Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review

Abstract A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia bulletin open 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.sgad006
Hauptverfasser: Addington, Jean, Chao, Amanda, Braun, Amy, Miller, Madeline, Farris, Megan S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page sgad006
container_title Schizophrenia bulletin open
container_volume 4
creator Addington, Jean
Chao, Amanda
Braun, Amy
Miller, Madeline
Farris, Megan S
description Abstract A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10069322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2798711674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2KqiDKT6DysZcUf2zsDZcKrWipBAJt2wsXy5lMdl2SOHgSquXXk2oXBLeeZkbzzmPPvIwdS_FFikKfEKzDYzk2TeyxO6GVr4Qw79iBMlpldl4Ue6_yfXZE9EcIoXIp88J8YPvaToXN8wN2e-OHgN2QLbGPacCKX48DxBb5FXoaExIPHV80oQvgG34RVmu-DHTH65j4DW1gHSnQKT_jPzc0YDvRgC_xIeDfj-x97RvCo108ZL-_nf9aXGSX199_LM4uM5jlesjqaqYRtLReK7CFBV2a2kMpoFQgclBzOcNCWDBS5GXlrfVGm2pufF2Kypb6kH3dcvuxbLGCaZvkG9en0Pq0cdEH97bThbVbxQcnp6MVWqmJ8HlHSPF-RBpcGwiwaXyHcSSnbDG3Uho7m6T5VgopEiWsX96Rwv3zxr3xxu28meY-vf7ky9SzE5NAbAVx7P-T-QTphKOJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2798711674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Addington, Jean ; Chao, Amanda ; Braun, Amy ; Miller, Madeline ; Farris, Megan S</creator><creatorcontrib>Addington, Jean ; Chao, Amanda ; Braun, Amy ; Miller, Madeline ; Farris, Megan S</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2632-7899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2632-7899</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37025755</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Major Review (Orig)</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.sgad006</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of Maryland's school of medicine, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of Maryland's school of medicine, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069322/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069322/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025755$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Addington, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Megan S</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin open</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull Open</addtitle><description>Abstract A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.</description><subject>Major Review (Orig)</subject><issn>2632-7899</issn><issn>2632-7899</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P3DAQhq2KqiDKT6DysZcUf2zsDZcKrWipBAJt2wsXy5lMdl2SOHgSquXXk2oXBLeeZkbzzmPPvIwdS_FFikKfEKzDYzk2TeyxO6GVr4Qw79iBMlpldl4Ue6_yfXZE9EcIoXIp88J8YPvaToXN8wN2e-OHgN2QLbGPacCKX48DxBb5FXoaExIPHV80oQvgG34RVmu-DHTH65j4DW1gHSnQKT_jPzc0YDvRgC_xIeDfj-x97RvCo108ZL-_nf9aXGSX199_LM4uM5jlesjqaqYRtLReK7CFBV2a2kMpoFQgclBzOcNCWDBS5GXlrfVGm2pufF2Kypb6kH3dcvuxbLGCaZvkG9en0Pq0cdEH97bThbVbxQcnp6MVWqmJ8HlHSPF-RBpcGwiwaXyHcSSnbDG3Uho7m6T5VgopEiWsX96Rwv3zxr3xxu28meY-vf7ky9SzE5NAbAVx7P-T-QTphKOJ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Addington, Jean</creator><creator>Chao, Amanda</creator><creator>Braun, Amy</creator><creator>Miller, Madeline</creator><creator>Farris, Megan S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</title><author>Addington, Jean ; Chao, Amanda ; Braun, Amy ; Miller, Madeline ; Farris, Megan S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fd43ec317a32c797c3b6facb0cb2c05c2814e907c6105bda77a636d86afb0d7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Major Review (Orig)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Addington, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farris, Megan S</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Addington, Jean</au><au>Chao, Amanda</au><au>Braun, Amy</au><au>Miller, Madeline</au><au>Farris, Megan S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin open</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull Open</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>sgad006</spage><pages>sgad006-</pages><issn>2632-7899</issn><eissn>2632-7899</eissn><abstract>Abstract A key issue in both research and clinical work with youth at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis is that there are clearly heterogenous clinical outcomes in addition to the development of psychosis. Thus, it is important to capture the psychopathologic outcomes of the CHR group and develop a core outcomes assessment set that may help in dissecting the heterogeneity and aid progress toward new treatments. In assessing psychopathology and often poor social and role functioning, we may be missing the important perspectives of the CHR individuals themselves. It is important to consider the perspectives of youth at CHR by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This systematic review of PROMs in CHR was conducted based on a comprehensive search of several databases and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Sixty-four publications were included in the review examining PROMs for symptoms, functioning, quality of life, self-perceptions, stress, and resilience. Typically, PROMs were not the primary focus of the studies reviewed. The PROMs summarized here fit with results published elsewhere in the literature based on interviewer measures. However, very few of the measures used were validated for CHR or for youth. There are several recommendations for determining a core set of PROMs for use with CHR.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37025755</pmid><doi>10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2632-7899
ispartof Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2023-01, Vol.4 (1), p.sgad006
issn 2632-7899
2632-7899
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10069322
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Major Review (Orig)
title Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T13%3A41%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Reported%20Outcome%20Measures%20in%20Clinical%20High%20Risk%20for%20Psychosis:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin%20open&rft.au=Addington,%20Jean&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=sgad006&rft.pages=sgad006-&rft.issn=2632-7899&rft.eissn=2632-7899&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2798711674%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2798711674&rft_id=info:pmid/37025755&rft_oup_id=10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad006&rfr_iscdi=true