Using flash glucose monitoring in pregnancies in routine care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study
Aim Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been approved for the care of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes since 2017. However, its use in gestational diabetes (GDM) has been critically discussed. Inaccuracy and missing recommendations for target values are the main arguments against the use of F...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta diabetologica 2023-05, Vol.60 (5), p.697-704 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 704 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 697 |
container_title | Acta diabetologica |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Bastobbe, Sophie Heimann, Yvonne Schleußner, Ekkehard Groten, Tanja Weschenfelder, Friederike |
description | Aim
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been approved for the care of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes since 2017. However, its use in gestational diabetes (GDM) has been critically discussed. Inaccuracy and missing recommendations for target values are the main arguments against the use of FGM in GDM. To date, there is a lack of data to justify routine use of FGM in GDM pregnancies. Consequently, this new technology has been withheld from GDM-patients. Aim of our pilot study was to analyze the impact of FGM use on pregnancy outcomes, patient’s satisfaction and to confirm the safe use in GDM pregnancies.
Methods
Cohort study of 37 FGM-managed GDM pregnancies compared with 74 matched women using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Group comparison using nonparametric testing concerning patients characteristic and perinatal outcome focusing on adverse outcomes (preeclampsia, preterm delivery, large for gestational age, C-sections, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoglycemia). Evaluation of patient’s treatment satisfaction using the “Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change” (DTSQc) and patient interviews.
Results
No significant differences in patient’s characteristics despite gestational age at diagnosis (FGM with 20 vs. SMBG with 25 weeks). No difference in gestational weight gain, HbA1c progression and perinatal outcome. Treatment satisfaction obtained by the DTSQc revealed a high level of satisfaction with FGM use.
Conclusion
FGM use was well accepted and did not affect perinatal outcome. Use of FGM during pregnancy is safe and non-inferior to the management with SBGM. FGM should be considered as an option in the management of GDM patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00592-023-02042-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10063475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2780079906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e0d1c83c47d494c6976181534c101117675e50873486bdfed1ba1d479514ff4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi1ERcuBF2CBLLFhE-pb4oQNQhU3qVI3dG35OJNTV4kdPA606svX6SmlsGBh-fbNP5efkFecveOM6WNkrO5ExYQsiylRXT0hR1xJUdVCyqePzofkOeIlY1xo2T4jh7JpFdOtOCI35-jDjg6jxQu6GxcXEegUg88xrR8-0DnBLtjgPOB6TXHJPgB1NgGNA51t9hAy0l8-FwnAXB5isCPtvd1CLlETjKPPC76nls5-jJliXvrrF-RgsCPCy_t9Q84_f_p-8rU6Pfvy7eTjaeWUaHIFrOeulU7pXnXKNZ1ueMtrqRxnnHPd6Bpq1mqp2mbbD9DzreW90l3N1TCoQW7Ih73uvGwn6F2pNtnRzMlPNl2baL35-yf4C7OLP02ZciOVrovC23uFFH8spUUzeXSlKxsgLmiEboshXVfwDXnzD3oZl1TGsVKd6OqCqkKJPeVSREwwPFTD2ZpWm725pphr7sw1VyXo9eM-HkJ-u1kAuQdwXs2D9Cf3f2RvAamDsi0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792957804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using flash glucose monitoring in pregnancies in routine care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Bastobbe, Sophie ; Heimann, Yvonne ; Schleußner, Ekkehard ; Groten, Tanja ; Weschenfelder, Friederike</creator><creatorcontrib>Bastobbe, Sophie ; Heimann, Yvonne ; Schleußner, Ekkehard ; Groten, Tanja ; Weschenfelder, Friederike</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been approved for the care of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes since 2017. However, its use in gestational diabetes (GDM) has been critically discussed. Inaccuracy and missing recommendations for target values are the main arguments against the use of FGM in GDM. To date, there is a lack of data to justify routine use of FGM in GDM pregnancies. Consequently, this new technology has been withheld from GDM-patients. Aim of our pilot study was to analyze the impact of FGM use on pregnancy outcomes, patient’s satisfaction and to confirm the safe use in GDM pregnancies.
Methods
Cohort study of 37 FGM-managed GDM pregnancies compared with 74 matched women using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Group comparison using nonparametric testing concerning patients characteristic and perinatal outcome focusing on adverse outcomes (preeclampsia, preterm delivery, large for gestational age, C-sections, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoglycemia). Evaluation of patient’s treatment satisfaction using the “Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change” (DTSQc) and patient interviews.
Results
No significant differences in patient’s characteristics despite gestational age at diagnosis (FGM with 20 vs. SMBG with 25 weeks). No difference in gestational weight gain, HbA1c progression and perinatal outcome. Treatment satisfaction obtained by the DTSQc revealed a high level of satisfaction with FGM use.
Conclusion
FGM use was well accepted and did not affect perinatal outcome. Use of FGM during pregnancy is safe and non-inferior to the management with SBGM. FGM should be considered as an option in the management of GDM patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-5233</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0940-5429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5233</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00592-023-02042-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36840782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Blood Glucose ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ; Cohort Studies ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis ; Diabetes, Gestational - therapy ; Female ; Gestational age ; Gestational diabetes ; Glucose monitoring ; Humans ; Hyperbilirubinemia ; Hypoglycemia ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metabolic Diseases ; Neonates ; Original ; Original Article ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Pre-eclampsia ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy and diabetes ; Pregnancy complications ; Pregnancy Outcome</subject><ispartof>Acta diabetologica, 2023-05, Vol.60 (5), p.697-704</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e0d1c83c47d494c6976181534c101117675e50873486bdfed1ba1d479514ff4f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3553-4056</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00592-023-02042-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00592-023-02042-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36840782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bastobbe, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimann, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleußner, Ekkehard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groten, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weschenfelder, Friederike</creatorcontrib><title>Using flash glucose monitoring in pregnancies in routine care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study</title><title>Acta diabetologica</title><addtitle>Acta Diabetol</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Diabetol</addtitle><description>Aim
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been approved for the care of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes since 2017. However, its use in gestational diabetes (GDM) has been critically discussed. Inaccuracy and missing recommendations for target values are the main arguments against the use of FGM in GDM. To date, there is a lack of data to justify routine use of FGM in GDM pregnancies. Consequently, this new technology has been withheld from GDM-patients. Aim of our pilot study was to analyze the impact of FGM use on pregnancy outcomes, patient’s satisfaction and to confirm the safe use in GDM pregnancies.
Methods
Cohort study of 37 FGM-managed GDM pregnancies compared with 74 matched women using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Group comparison using nonparametric testing concerning patients characteristic and perinatal outcome focusing on adverse outcomes (preeclampsia, preterm delivery, large for gestational age, C-sections, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoglycemia). Evaluation of patient’s treatment satisfaction using the “Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change” (DTSQc) and patient interviews.
Results
No significant differences in patient’s characteristics despite gestational age at diagnosis (FGM with 20 vs. SMBG with 25 weeks). No difference in gestational weight gain, HbA1c progression and perinatal outcome. Treatment satisfaction obtained by the DTSQc revealed a high level of satisfaction with FGM use.
Conclusion
FGM use was well accepted and did not affect perinatal outcome. Use of FGM during pregnancy is safe and non-inferior to the management with SBGM. FGM should be considered as an option in the management of GDM patients.</description><subject>Blood Glucose</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Gestational diabetes</subject><subject>Glucose monitoring</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperbilirubinemia</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Pre-eclampsia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy and diabetes</subject><subject>Pregnancy complications</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><issn>1432-5233</issn><issn>0940-5429</issn><issn>1432-5233</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi1ERcuBF2CBLLFhE-pb4oQNQhU3qVI3dG35OJNTV4kdPA606svX6SmlsGBh-fbNP5efkFecveOM6WNkrO5ExYQsiylRXT0hR1xJUdVCyqePzofkOeIlY1xo2T4jh7JpFdOtOCI35-jDjg6jxQu6GxcXEegUg88xrR8-0DnBLtjgPOB6TXHJPgB1NgGNA51t9hAy0l8-FwnAXB5isCPtvd1CLlETjKPPC76nls5-jJliXvrrF-RgsCPCy_t9Q84_f_p-8rU6Pfvy7eTjaeWUaHIFrOeulU7pXnXKNZ1ueMtrqRxnnHPd6Bpq1mqp2mbbD9DzreW90l3N1TCoQW7Ih73uvGwn6F2pNtnRzMlPNl2baL35-yf4C7OLP02ZciOVrovC23uFFH8spUUzeXSlKxsgLmiEboshXVfwDXnzD3oZl1TGsVKd6OqCqkKJPeVSREwwPFTD2ZpWm725pphr7sw1VyXo9eM-HkJ-u1kAuQdwXs2D9Cf3f2RvAamDsi0</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Bastobbe, Sophie</creator><creator>Heimann, Yvonne</creator><creator>Schleußner, Ekkehard</creator><creator>Groten, Tanja</creator><creator>Weschenfelder, Friederike</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4056</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Using flash glucose monitoring in pregnancies in routine care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study</title><author>Bastobbe, Sophie ; Heimann, Yvonne ; Schleußner, Ekkehard ; Groten, Tanja ; Weschenfelder, Friederike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-e0d1c83c47d494c6976181534c101117675e50873486bdfed1ba1d479514ff4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Blood Glucose</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Gestational diabetes</topic><topic>Glucose monitoring</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperbilirubinemia</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Pre-eclampsia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy and diabetes</topic><topic>Pregnancy complications</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bastobbe, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimann, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleußner, Ekkehard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groten, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weschenfelder, Friederike</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta diabetologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bastobbe, Sophie</au><au>Heimann, Yvonne</au><au>Schleußner, Ekkehard</au><au>Groten, Tanja</au><au>Weschenfelder, Friederike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using flash glucose monitoring in pregnancies in routine care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Acta diabetologica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Diabetol</stitle><addtitle>Acta Diabetol</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>697</spage><epage>704</epage><pages>697-704</pages><issn>1432-5233</issn><issn>0940-5429</issn><eissn>1432-5233</eissn><abstract>Aim
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been approved for the care of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes since 2017. However, its use in gestational diabetes (GDM) has been critically discussed. Inaccuracy and missing recommendations for target values are the main arguments against the use of FGM in GDM. To date, there is a lack of data to justify routine use of FGM in GDM pregnancies. Consequently, this new technology has been withheld from GDM-patients. Aim of our pilot study was to analyze the impact of FGM use on pregnancy outcomes, patient’s satisfaction and to confirm the safe use in GDM pregnancies.
Methods
Cohort study of 37 FGM-managed GDM pregnancies compared with 74 matched women using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Group comparison using nonparametric testing concerning patients characteristic and perinatal outcome focusing on adverse outcomes (preeclampsia, preterm delivery, large for gestational age, C-sections, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoglycemia). Evaluation of patient’s treatment satisfaction using the “Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change” (DTSQc) and patient interviews.
Results
No significant differences in patient’s characteristics despite gestational age at diagnosis (FGM with 20 vs. SMBG with 25 weeks). No difference in gestational weight gain, HbA1c progression and perinatal outcome. Treatment satisfaction obtained by the DTSQc revealed a high level of satisfaction with FGM use.
Conclusion
FGM use was well accepted and did not affect perinatal outcome. Use of FGM during pregnancy is safe and non-inferior to the management with SBGM. FGM should be considered as an option in the management of GDM patients.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>36840782</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00592-023-02042-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4056</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1432-5233 |
ispartof | Acta diabetologica, 2023-05, Vol.60 (5), p.697-704 |
issn | 1432-5233 0940-5429 1432-5233 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10063475 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Blood Glucose Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring Cohort Studies Diabetes Diabetes mellitus Diabetes, Gestational - diagnosis Diabetes, Gestational - therapy Female Gestational age Gestational diabetes Glucose monitoring Humans Hyperbilirubinemia Hypoglycemia Infant, Newborn Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metabolic Diseases Neonates Original Original Article Patients Pilot Projects Pre-eclampsia Pregnancy Pregnancy and diabetes Pregnancy complications Pregnancy Outcome |
title | Using flash glucose monitoring in pregnancies in routine care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A11%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20flash%20glucose%20monitoring%20in%20pregnancies%20in%20routine%20care%20of%20patients%20with%20gestational%20diabetes%20mellitus:%20a%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20diabetologica&rft.au=Bastobbe,%20Sophie&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=697&rft.epage=704&rft.pages=697-704&rft.issn=1432-5233&rft.eissn=1432-5233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00592-023-02042-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2780079906%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792957804&rft_id=info:pmid/36840782&rfr_iscdi=true |