Speech Illusions in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Linked to Clinical Outcome

Abstract Background and hypothesis Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia bulletin 2023-03, Vol.49 (2), p.339-349
Hauptverfasser: Hird, Emily J, Ohmuro, Noriyuki, Allen, Paul, Moseley, Peter, Kempton, Matthew J, Modinos, Gemma, Sachs, Gabriele, van der Gaag, Mark, de Haan, Lieuwe, Gadelha, Ary, Bressan, Rodrigo, Barrantes-Vidal, Neus, Ruhrmann, Stephan, Catalan, Ana, McGuire, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 349
container_issue 2
container_start_page 339
container_title Schizophrenia bulletin
container_volume 49
creator Hird, Emily J
Ohmuro, Noriyuki
Allen, Paul
Moseley, Peter
Kempton, Matthew J
Modinos, Gemma
Sachs, Gabriele
van der Gaag, Mark
de Haan, Lieuwe
Gadelha, Ary
Bressan, Rodrigo
Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
Ruhrmann, Stephan
Catalan, Ana
McGuire, Philip
description Abstract Background and hypothesis Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined whether this was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Study design At baseline, 344 CHR participants and 67 healthy controls were presented with a computerized white noise task and asked whether they heard speech, and whether speech was neutral, affective, or whether they were uncertain about its valence. After 2 years, we assessed whether participants transitioned to psychosis, or remitted from the CHR state, and their functioning. Study results CHR participants had a lower sensitivity to the task. Logistic regression revealed that a bias towards hearing targets in stimuli was associated with remission status (OR = 0.21, P = 042). Conversely, hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of remission (OR = 7.72. P = .007). When we assessed only participants who did not take antipsychotic medication at baseline, the association between hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline and remission likelihood remained (OR = 7.61, P = .043) and this variable was additionally associated with a greater likelihood of transition to psychosis (OR = 5.34, P = .029). Conclusions In CHR individuals, a tendency to hear speech in noise, and uncertainty about the affective valence of this speech, is associated with adverse outcomes. This task could be used in a battery of cognitive markers to stratify CHR participants according to subsequent outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/schbul/sbac163
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10016413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/schbul/sbac163</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2754861121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-25c60cbada6a31370c14204e6bb01150e07cd30c0ed2649524c2490e995db2f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EglJYGZFHGAI-x3bIhFAFFKkSiI-ByXKcKzG4cYgTJP49QS1fE9MN99xzp3sJ2QN2BCxPj6Otit4fx8JYUOkaGUEmZAIZg3UyYvJEJZkCsUW2Y3xmDESu-CbZSpUc6FyNyONdg2greuV9H12oI3U1vcHQeKSmoxPvameNp1P3VNFbF1_oPLT0Jr7bKkQX6czVL1jSLvyg131nwwJ3yMbc-Ii7qzomDxfn95NpMru-vJqczRIruOwSLq1itjClUSaFNGMWBGcCVVEwAMmQZbZMmWVYciVyyYXlImeY57Is-FykY3K69DZ9scDSYt21xuumdQvTvutgnP7bqV2ln8KbhuEfSkA6GA5Whja89hg7vXDRovemxtBHzTMpThQAhwE9WqK2DTG2OP_eA0x_BqKXgehVIMPA_u_rvvGvBAbgcAmEvvlP9gHgvpe6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2754861121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Speech Illusions in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Linked to Clinical Outcome</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hird, Emily J ; Ohmuro, Noriyuki ; Allen, Paul ; Moseley, Peter ; Kempton, Matthew J ; Modinos, Gemma ; Sachs, Gabriele ; van der Gaag, Mark ; de Haan, Lieuwe ; Gadelha, Ary ; Bressan, Rodrigo ; Barrantes-Vidal, Neus ; Ruhrmann, Stephan ; Catalan, Ana ; McGuire, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Hird, Emily J ; Ohmuro, Noriyuki ; Allen, Paul ; Moseley, Peter ; Kempton, Matthew J ; Modinos, Gemma ; Sachs, Gabriele ; van der Gaag, Mark ; de Haan, Lieuwe ; Gadelha, Ary ; Bressan, Rodrigo ; Barrantes-Vidal, Neus ; Ruhrmann, Stephan ; Catalan, Ana ; McGuire, Philip ; EU-GEI High Risk Study</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and hypothesis Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined whether this was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Study design At baseline, 344 CHR participants and 67 healthy controls were presented with a computerized white noise task and asked whether they heard speech, and whether speech was neutral, affective, or whether they were uncertain about its valence. After 2 years, we assessed whether participants transitioned to psychosis, or remitted from the CHR state, and their functioning. Study results CHR participants had a lower sensitivity to the task. Logistic regression revealed that a bias towards hearing targets in stimuli was associated with remission status (OR = 0.21, P = 042). Conversely, hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of remission (OR = 7.72. P = .007). When we assessed only participants who did not take antipsychotic medication at baseline, the association between hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline and remission likelihood remained (OR = 7.61, P = .043) and this variable was additionally associated with a greater likelihood of transition to psychosis (OR = 5.34, P = .029). Conclusions In CHR individuals, a tendency to hear speech in noise, and uncertainty about the affective valence of this speech, is associated with adverse outcomes. This task could be used in a battery of cognitive markers to stratify CHR participants according to subsequent outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0586-7614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac163</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36516396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Antipsychotic Agents ; Humans ; Illusions ; Incidence ; Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Regular ; Speech</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023-03, Vol.49 (2), p.339-349</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-25c60cbada6a31370c14204e6bb01150e07cd30c0ed2649524c2490e995db2f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-25c60cbada6a31370c14204e6bb01150e07cd30c0ed2649524c2490e995db2f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9284-2509 ; 0000-0002-8671-1238 ; 0000-0002-8359-9877 ; 0000-0002-0418-7904 ; 0000-0001-6599-7292 ; 0000-0002-7870-066X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016413/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10016413/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516396$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hird, Emily J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmuro, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempton, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modinos, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachs, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Gaag, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, Lieuwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadelha, Ary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressan, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrantes-Vidal, Neus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruhrmann, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EU-GEI High Risk Study</creatorcontrib><title>Speech Illusions in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Linked to Clinical Outcome</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and hypothesis Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined whether this was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Study design At baseline, 344 CHR participants and 67 healthy controls were presented with a computerized white noise task and asked whether they heard speech, and whether speech was neutral, affective, or whether they were uncertain about its valence. After 2 years, we assessed whether participants transitioned to psychosis, or remitted from the CHR state, and their functioning. Study results CHR participants had a lower sensitivity to the task. Logistic regression revealed that a bias towards hearing targets in stimuli was associated with remission status (OR = 0.21, P = 042). Conversely, hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of remission (OR = 7.72. P = .007). When we assessed only participants who did not take antipsychotic medication at baseline, the association between hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline and remission likelihood remained (OR = 7.61, P = .043) and this variable was additionally associated with a greater likelihood of transition to psychosis (OR = 5.34, P = .029). Conclusions In CHR individuals, a tendency to hear speech in noise, and uncertainty about the affective valence of this speech, is associated with adverse outcomes. This task could be used in a battery of cognitive markers to stratify CHR participants according to subsequent outcomes.</description><subject>Antipsychotic Agents</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illusions</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Regular</subject><subject>Speech</subject><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EglJYGZFHGAI-x3bIhFAFFKkSiI-ByXKcKzG4cYgTJP49QS1fE9MN99xzp3sJ2QN2BCxPj6Otit4fx8JYUOkaGUEmZAIZg3UyYvJEJZkCsUW2Y3xmDESu-CbZSpUc6FyNyONdg2greuV9H12oI3U1vcHQeKSmoxPvameNp1P3VNFbF1_oPLT0Jr7bKkQX6czVL1jSLvyg131nwwJ3yMbc-Ii7qzomDxfn95NpMru-vJqczRIruOwSLq1itjClUSaFNGMWBGcCVVEwAMmQZbZMmWVYciVyyYXlImeY57Is-FykY3K69DZ9scDSYt21xuumdQvTvutgnP7bqV2ln8KbhuEfSkA6GA5Whja89hg7vXDRovemxtBHzTMpThQAhwE9WqK2DTG2OP_eA0x_BqKXgehVIMPA_u_rvvGvBAbgcAmEvvlP9gHgvpe6</recordid><startdate>20230315</startdate><enddate>20230315</enddate><creator>Hird, Emily J</creator><creator>Ohmuro, Noriyuki</creator><creator>Allen, Paul</creator><creator>Moseley, Peter</creator><creator>Kempton, Matthew J</creator><creator>Modinos, Gemma</creator><creator>Sachs, Gabriele</creator><creator>van der Gaag, Mark</creator><creator>de Haan, Lieuwe</creator><creator>Gadelha, Ary</creator><creator>Bressan, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Barrantes-Vidal, Neus</creator><creator>Ruhrmann, Stephan</creator><creator>Catalan, Ana</creator><creator>McGuire, Philip</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-2509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-1238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-9877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-7904</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-7292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-066X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230315</creationdate><title>Speech Illusions in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Linked to Clinical Outcome</title><author>Hird, Emily J ; Ohmuro, Noriyuki ; Allen, Paul ; Moseley, Peter ; Kempton, Matthew J ; Modinos, Gemma ; Sachs, Gabriele ; van der Gaag, Mark ; de Haan, Lieuwe ; Gadelha, Ary ; Bressan, Rodrigo ; Barrantes-Vidal, Neus ; Ruhrmann, Stephan ; Catalan, Ana ; McGuire, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-25c60cbada6a31370c14204e6bb01150e07cd30c0ed2649524c2490e995db2f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antipsychotic Agents</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illusions</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Regular</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hird, Emily J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmuro, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempton, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modinos, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachs, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Gaag, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, Lieuwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadelha, Ary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressan, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrantes-Vidal, Neus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruhrmann, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalan, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EU-GEI High Risk Study</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hird, Emily J</au><au>Ohmuro, Noriyuki</au><au>Allen, Paul</au><au>Moseley, Peter</au><au>Kempton, Matthew J</au><au>Modinos, Gemma</au><au>Sachs, Gabriele</au><au>van der Gaag, Mark</au><au>de Haan, Lieuwe</au><au>Gadelha, Ary</au><au>Bressan, Rodrigo</au><au>Barrantes-Vidal, Neus</au><au>Ruhrmann, Stephan</au><au>Catalan, Ana</au><au>McGuire, Philip</au><aucorp>EU-GEI High Risk Study</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Speech Illusions in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Linked to Clinical Outcome</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><date>2023-03-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>339-349</pages><issn>0586-7614</issn><eissn>1745-1701</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and hypothesis Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined whether this was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Study design At baseline, 344 CHR participants and 67 healthy controls were presented with a computerized white noise task and asked whether they heard speech, and whether speech was neutral, affective, or whether they were uncertain about its valence. After 2 years, we assessed whether participants transitioned to psychosis, or remitted from the CHR state, and their functioning. Study results CHR participants had a lower sensitivity to the task. Logistic regression revealed that a bias towards hearing targets in stimuli was associated with remission status (OR = 0.21, P = 042). Conversely, hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of remission (OR = 7.72. P = .007). When we assessed only participants who did not take antipsychotic medication at baseline, the association between hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline and remission likelihood remained (OR = 7.61, P = .043) and this variable was additionally associated with a greater likelihood of transition to psychosis (OR = 5.34, P = .029). Conclusions In CHR individuals, a tendency to hear speech in noise, and uncertainty about the affective valence of this speech, is associated with adverse outcomes. This task could be used in a battery of cognitive markers to stratify CHR participants according to subsequent outcomes.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36516396</pmid><doi>10.1093/schbul/sbac163</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-2509</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-1238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-9877</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-7904</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-7292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-066X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0586-7614
ispartof Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023-03, Vol.49 (2), p.339-349
issn 0586-7614
1745-1701
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10016413
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antipsychotic Agents
Humans
Illusions
Incidence
Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology
Psychotic Disorders - psychology
Regular
Speech
title Speech Illusions in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Linked to Clinical Outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A35%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Speech%20Illusions%20in%20People%20at%20Clinical%20High%20Risk%20for%20Psychosis%20Linked%20to%20Clinical%20Outcome&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin&rft.au=Hird,%20Emily%20J&rft.aucorp=EU-GEI%20High%20Risk%20Study&rft.date=2023-03-15&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=339-349&rft.issn=0586-7614&rft.eissn=1745-1701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/schbul/sbac163&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2754861121%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2754861121&rft_id=info:pmid/36516396&rft_oup_id=10.1093/schbul/sbac163&rfr_iscdi=true