Reliability of an Adaptive Marijuana Purchase Task
Purchase tasks are used to measure the value, or demand, for various substances by assessing the amount of a substance individuals would purchase across a series of escalating prices. Marijuana purchase task (MPT) has been previously developed; however, cannabis can be consumed in various forms and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 2023-04, Vol.31 (2), p.491-497 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 491 |
container_title | Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Bush, Nicholas J. Ferguson, Erin Boissoneault, Jeff Yurasek, Ali M. |
description | Purchase tasks are used to measure the value, or demand, for various substances by assessing the amount of a substance individuals would purchase across a series of escalating prices. Marijuana purchase task (MPT) has been previously developed; however, cannabis can be consumed in various forms and measurements, thus raising questions about the applicability of the MPT across cannabis users. An adaptive MPT was developed to allow participants to select their preferred product (e.g., herbal, dabs) and division (e.g., hits, grams). Little research has been done to assess the temporal stability of these measures. Participants (N = 50, Mage = 35.3) who reported at least monthly cannabis use were recruited via Amazon's Mechanical Turk and completed a baseline and repeated original and adaptive MPT. Seventy-two percent (N = 36) of the sample reported the same preferred product and division. Results indicated that the baseline and repeated original MPT were significantly correlated across all indices (rrange = .37-.73), while the baseline and repeated adaptive MPT was significantly correlated with Pmax (r = .31, p = .029) and Omax (r = .57, p < .001). Permutation testing comparing the difference between the original and adaptive MPT on all indices demonstrated a difference for break point (rdifference = .52, p = .004) and elasticity (rdifference = .94, p = .005). Correlations were lower between participants who switched their preferences on the adaptive MPT. Only elasticity was significantly different (rdifference = .93, p = .012) between tasks among participants who did not switch their preferences. Results provide support that both the original and adaptive MPT are reliable across repeated measurement and demonstrate the importance of assessing cannabis product and division preferences.
Public Health Significance
This study provides support that the original and adaptive marijuana purchase tasks (MPT) are reliable across repeated measurements for studying associations with cannabis use demand. Further, the adaptive MPT provides additional utility by allowing researchers to compare behavioral and demand associations by cannabis product. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pha0000606 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10033342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2719051656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-c09eb8bff1fb2a7c0cf11e0dfcb305fbd08e1443c08cfb568f30f6302a3edc733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0d9rFDEQB_AgSn_ZF_8AWfBFlK0zmVx290lKsSpUKtI-h9lc4uW6t7tNdgv335tybbXmJSH58GUmI8QbhBMEqj6NK4a8NOgX4gAb0qWUDb3MZ9CqRNlU--IwpTUAKmrkntgnjZVCVR0I-ct1gdvQhWlbDL7gvjhd8jiFO1f84BjWM_dc_JyjXXFyxRWnm9filecuueOH_Uhcn3-5OvtWXlx-_X52elGyUjSVFhrX1q336FvJlQXrER0svW0JFr5dQu0wSwu19e1C157AawLJ5Ja2IjoSn3e549xu8pXrp8idGWPYcNyagYN5_tKHlfk93BkEICIlc8L7h4Q43M4uTWYTknVdx70b5mRkJUERVlhn-u4_uh7m2Of-ssIGFqgXOqsPO2XjkFJ0_qkaBHM_C_N3Fhm__bf-J_r4-Rl83AEe2YxpazlOwXYu2TnG3NN9mCE00qgG6Q-F2pPL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2719051656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of an Adaptive Marijuana Purchase Task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Bush, Nicholas J. ; Ferguson, Erin ; Boissoneault, Jeff ; Yurasek, Ali M.</creator><contributor>Dunn, Kelly ; Stoops, William W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bush, Nicholas J. ; Ferguson, Erin ; Boissoneault, Jeff ; Yurasek, Ali M. ; Dunn, Kelly ; Stoops, William W</creatorcontrib><description>Purchase tasks are used to measure the value, or demand, for various substances by assessing the amount of a substance individuals would purchase across a series of escalating prices. Marijuana purchase task (MPT) has been previously developed; however, cannabis can be consumed in various forms and measurements, thus raising questions about the applicability of the MPT across cannabis users. An adaptive MPT was developed to allow participants to select their preferred product (e.g., herbal, dabs) and division (e.g., hits, grams). Little research has been done to assess the temporal stability of these measures. Participants (N = 50, Mage = 35.3) who reported at least monthly cannabis use were recruited via Amazon's Mechanical Turk and completed a baseline and repeated original and adaptive MPT. Seventy-two percent (N = 36) of the sample reported the same preferred product and division. Results indicated that the baseline and repeated original MPT were significantly correlated across all indices (rrange = .37-.73), while the baseline and repeated adaptive MPT was significantly correlated with Pmax (r = .31, p = .029) and Omax (r = .57, p < .001). Permutation testing comparing the difference between the original and adaptive MPT on all indices demonstrated a difference for break point (rdifference = .52, p = .004) and elasticity (rdifference = .94, p = .005). Correlations were lower between participants who switched their preferences on the adaptive MPT. Only elasticity was significantly different (rdifference = .93, p = .012) between tasks among participants who did not switch their preferences. Results provide support that both the original and adaptive MPT are reliable across repeated measurement and demonstrate the importance of assessing cannabis product and division preferences.
Public Health Significance
This study provides support that the original and adaptive marijuana purchase tasks (MPT) are reliable across repeated measurements for studying associations with cannabis use demand. Further, the adaptive MPT provides additional utility by allowing researchers to compare behavioral and demand associations by cannabis product.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-1297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pha0000606</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36174147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral Economics ; Cannabis ; Drug Usage ; Economics, Behavioral ; Female ; Hallucinogens ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Marijuana ; Marijuana Smoking ; Reproducibility of Results ; Task ; Test Reliability ; Test-Retest Reliability</subject><ispartof>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2023-04, Vol.31 (2), p.491-497</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-c09eb8bff1fb2a7c0cf11e0dfcb305fbd08e1443c08cfb568f30f6302a3edc733</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8502-3006 ; 0000-0003-1476-4362</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36174147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Dunn, Kelly</contributor><contributor>Stoops, William W</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bush, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boissoneault, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurasek, Ali M.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of an Adaptive Marijuana Purchase Task</title><title>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Exp Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><description>Purchase tasks are used to measure the value, or demand, for various substances by assessing the amount of a substance individuals would purchase across a series of escalating prices. Marijuana purchase task (MPT) has been previously developed; however, cannabis can be consumed in various forms and measurements, thus raising questions about the applicability of the MPT across cannabis users. An adaptive MPT was developed to allow participants to select their preferred product (e.g., herbal, dabs) and division (e.g., hits, grams). Little research has been done to assess the temporal stability of these measures. Participants (N = 50, Mage = 35.3) who reported at least monthly cannabis use were recruited via Amazon's Mechanical Turk and completed a baseline and repeated original and adaptive MPT. Seventy-two percent (N = 36) of the sample reported the same preferred product and division. Results indicated that the baseline and repeated original MPT were significantly correlated across all indices (rrange = .37-.73), while the baseline and repeated adaptive MPT was significantly correlated with Pmax (r = .31, p = .029) and Omax (r = .57, p < .001). Permutation testing comparing the difference between the original and adaptive MPT on all indices demonstrated a difference for break point (rdifference = .52, p = .004) and elasticity (rdifference = .94, p = .005). Correlations were lower between participants who switched their preferences on the adaptive MPT. Only elasticity was significantly different (rdifference = .93, p = .012) between tasks among participants who did not switch their preferences. Results provide support that both the original and adaptive MPT are reliable across repeated measurement and demonstrate the importance of assessing cannabis product and division preferences.
Public Health Significance
This study provides support that the original and adaptive marijuana purchase tasks (MPT) are reliable across repeated measurements for studying associations with cannabis use demand. Further, the adaptive MPT provides additional utility by allowing researchers to compare behavioral and demand associations by cannabis product.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Economics</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Drug Usage</subject><subject>Economics, Behavioral</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hallucinogens</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Marijuana Smoking</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Task</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test-Retest Reliability</subject><issn>1064-1297</issn><issn>1936-2293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0d9rFDEQB_AgSn_ZF_8AWfBFlK0zmVx290lKsSpUKtI-h9lc4uW6t7tNdgv335tybbXmJSH58GUmI8QbhBMEqj6NK4a8NOgX4gAb0qWUDb3MZ9CqRNlU--IwpTUAKmrkntgnjZVCVR0I-ct1gdvQhWlbDL7gvjhd8jiFO1f84BjWM_dc_JyjXXFyxRWnm9filecuueOH_Uhcn3-5OvtWXlx-_X52elGyUjSVFhrX1q336FvJlQXrER0svW0JFr5dQu0wSwu19e1C157AawLJ5Ja2IjoSn3e549xu8pXrp8idGWPYcNyagYN5_tKHlfk93BkEICIlc8L7h4Q43M4uTWYTknVdx70b5mRkJUERVlhn-u4_uh7m2Of-ssIGFqgXOqsPO2XjkFJ0_qkaBHM_C_N3Fhm__bf-J_r4-Rl83AEe2YxpazlOwXYu2TnG3NN9mCE00qgG6Q-F2pPL</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Bush, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Ferguson, Erin</creator><creator>Boissoneault, Jeff</creator><creator>Yurasek, Ali M.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8502-3006</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1476-4362</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Reliability of an Adaptive Marijuana Purchase Task</title><author>Bush, Nicholas J. ; Ferguson, Erin ; Boissoneault, Jeff ; Yurasek, Ali M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a443t-c09eb8bff1fb2a7c0cf11e0dfcb305fbd08e1443c08cfb568f30f6302a3edc733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Economics</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Drug Usage</topic><topic>Economics, Behavioral</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hallucinogens</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Marijuana Smoking</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Task</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test-Retest Reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bush, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boissoneault, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurasek, Ali M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bush, Nicholas J.</au><au>Ferguson, Erin</au><au>Boissoneault, Jeff</au><au>Yurasek, Ali M.</au><au>Dunn, Kelly</au><au>Stoops, William W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of an Adaptive Marijuana Purchase Task</atitle><jtitle>Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Clin Psychopharmacol</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>491-497</pages><issn>1064-1297</issn><eissn>1936-2293</eissn><abstract>Purchase tasks are used to measure the value, or demand, for various substances by assessing the amount of a substance individuals would purchase across a series of escalating prices. Marijuana purchase task (MPT) has been previously developed; however, cannabis can be consumed in various forms and measurements, thus raising questions about the applicability of the MPT across cannabis users. An adaptive MPT was developed to allow participants to select their preferred product (e.g., herbal, dabs) and division (e.g., hits, grams). Little research has been done to assess the temporal stability of these measures. Participants (N = 50, Mage = 35.3) who reported at least monthly cannabis use were recruited via Amazon's Mechanical Turk and completed a baseline and repeated original and adaptive MPT. Seventy-two percent (N = 36) of the sample reported the same preferred product and division. Results indicated that the baseline and repeated original MPT were significantly correlated across all indices (rrange = .37-.73), while the baseline and repeated adaptive MPT was significantly correlated with Pmax (r = .31, p = .029) and Omax (r = .57, p < .001). Permutation testing comparing the difference between the original and adaptive MPT on all indices demonstrated a difference for break point (rdifference = .52, p = .004) and elasticity (rdifference = .94, p = .005). Correlations were lower between participants who switched their preferences on the adaptive MPT. Only elasticity was significantly different (rdifference = .93, p = .012) between tasks among participants who did not switch their preferences. Results provide support that both the original and adaptive MPT are reliable across repeated measurement and demonstrate the importance of assessing cannabis product and division preferences.
Public Health Significance
This study provides support that the original and adaptive marijuana purchase tasks (MPT) are reliable across repeated measurements for studying associations with cannabis use demand. Further, the adaptive MPT provides additional utility by allowing researchers to compare behavioral and demand associations by cannabis product.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>36174147</pmid><doi>10.1037/pha0000606</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8502-3006</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1476-4362</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-1297 |
ispartof | Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2023-04, Vol.31 (2), p.491-497 |
issn | 1064-1297 1936-2293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10033342 |
source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult Behavioral Economics Cannabis Drug Usage Economics, Behavioral Female Hallucinogens Human Humans Male Marijuana Marijuana Smoking Reproducibility of Results Task Test Reliability Test-Retest Reliability |
title | Reliability of an Adaptive Marijuana Purchase Task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A56%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20an%20Adaptive%20Marijuana%20Purchase%20Task&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20and%20clinical%20psychopharmacology&rft.au=Bush,%20Nicholas%20J.&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=491-497&rft.issn=1064-1297&rft.eissn=1936-2293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pha0000606&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2719051656%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2719051656&rft_id=info:pmid/36174147&rfr_iscdi=true |