Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide

Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian medical education journal 2023-03, Vol.14 (1), p.95-100
Hauptverfasser: Desjardins, Chloé, Pitre, Lyne, Adjo, David, Sagne, Jean Henri, Fotsing, Salomon, Dionne, Éric, Seale, Edward, Pomerleau, Marjorie, Philippe, Marissa, Gharib, Georges, Denis-LeBlanc, Manon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Canadian medical education journal
container_volume 14
creator Desjardins, Chloé
Pitre, Lyne
Adjo, David
Sagne, Jean Henri
Fotsing, Salomon
Dionne, Éric
Seale, Edward
Pomerleau, Marjorie
Philippe, Marissa
Gharib, Georges
Denis-LeBlanc, Manon
description Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital. Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period. Based on the analysis of the Field Notes ( = 70 pre-test; = 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%, = 2.97, = 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%, = 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role. The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.
doi_str_mv 10.36834/cmej.75256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2793983482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1127-5d1383290da11d4d12fd9e74811c1dc8afb854bd469facdd6f5fb0d036b91ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1PHDEMhqOKqiDKqfcqRy6zTJL5CheElqVUAvVQ7iNP4iyBmWRIMlvtX-qvbBC0oj7Ylm09ry0T8oWVK9F0ojpTEz6u2prXzQdyxCQXBeMlP3iXH5KTGB_LbA0TNROfyKFopOwq2RyR35sdjAsk6x31hgJN3o_ZUTvNwe-QpgekzwuMNu1fBuaACufkA_0VbEroqEHUA6gnanLRwGTHPZ1QW2Ud0oDRanQpntMUwDrrthScpkvEV7k1uLvN1c_i7poqP82YiWpfDBBRU5UVMLxstl0y5TP5aGCMePIWj8n99eZ-fVPc_vj2fX15W8yM8baoNROd4LLUwJiuNONGS2yrjjHFtOrADF1dDbpqpAGldWNqM5S6FM0gmTHimFy8YudlyHeovH2AsZ-DnSDsew-2_7_j7EO_9buelWXF267NhNM3QvDPC8bUTzYqHEdw6JfY81YKmX_X8Tz69b3YP5W_DxJ_AGLml70</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793983482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Desjardins, Chloé ; Pitre, Lyne ; Adjo, David ; Sagne, Jean Henri ; Fotsing, Salomon ; Dionne, Éric ; Seale, Edward ; Pomerleau, Marjorie ; Philippe, Marissa ; Gharib, Georges ; Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creator><creatorcontrib>Desjardins, Chloé ; Pitre, Lyne ; Adjo, David ; Sagne, Jean Henri ; Fotsing, Salomon ; Dionne, Éric ; Seale, Edward ; Pomerleau, Marjorie ; Philippe, Marissa ; Gharib, Georges ; Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creatorcontrib><description>Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital. Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period. Based on the analysis of the Field Notes ( = 70 pre-test; = 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%, = 2.97, = 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%, = 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role. The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1923-1202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-1202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36834/cmej.75256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36998496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Medical Education Journal</publisher><subject>Brief Reports ; Clinical Competence ; Educational Measurement ; Family Practice - education ; Feedback ; Internship and Residency</subject><ispartof>Canadian medical education journal, 2023-03, Vol.14 (1), p.95-100</ispartof><rights>2023 Desjardins, Pitre, Adjo, Sagne, Fotsing, Dionne, Seale, Pomerleau, Philippe, Gharib, Denis-LeBlanc; licensee Synergies Partners.</rights><rights>2023 Desjardins, Pitre, Adjo, Sagne, Fotsing, Dionne, Seale, Pomerleau, Philippe, Gharib, Denis-LeBlanc; licensee Synergies Partners. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042787/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042787/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Desjardins, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitre, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagne, Jean Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotsing, Salomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionne, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seale, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippe, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharib, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</title><title>Canadian medical education journal</title><addtitle>Can Med Educ J</addtitle><description>Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital. Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period. Based on the analysis of the Field Notes ( = 70 pre-test; = 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%, = 2.97, = 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%, = 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role. The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.</description><subject>Brief Reports</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Family Practice - education</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><issn>1923-1202</issn><issn>1923-1202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1PHDEMhqOKqiDKqfcqRy6zTJL5CheElqVUAvVQ7iNP4iyBmWRIMlvtX-qvbBC0oj7Ylm09ry0T8oWVK9F0ojpTEz6u2prXzQdyxCQXBeMlP3iXH5KTGB_LbA0TNROfyKFopOwq2RyR35sdjAsk6x31hgJN3o_ZUTvNwe-QpgekzwuMNu1fBuaACufkA_0VbEroqEHUA6gnanLRwGTHPZ1QW2Ud0oDRanQpntMUwDrrthScpkvEV7k1uLvN1c_i7poqP82YiWpfDBBRU5UVMLxstl0y5TP5aGCMePIWj8n99eZ-fVPc_vj2fX15W8yM8baoNROd4LLUwJiuNONGS2yrjjHFtOrADF1dDbpqpAGldWNqM5S6FM0gmTHimFy8YudlyHeovH2AsZ-DnSDsew-2_7_j7EO_9buelWXF267NhNM3QvDPC8bUTzYqHEdw6JfY81YKmX_X8Tz69b3YP5W_DxJ_AGLml70</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Desjardins, Chloé</creator><creator>Pitre, Lyne</creator><creator>Adjo, David</creator><creator>Sagne, Jean Henri</creator><creator>Fotsing, Salomon</creator><creator>Dionne, Éric</creator><creator>Seale, Edward</creator><creator>Pomerleau, Marjorie</creator><creator>Philippe, Marissa</creator><creator>Gharib, Georges</creator><creator>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creator><general>Canadian Medical Education Journal</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</title><author>Desjardins, Chloé ; Pitre, Lyne ; Adjo, David ; Sagne, Jean Henri ; Fotsing, Salomon ; Dionne, Éric ; Seale, Edward ; Pomerleau, Marjorie ; Philippe, Marissa ; Gharib, Georges ; Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1127-5d1383290da11d4d12fd9e74811c1dc8afb854bd469facdd6f5fb0d036b91ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brief Reports</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Family Practice - education</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desjardins, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitre, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagne, Jean Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotsing, Salomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionne, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seale, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippe, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharib, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian medical education journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desjardins, Chloé</au><au>Pitre, Lyne</au><au>Adjo, David</au><au>Sagne, Jean Henri</au><au>Fotsing, Salomon</au><au>Dionne, Éric</au><au>Seale, Edward</au><au>Pomerleau, Marjorie</au><au>Philippe, Marissa</au><au>Gharib, Georges</au><au>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</atitle><jtitle>Canadian medical education journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Med Educ J</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>95-100</pages><issn>1923-1202</issn><eissn>1923-1202</eissn><abstract>Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital. Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period. Based on the analysis of the Field Notes ( = 70 pre-test; = 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%, = 2.97, = 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%, = 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role. The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Medical Education Journal</pub><pmid>36998496</pmid><doi>10.36834/cmej.75256</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1923-1202
ispartof Canadian medical education journal, 2023-03, Vol.14 (1), p.95-100
issn 1923-1202
1923-1202
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042787
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Brief Reports
Clinical Competence
Educational Measurement
Family Practice - education
Feedback
Internship and Residency
title Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20tool%20to%20improve%20the%20quality%20of%20preceptor%20written%20feedback%20for%20family%20medicine%20residents:%20training%20and%20use%20of%20a%20CanMEDS-MF%20competency-based%20criterion%20guide&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20medical%20education%20journal&rft.au=Desjardins,%20Chlo%C3%A9&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=95-100&rft.issn=1923-1202&rft.eissn=1923-1202&rft_id=info:doi/10.36834/cmej.75256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2793983482%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793983482&rft_id=info:pmid/36998496&rfr_iscdi=true