Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial
Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.704-716 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 716 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 704 |
container_title | Neurorehabilitation and neural repair |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Gunduz, Muhammed Enes Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin Bonin Pinto, Camila Duarte, Dante Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes Giannoni-Luza, Stefano Crandell, David Battistella, Linamara Rizzo Simis, Marcel Fregni, Felipe |
description | Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15459683211017509 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15459683211017509</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2535842848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9uFCEUxonR2D_6AN4YLr2ZCjPADN6YzaatJtvY6HpNDgzTpZmBFRhjfQPfWsatjcbEmwPh_M73kfMh9IKSM0rb9jXljEvRNTWlhLacyEfomHJeV6Jj7PFyZ7xagCN0ktItIXXTSfIUHTWMCCIbdox-nA-DNTnhMOB1mLTztsfge7wag7d4G8EnU4qDEV-FHGKhYrbf8KfspnmE7IL_xV-5GEt3u7MR9nfYeXy9A5_DhDdu0vganH-DV_hjYcPkvheXCzBFbxHeLvUZejLAmOzz-_MUfb44367fVZsPl-_Xq01lWCNzJQ1oK4yQIK0kgzZaNK0GEISC1hI4113d84b31hhDGG-HtuHlaahra4VoTtHbg-5-1pPtjfU5wqj20U0Q71QAp_7ueLdTN-GrooSwuqy5KLy6V4jhy2xTVpNLxo4jeBvmpOri3rG6Y11B6QE1MaQU7fDgQ4laMlT_ZFhmXv75wYeJ36EV4OwAJLix6jbM0ZeF_UfxJwoupxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535842848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes ; Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin ; Bonin Pinto, Camila ; Duarte, Dante ; Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh ; Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur ; Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes ; Giannoni-Luza, Stefano ; Crandell, David ; Battistella, Linamara Rizzo ; Simis, Marcel ; Fregni, Felipe</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes ; Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin ; Bonin Pinto, Camila ; Duarte, Dante ; Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh ; Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur ; Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes ; Giannoni-Luza, Stefano ; Crandell, David ; Battistella, Linamara Rizzo ; Simis, Marcel ; Fregni, Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15459683211017509</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34060934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mirror Movement Therapy - methods ; Motor Cortex - physiopathology ; Phantom Limb - physiopathology ; Phantom Limb - therapy ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.704-716</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1307-9355 ; 0000-0001-5275-0733 ; 0000-0003-2820-8703 ; 0000-0001-7516-5473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15459683211017509$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15459683211017509$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin Pinto, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crandell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simis, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregni, Felipe</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</title><title>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</title><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><description>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mirror Movement Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Phantom Limb - physiopathology</subject><subject>Phantom Limb - therapy</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1545-9683</issn><issn>1552-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9uFCEUxonR2D_6AN4YLr2ZCjPADN6YzaatJtvY6HpNDgzTpZmBFRhjfQPfWsatjcbEmwPh_M73kfMh9IKSM0rb9jXljEvRNTWlhLacyEfomHJeV6Jj7PFyZ7xagCN0ktItIXXTSfIUHTWMCCIbdox-nA-DNTnhMOB1mLTztsfge7wag7d4G8EnU4qDEV-FHGKhYrbf8KfspnmE7IL_xV-5GEt3u7MR9nfYeXy9A5_DhDdu0vganH-DV_hjYcPkvheXCzBFbxHeLvUZejLAmOzz-_MUfb44367fVZsPl-_Xq01lWCNzJQ1oK4yQIK0kgzZaNK0GEISC1hI4113d84b31hhDGG-HtuHlaahra4VoTtHbg-5-1pPtjfU5wqj20U0Q71QAp_7ueLdTN-GrooSwuqy5KLy6V4jhy2xTVpNLxo4jeBvmpOri3rG6Y11B6QE1MaQU7fDgQ4laMlT_ZFhmXv75wYeJ36EV4OwAJLix6jbM0ZeF_UfxJwoupxY</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</creator><creator>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</creator><creator>Bonin Pinto, Camila</creator><creator>Duarte, Dante</creator><creator>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</creator><creator>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</creator><creator>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</creator><creator>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</creator><creator>Crandell, David</creator><creator>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</creator><creator>Simis, Marcel</creator><creator>Fregni, Felipe</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-9355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-8703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-5473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</title><author>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes ; Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin ; Bonin Pinto, Camila ; Duarte, Dante ; Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh ; Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur ; Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes ; Giannoni-Luza, Stefano ; Crandell, David ; Battistella, Linamara Rizzo ; Simis, Marcel ; Fregni, Felipe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9cabe6c69a9e90fbcb637baa601abb9a55b82d535deccc0457f73582df22ee663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mirror Movement Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Phantom Limb - physiopathology</topic><topic>Phantom Limb - therapy</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin Pinto, Camila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Dante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crandell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simis, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregni, Felipe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunduz, Muhammed Enes</au><au>Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin</au><au>Bonin Pinto, Camila</au><au>Duarte, Dante</au><au>Vélez, Faddi Ghassan Saleh</au><au>Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur</au><au>Teixeira, Paulo Eduardo Portes</au><au>Giannoni-Luza, Stefano</au><au>Crandell, David</au><au>Battistella, Linamara Rizzo</au><au>Simis, Marcel</au><au>Fregni, Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial</atitle><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</jtitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>704-716</pages><issn>1545-9683</issn><eissn>1552-6844</eissn><abstract>Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (F = 1.90, P = .13). In the adjusted models, there was a main effect of active tDCS compared to sham tDCS (beta coefficient = −0.99, P = .04) on phantom pain. The overall effect size was 1.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.47). No changes in depression and anxiety were found. TDCS intervention was associated with increased intracortical inhibition (coefficient = 0.96, P = .02) and facilitation (coefficient = 2.03, P = .03) as well as a posterolateral shift of the center of gravity in the affected hemisphere. MT induced no motor cortex plasticity changes assessed by TMS. These findings indicate that transcranial motor cortex stimulation might be an affordable and beneficial PLP treatment modality.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34060934</pmid><doi>10.1177/15459683211017509</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-9355</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-8703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-5473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-9683 |
ispartof | Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.704-716 |
issn | 1545-9683 1552-6844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10042175 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Combined Modality Therapy Double-Blind Method Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Mirror Movement Therapy - methods Motor Cortex - physiopathology Phantom Limb - physiopathology Phantom Limb - therapy Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Combined%20and%20Alone%20Transcranial%20Motor%20Cortex%20Stimulation%20and%20Mirror%20Therapy%20in%20Phantom%20Limb%20Pain:%20A%20Randomized%20Factorial%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20neural%20repair&rft.au=Gunduz,%20Muhammed%20Enes&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=704-716&rft.issn=1545-9683&rft.eissn=1552-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15459683211017509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2535842848%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535842848&rft_id=info:pmid/34060934&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15459683211017509&rfr_iscdi=true |