Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture ris...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e35205-e35205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e35205 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e35205 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Santos Monteiro, Sílvia da Silva Santos, Tiago Fonseca, Liliana Dores, Jorge |
description | Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy.
We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®.
One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%).
More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.35205 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10031547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2791374409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b1c6d05e04fd3e6da68ef39b15258a0cf805474ccd0f5791f0a29fc10aa2556c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LXDEUhkNpqWLddV0C3XTRsSfJzf1YlcE6WlAKMtLuQm5uorF3bsacRJh_b8axYl3lQB6ec15eQj4yOGoa2X0zOdqMR0JykG_IPmd1O2tZW719Me-RQ8RbAGDQcGjgPdkTdVcDr-U-cSf3esw6-TDR4OgV6mu7HTRdRG1S0dNLj3_pHNEiruyUaL-hi8v5H7oMYaR-ovMhjwnpb59u6HKztpTTH173NlmkF3Ycfcr4gbxzekR7-PQekKvFyfL4bHb-6_Tn8fx8ZgRAmvXM1ANIC5UbhK0HXbfWia5nkstWg3EtyKqpjBnAyaZjDjTvnGGgNZeyNuKAfN9517lf2cGUe6Me1Tr6lY4bFbRX__9M_kZdh3vFAAQr7mL48mSI4S5bTGrl0ZQYerIho-JlrWiqCrqCfn6F3oYcp5JvSwnBoZOiUF93lIkBMVr3fA0DtS1R7UpUjyUW_NPLBM_wv8rEA1E1mH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793320953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia ; da Silva Santos, Tiago ; Fonseca, Liliana ; Dores, Jorge</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia ; da Silva Santos, Tiago ; Fonseca, Liliana ; Dores, Jorge</creatorcontrib><description>Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy.
We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®.
One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%).
More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35205</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36960265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Bisphosphonates ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Disease ; Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism ; Fractures ; Health care ; Liver cirrhosis ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Osteoporosis ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e35205-e35205</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Santos Monteiro et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Santos Monteiro et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Santos Monteiro et al. 2023 Santos Monteiro et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b1c6d05e04fd3e6da68ef39b15258a0cf805474ccd0f5791f0a29fc10aa2556c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031547/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031547/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36960265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva Santos, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Liliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dores, Jorge</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy.
We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®.
One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%).
More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Bisphosphonates</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LXDEUhkNpqWLddV0C3XTRsSfJzf1YlcE6WlAKMtLuQm5uorF3bsacRJh_b8axYl3lQB6ec15eQj4yOGoa2X0zOdqMR0JykG_IPmd1O2tZW719Me-RQ8RbAGDQcGjgPdkTdVcDr-U-cSf3esw6-TDR4OgV6mu7HTRdRG1S0dNLj3_pHNEiruyUaL-hi8v5H7oMYaR-ovMhjwnpb59u6HKztpTTH173NlmkF3Ycfcr4gbxzekR7-PQekKvFyfL4bHb-6_Tn8fx8ZgRAmvXM1ANIC5UbhK0HXbfWia5nkstWg3EtyKqpjBnAyaZjDjTvnGGgNZeyNuKAfN9517lf2cGUe6Me1Tr6lY4bFbRX__9M_kZdh3vFAAQr7mL48mSI4S5bTGrl0ZQYerIho-JlrWiqCrqCfn6F3oYcp5JvSwnBoZOiUF93lIkBMVr3fA0DtS1R7UpUjyUW_NPLBM_wv8rEA1E1mH0</recordid><startdate>20230220</startdate><enddate>20230220</enddate><creator>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</creator><creator>da Silva Santos, Tiago</creator><creator>Fonseca, Liliana</creator><creator>Dores, Jorge</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230220</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</title><author>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia ; da Silva Santos, Tiago ; Fonseca, Liliana ; Dores, Jorge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-b1c6d05e04fd3e6da68ef39b15258a0cf805474ccd0f5791f0a29fc10aa2556c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Bisphosphonates</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva Santos, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Liliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dores, Jorge</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos Monteiro, Sílvia</au><au>da Silva Santos, Tiago</au><au>Fonseca, Liliana</au><au>Dores, Jorge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2023-02-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e35205</spage><epage>e35205</epage><pages>e35205-e35205</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy.
We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®.
One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%).
More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>36960265</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.35205</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-02, Vol.15 (2), p.e35205-e35205 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10031547 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Alcohol Bisphosphonates Diabetes Diabetic retinopathy Disease Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Fractures Health care Liver cirrhosis Monoclonal antibodies Osteoporosis Rheumatoid arthritis Risk assessment Risk factors |
title | Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A18%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Usage%20of%20a%20Fracture%20Risk%20Assessment%20by%20FRAX%20Tool%20in%20Adults%20With%20Type%202%20Diabetes%20Mellitus&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Santos%20Monteiro,%20S%C3%ADlvia&rft.date=2023-02-20&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e35205&rft.epage=e35205&rft.pages=e35205-e35205&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.35205&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2791374409%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793320953&rft_id=info:pmid/36960265&rfr_iscdi=true |