A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India

The aim of this study is to describe the usage of PROM, its use or lack of use, barriers in using it and its future prospect among the arthroplasty surgeons from a developing country like India. An online survey was conducted by emailing an anonymous questionnaire to orthopaedic surgeons working in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedics 2023-03, Vol.37, p.59-63
Hauptverfasser: Paul, Souvik, Barik, Sitanshu, Raj, Vikash, Raj, Manish, Kalia, Roop Bhushan, Goyal, Tarun, Arora, Manit, Nazeer, Muhammed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue
container_start_page 59
container_title Journal of orthopaedics
container_volume 37
creator Paul, Souvik
Barik, Sitanshu
Raj, Vikash
Raj, Manish
Kalia, Roop Bhushan
Goyal, Tarun
Arora, Manit
Nazeer, Muhammed
description The aim of this study is to describe the usage of PROM, its use or lack of use, barriers in using it and its future prospect among the arthroplasty surgeons from a developing country like India. An online survey was conducted by emailing an anonymous questionnaire to orthopaedic surgeons working in three tertiary care academic institutions and two tertiary care private hospitals. All orthopaedic surgeons or residents who have been performing or assisting in arthroplasty and arthroscopy were included in the study. The study was cross-sectional in design based on a single response from all surgeons. The mean age of the 87 surgeons participating in this study was 38.6 ± 4.7 years. 62.1% of surgeons had used PROMs for both clinical as well as research purposes at some point. 25.9% of surgeons had an adequate understanding of the function, benefits, and drawbacks of PROMs. Among the barriers against using PROMs, time constraint was agreed upon by most of the surgeons (59.5%). 64.3% of surgeons were willing to incorporate the PROMs into their daily practice if the barriers are overcome. The limitations of use of PROM should also be borne in mind before embarking on its widespread implementation. Involvement of regulatory and professional societies as well as substantial investment in manpower, money and time is required for making the use of PROMs regular.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10039111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0972978X23000417</els_id><sourcerecordid>2792505830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-3e8aa698e1d4394c9112e892c7c49423f4795c8f89acf32ff1d10b833496d8003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIlsIHsEFetosJfmSSWCxQVfGoVFSEQGJn3do3U0eJHWxnYD6HP8WZKVXZsLJ173nY5xTFS0ZLRln9ui97H0pOuSgpLymVj4pjKhu-kk37_fGD-1HxLMaeUsHXtXhaHIlaNlXeHhe_z4kOPkYSUSfrHQwkzmGLO4K_psEH6zYk3SKBnxDQYQaCM6SD0Q4Wgk07EnADwSy4CZJFl_Jk8iGhIX5O2o9IRoQsipGcfv5y_SmeERh9xvfe7tHau5jCvPdf3DeYB8Q6cumMhefFkw6GiC_uzpPi2_t3Xy8-rq6uP1xenF-ttKhZWglsAWrZIjOVkJWWjHFsJdeNrmTFRVc1cq3brpWgO8G7jhlGb1ohKlmbNkdzUrw96E7zzYhG558EGNQU7AhhpzxY9e_G2Vu18VvFMjm7saxweqcQ_I8ZY1KjjRqHARz6OSreSL6m61YsZuwA3YcfsLv3YVQt3ape5W7V0q2iXOVuM-fVwwfeM_6WmQFvDgDMMW0tBhV1LkSjsTnkpIy3_5H_A1aVug0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792505830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Paul, Souvik ; Barik, Sitanshu ; Raj, Vikash ; Raj, Manish ; Kalia, Roop Bhushan ; Goyal, Tarun ; Arora, Manit ; Nazeer, Muhammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Paul, Souvik ; Barik, Sitanshu ; Raj, Vikash ; Raj, Manish ; Kalia, Roop Bhushan ; Goyal, Tarun ; Arora, Manit ; Nazeer, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to describe the usage of PROM, its use or lack of use, barriers in using it and its future prospect among the arthroplasty surgeons from a developing country like India. An online survey was conducted by emailing an anonymous questionnaire to orthopaedic surgeons working in three tertiary care academic institutions and two tertiary care private hospitals. All orthopaedic surgeons or residents who have been performing or assisting in arthroplasty and arthroscopy were included in the study. The study was cross-sectional in design based on a single response from all surgeons. The mean age of the 87 surgeons participating in this study was 38.6 ± 4.7 years. 62.1% of surgeons had used PROMs for both clinical as well as research purposes at some point. 25.9% of surgeons had an adequate understanding of the function, benefits, and drawbacks of PROMs. Among the barriers against using PROMs, time constraint was agreed upon by most of the surgeons (59.5%). 64.3% of surgeons were willing to incorporate the PROMs into their daily practice if the barriers are overcome. The limitations of use of PROM should also be borne in mind before embarking on its widespread implementation. Involvement of regulatory and professional societies as well as substantial investment in manpower, money and time is required for making the use of PROMs regular.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-978X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0972-978X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36974097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty ; Original article ; Patient reported outcome measure ; PROM ; Survey</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedics, 2023-03, Vol.37, p.59-63</ispartof><rights>2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation</rights><rights>2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-3e8aa698e1d4394c9112e892c7c49423f4795c8f89acf32ff1d10b833496d8003</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1439-7654 ; 0000-0002-3418-5942 ; 0000-0002-1172-3664 ; 0000-0002-1935-1340 ; 0000-0002-4611-4324</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039111/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039111/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36974097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paul, Souvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barik, Sitanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Vikash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Roop Bhushan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Manit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazeer, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><title>A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India</title><title>Journal of orthopaedics</title><addtitle>J Orthop</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to describe the usage of PROM, its use or lack of use, barriers in using it and its future prospect among the arthroplasty surgeons from a developing country like India. An online survey was conducted by emailing an anonymous questionnaire to orthopaedic surgeons working in three tertiary care academic institutions and two tertiary care private hospitals. All orthopaedic surgeons or residents who have been performing or assisting in arthroplasty and arthroscopy were included in the study. The study was cross-sectional in design based on a single response from all surgeons. The mean age of the 87 surgeons participating in this study was 38.6 ± 4.7 years. 62.1% of surgeons had used PROMs for both clinical as well as research purposes at some point. 25.9% of surgeons had an adequate understanding of the function, benefits, and drawbacks of PROMs. Among the barriers against using PROMs, time constraint was agreed upon by most of the surgeons (59.5%). 64.3% of surgeons were willing to incorporate the PROMs into their daily practice if the barriers are overcome. The limitations of use of PROM should also be borne in mind before embarking on its widespread implementation. Involvement of regulatory and professional societies as well as substantial investment in manpower, money and time is required for making the use of PROMs regular.</description><subject>Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Original article</subject><subject>Patient reported outcome measure</subject><subject>PROM</subject><subject>Survey</subject><issn>0972-978X</issn><issn>0972-978X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIlsIHsEFetosJfmSSWCxQVfGoVFSEQGJn3do3U0eJHWxnYD6HP8WZKVXZsLJ173nY5xTFS0ZLRln9ui97H0pOuSgpLymVj4pjKhu-kk37_fGD-1HxLMaeUsHXtXhaHIlaNlXeHhe_z4kOPkYSUSfrHQwkzmGLO4K_psEH6zYk3SKBnxDQYQaCM6SD0Q4Wgk07EnADwSy4CZJFl_Jk8iGhIX5O2o9IRoQsipGcfv5y_SmeERh9xvfe7tHau5jCvPdf3DeYB8Q6cumMhefFkw6GiC_uzpPi2_t3Xy8-rq6uP1xenF-ttKhZWglsAWrZIjOVkJWWjHFsJdeNrmTFRVc1cq3brpWgO8G7jhlGb1ohKlmbNkdzUrw96E7zzYhG558EGNQU7AhhpzxY9e_G2Vu18VvFMjm7saxweqcQ_I8ZY1KjjRqHARz6OSreSL6m61YsZuwA3YcfsLv3YVQt3ape5W7V0q2iXOVuM-fVwwfeM_6WmQFvDgDMMW0tBhV1LkSjsTnkpIy3_5H_A1aVug0</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Paul, Souvik</creator><creator>Barik, Sitanshu</creator><creator>Raj, Vikash</creator><creator>Raj, Manish</creator><creator>Kalia, Roop Bhushan</creator><creator>Goyal, Tarun</creator><creator>Arora, Manit</creator><creator>Nazeer, Muhammed</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1439-7654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-5942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-3664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1935-1340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-4324</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India</title><author>Paul, Souvik ; Barik, Sitanshu ; Raj, Vikash ; Raj, Manish ; Kalia, Roop Bhushan ; Goyal, Tarun ; Arora, Manit ; Nazeer, Muhammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-3e8aa698e1d4394c9112e892c7c49423f4795c8f89acf32ff1d10b833496d8003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Original article</topic><topic>Patient reported outcome measure</topic><topic>PROM</topic><topic>Survey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paul, Souvik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barik, Sitanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Vikash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalia, Roop Bhushan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Manit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazeer, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paul, Souvik</au><au>Barik, Sitanshu</au><au>Raj, Vikash</au><au>Raj, Manish</au><au>Kalia, Roop Bhushan</au><au>Goyal, Tarun</au><au>Arora, Manit</au><au>Nazeer, Muhammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><spage>59</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>59-63</pages><issn>0972-978X</issn><eissn>0972-978X</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to describe the usage of PROM, its use or lack of use, barriers in using it and its future prospect among the arthroplasty surgeons from a developing country like India. An online survey was conducted by emailing an anonymous questionnaire to orthopaedic surgeons working in three tertiary care academic institutions and two tertiary care private hospitals. All orthopaedic surgeons or residents who have been performing or assisting in arthroplasty and arthroscopy were included in the study. The study was cross-sectional in design based on a single response from all surgeons. The mean age of the 87 surgeons participating in this study was 38.6 ± 4.7 years. 62.1% of surgeons had used PROMs for both clinical as well as research purposes at some point. 25.9% of surgeons had an adequate understanding of the function, benefits, and drawbacks of PROMs. Among the barriers against using PROMs, time constraint was agreed upon by most of the surgeons (59.5%). 64.3% of surgeons were willing to incorporate the PROMs into their daily practice if the barriers are overcome. The limitations of use of PROM should also be borne in mind before embarking on its widespread implementation. Involvement of regulatory and professional societies as well as substantial investment in manpower, money and time is required for making the use of PROMs regular.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36974097</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1439-7654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-5942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-3664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1935-1340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-4324</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-978X
ispartof Journal of orthopaedics, 2023-03, Vol.37, p.59-63
issn 0972-978X
0972-978X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10039111
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arthroplasty
Original article
Patient reported outcome measure
PROM
Survey
title A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross%20sectional%20survey%20exploring%20the%20awareness%20and%20familiarity%20regarding%20patient%20reported%20outcome%20measures%20(PROMs)%20among%20joint%20reconstruction%20surgeons%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Paul,%20Souvik&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=37&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=59-63&rft.issn=0972-978X&rft.eissn=0972-978X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2792505830%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792505830&rft_id=info:pmid/36974097&rft_els_id=S0972978X23000417&rfr_iscdi=true