Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Schizophrenia bulletin open 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.sgad006 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | sgad006 |
container_title | Schizophrenia bulletin open |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Addington, Jean Chao, Amanda Braun, Amy Miller, Madeline Farris, Megan S |
description | Abstract
A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10069322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2798711674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2KqiDKT6DysZcUf2zsDZcKrWipBAJt2wsXy5lMdl2SOHgSquXXk2oXBLeeZkbzzmPPvIwdS_FFikKfEKzDYzk2TeyxO6GVr4Qw79iBMlpldl4Ue6_yfXZE9EcIoXIp88J8YPvaToXN8wN2e-OHgN2QLbGPacCKX48DxBb5FXoaExIPHV80oQvgG34RVmu-DHTH65j4DW1gHSnQKT_jPzc0YDvRgC_xIeDfj-x97RvCo108ZL-_nf9aXGSX199_LM4uM5jlesjqaqYRtLReK7CFBV2a2kMpoFQgclBzOcNCWDBS5GXlrfVGm2pufF2Kypb6kH3dcvuxbLGCaZvkG9en0Pq0cdEH97bThbVbxQcnp6MVWqmJ8HlHSPF-RBpcGwiwaXyHcSSnbDG3Uho7m6T5VgopEiWsX96Rwv3zxr3xxu28meY-vf7ky9SzE5NAbAVx7P-T-QTphKOJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2798711674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Addington, Jean ; Chao, Amanda ; Braun, Amy ; Miller, Madeline ; Farris, Megan S</creator><creatorcontrib>Addington, Jean ; Chao, Amanda ; Braun, Amy ; Miller, Madeline ; Farris, Megan S</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2632-7899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2632-7899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37025755</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Major Review (Orig)</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.sgad006</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of Maryland's school of medicine, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of Maryland's school of medicine, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069322/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069322/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025755$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Addington, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Megan S</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin open</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull Open</addtitle><description>Abstract
A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.</description><subject>Major Review (Orig)</subject><issn>2632-7899</issn><issn>2632-7899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2KqiDKT6DysZcUf2zsDZcKrWipBAJt2wsXy5lMdl2SOHgSquXXk2oXBLeeZkbzzmPPvIwdS_FFikKfEKzDYzk2TeyxO6GVr4Qw79iBMlpldl4Ue6_yfXZE9EcIoXIp88J8YPvaToXN8wN2e-OHgN2QLbGPacCKX48DxBb5FXoaExIPHV80oQvgG34RVmu-DHTH65j4DW1gHSnQKT_jPzc0YDvRgC_xIeDfj-x97RvCo108ZL-_nf9aXGSX199_LM4uM5jlesjqaqYRtLReK7CFBV2a2kMpoFQgclBzOcNCWDBS5GXlrfVGm2pufF2Kypb6kH3dcvuxbLGCaZvkG9en0Pq0cdEH97bThbVbxQcnp6MVWqmJ8HlHSPF-RBpcGwiwaXyHcSSnbDG3Uho7m6T5VgopEiWsX96Rwv3zxr3xxu28meY-vf7ky9SzE5NAbAVx7P-T-QTphKOJ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Addington, Jean</creator><creator>Chao, Amanda</creator><creator>Braun, Amy</creator><creator>Miller, Madeline</creator><creator>Farris, Megan S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</title><author>Addington, Jean ; Chao, Amanda ; Braun, Amy ; Miller, Madeline ; Farris, Megan S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Major Review (Orig)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Addington, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Megan S</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Addington, Jean</au><au>Chao, Amanda</au><au>Braun, Amy</au><au>Miller, Madeline</au><au>Farris, Megan S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin open</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull Open</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>sgad006</spage><pages>sgad006-</pages><issn>2632-7899</issn><eissn>2632-7899</eissn><abstract>Abstract
A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37025755</pmid><doi>10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2632-7899 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.sgad006 |
issn | 2632-7899 2632-7899 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10069322 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Major Review (Orig) |
title | Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A41%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Reported%20Outcome%20Measures%20in%20Clinical%20High%20Risk%20for%20Psychosis:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin%20open&rft.au=Addington,%20Jean&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=sgad006&rft.pages=sgad006-&rft.issn=2632-7899&rft.eissn=2632-7899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2798711674%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2798711674&rft_id=info:pmid/37025755&rft_oup_id=10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006&rfr_iscdi=true |