Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture ris...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e35205-e35205
Hauptverfasser: Santos Monteiro, Sílvia, da Silva Santos, Tiago, Fonseca, Liliana, Dores, Jorge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e35205
container_issue 2
container_start_page e35205
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 15
creator Santos Monteiro, Sílvia
da Silva Santos, Tiago
Fonseca, Liliana
Dores, Jorge
description Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy. We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®. One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%). More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.35205
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10031547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2791374409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b1c6d05e04fd3e6da68ef39b15258a0cf805474ccd0f5791f0a29fc10aa2556c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LXDEUhkNpqWLddV0C3XTRsSfJzf1YlcE6WlAKMtLuQm5uorF3bsacRJh_b8axYl3lQB6ec15eQj4yOGoa2X0zOdqMR0JykG_IPmd1O2tZW719Me-RQ8RbAGDQcGjgPdkTdVcDr-U-cSf3esw6-TDR4OgV6mu7HTRdRG1S0dNLj3_pHNEiruyUaL-hi8v5H7oMYaR-ovMhjwnpb59u6HKztpTTH173NlmkF3Ycfcr4gbxzekR7-PQekKvFyfL4bHb-6_Tn8fx8ZgRAmvXM1ANIC5UbhK0HXbfWia5nkstWg3EtyKqpjBnAyaZjDjTvnGGgNZeyNuKAfN9517lf2cGUe6Me1Tr6lY4bFbRX__9M_kZdh3vFAAQr7mL48mSI4S5bTGrl0ZQYerIho-JlrWiqCrqCfn6F3oYcp5JvSwnBoZOiUF93lIkBMVr3fA0DtS1R7UpUjyUW_NPLBM_wv8rEA1E1mH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793320953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia ; da Silva Santos, Tiago ; Fonseca, Liliana ; Dores, Jorge</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia ; da Silva Santos, Tiago ; Fonseca, Liliana ; Dores, Jorge</creatorcontrib><description>Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy. We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®. One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%). More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35205</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36960265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Bisphosphonates ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Disease ; Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism ; Fractures ; Health care ; Liver cirrhosis ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Osteoporosis ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e35205-e35205</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Santos Monteiro et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Santos Monteiro et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Santos Monteiro et al. 2023 Santos Monteiro et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b1c6d05e04fd3e6da68ef39b15258a0cf805474ccd0f5791f0a29fc10aa2556c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031547/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031547/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva Santos, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Liliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dores, Jorge</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy. We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®. One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%). More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LXDEUhkNpqWLddV0C3XTRsSfJzf1YlcE6WlAKMtLuQm5uorF3bsacRJh_b8axYl3lQB6ec15eQj4yOGoa2X0zOdqMR0JykG_IPmd1O2tZW719Me-RQ8RbAGDQcGjgPdkTdVcDr-U-cSf3esw6-TDR4OgV6mu7HTRdRG1S0dNLj3_pHNEiruyUaL-hi8v5H7oMYaR-ovMhjwnpb59u6HKztpTTH173NlmkF3Ycfcr4gbxzekR7-PQekKvFyfL4bHb-6_Tn8fx8ZgRAmvXM1ANIC5UbhK0HXbfWia5nkstWg3EtyKqpjBnAyaZjDjTvnGGgNZeyNuKAfN9517lf2cGUe6Me1Tr6lY4bFbRX__9M_kZdh3vFAAQr7mL48mSI4S5bTGrl0ZQYerIho-JlrWiqCrqCfn6F3oYcp5JvSwnBoZOiUF93lIkBMVr3fA0DtS1R7UpUjyUW_NPLBM_wv8rEA1E1mH0</recordid><startdate>20230220</startdate><enddate>20230220</enddate><creator>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</creator><creator>da Silva Santos, Tiago</creator><creator>Fonseca, Liliana</creator><creator>Dores, Jorge</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230220</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</title><author>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia ; da Silva Santos, Tiago ; Fonseca, Liliana ; Dores, Jorge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b1c6d05e04fd3e6da68ef39b15258a0cf805474ccd0f5791f0a29fc10aa2556c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva Santos, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Liliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dores, Jorge</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</au><au>da Silva Santos, Tiago</au><au>Fonseca, Liliana</au><au>Dores, Jorge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2023-02-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e35205</spage><epage>e35205</epage><pages>e35205-e35205</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy. We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®. One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%). More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36960265</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.35205</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e35205-e35205
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10031547
source PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Alcohol
Bisphosphonates
Diabetes
Diabetic retinopathy
Disease
Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism
Fractures
Health care
Liver cirrhosis
Monoclonal antibodies
Osteoporosis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Risk assessment
Risk factors
title Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A18%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Usage%20of%20a%20Fracture%20Risk%20Assessment%20by%20FRAX%20Tool%20in%20Adults%20With%20Type%202%20Diabetes%20Mellitus&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Santos%20Monteiro,%20S%C3%ADlvia&rft.date=2023-02-20&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e35205&rft.epage=e35205&rft.pages=e35205-e35205&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.35205&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2791374409%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793320953&rft_id=info:pmid/36960265&rfr_iscdi=true