Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical rese...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological assessment 2022-07, Vol.34 (7), p.671-683
Hauptverfasser: Goodman, Zachary T., Timpano, Kiara R., Llabre, Maria M., Bainter, Sierra A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 683
container_issue 7
container_start_page 671
container_title Psychological assessment
container_volume 34
creator Goodman, Zachary T.
Timpano, Kiara R.
Llabre, Maria M.
Bainter, Sierra A.
description The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts. Public Significance Statement The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pas0001127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10044453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2685585369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-5ba186002b4f494a0b8ac86dbd91b8af50da496e7e3d0184a51f5c4d7a5588a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EomXhwgdAkbhUoIAd27F9QtWKAlKlir_ihDVxnK2rrB1sZ6X99jjd0gIHTjOa-c3TPD2EnhL8imAqXk-QMMaENOIeOiaKqppQ9v1-6THDNeUKH6FHKV0VhlHJH6IjyqkQrVTH6Mcnu3PJZec3Vb601RmYHGL1OcfZ5DnaCnxfrYNP14PqG4yud3lfheEaX4eNL8e75dCNhU_Vx9mm7IL34KJ9jB4MMCb75Kau0Nezt1_W7-vzi3cf1qfnNTBBcs07ILLFuOnYwBQD3Ekwsu27XpHSDhz3wFRrhaU9JpIBJwM3rBfAuZSg6Aq9OehOc7e1vbE-Rxj1FN0W4l4HcPrvjXeXehN2mmDMGOO0KJzcKMTwc7Ggty4ZO47gbZiTblomGsIavKDP_0Gvwhx98VcoWT7itFX_p1gruBIlhhV6caBMDClFO9z-TLBe0tV36Rb42Z8ub9HfcRbg5QGACfSU9gZidma0ycwxFueLmKZMC90KQn8BM5OwQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646759735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Goodman, Zachary T. ; Timpano, Kiara R. ; Llabre, Maria M. ; Bainter, Sierra A.</creator><contributor>Suhr, Julie A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Zachary T. ; Timpano, Kiara R. ; Llabre, Maria M. ; Bainter, Sierra A. ; Suhr, Julie A</creatorcontrib><description>The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts. Public Significance Statement The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0001127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35377689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Assessment ; Confirmatory Factor Analysis ; Construct Validity ; Discriminant analysis ; Distractibility ; Distress ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Neuropsychology ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Self Report ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2022-07, Vol.34 (7), p.671-683</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-5ba186002b4f494a0b8ac86dbd91b8af50da496e7e3d0184a51f5c4d7a5588a93</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0665-8722 ; 0000-0002-7450-2498 ; 0000-0002-0126-4425</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Suhr, Julie A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Zachary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timpano, Kiara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llabre, Maria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainter, Sierra A.</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts. Public Significance Statement The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Assessment</subject><subject>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Distractibility</subject><subject>Distress</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EomXhwgdAkbhUoIAd27F9QtWKAlKlir_ihDVxnK2rrB1sZ6X99jjd0gIHTjOa-c3TPD2EnhL8imAqXk-QMMaENOIeOiaKqppQ9v1-6THDNeUKH6FHKV0VhlHJH6IjyqkQrVTH6Mcnu3PJZec3Vb601RmYHGL1OcfZ5DnaCnxfrYNP14PqG4yud3lfheEaX4eNL8e75dCNhU_Vx9mm7IL34KJ9jB4MMCb75Kau0Nezt1_W7-vzi3cf1qfnNTBBcs07ILLFuOnYwBQD3Ekwsu27XpHSDhz3wFRrhaU9JpIBJwM3rBfAuZSg6Aq9OehOc7e1vbE-Rxj1FN0W4l4HcPrvjXeXehN2mmDMGOO0KJzcKMTwc7Ggty4ZO47gbZiTblomGsIavKDP_0Gvwhx98VcoWT7itFX_p1gruBIlhhV6caBMDClFO9z-TLBe0tV36Rb42Z8ub9HfcRbg5QGACfSU9gZidma0ycwxFueLmKZMC90KQn8BM5OwQw</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Goodman, Zachary T.</creator><creator>Timpano, Kiara R.</creator><creator>Llabre, Maria M.</creator><creator>Bainter, Sierra A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-8722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-2498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-4425</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</title><author>Goodman, Zachary T. ; Timpano, Kiara R. ; Llabre, Maria M. ; Bainter, Sierra A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-5ba186002b4f494a0b8ac86dbd91b8af50da496e7e3d0184a51f5c4d7a5588a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Assessment</topic><topic>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Distractibility</topic><topic>Distress</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Zachary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timpano, Kiara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llabre, Maria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainter, Sierra A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodman, Zachary T.</au><au>Timpano, Kiara R.</au><au>Llabre, Maria M.</au><au>Bainter, Sierra A.</au><au>Suhr, Julie A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>683</epage><pages>671-683</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts. Public Significance Statement The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>35377689</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0001127</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-8722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-2498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-4425</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-3590
ispartof Psychological assessment, 2022-07, Vol.34 (7), p.671-683
issn 1040-3590
1939-134X
1939-134X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10044453
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Cognition
Cognitive ability
Cognitive Assessment
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Construct Validity
Discriminant analysis
Distractibility
Distress
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Factor Structure
Female
Human
Humans
Male
Neuropsychology
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A38%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20Factor%20Structure%20and%20Construct%20Validity%20of%20the%20Cognitive%20Failures%20Questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Goodman,%20Zachary%20T.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=683&rft.pages=671-683&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0001127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2685585369%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646759735&rft_id=info:pmid/35377689&rfr_iscdi=true