The role of T‐tubes and abdominal drains on short‐term outcomes in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

Background This systematic review and expert panel recommendation aims to answer the question regarding the routine use of T‐tubes or abdominal drains to better manage complications and thereby improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical transplantation 2022-10, Vol.36 (10), p.e14719-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Kalisvaart, Marit, Jonge, Jeroen, Abt, Peter, Orloff, Susan, Muiesan, Paolo, Florman, Sander, Spiro, Michael, Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle, Eghtesad, Bijan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page e14719
container_title Clinical transplantation
container_volume 36
creator Kalisvaart, Marit
Jonge, Jeroen
Abt, Peter
Orloff, Susan
Muiesan, Paolo
Florman, Sander
Spiro, Michael
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle
Eghtesad, Bijan
description Background This systematic review and expert panel recommendation aims to answer the question regarding the routine use of T‐tubes or abdominal drains to better manage complications and thereby improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel to assess the potential risks and benefits of T‐tubes and intra‐abdominal drainage in liver transplantation (CRD42021243036). Results Of the 2996 screened records, 33 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 29 (six RCTs) assessed the use of T‐tubes and four regarding surgical drains. Although some studies reported less strictures when using a T‐tube, there was a trend toward more biliary complications with T‐tubes, mainly related to biliary leakage. Due to the small number of studies, there was a paucity of evidence on the effect of abdominal drains with no clear benefit for or against the use of drainage. However, one study investigating the open vs. closed circuit drains found a significantly higher incidence of intra‐abdominal infections when open‐circuit drains were used. Conclusions Due to the potential risk of biliary leakage and infections, the routine intraoperative insertion of T‐tubes is not recommended (Level of Evidence moderate ‐ very low; grade of recommendation strong). However, a T‐tube can be considered in cases at risk for biliary stenosis. Due to the scant evidence on abdominal drainage, no change in clinical practice in individual centers is recommended. (Level of Evidence very low; weak recommendation).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ctr.14719
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10078006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667788037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ac4dc8b3347dcf1f51014d879a7fabfd5660339da33b4d3b20ad4898308911f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9uGyEUh1HVqnHdLnqBimW7cAJmhhlWVWT1nxQpUuWuEQNvaioGpsA49S5HqNRD9F45SbGdRM0ibECPT98P3kPoNSWntKwzneMprRoqnqAZZUIsCKHLp2hGBFmWM2cn6EVKP0qVU14_RyesrgVvSD1Df9cbwDE4wKHH65vr33nqIGHlDVadCYP1ymETlfUJB4_TJsS8pyAOOExZh6HQ1mNntxBxjsqn0SmfVbYFv7n-g89x2qUMQ6loHGFr4WqflUuus8Wj8hThEAi_RogZj8qDK2RxD-DNwZReome9cgle3e5z9O3jh_Xq8-Li8tOX1fnFQleUi4XSldFtx1jVGN3TvqaEVqZthGp61fWm5pwwJoxirKsM65ZEmaoVLSOtoLRnbI7eH73j1A1gNPjyJyfHaAcVdzIoKx_eeLuR38NWUkKadt_rOXp7a4jh5wQpy8EmDa50BcKU5JLzpmlbwpqCvjuiOoaUIvT3OZTI_WRlmaw8TLawb_5_2D15N8oCnB2BK-tg97hJrtZfj8p_04O1Pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667788037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of T‐tubes and abdominal drains on short‐term outcomes in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kalisvaart, Marit ; Jonge, Jeroen ; Abt, Peter ; Orloff, Susan ; Muiesan, Paolo ; Florman, Sander ; Spiro, Michael ; Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle ; Eghtesad, Bijan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalisvaart, Marit ; Jonge, Jeroen ; Abt, Peter ; Orloff, Susan ; Muiesan, Paolo ; Florman, Sander ; Spiro, Michael ; Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle ; Eghtesad, Bijan ; ERAS4OLT.org working group ; ERAS4OLT.org working group</creatorcontrib><description>Background This systematic review and expert panel recommendation aims to answer the question regarding the routine use of T‐tubes or abdominal drains to better manage complications and thereby improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel to assess the potential risks and benefits of T‐tubes and intra‐abdominal drainage in liver transplantation (CRD42021243036). Results Of the 2996 screened records, 33 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 29 (six RCTs) assessed the use of T‐tubes and four regarding surgical drains. Although some studies reported less strictures when using a T‐tube, there was a trend toward more biliary complications with T‐tubes, mainly related to biliary leakage. Due to the small number of studies, there was a paucity of evidence on the effect of abdominal drains with no clear benefit for or against the use of drainage. However, one study investigating the open vs. closed circuit drains found a significantly higher incidence of intra‐abdominal infections when open‐circuit drains were used. Conclusions Due to the potential risk of biliary leakage and infections, the routine intraoperative insertion of T‐tubes is not recommended (Level of Evidence moderate ‐ very low; grade of recommendation strong). However, a T‐tube can be considered in cases at risk for biliary stenosis. Due to the scant evidence on abdominal drainage, no change in clinical practice in individual centers is recommended. (Level of Evidence very low; weak recommendation).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-0063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14719</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35596705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; abdominal drainage ; biliary complications ; biliary leakage ; biliary strictures ; Biliary Tract Diseases ; complications ; Drainage ; Humans ; liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Original ; outcomes ; Postoperative Complications ; T‐tubes</subject><ispartof>Clinical transplantation, 2022-10, Vol.36 (10), p.e14719-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Clinical Transplantation published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ac4dc8b3347dcf1f51014d879a7fabfd5660339da33b4d3b20ad4898308911f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ac4dc8b3347dcf1f51014d879a7fabfd5660339da33b4d3b20ad4898308911f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1635-9136 ; 0000-0002-7857-0092</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fctr.14719$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fctr.14719$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35596705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalisvaart, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abt, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orloff, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muiesan, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florman, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiro, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghtesad, Bijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERAS4OLT.org working group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERAS4OLT.org working group</creatorcontrib><title>The role of T‐tubes and abdominal drains on short‐term outcomes in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations</title><title>Clinical transplantation</title><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><description>Background This systematic review and expert panel recommendation aims to answer the question regarding the routine use of T‐tubes or abdominal drains to better manage complications and thereby improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel to assess the potential risks and benefits of T‐tubes and intra‐abdominal drainage in liver transplantation (CRD42021243036). Results Of the 2996 screened records, 33 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 29 (six RCTs) assessed the use of T‐tubes and four regarding surgical drains. Although some studies reported less strictures when using a T‐tube, there was a trend toward more biliary complications with T‐tubes, mainly related to biliary leakage. Due to the small number of studies, there was a paucity of evidence on the effect of abdominal drains with no clear benefit for or against the use of drainage. However, one study investigating the open vs. closed circuit drains found a significantly higher incidence of intra‐abdominal infections when open‐circuit drains were used. Conclusions Due to the potential risk of biliary leakage and infections, the routine intraoperative insertion of T‐tubes is not recommended (Level of Evidence moderate ‐ very low; grade of recommendation strong). However, a T‐tube can be considered in cases at risk for biliary stenosis. Due to the scant evidence on abdominal drainage, no change in clinical practice in individual centers is recommended. (Level of Evidence very low; weak recommendation).</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>abdominal drainage</subject><subject>biliary complications</subject><subject>biliary leakage</subject><subject>biliary strictures</subject><subject>Biliary Tract Diseases</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>T‐tubes</subject><issn>0902-0063</issn><issn>1399-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9uGyEUh1HVqnHdLnqBimW7cAJmhhlWVWT1nxQpUuWuEQNvaioGpsA49S5HqNRD9F45SbGdRM0ibECPT98P3kPoNSWntKwzneMprRoqnqAZZUIsCKHLp2hGBFmWM2cn6EVKP0qVU14_RyesrgVvSD1Df9cbwDE4wKHH65vr33nqIGHlDVadCYP1ymETlfUJB4_TJsS8pyAOOExZh6HQ1mNntxBxjsqn0SmfVbYFv7n-g89x2qUMQ6loHGFr4WqflUuus8Wj8hThEAi_RogZj8qDK2RxD-DNwZReome9cgle3e5z9O3jh_Xq8-Li8tOX1fnFQleUi4XSldFtx1jVGN3TvqaEVqZthGp61fWm5pwwJoxirKsM65ZEmaoVLSOtoLRnbI7eH73j1A1gNPjyJyfHaAcVdzIoKx_eeLuR38NWUkKadt_rOXp7a4jh5wQpy8EmDa50BcKU5JLzpmlbwpqCvjuiOoaUIvT3OZTI_WRlmaw8TLawb_5_2D15N8oCnB2BK-tg97hJrtZfj8p_04O1Pg</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Kalisvaart, Marit</creator><creator>Jonge, Jeroen</creator><creator>Abt, Peter</creator><creator>Orloff, Susan</creator><creator>Muiesan, Paolo</creator><creator>Florman, Sander</creator><creator>Spiro, Michael</creator><creator>Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle</creator><creator>Eghtesad, Bijan</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1635-9136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7857-0092</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>The role of T‐tubes and abdominal drains on short‐term outcomes in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations</title><author>Kalisvaart, Marit ; Jonge, Jeroen ; Abt, Peter ; Orloff, Susan ; Muiesan, Paolo ; Florman, Sander ; Spiro, Michael ; Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle ; Eghtesad, Bijan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ac4dc8b3347dcf1f51014d879a7fabfd5660339da33b4d3b20ad4898308911f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>abdominal drainage</topic><topic>biliary complications</topic><topic>biliary leakage</topic><topic>biliary strictures</topic><topic>Biliary Tract Diseases</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>T‐tubes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalisvaart, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonge, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abt, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orloff, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muiesan, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florman, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiro, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghtesad, Bijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERAS4OLT.org working group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERAS4OLT.org working group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalisvaart, Marit</au><au>Jonge, Jeroen</au><au>Abt, Peter</au><au>Orloff, Susan</au><au>Muiesan, Paolo</au><au>Florman, Sander</au><au>Spiro, Michael</au><au>Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle</au><au>Eghtesad, Bijan</au><aucorp>ERAS4OLT.org working group</aucorp><aucorp>ERAS4OLT.org working group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of T‐tubes and abdominal drains on short‐term outcomes in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Clinical transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transplant</addtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e14719</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14719-n/a</pages><issn>0902-0063</issn><eissn>1399-0012</eissn><abstract>Background This systematic review and expert panel recommendation aims to answer the question regarding the routine use of T‐tubes or abdominal drains to better manage complications and thereby improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel to assess the potential risks and benefits of T‐tubes and intra‐abdominal drainage in liver transplantation (CRD42021243036). Results Of the 2996 screened records, 33 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 29 (six RCTs) assessed the use of T‐tubes and four regarding surgical drains. Although some studies reported less strictures when using a T‐tube, there was a trend toward more biliary complications with T‐tubes, mainly related to biliary leakage. Due to the small number of studies, there was a paucity of evidence on the effect of abdominal drains with no clear benefit for or against the use of drainage. However, one study investigating the open vs. closed circuit drains found a significantly higher incidence of intra‐abdominal infections when open‐circuit drains were used. Conclusions Due to the potential risk of biliary leakage and infections, the routine intraoperative insertion of T‐tubes is not recommended (Level of Evidence moderate ‐ very low; grade of recommendation strong). However, a T‐tube can be considered in cases at risk for biliary stenosis. Due to the scant evidence on abdominal drainage, no change in clinical practice in individual centers is recommended. (Level of Evidence very low; weak recommendation).</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>35596705</pmid><doi>10.1111/ctr.14719</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1635-9136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7857-0092</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-0063
ispartof Clinical transplantation, 2022-10, Vol.36 (10), p.e14719-n/a
issn 0902-0063
1399-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10078006
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Abdomen - surgery
abdominal drainage
biliary complications
biliary leakage
biliary strictures
Biliary Tract Diseases
complications
Drainage
Humans
liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Original
outcomes
Postoperative Complications
T‐tubes
title The role of T‐tubes and abdominal drains on short‐term outcomes in liver transplantation – A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A19%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20T%E2%80%90tubes%20and%20abdominal%20drains%20on%20short%E2%80%90term%20outcomes%20in%20liver%20transplantation%20%E2%80%93%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20literature%20and%20expert%20panel%20recommendations&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20transplantation&rft.au=Kalisvaart,%20Marit&rft.aucorp=ERAS4OLT.org%20working%20group&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e14719&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14719-n/a&rft.issn=0902-0063&rft.eissn=1399-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ctr.14719&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2667788037%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667788037&rft_id=info:pmid/35596705&rfr_iscdi=true