Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical rese...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological assessment 2022-07, Vol.34 (7), p.671-683 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 683 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 671 |
container_title | Psychological assessment |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Goodman, Zachary T. Timpano, Kiara R. Llabre, Maria M. Bainter, Sierra A. |
description | The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts.
Public Significance Statement
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pas0001127 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10044453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2685585369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-5ba186002b4f494a0b8ac86dbd91b8af50da496e7e3d0184a51f5c4d7a5588a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EomXhwgdAkbhUoIAd27F9QtWKAlKlir_ihDVxnK2rrB1sZ6X99jjd0gIHTjOa-c3TPD2EnhL8imAqXk-QMMaENOIeOiaKqppQ9v1-6THDNeUKH6FHKV0VhlHJH6IjyqkQrVTH6Mcnu3PJZec3Vb601RmYHGL1OcfZ5DnaCnxfrYNP14PqG4yud3lfheEaX4eNL8e75dCNhU_Vx9mm7IL34KJ9jB4MMCb75Kau0Nezt1_W7-vzi3cf1qfnNTBBcs07ILLFuOnYwBQD3Ekwsu27XpHSDhz3wFRrhaU9JpIBJwM3rBfAuZSg6Aq9OehOc7e1vbE-Rxj1FN0W4l4HcPrvjXeXehN2mmDMGOO0KJzcKMTwc7Ggty4ZO47gbZiTblomGsIavKDP_0Gvwhx98VcoWT7itFX_p1gruBIlhhV6caBMDClFO9z-TLBe0tV36Rb42Z8ub9HfcRbg5QGACfSU9gZidma0ycwxFueLmKZMC90KQn8BM5OwQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646759735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Goodman, Zachary T. ; Timpano, Kiara R. ; Llabre, Maria M. ; Bainter, Sierra A.</creator><contributor>Suhr, Julie A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Zachary T. ; Timpano, Kiara R. ; Llabre, Maria M. ; Bainter, Sierra A. ; Suhr, Julie A</creatorcontrib><description>The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts.
Public Significance Statement
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0001127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35377689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Assessment ; Confirmatory Factor Analysis ; Construct Validity ; Discriminant analysis ; Distractibility ; Distress ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Factor Structure ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Neuropsychology ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Self Report ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2022-07, Vol.34 (7), p.671-683</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-5ba186002b4f494a0b8ac86dbd91b8af50da496e7e3d0184a51f5c4d7a5588a93</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0665-8722 ; 0000-0002-7450-2498 ; 0000-0002-0126-4425</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35377689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Suhr, Julie A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Zachary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timpano, Kiara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llabre, Maria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainter, Sierra A.</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts.
Public Significance Statement
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Assessment</subject><subject>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Distractibility</subject><subject>Distress</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EomXhwgdAkbhUoIAd27F9QtWKAlKlir_ihDVxnK2rrB1sZ6X99jjd0gIHTjOa-c3TPD2EnhL8imAqXk-QMMaENOIeOiaKqppQ9v1-6THDNeUKH6FHKV0VhlHJH6IjyqkQrVTH6Mcnu3PJZec3Vb601RmYHGL1OcfZ5DnaCnxfrYNP14PqG4yud3lfheEaX4eNL8e75dCNhU_Vx9mm7IL34KJ9jB4MMCb75Kau0Nezt1_W7-vzi3cf1qfnNTBBcs07ILLFuOnYwBQD3Ekwsu27XpHSDhz3wFRrhaU9JpIBJwM3rBfAuZSg6Aq9OehOc7e1vbE-Rxj1FN0W4l4HcPrvjXeXehN2mmDMGOO0KJzcKMTwc7Ggty4ZO47gbZiTblomGsIavKDP_0Gvwhx98VcoWT7itFX_p1gruBIlhhV6caBMDClFO9z-TLBe0tV36Rb42Z8ub9HfcRbg5QGACfSU9gZidma0ycwxFueLmKZMC90KQn8BM5OwQw</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Goodman, Zachary T.</creator><creator>Timpano, Kiara R.</creator><creator>Llabre, Maria M.</creator><creator>Bainter, Sierra A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-8722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-2498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-4425</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</title><author>Goodman, Zachary T. ; Timpano, Kiara R. ; Llabre, Maria M. ; Bainter, Sierra A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-5ba186002b4f494a0b8ac86dbd91b8af50da496e7e3d0184a51f5c4d7a5588a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Assessment</topic><topic>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Distractibility</topic><topic>Distress</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Zachary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timpano, Kiara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llabre, Maria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainter, Sierra A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodman, Zachary T.</au><au>Timpano, Kiara R.</au><au>Llabre, Maria M.</au><au>Bainter, Sierra A.</au><au>Suhr, Julie A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>683</epage><pages>671-683</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ; Broadbent et al., 1982) is an established and commonly used self-report measure of cognitive errors experienced in daily life, capturing perceived difficulties with forgetfulness, distractibility, and thinking blunders. Despite frequent use in clinical research and established associations with psychological and neuropsychological disorders, the psychometric properties and construct validity of the CFQ remain ambiguous. This study sought to critically assess the factor structure and external validity of the CFQ. A sample of 839 people (62% female) between 16 and 85 years of age (M = 44.12, SD = 19.54) was drawn from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample. Previously published CFQ factor structures were compared via confirmatory factor analysis and the unique variance explained by each factor was assessed. Next, we related the CFQ latent variables to neuropsychological tasks and symptom measures of depression, anxiety domains, inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. A single-factor model was best supported by the data, indicating that the CFQ represents a global measure of subjective cognitive difficulties rather than errors in specific domains. Scores on the CFQ did not predict poorer performance on objective neuropsychological tasks but were related to a range of psychological distress symptoms. Subscales derived from previously published factor structures may provide misleading impressions of the construct validity of the CFQ and are not recommended for use in future research or clinical contexts.
Public Significance Statement
The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is a commonly used self-report measure to capture subjective cognitive difficulties experienced throughout the day. Our study suggests that these subjective difficulties are unrelated to underlying deficits in cognition, as traditionally measured, and instead may simply reflect elevated psychological distress. The method used to assess daily cognitive difficulties can have a considerable impact on the conclusions drawn and should be selected with intention and care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>35377689</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0001127</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-8722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-2498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-4425</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-3590 |
ispartof | Psychological assessment, 2022-07, Vol.34 (7), p.671-683 |
issn | 1040-3590 1939-134X 1939-134X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10044453 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Cognition Cognitive ability Cognitive Assessment Confirmatory Factor Analysis Construct Validity Discriminant analysis Distractibility Distress Factor Analysis, Statistical Factor Structure Female Human Humans Male Neuropsychology Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Self Report Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Revisiting the Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A38%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20Factor%20Structure%20and%20Construct%20Validity%20of%20the%20Cognitive%20Failures%20Questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Goodman,%20Zachary%20T.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=683&rft.pages=671-683&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0001127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2685585369%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646759735&rft_id=info:pmid/35377689&rfr_iscdi=true |