Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide
Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian medical education journal 2023-03, Vol.14 (1), p.95-100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Canadian medical education journal |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Desjardins, Chloé Pitre, Lyne Adjo, David Sagne, Jean Henri Fotsing, Salomon Dionne, Éric Seale, Edward Pomerleau, Marjorie Philippe, Marissa Gharib, Georges Denis-LeBlanc, Manon |
description | Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital.
Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period.
Based on the analysis of the Field Notes (
= 70 pre-test;
= 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%,
= 2.97,
= 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%,
= 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role.
The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.36834/cmej.75256 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2793983482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1127-5d1383290da11d4d12fd9e74811c1dc8afb854bd469facdd6f5fb0d036b91ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1PHDEMhqOKqiDKqfcqRy6zTJL5CheElqVUAvVQ7iNP4iyBmWRIMlvtX-qvbBC0oj7Ylm09ry0T8oWVK9F0ojpTEz6u2prXzQdyxCQXBeMlP3iXH5KTGB_LbA0TNROfyKFopOwq2RyR35sdjAsk6x31hgJN3o_ZUTvNwe-QpgekzwuMNu1fBuaACufkA_0VbEroqEHUA6gnanLRwGTHPZ1QW2Ud0oDRanQpntMUwDrrthScpkvEV7k1uLvN1c_i7poqP82YiWpfDBBRU5UVMLxstl0y5TP5aGCMePIWj8n99eZ-fVPc_vj2fX15W8yM8baoNROd4LLUwJiuNONGS2yrjjHFtOrADF1dDbpqpAGldWNqM5S6FM0gmTHimFy8YudlyHeovH2AsZ-DnSDsew-2_7_j7EO_9buelWXF267NhNM3QvDPC8bUTzYqHEdw6JfY81YKmX_X8Tz69b3YP5W_DxJ_AGLml70</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793983482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Desjardins, Chloé ; Pitre, Lyne ; Adjo, David ; Sagne, Jean Henri ; Fotsing, Salomon ; Dionne, Éric ; Seale, Edward ; Pomerleau, Marjorie ; Philippe, Marissa ; Gharib, Georges ; Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creator><creatorcontrib>Desjardins, Chloé ; Pitre, Lyne ; Adjo, David ; Sagne, Jean Henri ; Fotsing, Salomon ; Dionne, Éric ; Seale, Edward ; Pomerleau, Marjorie ; Philippe, Marissa ; Gharib, Georges ; Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creatorcontrib><description>Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital.
Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period.
Based on the analysis of the Field Notes (
= 70 pre-test;
= 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%,
= 2.97,
= 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%,
= 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role.
The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1923-1202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-1202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36834/cmej.75256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36998496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Medical Education Journal</publisher><subject>Brief Reports ; Clinical Competence ; Educational Measurement ; Family Practice - education ; Feedback ; Internship and Residency</subject><ispartof>Canadian medical education journal, 2023-03, Vol.14 (1), p.95-100</ispartof><rights>2023 Desjardins, Pitre, Adjo, Sagne, Fotsing, Dionne, Seale, Pomerleau, Philippe, Gharib, Denis-LeBlanc; licensee Synergies Partners.</rights><rights>2023 Desjardins, Pitre, Adjo, Sagne, Fotsing, Dionne, Seale, Pomerleau, Philippe, Gharib, Denis-LeBlanc; licensee Synergies Partners. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042787/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042787/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Desjardins, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitre, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagne, Jean Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotsing, Salomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionne, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seale, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippe, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharib, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</title><title>Canadian medical education journal</title><addtitle>Can Med Educ J</addtitle><description>Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital.
Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period.
Based on the analysis of the Field Notes (
= 70 pre-test;
= 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%,
= 2.97,
= 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%,
= 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role.
The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.</description><subject>Brief Reports</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Family Practice - education</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><issn>1923-1202</issn><issn>1923-1202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1PHDEMhqOKqiDKqfcqRy6zTJL5CheElqVUAvVQ7iNP4iyBmWRIMlvtX-qvbBC0oj7Ylm09ry0T8oWVK9F0ojpTEz6u2prXzQdyxCQXBeMlP3iXH5KTGB_LbA0TNROfyKFopOwq2RyR35sdjAsk6x31hgJN3o_ZUTvNwe-QpgekzwuMNu1fBuaACufkA_0VbEroqEHUA6gnanLRwGTHPZ1QW2Ud0oDRanQpntMUwDrrthScpkvEV7k1uLvN1c_i7poqP82YiWpfDBBRU5UVMLxstl0y5TP5aGCMePIWj8n99eZ-fVPc_vj2fX15W8yM8baoNROd4LLUwJiuNONGS2yrjjHFtOrADF1dDbpqpAGldWNqM5S6FM0gmTHimFy8YudlyHeovH2AsZ-DnSDsew-2_7_j7EO_9buelWXF267NhNM3QvDPC8bUTzYqHEdw6JfY81YKmX_X8Tz69b3YP5W_DxJ_AGLml70</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Desjardins, Chloé</creator><creator>Pitre, Lyne</creator><creator>Adjo, David</creator><creator>Sagne, Jean Henri</creator><creator>Fotsing, Salomon</creator><creator>Dionne, Éric</creator><creator>Seale, Edward</creator><creator>Pomerleau, Marjorie</creator><creator>Philippe, Marissa</creator><creator>Gharib, Georges</creator><creator>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creator><general>Canadian Medical Education Journal</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</title><author>Desjardins, Chloé ; Pitre, Lyne ; Adjo, David ; Sagne, Jean Henri ; Fotsing, Salomon ; Dionne, Éric ; Seale, Edward ; Pomerleau, Marjorie ; Philippe, Marissa ; Gharib, Georges ; Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1127-5d1383290da11d4d12fd9e74811c1dc8afb854bd469facdd6f5fb0d036b91ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brief Reports</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Family Practice - education</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Desjardins, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitre, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagne, Jean Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotsing, Salomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionne, Éric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seale, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomerleau, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippe, Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gharib, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian medical education journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Desjardins, Chloé</au><au>Pitre, Lyne</au><au>Adjo, David</au><au>Sagne, Jean Henri</au><au>Fotsing, Salomon</au><au>Dionne, Éric</au><au>Seale, Edward</au><au>Pomerleau, Marjorie</au><au>Philippe, Marissa</au><au>Gharib, Georges</au><au>Denis-LeBlanc, Manon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide</atitle><jtitle>Canadian medical education journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Med Educ J</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>95-100</pages><issn>1923-1202</issn><eissn>1923-1202</eissn><abstract>Written feedback is essential in resident teaching, but preceptors are not always well equipped to provide relevant feedback. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-episodic training and the use of a criterion-referenced guide for written feedback for family medicine preceptors in a French-language academic hospital.
Twenty-three (23) preceptors participated in the training and used the criterion-referenced guide to guide them during the written evaluation in an evaluation sheet named "Field Notes." The content of these Field Notes was analyzed according to completion, the rate of specific feedback, and the rate of feedback by CanMEDS-MF role before and after the training over a three-month period.
Based on the analysis of the Field Notes (
= 70 pre-test;
= 138 post-test), an increase in the percentage of completion (50% vs. 92%,
= 2.97,
= 0.0030) and specific feedback (59% vs. 92%,
= 2.47, p=0.0137) was noted. There was no significant increase in feedback by CanMEDS-MF role.
The development of multi-episodic training and a criterion-referenced guide, created according to the CanMEDS-MF repository, suggests an improvement in comprehensive and specific written feedback in family medicine education.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Medical Education Journal</pub><pmid>36998496</pmid><doi>10.36834/cmej.75256</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1923-1202 |
ispartof | Canadian medical education journal, 2023-03, Vol.14 (1), p.95-100 |
issn | 1923-1202 1923-1202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042787 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Brief Reports Clinical Competence Educational Measurement Family Practice - education Feedback Internship and Residency |
title | Evaluation of a tool to improve the quality of preceptor written feedback for family medicine residents: training and use of a CanMEDS-MF competency-based criterion guide |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20tool%20to%20improve%20the%20quality%20of%20preceptor%20written%20feedback%20for%20family%20medicine%20residents:%20training%20and%20use%20of%20a%20CanMEDS-MF%20competency-based%20criterion%20guide&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20medical%20education%20journal&rft.au=Desjardins,%20Chlo%C3%A9&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=95-100&rft.issn=1923-1202&rft.eissn=1923-1202&rft_id=info:doi/10.36834/cmej.75256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2793983482%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793983482&rft_id=info:pmid/36998496&rfr_iscdi=true |