Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia
(1) Background: The CEECCA questionnaire assesses the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. It was designed using the NANDA-I and NOC standardised nursing languages (SNLs), reaching high content validity index and representativeness index values. The questionnaire was pilot-tested,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2023-02, Vol.20 (5), p.3935 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 3935 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan Sainz-Fregel, Estela Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra Martín-Felipe, Elena Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán |
| description | (1) Background: The CEECCA questionnaire assesses the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. It was designed using the NANDA-I and NOC standardised nursing languages (SNLs), reaching high content validity index and representativeness index values. The questionnaire was pilot-tested, demonstrating its feasibility for use by nurses in any healthcare setting. This study aims to identify the psychometric properties of this instrument. (2) Methods: 47 individuals with aphasia were recruited from primary and specialist care facilities. The instrument was tested for construct validity and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness. The NANDA-I and NOC SNLs and the Boston test were used for criterion validity testing. (3) Results: five language dimensions explained 78.6% of the total variance. Convergent criterion validity tests showed concordances of up to 94% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using the Boston test, concordances of up to 81% using DCs of NANDA-I diagnoses (Cohen's
: 0.6;
< 0.001), and concordances of up to 96% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using NOC indicators. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.98. Reliability tests revealed test-retest concordances of 76-100% (
< 0.001). (4) Conclusions: the CEECCA is an easy-to-use, valid, and reliable instrument to assess the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph20053935 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10001674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A751916609</galeid><sourcerecordid>A751916609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-46098a01c4dd69eadec188c84315c886fe7a3cf6b2c6e420deadfc24c90b4e073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5YgsceGyZRw7TnxCUbSUSpUAqZwtrzPZeJXYwU5a7b_HEaW0qPLB1utn3vGMJ8veUbhgTMIne8Aw9TlAwSQrXmSnVAjYcAH05aPzSXYW4wGAVVzI19kJExJA8uI0m77Ho-n9iHOwhtxgnK3bE9-RuUfSbLdNU5Mfyyp757QNSGZP6hgxRlLv7GDn46o0fhwXZ42ekejRJ4sr19pb2y56iOTOzj2pp15Hq99kr7qk4dv7_Tz7-WV703zdXH-7vGrq643hQIv11bLSQA1vWyFRt2hoVZmKM1qYqhIdlpqZTuxyI5Dn0CakMzk3EnYcoWTn2ec_vtOyG7E16OagBzUFO-pwVF5b9fTG2V7t_a2iAEBFyZPDx3uH4H-tLVCjjQaHQTv0S1R5WQkKjAqZ0A__oQe_BJfqW6kih7wC_o_a6wGVdZ1Pic1qquqyoHL9rtXr4hkqrRZHa7zDzib9uQATfIwBu4ciKah1SNTTIUkB7x-35gH_OxXsN14YuOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2785202804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús ; García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel ; Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan ; Sainz-Fregel, Estela ; Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria ; Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra ; Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra ; Martín-Felipe, Elena ; Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán</creator><creatorcontrib>Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús ; García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel ; Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan ; Sainz-Fregel, Estela ; Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria ; Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra ; Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra ; Martín-Felipe, Elena ; Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán</creatorcontrib><description>(1) Background: The CEECCA questionnaire assesses the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. It was designed using the NANDA-I and NOC standardised nursing languages (SNLs), reaching high content validity index and representativeness index values. The questionnaire was pilot-tested, demonstrating its feasibility for use by nurses in any healthcare setting. This study aims to identify the psychometric properties of this instrument. (2) Methods: 47 individuals with aphasia were recruited from primary and specialist care facilities. The instrument was tested for construct validity and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness. The NANDA-I and NOC SNLs and the Boston test were used for criterion validity testing. (3) Results: five language dimensions explained 78.6% of the total variance. Convergent criterion validity tests showed concordances of up to 94% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using the Boston test, concordances of up to 81% using DCs of NANDA-I diagnoses (Cohen's
: 0.6;
< 0.001), and concordances of up to 96% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using NOC indicators. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.98. Reliability tests revealed test-retest concordances of 76-100% (
< 0.001). (4) Conclusions: the CEECCA is an easy-to-use, valid, and reliable instrument to assess the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053935</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36900945</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aphasia ; Aphasia - diagnosis ; Brain damage ; Brain research ; Criteria ; Data collection ; Health facilities ; Humans ; Language ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Patients ; Pictographs ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reading comprehension ; Rehabilitation ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sociodemographics ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity ; Verbal communication</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023-02, Vol.20 (5), p.3935</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-46098a01c4dd69eadec188c84315c886fe7a3cf6b2c6e420deadfc24c90b4e073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-46098a01c4dd69eadec188c84315c886fe7a3cf6b2c6e420deadfc24c90b4e073</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3865-9180 ; 0000-0002-8048-9701 ; 0000-0002-4552-8920 ; 0000-0002-2838-8735</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001674/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001674/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900945$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainz-Fregel, Estela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Felipe, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>(1) Background: The CEECCA questionnaire assesses the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. It was designed using the NANDA-I and NOC standardised nursing languages (SNLs), reaching high content validity index and representativeness index values. The questionnaire was pilot-tested, demonstrating its feasibility for use by nurses in any healthcare setting. This study aims to identify the psychometric properties of this instrument. (2) Methods: 47 individuals with aphasia were recruited from primary and specialist care facilities. The instrument was tested for construct validity and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness. The NANDA-I and NOC SNLs and the Boston test were used for criterion validity testing. (3) Results: five language dimensions explained 78.6% of the total variance. Convergent criterion validity tests showed concordances of up to 94% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using the Boston test, concordances of up to 81% using DCs of NANDA-I diagnoses (Cohen's
: 0.6;
< 0.001), and concordances of up to 96% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using NOC indicators. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.98. Reliability tests revealed test-retest concordances of 76-100% (
< 0.001). (4) Conclusions: the CEECCA is an easy-to-use, valid, and reliable instrument to assess the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia.</description><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pictographs</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5YgsceGyZRw7TnxCUbSUSpUAqZwtrzPZeJXYwU5a7b_HEaW0qPLB1utn3vGMJ8veUbhgTMIne8Aw9TlAwSQrXmSnVAjYcAH05aPzSXYW4wGAVVzI19kJExJA8uI0m77Ho-n9iHOwhtxgnK3bE9-RuUfSbLdNU5Mfyyp757QNSGZP6hgxRlLv7GDn46o0fhwXZ42ekejRJ4sr19pb2y56iOTOzj2pp15Hq99kr7qk4dv7_Tz7-WV703zdXH-7vGrq643hQIv11bLSQA1vWyFRt2hoVZmKM1qYqhIdlpqZTuxyI5Dn0CakMzk3EnYcoWTn2ec_vtOyG7E16OagBzUFO-pwVF5b9fTG2V7t_a2iAEBFyZPDx3uH4H-tLVCjjQaHQTv0S1R5WQkKjAqZ0A__oQe_BJfqW6kih7wC_o_a6wGVdZ1Pic1qquqyoHL9rtXr4hkqrRZHa7zDzib9uQATfIwBu4ciKah1SNTTIUkB7x-35gH_OxXsN14YuOA</recordid><startdate>20230222</startdate><enddate>20230222</enddate><creator>Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús</creator><creator>García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel</creator><creator>Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan</creator><creator>Sainz-Fregel, Estela</creator><creator>Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria</creator><creator>Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra</creator><creator>Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra</creator><creator>Martín-Felipe, Elena</creator><creator>Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3865-9180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8048-9701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4552-8920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-8735</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230222</creationdate><title>Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia</title><author>Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús ; García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel ; Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan ; Sainz-Fregel, Estela ; Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria ; Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra ; Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra ; Martín-Felipe, Elena ; Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4015-46098a01c4dd69eadec188c84315c886fe7a3cf6b2c6e420deadfc24c90b4e073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pictographs</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sainz-Fregel, Estela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Felipe, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús</au><au>García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel</au><au>Delgado-Hernández, Jonathan</au><au>Sainz-Fregel, Estela</au><au>Miranda-Martín, Raquel-Candelaria</au><au>Suárez-Pérez, Alejandra</au><au>Jiménez-Álvarez, Alejandra</au><au>Martín-Felipe, Elena</au><au>Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2023-02-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3935</spage><pages>3935-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>(1) Background: The CEECCA questionnaire assesses the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. It was designed using the NANDA-I and NOC standardised nursing languages (SNLs), reaching high content validity index and representativeness index values. The questionnaire was pilot-tested, demonstrating its feasibility for use by nurses in any healthcare setting. This study aims to identify the psychometric properties of this instrument. (2) Methods: 47 individuals with aphasia were recruited from primary and specialist care facilities. The instrument was tested for construct validity and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness. The NANDA-I and NOC SNLs and the Boston test were used for criterion validity testing. (3) Results: five language dimensions explained 78.6% of the total variance. Convergent criterion validity tests showed concordances of up to 94% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using the Boston test, concordances of up to 81% using DCs of NANDA-I diagnoses (Cohen's
: 0.6;
< 0.001), and concordances of up to 96% (Cohen's
: 0.9;
< 0.001) using NOC indicators. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.98. Reliability tests revealed test-retest concordances of 76-100% (
< 0.001). (4) Conclusions: the CEECCA is an easy-to-use, valid, and reliable instrument to assess the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36900945</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph20053935</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3865-9180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8048-9701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4552-8920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-8735</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023-02, Vol.20 (5), p.3935 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10001674 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Aphasia Aphasia - diagnosis Brain damage Brain research Criteria Data collection Health facilities Humans Language Nurses Nursing Nursing care Patients Pictographs Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reading comprehension Rehabilitation Reliability Reproducibility of Results Sociodemographics Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Validity Verbal communication |
| title | Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Testing%20of%20the%20CEECCA%20Questionnaire%20to%20Assess%20Ability%20to%20Communicate%20among%20Individuals%20with%20Aphasia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADn-Dorta,%20Willian-Jes%C3%BAs&rft.date=2023-02-22&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3935&rft.pages=3935-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph20053935&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA751916609%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2785202804&rft_id=info:pmid/36900945&rft_galeid=A751916609&rfr_iscdi=true |