The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients

A number of Monte Carlo codes are available, which can be used to calculate dose distributions in patients with high accuracy. Patient geometry can readily be derived with adequate spatial resolution from CT scans. To perform the Monte Carlo calculation with the same spatial resolution, it is necess...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 1998-07, Vol.25 (7), p.1195-1201
Hauptverfasser: du Plessis, F. C. P., Willemse, C. A., Lötter, M. G., Goedhals, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1201
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1195
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 25
creator du Plessis, F. C. P.
Willemse, C. A.
Lötter, M. G.
Goedhals, L.
description A number of Monte Carlo codes are available, which can be used to calculate dose distributions in patients with high accuracy. Patient geometry can readily be derived with adequate spatial resolution from CT scans. To perform the Monte Carlo calculation with the same spatial resolution, it is necessary to enter the atomic composition and density of the tissue in each voxel of the CT image. This means entering 65 536 discrete values for a CT slice with a 256 × 256 matrix size. The need for automated methods of setting up the material data files is obvious. Because there is no direct unique relationship between CT numbers and material composition, the aim of our work was to devise a method whereby the atomic composition and density in each voxel could be assigned automatically by indirect derivation from the CT numbers. The set of all tissues types in the human body was divided into subsets that are dosimetrically equivalent, based on Monte Carlo calculated depth dose curves in homogeneous phantoms of each tissue. CT number ranges corresponding to each tissue subset were determined from the calibration curve linking electron density with CT number for the specific CT scanner. Further subdivision was found to be necessary for the lung and bone type tissues. This was done by keeping the atomic composition constant and varying the physical density. It was found that 57 distinct tissue subsets were needed to represent the 16 main tissue types in the body at a 1% dose level. Corresponding CT number intervals of 30 HU were needed in the lung and soft tissue region, whereas in the bone region the intervals could be increased to 100 HU. A computer algorithm was set up to convert automatically from CT number to corresponding equivalent material number for the Monte Carlo preprocessor code.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.598297
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9682205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80033595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-8f45527a1ff95137ce73ff45f1aaef91df709acdc4f4ef082753100c4409a4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vFSEUhonR1Gs18Q-YsDI2cephgM6wNDd-JW10cfcTBg4phhlGYGy694fLdW50VVck73l4DryEvGRwyRjr37FLqfpWdY_IrhUdb0QL6jHZASjRtALkU_Is5-8AcMUlnJEzddW3Lcgd-XW4Repn6xOaQteMNDq6P9B5nUZMmZZIMRc9Bp9v6aQLJq8DXVJcMBWPmc6IFi11MdGbOBeke51CpEYHswZdfJyPRhur2fpckh_XY5jrUrrUOc4lPydPnA4ZX5zOc3L4-OGw_9xcf_30Zf_-ujFCqK7pnZCy7TRzTknGO4MddzVzTGt0ilnXgdLGGuEEOujbTnIGUC_XWIz8nLzetPX5P9b6rWHy2WAIesa45qEH4FwqWcE3G2hSzDmhG5bkJ53uBwbDse-BDVvfFX11cq7jhPYveCq4zt9u8zsf8P5Bz3Dz7aS72PBsfPnT3v9WP8j-jOmferGO_wbgBqXW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80033595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>du Plessis, F. C. P. ; Willemse, C. A. ; Lötter, M. G. ; Goedhals, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>du Plessis, F. C. P. ; Willemse, C. A. ; Lötter, M. G. ; Goedhals, L.</creatorcontrib><description>A number of Monte Carlo codes are available, which can be used to calculate dose distributions in patients with high accuracy. Patient geometry can readily be derived with adequate spatial resolution from CT scans. To perform the Monte Carlo calculation with the same spatial resolution, it is necessary to enter the atomic composition and density of the tissue in each voxel of the CT image. This means entering 65 536 discrete values for a CT slice with a 256 × 256 matrix size. The need for automated methods of setting up the material data files is obvious. Because there is no direct unique relationship between CT numbers and material composition, the aim of our work was to devise a method whereby the atomic composition and density in each voxel could be assigned automatically by indirect derivation from the CT numbers. The set of all tissues types in the human body was divided into subsets that are dosimetrically equivalent, based on Monte Carlo calculated depth dose curves in homogeneous phantoms of each tissue. CT number ranges corresponding to each tissue subset were determined from the calibration curve linking electron density with CT number for the specific CT scanner. Further subdivision was found to be necessary for the lung and bone type tissues. This was done by keeping the atomic composition constant and varying the physical density. It was found that 57 distinct tissue subsets were needed to represent the 16 main tissue types in the body at a 1% dose level. Corresponding CT number intervals of 30 HU were needed in the lung and soft tissue region, whereas in the bone region the intervals could be increased to 100 HU. A computer algorithm was set up to convert automatically from CT number to corresponding equivalent material number for the Monte Carlo preprocessor code.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598297</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9682205</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>87.53.01 ; 87.56.05 ; Algorithms ; bone ; calibration ; Computed radiography ; Computed tomography ; Computer Simulation ; computerised tomography ; CT number ; Distribution theory and Monte Carlo studies ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Humans ; lung ; Lungs ; Materials physicists ; Materials properties ; Medical image spatial resolution ; Medical imaging ; Monte Carlo ; Monte Carlo algorithms ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; patient dose distributions ; Phantoms, Imaging ; radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage - standards ; Spatial resolution ; tissue composition ; Tissue Distribution - radiation effects ; Tissues ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 1998-07, Vol.25 (7), p.1195-1201</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-8f45527a1ff95137ce73ff45f1aaef91df709acdc4f4ef082753100c4409a4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-8f45527a1ff95137ce73ff45f1aaef91df709acdc4f4ef082753100c4409a4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.598297$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.598297$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9682205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>du Plessis, F. C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lötter, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goedhals, L.</creatorcontrib><title>The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>A number of Monte Carlo codes are available, which can be used to calculate dose distributions in patients with high accuracy. Patient geometry can readily be derived with adequate spatial resolution from CT scans. To perform the Monte Carlo calculation with the same spatial resolution, it is necessary to enter the atomic composition and density of the tissue in each voxel of the CT image. This means entering 65 536 discrete values for a CT slice with a 256 × 256 matrix size. The need for automated methods of setting up the material data files is obvious. Because there is no direct unique relationship between CT numbers and material composition, the aim of our work was to devise a method whereby the atomic composition and density in each voxel could be assigned automatically by indirect derivation from the CT numbers. The set of all tissues types in the human body was divided into subsets that are dosimetrically equivalent, based on Monte Carlo calculated depth dose curves in homogeneous phantoms of each tissue. CT number ranges corresponding to each tissue subset were determined from the calibration curve linking electron density with CT number for the specific CT scanner. Further subdivision was found to be necessary for the lung and bone type tissues. This was done by keeping the atomic composition constant and varying the physical density. It was found that 57 distinct tissue subsets were needed to represent the 16 main tissue types in the body at a 1% dose level. Corresponding CT number intervals of 30 HU were needed in the lung and soft tissue region, whereas in the bone region the intervals could be increased to 100 HU. A computer algorithm was set up to convert automatically from CT number to corresponding equivalent material number for the Monte Carlo preprocessor code.</description><subject>87.53.01</subject><subject>87.56.05</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>Computed radiography</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>CT number</subject><subject>Distribution theory and Monte Carlo studies</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Materials physicists</subject><subject>Materials properties</subject><subject>Medical image spatial resolution</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Monte Carlo algorithms</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>patient dose distributions</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>tissue composition</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution - radiation effects</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vFSEUhonR1Gs18Q-YsDI2cephgM6wNDd-JW10cfcTBg4phhlGYGy694fLdW50VVck73l4DryEvGRwyRjr37FLqfpWdY_IrhUdb0QL6jHZASjRtALkU_Is5-8AcMUlnJEzddW3Lcgd-XW4Repn6xOaQteMNDq6P9B5nUZMmZZIMRc9Bp9v6aQLJq8DXVJcMBWPmc6IFi11MdGbOBeke51CpEYHswZdfJyPRhur2fpckh_XY5jrUrrUOc4lPydPnA4ZX5zOc3L4-OGw_9xcf_30Zf_-ujFCqK7pnZCy7TRzTknGO4MddzVzTGt0ilnXgdLGGuEEOujbTnIGUC_XWIz8nLzetPX5P9b6rWHy2WAIesa45qEH4FwqWcE3G2hSzDmhG5bkJ53uBwbDse-BDVvfFX11cq7jhPYveCq4zt9u8zsf8P5Bz3Dz7aS72PBsfPnT3v9WP8j-jOmferGO_wbgBqXW</recordid><startdate>199807</startdate><enddate>199807</enddate><creator>du Plessis, F. C. P.</creator><creator>Willemse, C. A.</creator><creator>Lötter, M. G.</creator><creator>Goedhals, L.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199807</creationdate><title>The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients</title><author>du Plessis, F. C. P. ; Willemse, C. A. ; Lötter, M. G. ; Goedhals, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4497-8f45527a1ff95137ce73ff45f1aaef91df709acdc4f4ef082753100c4409a4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>87.53.01</topic><topic>87.56.05</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>Computed radiography</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>CT number</topic><topic>Distribution theory and Monte Carlo studies</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Materials physicists</topic><topic>Materials properties</topic><topic>Medical image spatial resolution</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Monte Carlo algorithms</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>patient dose distributions</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>tissue composition</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution - radiation effects</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>du Plessis, F. C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemse, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lötter, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goedhals, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>du Plessis, F. C. P.</au><au>Willemse, C. A.</au><au>Lötter, M. G.</au><au>Goedhals, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>1998-07</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1195</spage><epage>1201</epage><pages>1195-1201</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>A number of Monte Carlo codes are available, which can be used to calculate dose distributions in patients with high accuracy. Patient geometry can readily be derived with adequate spatial resolution from CT scans. To perform the Monte Carlo calculation with the same spatial resolution, it is necessary to enter the atomic composition and density of the tissue in each voxel of the CT image. This means entering 65 536 discrete values for a CT slice with a 256 × 256 matrix size. The need for automated methods of setting up the material data files is obvious. Because there is no direct unique relationship between CT numbers and material composition, the aim of our work was to devise a method whereby the atomic composition and density in each voxel could be assigned automatically by indirect derivation from the CT numbers. The set of all tissues types in the human body was divided into subsets that are dosimetrically equivalent, based on Monte Carlo calculated depth dose curves in homogeneous phantoms of each tissue. CT number ranges corresponding to each tissue subset were determined from the calibration curve linking electron density with CT number for the specific CT scanner. Further subdivision was found to be necessary for the lung and bone type tissues. This was done by keeping the atomic composition constant and varying the physical density. It was found that 57 distinct tissue subsets were needed to represent the 16 main tissue types in the body at a 1% dose level. Corresponding CT number intervals of 30 HU were needed in the lung and soft tissue region, whereas in the bone region the intervals could be increased to 100 HU. A computer algorithm was set up to convert automatically from CT number to corresponding equivalent material number for the Monte Carlo preprocessor code.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>9682205</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598297</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 1998-07, Vol.25 (7), p.1195-1201
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_9682205
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 87.53.01
87.56.05
Algorithms
bone
calibration
Computed radiography
Computed tomography
Computer Simulation
computerised tomography
CT number
Distribution theory and Monte Carlo studies
dosimetry
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
Humans
lung
Lungs
Materials physicists
Materials properties
Medical image spatial resolution
Medical imaging
Monte Carlo
Monte Carlo algorithms
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo methods
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
patient dose distributions
Phantoms, Imaging
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy Dosage - standards
Spatial resolution
tissue composition
Tissue Distribution - radiation effects
Tissues
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data
title The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20indirect%20use%20of%20CT%20numbers%20to%20establish%20material%20properties%20needed%20for%20Monte%20Carlo%20calculation%20of%20dose%20distributions%20in%20patients&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=du%20Plessis,%20F.%20C.%20P.&rft.date=1998-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1195&rft.epage=1201&rft.pages=1195-1201&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E80033595%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80033595&rft_id=info:pmid/9682205&rfr_iscdi=true