Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks?
In everyday life, action and decision-making often run in parallel. Action-based models argue that action and decision-making strongly interact and, more specifically, that action can bias decision-making. This embodied decision bias is thought to originate from changes in motor costs and/or cogniti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2023-04, Vol.241 (4), p.1053-1064 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1064 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1053 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 241 |
creator | Grießbach, Eric Raßbach, Philipp Herbort, Oliver Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen |
description | In everyday life, action and decision-making often run in parallel. Action-based models argue that action and decision-making strongly interact and, more specifically, that action can bias decision-making. This embodied decision bias is thought to originate from changes in motor costs and/or cognitive crosstalk. Recent research confirmed embodied decision biases for different tasks including walking and manual movements. Yet, whether such biases generalize within individuals across different tasks remains to be determined. To test this, we used two different decision-making tasks that have independently been shown to reliably produce embodied decision biases. In a within-participant design, participants performed two tasks in a counterbalanced fashion: (i) a walking paradigm for which it is known that motor costs systematically influence reward decisions, and (ii) a manual movement task in which motor costs and cognitive crosstalk have been shown to impact reward decisions. In both tasks, we successfully replicated the predicted embodied decision biases. However, there was no evidence that the strength of the biases correlated between tasks. Hence, our findings do not confirm that embodied decision biases transfer between tasks. Future research is needed to examine whether this lack of transfer may be due to different causes underlying the impact of motor costs on decisions and the impact of cognitive crosstalk or task-specific differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-023-06591-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10082122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A744726595</galeid><sourcerecordid>A744726595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-7f58f39c2e78d9f1d8c3f126ae5eecded9c3165534fc289ed87b43589970b4213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhoModq3-AS9kQBC9mJrPSeJNKWXVQkHw4zpkkpPd1NlJncwU219vtlvXjogkEJI85z3Jew5Czwk-IhjLtxljSkmNKatxIzSpbx6gBeGM1oTg5iFaYEx4zRXRB-hJzhfbLZP4MTpgjcZSKbFAy-WmTT6Crzy4mGPqqzbaDPldFXsfr6KfbNddV3m0bQeVdUPKufIxBBigH6vR5u_5-Cl6FGyX4dndeoi-vV9-Pf1Yn3_6cHZ6cl67BsuxlkGowLSjIJXXgXjlWCC0sSAAnAevHSONEIwHR5UGr2TLmVBaS9xyStghOt7pXk7tBrwrLxhsZy6HuLHDtUk2mvlNH9dmla5M8UtRQmlReH2nMKQfE-TRbGJ20HW2hzRlQ6VqBCGCb5O9_Au9SNPQl_8VSksuGCtzT61sByb2IZXEbitqTiTnkpbKiEId_YMqw8MmutRDiOV8FvBmFlCYEX6OKzvlbM6-fJ6zr-6xa7DduM6pm8ZSzTwH6Q68reIAYe8cwVuLpNm1lCktZW5bytyUoBf3Pd-H_O6hArAdkMtVv4Lhj0__kf0FJmjUkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2797453353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Grießbach, Eric ; Raßbach, Philipp ; Herbort, Oliver ; Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen</creator><creatorcontrib>Grießbach, Eric ; Raßbach, Philipp ; Herbort, Oliver ; Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen</creatorcontrib><description>In everyday life, action and decision-making often run in parallel. Action-based models argue that action and decision-making strongly interact and, more specifically, that action can bias decision-making. This embodied decision bias is thought to originate from changes in motor costs and/or cognitive crosstalk. Recent research confirmed embodied decision biases for different tasks including walking and manual movements. Yet, whether such biases generalize within individuals across different tasks remains to be determined. To test this, we used two different decision-making tasks that have independently been shown to reliably produce embodied decision biases. In a within-participant design, participants performed two tasks in a counterbalanced fashion: (i) a walking paradigm for which it is known that motor costs systematically influence reward decisions, and (ii) a manual movement task in which motor costs and cognitive crosstalk have been shown to impact reward decisions. In both tasks, we successfully replicated the predicted embodied decision biases. However, there was no evidence that the strength of the biases correlated between tasks. Hence, our findings do not confirm that embodied decision biases transfer between tasks. Future research is needed to examine whether this lack of transfer may be due to different causes underlying the impact of motor costs on decisions and the impact of cognitive crosstalk or task-specific differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06591-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36907885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bias ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cognitive ability ; Decision Making ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Movement ; Neurology ; Neurophysiology ; Neurosciences ; Observations ; Research Article ; Response bias ; Reward ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2023-04, Vol.241 (4), p.1053-1064</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-7f58f39c2e78d9f1d8c3f126ae5eecded9c3165534fc289ed87b43589970b4213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-7f58f39c2e78d9f1d8c3f126ae5eecded9c3165534fc289ed87b43589970b4213</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2026-0523</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-023-06591-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-023-06591-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36907885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grießbach, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raßbach, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbort, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen</creatorcontrib><title>Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks?</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>In everyday life, action and decision-making often run in parallel. Action-based models argue that action and decision-making strongly interact and, more specifically, that action can bias decision-making. This embodied decision bias is thought to originate from changes in motor costs and/or cognitive crosstalk. Recent research confirmed embodied decision biases for different tasks including walking and manual movements. Yet, whether such biases generalize within individuals across different tasks remains to be determined. To test this, we used two different decision-making tasks that have independently been shown to reliably produce embodied decision biases. In a within-participant design, participants performed two tasks in a counterbalanced fashion: (i) a walking paradigm for which it is known that motor costs systematically influence reward decisions, and (ii) a manual movement task in which motor costs and cognitive crosstalk have been shown to impact reward decisions. In both tasks, we successfully replicated the predicted embodied decision biases. However, there was no evidence that the strength of the biases correlated between tasks. Hence, our findings do not confirm that embodied decision biases transfer between tasks. Future research is needed to examine whether this lack of transfer may be due to different causes underlying the impact of motor costs on decisions and the impact of cognitive crosstalk or task-specific differences.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurophysiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Response bias</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhoModq3-AS9kQBC9mJrPSeJNKWXVQkHw4zpkkpPd1NlJncwU219vtlvXjogkEJI85z3Jew5Czwk-IhjLtxljSkmNKatxIzSpbx6gBeGM1oTg5iFaYEx4zRXRB-hJzhfbLZP4MTpgjcZSKbFAy-WmTT6Crzy4mGPqqzbaDPldFXsfr6KfbNddV3m0bQeVdUPKufIxBBigH6vR5u_5-Cl6FGyX4dndeoi-vV9-Pf1Yn3_6cHZ6cl67BsuxlkGowLSjIJXXgXjlWCC0sSAAnAevHSONEIwHR5UGr2TLmVBaS9xyStghOt7pXk7tBrwrLxhsZy6HuLHDtUk2mvlNH9dmla5M8UtRQmlReH2nMKQfE-TRbGJ20HW2hzRlQ6VqBCGCb5O9_Au9SNPQl_8VSksuGCtzT61sByb2IZXEbitqTiTnkpbKiEId_YMqw8MmutRDiOV8FvBmFlCYEX6OKzvlbM6-fJ6zr-6xa7DduM6pm8ZSzTwH6Q68reIAYe8cwVuLpNm1lCktZW5bytyUoBf3Pd-H_O6hArAdkMtVv4Lhj0__kf0FJmjUkQ</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Grießbach, Eric</creator><creator>Raßbach, Philipp</creator><creator>Herbort, Oliver</creator><creator>Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-0523</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks?</title><author>Grießbach, Eric ; Raßbach, Philipp ; Herbort, Oliver ; Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-7f58f39c2e78d9f1d8c3f126ae5eecded9c3165534fc289ed87b43589970b4213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurophysiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Response bias</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grießbach, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raßbach, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbort, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grießbach, Eric</au><au>Raßbach, Philipp</au><au>Herbort, Oliver</au><au>Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks?</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>241</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1053</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1053-1064</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>In everyday life, action and decision-making often run in parallel. Action-based models argue that action and decision-making strongly interact and, more specifically, that action can bias decision-making. This embodied decision bias is thought to originate from changes in motor costs and/or cognitive crosstalk. Recent research confirmed embodied decision biases for different tasks including walking and manual movements. Yet, whether such biases generalize within individuals across different tasks remains to be determined. To test this, we used two different decision-making tasks that have independently been shown to reliably produce embodied decision biases. In a within-participant design, participants performed two tasks in a counterbalanced fashion: (i) a walking paradigm for which it is known that motor costs systematically influence reward decisions, and (ii) a manual movement task in which motor costs and cognitive crosstalk have been shown to impact reward decisions. In both tasks, we successfully replicated the predicted embodied decision biases. However, there was no evidence that the strength of the biases correlated between tasks. Hence, our findings do not confirm that embodied decision biases transfer between tasks. Future research is needed to examine whether this lack of transfer may be due to different causes underlying the impact of motor costs on decisions and the impact of cognitive crosstalk or task-specific differences.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36907885</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-023-06591-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-0523</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2023-04, Vol.241 (4), p.1053-1064 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10082122 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analysis Bias Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cognitive ability Decision Making Health aspects Humans Movement Neurology Neurophysiology Neurosciences Observations Research Article Response bias Reward Walking |
title | Embodied decision biases: individually stable across different tasks? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A48%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Embodied%20decision%20biases:%20individually%20stable%20across%20different%20tasks?&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Grie%C3%9Fbach,%20Eric&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=241&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1053&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1053-1064&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-023-06591-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA744726595%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2797453353&rft_id=info:pmid/36907885&rft_galeid=A744726595&rfr_iscdi=true |