Semantic Speech Networks Linked to Formal Thought Disorder in Early Psychosis

Abstract Background and Hypothesis Mapping a patient’s speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not explicitly modelled the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study Desig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia bulletin 2023-03, Vol.49 (Supplement_2), p.S142-S152
Hauptverfasser: Nettekoven, Caroline R, Diederen, Kelly, Giles, Oscar, Duncan, Helen, Stenson, Iain, Olah, Julianna, Gibbs-Dean, Toni, Collier, Nigel, Vértes, Petra E, Spencer, Tom J, Morgan, Sarah E, McGuire, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S152
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page S142
container_title Schizophrenia bulletin
container_volume 49
creator Nettekoven, Caroline R
Diederen, Kelly
Giles, Oscar
Duncan, Helen
Stenson, Iain
Olah, Julianna
Gibbs-Dean, Toni
Collier, Nigel
Vértes, Petra E
Spencer, Tom J
Morgan, Sarah E
McGuire, Philip
description Abstract Background and Hypothesis Mapping a patient’s speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not explicitly modelled the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study Design We developed an algorithm, “netts,” to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample (N = 436), and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls (total N = 53). Study Results Semantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomized networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the nonrandom nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more connected components, which tended to include fewer nodes on average. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signals not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. Whilst here we focus on network fragmentation, the semantic speech networks created by Netts also contain other, rich information which could be extracted to shed further light on formal thought disorder. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/schbul/sbac056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10031728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/schbul/sbac056</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2789710226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ce95d2628ad22b7de723d27bcbcf00edd50bca505075d93898936021bdb1196b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbtv2zAQh4miQe04XTsWHJNByZESSXEqijwLuA8gzkzwZYuNJDqklMD_fRzYCZqp0w333XeH-yH0hcApAVmeZduYsT3LRltg_AOaElGxggggH9EUWM0LwUk1QYc5_wUgleT0E5qUXFaclWSKft76TvdDsPh27b1t8C8_PMV0n_E89Pfe4SHiq5g63eJFE8dVM-CLkGNyPuHQ40ud2g3-kze2iTnkI3Sw1G32n_d1hu6uLhfnN8X89_WP8-_zwlaUDYX1kjnKaa0dpUY4L2jpqDDW2CWAd46BsZoBA8GcLGtZy5IDJcYZQiQ35Qx923nXo-m8s74fkm7VOoVOp42KOqj3nT40ahUfFQEoiaD11nC8N6T4MPo8qC5k69tW9z6OWVFRS0GAUr5FT3eoTTHn5JdvewiolxDULgS1D2E78PXf697w169vgZMdEMf1_2TPjZCUow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789710226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Semantic Speech Networks Linked to Formal Thought Disorder in Early Psychosis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nettekoven, Caroline R ; Diederen, Kelly ; Giles, Oscar ; Duncan, Helen ; Stenson, Iain ; Olah, Julianna ; Gibbs-Dean, Toni ; Collier, Nigel ; Vértes, Petra E ; Spencer, Tom J ; Morgan, Sarah E ; McGuire, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Nettekoven, Caroline R ; Diederen, Kelly ; Giles, Oscar ; Duncan, Helen ; Stenson, Iain ; Olah, Julianna ; Gibbs-Dean, Toni ; Collier, Nigel ; Vértes, Petra E ; Spencer, Tom J ; Morgan, Sarah E ; McGuire, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and Hypothesis Mapping a patient’s speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not explicitly modelled the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study Design We developed an algorithm, “netts,” to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample (N = 436), and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls (total N = 53). Study Results Semantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomized networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the nonrandom nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more connected components, which tended to include fewer nodes on average. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signals not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. Whilst here we focus on network fragmentation, the semantic speech networks created by Netts also contain other, rich information which could be extracted to shed further light on formal thought disorder. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0586-7614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36946531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Humans ; Language ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Semantic Web ; Semantics ; Speech ; Supplement</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023-03, Vol.49 (Supplement_2), p.S142-S152</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ce95d2628ad22b7de723d27bcbcf00edd50bca505075d93898936021bdb1196b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ce95d2628ad22b7de723d27bcbcf00edd50bca505075d93898936021bdb1196b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5427-2907 ; 0000-0002-7230-4164 ; 0000-0002-0992-3210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031728/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031728/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36946531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nettekoven, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diederen, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenson, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olah, Julianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs-Dean, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vértes, Petra E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Tom J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Semantic Speech Networks Linked to Formal Thought Disorder in Early Psychosis</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and Hypothesis Mapping a patient’s speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not explicitly modelled the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study Design We developed an algorithm, “netts,” to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample (N = 436), and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls (total N = 53). Study Results Semantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomized networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the nonrandom nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more connected components, which tended to include fewer nodes on average. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signals not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. Whilst here we focus on network fragmentation, the semantic speech networks created by Netts also contain other, rich information which could be extracted to shed further light on formal thought disorder. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Semantic Web</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Supplement</subject><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbtv2zAQh4miQe04XTsWHJNByZESSXEqijwLuA8gzkzwZYuNJDqklMD_fRzYCZqp0w333XeH-yH0hcApAVmeZduYsT3LRltg_AOaElGxggggH9EUWM0LwUk1QYc5_wUgleT0E5qUXFaclWSKft76TvdDsPh27b1t8C8_PMV0n_E89Pfe4SHiq5g63eJFE8dVM-CLkGNyPuHQ40ud2g3-kze2iTnkI3Sw1G32n_d1hu6uLhfnN8X89_WP8-_zwlaUDYX1kjnKaa0dpUY4L2jpqDDW2CWAd46BsZoBA8GcLGtZy5IDJcYZQiQ35Qx923nXo-m8s74fkm7VOoVOp42KOqj3nT40ahUfFQEoiaD11nC8N6T4MPo8qC5k69tW9z6OWVFRS0GAUr5FT3eoTTHn5JdvewiolxDULgS1D2E78PXf697w169vgZMdEMf1_2TPjZCUow</recordid><startdate>20230322</startdate><enddate>20230322</enddate><creator>Nettekoven, Caroline R</creator><creator>Diederen, Kelly</creator><creator>Giles, Oscar</creator><creator>Duncan, Helen</creator><creator>Stenson, Iain</creator><creator>Olah, Julianna</creator><creator>Gibbs-Dean, Toni</creator><creator>Collier, Nigel</creator><creator>Vértes, Petra E</creator><creator>Spencer, Tom J</creator><creator>Morgan, Sarah E</creator><creator>McGuire, Philip</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-2907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-3210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230322</creationdate><title>Semantic Speech Networks Linked to Formal Thought Disorder in Early Psychosis</title><author>Nettekoven, Caroline R ; Diederen, Kelly ; Giles, Oscar ; Duncan, Helen ; Stenson, Iain ; Olah, Julianna ; Gibbs-Dean, Toni ; Collier, Nigel ; Vértes, Petra E ; Spencer, Tom J ; Morgan, Sarah E ; McGuire, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-ce95d2628ad22b7de723d27bcbcf00edd50bca505075d93898936021bdb1196b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Semantic Web</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Supplement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nettekoven, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diederen, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenson, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olah, Julianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs-Dean, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collier, Nigel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vértes, Petra E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Tom J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nettekoven, Caroline R</au><au>Diederen, Kelly</au><au>Giles, Oscar</au><au>Duncan, Helen</au><au>Stenson, Iain</au><au>Olah, Julianna</au><au>Gibbs-Dean, Toni</au><au>Collier, Nigel</au><au>Vértes, Petra E</au><au>Spencer, Tom J</au><au>Morgan, Sarah E</au><au>McGuire, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Semantic Speech Networks Linked to Formal Thought Disorder in Early Psychosis</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><date>2023-03-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>S142</spage><epage>S152</epage><pages>S142-S152</pages><issn>0586-7614</issn><eissn>1745-1701</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and Hypothesis Mapping a patient’s speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not explicitly modelled the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study Design We developed an algorithm, “netts,” to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample (N = 436), and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls (total N = 53). Study Results Semantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomized networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the nonrandom nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more connected components, which tended to include fewer nodes on average. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signals not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. Whilst here we focus on network fragmentation, the semantic speech networks created by Netts also contain other, rich information which could be extracted to shed further light on formal thought disorder. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36946531</pmid><doi>10.1093/schbul/sbac056</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-2907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-3210</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0586-7614
ispartof Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023-03, Vol.49 (Supplement_2), p.S142-S152
issn 0586-7614
1745-1701
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10031728
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Case-Control Studies
Humans
Language
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis
Semantic Web
Semantics
Speech
Supplement
title Semantic Speech Networks Linked to Formal Thought Disorder in Early Psychosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A01%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Semantic%20Speech%20Networks%20Linked%20to%20Formal%20Thought%20Disorder%20in%20Early%20Psychosis&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin&rft.au=Nettekoven,%20Caroline%20R&rft.date=2023-03-22&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=S142&rft.epage=S152&rft.pages=S142-S152&rft.issn=0586-7614&rft.eissn=1745-1701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/schbul/sbac056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2789710226%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789710226&rft_id=info:pmid/36946531&rft_oup_id=10.1093/schbul/sbac056&rfr_iscdi=true