Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.704-716
Hauptverfasser: Gunduz, Muhammed Enes, Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin, Bonin Pinto, Camila, Duarte, Dante, Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh, Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur, Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes, Giannoni-Luza, Stefano, Crandell, David, Battistella, Linamara Rizzo, Simis, Marcel, Fregni, Felipe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 716
container_issue 8
container_start_page 704
container_title Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
container_volume 35
creator Gunduz, Muhammed Enes
Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
Bonin Pinto, Camila
Duarte, Dante
Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh
Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur
Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes
Giannoni-Luza, Stefano
Crandell, David
Battistella, Linamara Rizzo
Simis, Marcel
Fregni, Felipe
description Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/15459683211017509
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15459683211017509</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2535842848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9uFCEUxonR2D_6AN4YLr2ZCjPADN6YzaatJtvY6HpNDgzTpZmBFRhjfQPfWsatjcbEmwPh_M73kfMh9IKSM0rb9jXljEvRNTWlhLacyEfomHJeV6Jj7PFyZ7xagCN0ktItIXXTSfIUHTWMCCIbdox-nA-DNTnhMOB1mLTztsfge7wag7d4G8EnU4qDEV-FHGKhYrbf8KfspnmE7IL_xV-5GEt3u7MR9nfYeXy9A5_DhDdu0vganH-DV_hjYcPkvheXCzBFbxHeLvUZejLAmOzz-_MUfb44367fVZsPl-_Xq01lWCNzJQ1oK4yQIK0kgzZaNK0GEISC1hI4113d84b31hhDGG-HtuHlaahra4VoTtHbg-5-1pPtjfU5wqj20U0Q71QAp_7ueLdTN-GrooSwuqy5KLy6V4jhy2xTVpNLxo4jeBvmpOri3rG6Y11B6QE1MaQU7fDgQ4laMlT_ZFhmXv75wYeJ36EV4OwAJLix6jbM0ZeF_UfxJwoupxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535842848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes ; Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin ; Bonin Pinto, Camila ; Duarte, Dante ; Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh ; Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur ; Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes ; Giannoni-Luza, Stefano ; Crandell, David ; Battistella, Linamara Rizzo ; Simis, Marcel ; Fregni, Felipe</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes ; Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin ; Bonin Pinto, Camila ; Duarte, Dante ; Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh ; Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur ; Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes ; Giannoni-Luza, Stefano ; Crandell, David ; Battistella, Linamara Rizzo ; Simis, Marcel ; Fregni, Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15459683211017509</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34060934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mirror Movement Therapy - methods ; Motor Cortex - physiopathology ; Phantom Limb - physiopathology ; Phantom Limb - therapy ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.704-716</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1307-9355 ; 0000-0001-5275-0733 ; 0000-0003-2820-8703 ; 0000-0001-7516-5473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15459683211017509$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15459683211017509$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin Pinto, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crandell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simis, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregni, Felipe</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</title><title>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</title><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><description>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mirror Movement Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Phantom Limb - physiopathology</subject><subject>Phantom Limb - therapy</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1545-9683</issn><issn>1552-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9uFCEUxonR2D_6AN4YLr2ZCjPADN6YzaatJtvY6HpNDgzTpZmBFRhjfQPfWsatjcbEmwPh_M73kfMh9IKSM0rb9jXljEvRNTWlhLacyEfomHJeV6Jj7PFyZ7xagCN0ktItIXXTSfIUHTWMCCIbdox-nA-DNTnhMOB1mLTztsfge7wag7d4G8EnU4qDEV-FHGKhYrbf8KfspnmE7IL_xV-5GEt3u7MR9nfYeXy9A5_DhDdu0vganH-DV_hjYcPkvheXCzBFbxHeLvUZejLAmOzz-_MUfb44367fVZsPl-_Xq01lWCNzJQ1oK4yQIK0kgzZaNK0GEISC1hI4113d84b31hhDGG-HtuHlaahra4VoTtHbg-5-1pPtjfU5wqj20U0Q71QAp_7ueLdTN-GrooSwuqy5KLy6V4jhy2xTVpNLxo4jeBvmpOri3rG6Y11B6QE1MaQU7fDgQ4laMlT_ZFhmXv75wYeJ36EV4OwAJLix6jbM0ZeF_UfxJwoupxY</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</creator><creator>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</creator><creator>Bonin Pinto, Camila</creator><creator>Duarte, Dante</creator><creator>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</creator><creator>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</creator><creator>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</creator><creator>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</creator><creator>Crandell, David</creator><creator>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</creator><creator>Simis, Marcel</creator><creator>Fregni, Felipe</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-9355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-8703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-5473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</title><author>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes ; Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin ; Bonin Pinto, Camila ; Duarte, Dante ; Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh ; Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur ; Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes ; Giannoni-Luza, Stefano ; Crandell, David ; Battistella, Linamara Rizzo ; Simis, Marcel ; Fregni, Felipe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mirror Movement Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Phantom Limb - physiopathology</topic><topic>Phantom Limb - therapy</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin Pinto, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crandell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simis, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregni, Felipe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</au><au>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</au><au>Bonin Pinto, Camila</au><au>Duarte, Dante</au><au>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</au><au>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</au><au>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</au><au>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</au><au>Crandell, David</au><au>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</au><au>Simis, Marcel</au><au>Fregni, Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</atitle><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>704-716</pages><issn>1545-9683</issn><eissn>1552-6844</eissn><abstract>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34060934</pmid><doi>10.1177/15459683211017509</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-9355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-8703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-5473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-9683
ispartof Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.704-716
issn 1545-9683
1552-6844
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042175
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Combined Modality Therapy
Double-Blind Method
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mirror Movement Therapy - methods
Motor Cortex - physiopathology
Phantom Limb - physiopathology
Phantom Limb - therapy
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Combined%20and%20Alone%20Transcranial%20Motor%20Cortex%20Stimulation%20and%20Mirror%20Therapy%20in%20Phantom%20Limb%20Pain:%20A%20Randomized%20Factorial%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20neural%20repair&rft.au=Gunduz,%20Muhammed%20Enes&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=704-716&rft.issn=1545-9683&rft.eissn=1552-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15459683211017509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2535842848%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535842848&rft_id=info:pmid/34060934&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15459683211017509&rfr_iscdi=true