Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing globally. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in adults with T2D; however, the global burden of DR in pediatric T2D is unknown. This knowledge can inform retinopathy screening and treatments to preserve vision in this population. To estimate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2023-03, Vol.6 (3), p.e231887-e231887
Hauptverfasser: Cioana, Milena, Deng, Jiawen, Nadarajah, Ajantha, Hou, Maggie, Qiu, Yuan, Chen, Sondra Song Jie, Rivas, Angelica, Toor, Parm Pal, Banfield, Laura, Thabane, Lehana, Chaudhary, Varun, Samaan, M Constantine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e231887
container_issue 3
container_start_page e231887
container_title JAMA network open
container_volume 6
creator Cioana, Milena
Deng, Jiawen
Nadarajah, Ajantha
Hou, Maggie
Qiu, Yuan
Chen, Sondra Song Jie
Rivas, Angelica
Toor, Parm Pal
Banfield, Laura
Thabane, Lehana
Chaudhary, Varun
Samaan, M Constantine
description Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing globally. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in adults with T2D; however, the global burden of DR in pediatric T2D is unknown. This knowledge can inform retinopathy screening and treatments to preserve vision in this population. To estimate the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and the gray literature (ie, literature containing information that is not available through traditional publishing and distribution channels) were searched for relevant records from the date of database inception to April 4, 2021, with updated searches conducted on May 17, 2022. Searches were limited to human studies. No language restrictions were applied. Search terms included diabetic retinopathy; diabetes mellitus, type 2; prevalence studies; and child, adolescent, teenage, youth, and pediatric. Three teams, each with 2 reviewers, independently screened for observational studies with 10 or more participants that reported the prevalence of DR. Among 1989 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria for the pooled analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Two independent reviewers performed the risk of bias and level of evidence analyses. The results were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was reported using χ2 and I2 statistics. The main outcome was the estimated pooled global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. Other outcomes included DR severity and current DR assessment methods. The association of diabetes duration, sex, race, age, and obesity with DR prevalence was also assessed. Among the 27 studies included in the pooled analysis (5924 unique patients; age range at T2D diagnosis, 6.5-21.0 years), the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D was 6.99% (95% CI, 3.75%-11.00%; I2 = 95%; 615 patients). Fundoscopy was less sensitive than 7-field stereoscopic fundus photography in detecting retinopathy (0.47% [95% CI, 0%-3.30%; I2 = 0%] vs 13.55% [95% CI, 5.43%-24.29%; I2 = 92%]). The prevalence of DR increased over time and was 1.11% (95% CI, 0.04%-3.06%; I2 = 5%) at less than 2.5 years after T2D diagnosis, 9.04% (95% CI, 2.24%-
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1887
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10024209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2788799785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-4765546abed12be66cfb11725cdd34c14a3438397ac2599f52bbfc64fc9883223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxSMEolXpV0BGXLhk8Z_YibmgqkCLVEQF5WxNnAn1ktjBzm6Vb1-vdqlKL7al-c0bz3tF8YbRFaOUvV_DCB7nuxD_hAn9ilMuVqxp6mfFMZd1VYqGyueP3kfFaUprSimnTGglXxZHQmlBmVTHxXgxhBYGch1xCwN6iyT05JODFmdnyY98-jDBfLsQ58k1dg7mmAs3y4SEH0BMH8gZ-bmkGUfYt20d3hHwHfmGM5TgYViSS6-KFz0MCU8P90nx68vnm_PL8ur7xdfzs6sShKrmsqqVlJXK0h3jLSpl-5axmkvbdaKyrAJRiUboGiyXWveSt21vVdVb3TSCc3FSfNzrTpt2xM6inyMMZopuhLiYAM78X_Hu1vwOW5Md5hWnOiu8OyjE8HeDaTajSxaHIXsfNsnwOjuudd3IjL59gq7DJuaNd5TmouaNEpnSe8rGkFLE_uE3jO7GMvMkWLML1uyCzb2vH6_z0PkvRnEPXFekqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792372863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cioana, Milena ; Deng, Jiawen ; Nadarajah, Ajantha ; Hou, Maggie ; Qiu, Yuan ; Chen, Sondra Song Jie ; Rivas, Angelica ; Toor, Parm Pal ; Banfield, Laura ; Thabane, Lehana ; Chaudhary, Varun ; Samaan, M Constantine</creator><creatorcontrib>Cioana, Milena ; Deng, Jiawen ; Nadarajah, Ajantha ; Hou, Maggie ; Qiu, Yuan ; Chen, Sondra Song Jie ; Rivas, Angelica ; Toor, Parm Pal ; Banfield, Laura ; Thabane, Lehana ; Chaudhary, Varun ; Samaan, M Constantine</creatorcontrib><description>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing globally. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in adults with T2D; however, the global burden of DR in pediatric T2D is unknown. This knowledge can inform retinopathy screening and treatments to preserve vision in this population. To estimate the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and the gray literature (ie, literature containing information that is not available through traditional publishing and distribution channels) were searched for relevant records from the date of database inception to April 4, 2021, with updated searches conducted on May 17, 2022. Searches were limited to human studies. No language restrictions were applied. Search terms included diabetic retinopathy; diabetes mellitus, type 2; prevalence studies; and child, adolescent, teenage, youth, and pediatric. Three teams, each with 2 reviewers, independently screened for observational studies with 10 or more participants that reported the prevalence of DR. Among 1989 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria for the pooled analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Two independent reviewers performed the risk of bias and level of evidence analyses. The results were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was reported using χ2 and I2 statistics. The main outcome was the estimated pooled global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. Other outcomes included DR severity and current DR assessment methods. The association of diabetes duration, sex, race, age, and obesity with DR prevalence was also assessed. Among the 27 studies included in the pooled analysis (5924 unique patients; age range at T2D diagnosis, 6.5-21.0 years), the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D was 6.99% (95% CI, 3.75%-11.00%; I2 = 95%; 615 patients). Fundoscopy was less sensitive than 7-field stereoscopic fundus photography in detecting retinopathy (0.47% [95% CI, 0%-3.30%; I2 = 0%] vs 13.55% [95% CI, 5.43%-24.29%; I2 = 92%]). The prevalence of DR increased over time and was 1.11% (95% CI, 0.04%-3.06%; I2 = 5%) at less than 2.5 years after T2D diagnosis, 9.04% (95% CI, 2.24%-19.55%; I2 = 88%) at 2.5 to 5.0 years after T2D diagnosis, and 28.14% (95% CI, 12.84%-46.45%; I2 = 96%) at more than 5 years after T2D diagnosis. The prevalence of DR increased with age, and no differences were noted based on sex, race, or obesity. Heterogeneity was high among studies. In this study, DR prevalence in pediatric T2D increased significantly at more than 5 years after diagnosis. These findings suggest that retinal microvasculature is an early target of T2D in children and adolescents, and annual screening with fundus photography beginning at diagnosis offers the best assessment method for early detection of DR in pediatric patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1887</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36930156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diabetes ; Diabetes and Endocrinology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnosis ; Diabetic Retinopathy - epidemiology ; Diabetic Retinopathy - etiology ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Obesity ; Observational studies ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Pediatrics ; Prevalence ; Retina ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2023-03, Vol.6 (3), p.e231887-e231887</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2023 Cioana M et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-4765546abed12be66cfb11725cdd34c14a3438397ac2599f52bbfc64fc9883223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,865,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36930156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cioana, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jiawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadarajah, Ajantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sondra Song Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toor, Parm Pal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfield, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thabane, Lehana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaan, M Constantine</creatorcontrib><title>Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing globally. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in adults with T2D; however, the global burden of DR in pediatric T2D is unknown. This knowledge can inform retinopathy screening and treatments to preserve vision in this population. To estimate the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and the gray literature (ie, literature containing information that is not available through traditional publishing and distribution channels) were searched for relevant records from the date of database inception to April 4, 2021, with updated searches conducted on May 17, 2022. Searches were limited to human studies. No language restrictions were applied. Search terms included diabetic retinopathy; diabetes mellitus, type 2; prevalence studies; and child, adolescent, teenage, youth, and pediatric. Three teams, each with 2 reviewers, independently screened for observational studies with 10 or more participants that reported the prevalence of DR. Among 1989 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria for the pooled analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Two independent reviewers performed the risk of bias and level of evidence analyses. The results were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was reported using χ2 and I2 statistics. The main outcome was the estimated pooled global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. Other outcomes included DR severity and current DR assessment methods. The association of diabetes duration, sex, race, age, and obesity with DR prevalence was also assessed. Among the 27 studies included in the pooled analysis (5924 unique patients; age range at T2D diagnosis, 6.5-21.0 years), the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D was 6.99% (95% CI, 3.75%-11.00%; I2 = 95%; 615 patients). Fundoscopy was less sensitive than 7-field stereoscopic fundus photography in detecting retinopathy (0.47% [95% CI, 0%-3.30%; I2 = 0%] vs 13.55% [95% CI, 5.43%-24.29%; I2 = 92%]). The prevalence of DR increased over time and was 1.11% (95% CI, 0.04%-3.06%; I2 = 5%) at less than 2.5 years after T2D diagnosis, 9.04% (95% CI, 2.24%-19.55%; I2 = 88%) at 2.5 to 5.0 years after T2D diagnosis, and 28.14% (95% CI, 12.84%-46.45%; I2 = 96%) at more than 5 years after T2D diagnosis. The prevalence of DR increased with age, and no differences were noted based on sex, race, or obesity. Heterogeneity was high among studies. In this study, DR prevalence in pediatric T2D increased significantly at more than 5 years after diagnosis. These findings suggest that retinal microvasculature is an early target of T2D in children and adolescents, and annual screening with fundus photography beginning at diagnosis offers the best assessment method for early detection of DR in pediatric patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes and Endocrinology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetic Retinopathy - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9v1DAQxSMEolXpV0BGXLhk8Z_YibmgqkCLVEQF5WxNnAn1ktjBzm6Vb1-vdqlKL7al-c0bz3tF8YbRFaOUvV_DCB7nuxD_hAn9ilMuVqxp6mfFMZd1VYqGyueP3kfFaUprSimnTGglXxZHQmlBmVTHxXgxhBYGch1xCwN6iyT05JODFmdnyY98-jDBfLsQ58k1dg7mmAs3y4SEH0BMH8gZ-bmkGUfYt20d3hHwHfmGM5TgYViSS6-KFz0MCU8P90nx68vnm_PL8ur7xdfzs6sShKrmsqqVlJXK0h3jLSpl-5axmkvbdaKyrAJRiUboGiyXWveSt21vVdVb3TSCc3FSfNzrTpt2xM6inyMMZopuhLiYAM78X_Hu1vwOW5Md5hWnOiu8OyjE8HeDaTajSxaHIXsfNsnwOjuudd3IjL59gq7DJuaNd5TmouaNEpnSe8rGkFLE_uE3jO7GMvMkWLML1uyCzb2vH6_z0PkvRnEPXFekqg</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Cioana, Milena</creator><creator>Deng, Jiawen</creator><creator>Nadarajah, Ajantha</creator><creator>Hou, Maggie</creator><creator>Qiu, Yuan</creator><creator>Chen, Sondra Song Jie</creator><creator>Rivas, Angelica</creator><creator>Toor, Parm Pal</creator><creator>Banfield, Laura</creator><creator>Thabane, Lehana</creator><creator>Chaudhary, Varun</creator><creator>Samaan, M Constantine</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Cioana, Milena ; Deng, Jiawen ; Nadarajah, Ajantha ; Hou, Maggie ; Qiu, Yuan ; Chen, Sondra Song Jie ; Rivas, Angelica ; Toor, Parm Pal ; Banfield, Laura ; Thabane, Lehana ; Chaudhary, Varun ; Samaan, M Constantine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a364t-4765546abed12be66cfb11725cdd34c14a3438397ac2599f52bbfc64fc9883223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes and Endocrinology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetic Retinopathy - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cioana, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jiawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadarajah, Ajantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sondra Song Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toor, Parm Pal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banfield, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thabane, Lehana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhary, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaan, M Constantine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cioana, Milena</au><au>Deng, Jiawen</au><au>Nadarajah, Ajantha</au><au>Hou, Maggie</au><au>Qiu, Yuan</au><au>Chen, Sondra Song Jie</au><au>Rivas, Angelica</au><au>Toor, Parm Pal</au><au>Banfield, Laura</au><au>Thabane, Lehana</au><au>Chaudhary, Varun</au><au>Samaan, M Constantine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e231887</spage><epage>e231887</epage><pages>e231887-e231887</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing globally. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in adults with T2D; however, the global burden of DR in pediatric T2D is unknown. This knowledge can inform retinopathy screening and treatments to preserve vision in this population. To estimate the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and the gray literature (ie, literature containing information that is not available through traditional publishing and distribution channels) were searched for relevant records from the date of database inception to April 4, 2021, with updated searches conducted on May 17, 2022. Searches were limited to human studies. No language restrictions were applied. Search terms included diabetic retinopathy; diabetes mellitus, type 2; prevalence studies; and child, adolescent, teenage, youth, and pediatric. Three teams, each with 2 reviewers, independently screened for observational studies with 10 or more participants that reported the prevalence of DR. Among 1989 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria for the pooled analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Two independent reviewers performed the risk of bias and level of evidence analyses. The results were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was reported using χ2 and I2 statistics. The main outcome was the estimated pooled global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D. Other outcomes included DR severity and current DR assessment methods. The association of diabetes duration, sex, race, age, and obesity with DR prevalence was also assessed. Among the 27 studies included in the pooled analysis (5924 unique patients; age range at T2D diagnosis, 6.5-21.0 years), the global prevalence of DR in pediatric T2D was 6.99% (95% CI, 3.75%-11.00%; I2 = 95%; 615 patients). Fundoscopy was less sensitive than 7-field stereoscopic fundus photography in detecting retinopathy (0.47% [95% CI, 0%-3.30%; I2 = 0%] vs 13.55% [95% CI, 5.43%-24.29%; I2 = 92%]). The prevalence of DR increased over time and was 1.11% (95% CI, 0.04%-3.06%; I2 = 5%) at less than 2.5 years after T2D diagnosis, 9.04% (95% CI, 2.24%-19.55%; I2 = 88%) at 2.5 to 5.0 years after T2D diagnosis, and 28.14% (95% CI, 12.84%-46.45%; I2 = 96%) at more than 5 years after T2D diagnosis. The prevalence of DR increased with age, and no differences were noted based on sex, race, or obesity. Heterogeneity was high among studies. In this study, DR prevalence in pediatric T2D increased significantly at more than 5 years after diagnosis. These findings suggest that retinal microvasculature is an early target of T2D in children and adolescents, and annual screening with fundus photography beginning at diagnosis offers the best assessment method for early detection of DR in pediatric patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>36930156</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1887</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-3805
ispartof JAMA network open, 2023-03, Vol.6 (3), p.e231887-e231887
issn 2574-3805
2574-3805
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10024209
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Diabetes
Diabetes and Endocrinology
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - complications
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - epidemiology
Diabetic retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy - diagnosis
Diabetic Retinopathy - epidemiology
Diabetic Retinopathy - etiology
Humans
Meta-analysis
Obesity
Observational studies
Observational Studies as Topic
Online Only
Original Investigation
Pediatrics
Prevalence
Retina
Systematic review
title Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T21%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Prevalence%20of%20Diabetic%20Retinopathy%20in%20Pediatric%20Type%202%20Diabetes:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Cioana,%20Milena&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e231887&rft.epage=e231887&rft.pages=e231887-e231887&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1887&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2788799785%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792372863&rft_id=info:pmid/36930156&rfr_iscdi=true