPz4nfM_h5D3nB1yxsQn7MOh5Jq9IttcSVGIuq5er--SMbVFdhBvGGNa6eot2ZJqprSo2Da5_opLP489TCl4OqY4QpoCII0tneZA89NDuIOG4pQAkaK3HdD9EfHx1wNnB_Q-THPqElicqLeDh0RHmxXDhO_Im9Z2CHvrc5f8ODv9fvKluLj6fH5yfFH4UtasKKVsS9U67upSNm3FVat4w0vOHbei1awC61wplYCZ103O6We6ssCd51K7Ru6So5V3XLgeGp9rJ9uZMYXepqWJNpiXP0OYm5_xzuThVSWrWTbsrw0p3i4AJ9MH9NB1doC4QCNmWq6GltGP_6A3cZGGnM8IrYUQkudAG6FPETFBu-mGs6eywuSdmaedZfTD8-434N8lZaBYAfehg-V_Rebb5fkf4W-M66Ge</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2772223143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (pss‐10) with breast cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M. ; Cerezo, M. Victoria ; Alarcón, Rafael ; Blanca, María J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M. ; Cerezo, M. Victoria ; Alarcón, Rafael ; Blanca, María J.</creatorcontrib><description>Breast cancer diagnosis is one of the most difficult events that a woman can experience during her life and it usually produces high levels of stress. Global measures of perceived stress are useful for screening and for comparing stress levels between cancer patients and other clinical and nonclinical populations. One such instrument that is widely used is the Perceived Stress Scale (pss‐10), but its psychometric properties have scarcely been analysed with breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to provide validity evidence regarding the use of the 10‐item version of the pss‐10 as a tool for measuring perceived stress in this context. Participants were 215 Spanish breast cancer patients who completed the PSS‐10 and the DASS‐21, a measure of affective distress (depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the PSS‐10 was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the reliability of test scores was estimated using McDonald's omega coefficient. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was also obtained using correlation analysis. The CFA supported a correlated two‐factor structure: perceived helplessness (six negatively worded items) and perceived self‐efficacy (four positively worded items). Reliability coefficients for scores on these two factors were 0.87 and 0.73, respectively. Scores on affective distress (DASS‐21) were strongly and positively correlated with perceived helplessness and moderately and negatively correlated with perceived self‐efficacy. The PSS‐10 is an adequate tool for measuring perceived stress in the breast cancer context and it may be useful for identifying women at risk of psychological maladjustment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/smi.3170</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35657280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; cancer ; Correlation analysis ; distress ; Factor analysis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; helplessness ; Humans ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; self‐efficacy ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological - diagnosis ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; validity evidence</subject><ispartof>Stress and health, 2023-02, Vol.39 (1), p.115-124</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Stress and Health published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-433f45fb1b943df815f51d1411b1a2f708eabb4352e6c7d170c678ae1bc137bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-433f45fb1b943df815f51d1411b1a2f708eabb4352e6c7d170c678ae1bc137bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9803-7239 ; 0000-0002-1955-8536 ; 0000-0003-2122-1374 ; 0000-0003-4046-9308</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsmi.3170$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsmi.3170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerezo, M. Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarcón, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanca, María J.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (pss‐10) with breast cancer patients</title><title>Stress and health</title><addtitle>Stress Health</addtitle><description>Breast cancer diagnosis is one of the most difficult events that a woman can experience during her life and it usually produces high levels of stress. Global measures of perceived stress are useful for screening and for comparing stress levels between cancer patients and other clinical and nonclinical populations. One such instrument that is widely used is the Perceived Stress Scale (pss‐10), but its psychometric properties have scarcely been analysed with breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to provide validity evidence regarding the use of the 10‐item version of the pss‐10 as a tool for measuring perceived stress in this context. Participants were 215 Spanish breast cancer patients who completed the PSS‐10 and the DASS‐21, a measure of affective distress (depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the PSS‐10 was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the reliability of test scores was estimated using McDonald's omega coefficient. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was also obtained using correlation analysis. The CFA supported a correlated two‐factor structure: perceived helplessness (six negatively worded items) and perceived self‐efficacy (four positively worded items). Reliability coefficients for scores on these two factors were 0.87 and 0.73, respectively. Scores on affective distress (DASS‐21) were strongly and positively correlated with perceived helplessness and moderately and negatively correlated with perceived self‐efficacy. The PSS‐10 is an adequate tool for measuring perceived stress in the breast cancer context and it may be useful for identifying women at risk of psychological maladjustment.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>distress</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>helplessness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>self‐efficacy</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>validity evidence</subject><issn>1532-3005</issn><issn>1532-2998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1KHDEUx0NpqR8V-gQl0Bu9GJuPyWbmSkS0FRQLbe-EkGTOdCMzkzFnVtm7PoLP6JM0dreLFnqVhPz4nfM_h5D3nB1yxsQn7MOh5Jq9IttcSVGIuq5er--SMbVFdhBvGGNa6eot2ZJqprSo2Da5_opLP489TCl4OqY4QpoCII0tneZA89NDuIOG4pQAkaK3HdD9EfHx1wNnB_Q-THPqElicqLeDh0RHmxXDhO_Im9Z2CHvrc5f8ODv9fvKluLj6fH5yfFH4UtasKKVsS9U67upSNm3FVat4w0vOHbei1awC61wplYCZ103O6We6ssCd51K7Ru6So5V3XLgeGp9rJ9uZMYXepqWJNpiXP0OYm5_xzuThVSWrWTbsrw0p3i4AJ9MH9NB1doC4QCNmWq6GltGP_6A3cZGGnM8IrYUQkudAG6FPETFBu-mGs6eywuSdmaedZfTD8-434N8lZaBYAfehg-V_Rebb5fkf4W-M66Ge</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M.</creator><creator>Cerezo, M. Victoria</creator><creator>Alarcón, Rafael</creator><creator>Blanca, María J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-7239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-8536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-1374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-9308</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (pss‐10) with breast cancer patients</title><author>Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M. ; Cerezo, M. Victoria ; Alarcón, Rafael ; Blanca, María J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-433f45fb1b943df815f51d1411b1a2f708eabb4352e6c7d170c678ae1bc137bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>distress</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>helplessness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>self‐efficacy</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>validity evidence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerezo, M. Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarcón, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanca, María J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Stress and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soria‐Reyes, Lorena M.</au><au>Cerezo, M. Victoria</au><au>Alarcón, Rafael</au><au>Blanca, María J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (pss‐10) with breast cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Stress and health</jtitle><addtitle>Stress Health</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>115-124</pages><issn>1532-3005</issn><eissn>1532-2998</eissn><abstract>Breast cancer diagnosis is one of the most difficult events that a woman can experience during her life and it usually produces high levels of stress. Global measures of perceived stress are useful for screening and for comparing stress levels between cancer patients and other clinical and nonclinical populations. One such instrument that is widely used is the Perceived Stress Scale (pss‐10), but its psychometric properties have scarcely been analysed with breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to provide validity evidence regarding the use of the 10‐item version of the pss‐10 as a tool for measuring perceived stress in this context. Participants were 215 Spanish breast cancer patients who completed the PSS‐10 and the DASS‐21, a measure of affective distress (depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the PSS‐10 was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the reliability of test scores was estimated using McDonald's omega coefficient. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was also obtained using correlation analysis. The CFA supported a correlated two‐factor structure: perceived helplessness (six negatively worded items) and perceived self‐efficacy (four positively worded items). Reliability coefficients for scores on these two factors were 0.87 and 0.73, respectively. Scores on affective distress (DASS‐21) were strongly and positively correlated with perceived helplessness and moderately and negatively correlated with perceived self‐efficacy. The PSS‐10 is an adequate tool for measuring perceived stress in the breast cancer context and it may be useful for identifying women at risk of psychological maladjustment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35657280</pmid><doi>10.1002/smi.3170</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-7239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-8536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-1374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-9308</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1532-3005
ispartof Stress and health, 2023-02, Vol.39 (1), p.115-124
issn 1532-3005
1532-2998
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10084090
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
cancer
Correlation analysis
distress
Factor analysis
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
helplessness
Humans
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Reproducibility of Results
self‐efficacy
Stress
Stress, Psychological - diagnosis
Stress, Psychological - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
validity evidence
title Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (pss‐10) with breast cancer patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20properties%20of%20the%20perceived%20stress%20scale%20(pss%E2%80%9010)%20with%20breast%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Stress%20and%20health&rft.au=Soria%E2%80%90Reyes,%20Lorena%20M.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=115-124&rft.issn=1532-3005&rft.eissn=1532-2998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/smi.3170&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2673356572%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2772223143&rft_id=info:pmid/35657280&rfr_iscdi=true