Calcium channel blockers and the risk of cancer : A preclinical assessment
The preclinical evidence for a potential influence of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on carcinogenesis is discussed in the light of a broad database from rodent carcinogenicity studies as well as literature data. In all bioassays performed in rats and mice on the dihydropyridine CCBs--nifedipine, n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cardiovascular drugs and therapy 1998-05, Vol.12 (2), p.157-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | Cardiovascular drugs and therapy |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | AHR, H. J BOMHARD, E ENZMANN, H KARBE, E MAGER, H SANDER, E SCHLÜTER, G |
description | The preclinical evidence for a potential influence of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on carcinogenesis is discussed in the light of a broad database from rodent carcinogenicity studies as well as literature data. In all bioassays performed in rats and mice on the dihydropyridine CCBs--nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine, and nitrendipine--no evidence was found for a carcinogenic potential of these compounds. Calcium is an essential intracellular signal for cell proliferation and apoptosis. The crucial role of increased cell proliferation in all stages of carcinogenesis is well documented. Some indirect experimental evidence also points to a role of defective apoptosis in tumor promotion. CCBs uniformly inhibit cell proliferation, whereas the influence of CCBs on apoptosis is inconsistent, resulting in an inhibition or increase in apoptosis dependent on cell type. Accordingly, antitumorigenic effects of CCBs have been reported based on their antiproliferative action. A tumor-promoting effect of CCBs based on inhibition of apoptosis, however, remains purely speculative and, in fact, can be denied based on the results of in vivo bioassays. It is therefore concluded that there is no preclinical evidence that should give rise to concern over the carcinogenic potential of dihydropyridine-type CCBs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1007727010076 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9652874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9652874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-e39a92be95a05b5661e3d3727a11579c23d789390b2c8911023ba3df72bf6f323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jz1PwzAURS0EKqEwMyF5YA3Y7yV23C2q-FQlFpirZ8dRQ5M0stOBf08qIqY73Kurcxi7leJBCsDHciWF0Bq0OKU6Y4nMNaYaMnnOEmFApAhCXbKrGL_FNDGmWLCFUTkUOkvY-5pa1xw77nbU977ltj24vQ-RU1_xced5aOKeH2ruqHc-8BUv-RC8a5u-cdRyitHH2Pl-vGYXNbXR38y5ZF_PT5_r13Tz8fK2LjfpAJiPqUdDBqw3OYnc5kpJjxVOBiQndOMAK10YNMKCK4w8WVrCqtZga1Uj4JLd_f0OR9v5ajuEpqPws52dpv5-7ilOhHWYwJv4PwPMFBQCfwH161kj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calcium channel blockers and the risk of cancer : A preclinical assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>AHR, H. J ; BOMHARD, E ; ENZMANN, H ; KARBE, E ; MAGER, H ; SANDER, E ; SCHLÜTER, G</creator><creatorcontrib>AHR, H. J ; BOMHARD, E ; ENZMANN, H ; KARBE, E ; MAGER, H ; SANDER, E ; SCHLÜTER, G</creatorcontrib><description>The preclinical evidence for a potential influence of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on carcinogenesis is discussed in the light of a broad database from rodent carcinogenicity studies as well as literature data. In all bioassays performed in rats and mice on the dihydropyridine CCBs--nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine, and nitrendipine--no evidence was found for a carcinogenic potential of these compounds. Calcium is an essential intracellular signal for cell proliferation and apoptosis. The crucial role of increased cell proliferation in all stages of carcinogenesis is well documented. Some indirect experimental evidence also points to a role of defective apoptosis in tumor promotion. CCBs uniformly inhibit cell proliferation, whereas the influence of CCBs on apoptosis is inconsistent, resulting in an inhibition or increase in apoptosis dependent on cell type. Accordingly, antitumorigenic effects of CCBs have been reported based on their antiproliferative action. A tumor-promoting effect of CCBs based on inhibition of apoptosis, however, remains purely speculative and, in fact, can be denied based on the results of in vivo bioassays. It is therefore concluded that there is no preclinical evidence that should give rise to concern over the carcinogenic potential of dihydropyridine-type CCBs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-3206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1007727010076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9652874</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CDTHET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Calcium Channel Blockers - blood ; Calcium Channel Blockers - toxicity ; Calcium Channel Blockers - urine ; Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens ; Carcinogens - toxicity ; Diet ; Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment ; Female ; Foods and miscellaneous ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...) ; Neoplasms, Experimental - chemically induced ; Neoplasms, Experimental - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Experimental - pathology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Risk Assessment ; Time Factors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 1998-05, Vol.12 (2), p.157-169</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2346280$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9652874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AHR, H. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOMHARD, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENZMANN, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARBE, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGER, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANDER, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLÜTER, G</creatorcontrib><title>Calcium channel blockers and the risk of cancer : A preclinical assessment</title><title>Cardiovascular drugs and therapy</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Drugs Ther</addtitle><description>The preclinical evidence for a potential influence of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on carcinogenesis is discussed in the light of a broad database from rodent carcinogenicity studies as well as literature data. In all bioassays performed in rats and mice on the dihydropyridine CCBs--nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine, and nitrendipine--no evidence was found for a carcinogenic potential of these compounds. Calcium is an essential intracellular signal for cell proliferation and apoptosis. The crucial role of increased cell proliferation in all stages of carcinogenesis is well documented. Some indirect experimental evidence also points to a role of defective apoptosis in tumor promotion. CCBs uniformly inhibit cell proliferation, whereas the influence of CCBs on apoptosis is inconsistent, resulting in an inhibition or increase in apoptosis dependent on cell type. Accordingly, antitumorigenic effects of CCBs have been reported based on their antiproliferative action. A tumor-promoting effect of CCBs based on inhibition of apoptosis, however, remains purely speculative and, in fact, can be denied based on the results of in vivo bioassays. It is therefore concluded that there is no preclinical evidence that should give rise to concern over the carcinogenic potential of dihydropyridine-type CCBs.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calcium Channel Blockers - blood</subject><subject>Calcium Channel Blockers - toxicity</subject><subject>Calcium Channel Blockers - urine</subject><subject>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</subject><subject>Carcinogens - toxicity</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foods and miscellaneous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...)</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Experimental - chemically induced</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Experimental - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Experimental - pathology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0920-3206</issn><issn>1573-7241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jz1PwzAURS0EKqEwMyF5YA3Y7yV23C2q-FQlFpirZ8dRQ5M0stOBf08qIqY73Kurcxi7leJBCsDHciWF0Bq0OKU6Y4nMNaYaMnnOEmFApAhCXbKrGL_FNDGmWLCFUTkUOkvY-5pa1xw77nbU977ltj24vQ-RU1_xced5aOKeH2ruqHc-8BUv-RC8a5u-cdRyitHH2Pl-vGYXNbXR38y5ZF_PT5_r13Tz8fK2LjfpAJiPqUdDBqw3OYnc5kpJjxVOBiQndOMAK10YNMKCK4w8WVrCqtZga1Uj4JLd_f0OR9v5ajuEpqPws52dpv5-7ilOhHWYwJv4PwPMFBQCfwH161kj</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>AHR, H. J</creator><creator>BOMHARD, E</creator><creator>ENZMANN, H</creator><creator>KARBE, E</creator><creator>MAGER, H</creator><creator>SANDER, E</creator><creator>SCHLÜTER, G</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Calcium channel blockers and the risk of cancer : A preclinical assessment</title><author>AHR, H. J ; BOMHARD, E ; ENZMANN, H ; KARBE, E ; MAGER, H ; SANDER, E ; SCHLÜTER, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p235t-e39a92be95a05b5661e3d3727a11579c23d789390b2c8911023ba3df72bf6f323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calcium Channel Blockers - blood</topic><topic>Calcium Channel Blockers - toxicity</topic><topic>Calcium Channel Blockers - urine</topic><topic>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</topic><topic>Carcinogens - toxicity</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foods and miscellaneous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...)</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Experimental - chemically induced</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Experimental - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Experimental - pathology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AHR, H. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOMHARD, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENZMANN, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARBE, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGER, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANDER, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHLÜTER, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular drugs and therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AHR, H. J</au><au>BOMHARD, E</au><au>ENZMANN, H</au><au>KARBE, E</au><au>MAGER, H</au><au>SANDER, E</au><au>SCHLÜTER, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calcium channel blockers and the risk of cancer : A preclinical assessment</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular drugs and therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Drugs Ther</addtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>157-169</pages><issn>0920-3206</issn><eissn>1573-7241</eissn><coden>CDTHET</coden><abstract>The preclinical evidence for a potential influence of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on carcinogenesis is discussed in the light of a broad database from rodent carcinogenicity studies as well as literature data. In all bioassays performed in rats and mice on the dihydropyridine CCBs--nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine, and nitrendipine--no evidence was found for a carcinogenic potential of these compounds. Calcium is an essential intracellular signal for cell proliferation and apoptosis. The crucial role of increased cell proliferation in all stages of carcinogenesis is well documented. Some indirect experimental evidence also points to a role of defective apoptosis in tumor promotion. CCBs uniformly inhibit cell proliferation, whereas the influence of CCBs on apoptosis is inconsistent, resulting in an inhibition or increase in apoptosis dependent on cell type. Accordingly, antitumorigenic effects of CCBs have been reported based on their antiproliferative action. A tumor-promoting effect of CCBs based on inhibition of apoptosis, however, remains purely speculative and, in fact, can be denied based on the results of in vivo bioassays. It is therefore concluded that there is no preclinical evidence that should give rise to concern over the carcinogenic potential of dihydropyridine-type CCBs.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>9652874</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1007727010076</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-3206 |
ispartof | Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 1998-05, Vol.12 (2), p.157-169 |
issn | 0920-3206 1573-7241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_9652874 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Calcium Channel Blockers - blood Calcium Channel Blockers - toxicity Calcium Channel Blockers - urine Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens Carcinogens - toxicity Diet Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment Female Foods and miscellaneous Male Medical sciences Mice Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...) Neoplasms, Experimental - chemically induced Neoplasms, Experimental - epidemiology Neoplasms, Experimental - pathology Pharmacology. Drug treatments Rats Rats, Wistar Risk Assessment Time Factors Tumors |
title | Calcium channel blockers and the risk of cancer : A preclinical assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calcium%20channel%20blockers%20and%20the%20risk%20of%20cancer%20:%20A%20preclinical%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20drugs%20and%20therapy&rft.au=AHR,%20H.%20J&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=157-169&rft.issn=0920-3206&rft.eissn=1573-7241&rft.coden=CDTHET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1007727010076&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_pasca%3E9652874%3C/pubmed_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9652874&rfr_iscdi=true |