On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy

Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 1998-05, Vol.25 (5), p.668-675
Hauptverfasser: Jiang, Steve B., Ayyangar, Komanduri M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 675
container_issue 5
container_start_page 668
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 25
creator Jiang, Steve B.
Ayyangar, Komanduri M.
description Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.598250
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9608477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79908052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2430-8ba5ae99afbdd9debd8c01da679a1fcf53b37e63c8be90a84ed425101cff7f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo67oKfgGhJ0Gw60ubtMlRFv_hynrQc0mbxI20SW1Spd_eLrvoSU_zYH4z8AahUwxzjDG7wnPKWUJhD00TkqcxSYDvoykAJ3FCgB6iI-_fASBLKUzQhGfASJ5P0ePKRpVrWmW9CK6LpPLmzUZ6PNu1C85GpRJNZGwYCROGuHGyr0VQcozZEWtEHYW16kQ7HKMDLWqvTnY6Q6-3Ny-L-3i5untYXC_jNiEpxKwUVCjOhS6l5FKVklWApchyLrCuNE3LNFdZWrFScRCMKEkSigFXWuc64-kMnW9728599MqHojG-UnUtrHK9L3LOgQFNRvBsB_Zlo2TRdqYR3VDsvh_9y63_ZWo1_NgYis2oBS62oxZPzxsZ8Yst7isTRDDO_hn5j_103W91K3X6DeUnhcY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79908052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jiang, Steve B. ; Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B. ; Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creatorcontrib><description>Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598250</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9608477</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>87.53.02 ; 87.53.10.h ; 87.54.02 ; biomedical equipment ; Calibration ; compensator ; conformal therapy ; Contaminants ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Drug delivery ; Electron scattering ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; intensity modulation ; Models, Theoretical ; Monte Carlo ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Particle Accelerators ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photon scattering ; Photons ; radiation therapy ; Radiation therapy equipment ; Radiotherapy - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy - methods ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Statistical properties ; Surface hardening ; Surface scattering</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 1998-05, Vol.25 (5), p.668-675</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.598250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.598250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9608477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creatorcontrib><title>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons.</description><subject>87.53.02</subject><subject>87.53.10.h</subject><subject>87.54.02</subject><subject>biomedical equipment</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>compensator</subject><subject>conformal therapy</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Drug delivery</subject><subject>Electron scattering</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>intensity modulation</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photon scattering</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy equipment</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Statistical properties</subject><subject>Surface hardening</subject><subject>Surface scattering</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo67oKfgGhJ0Gw60ubtMlRFv_hynrQc0mbxI20SW1Spd_eLrvoSU_zYH4z8AahUwxzjDG7wnPKWUJhD00TkqcxSYDvoykAJ3FCgB6iI-_fASBLKUzQhGfASJ5P0ePKRpVrWmW9CK6LpPLmzUZ6PNu1C85GpRJNZGwYCROGuHGyr0VQcozZEWtEHYW16kQ7HKMDLWqvTnY6Q6-3Ny-L-3i5untYXC_jNiEpxKwUVCjOhS6l5FKVklWApchyLrCuNE3LNFdZWrFScRCMKEkSigFXWuc64-kMnW9728599MqHojG-UnUtrHK9L3LOgQFNRvBsB_Zlo2TRdqYR3VDsvh_9y63_ZWo1_NgYis2oBS62oxZPzxsZ8Yst7isTRDDO_hn5j_103W91K3X6DeUnhcY</recordid><startdate>199805</startdate><enddate>199805</enddate><creator>Jiang, Steve B.</creator><creator>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199805</creationdate><title>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</title><author>Jiang, Steve B. ; Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2430-8ba5ae99afbdd9debd8c01da679a1fcf53b37e63c8be90a84ed425101cff7f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>87.53.02</topic><topic>87.53.10.h</topic><topic>87.54.02</topic><topic>biomedical equipment</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>compensator</topic><topic>conformal therapy</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Drug delivery</topic><topic>Electron scattering</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>intensity modulation</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photon scattering</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy equipment</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Statistical properties</topic><topic>Surface hardening</topic><topic>Surface scattering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Steve B.</au><au>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>1998-05</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>668</spage><epage>675</epage><pages>668-675</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>9608477</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598250</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 1998-05, Vol.25 (5), p.668-675
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_9608477
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 87.53.02
87.53.10.h
87.54.02
biomedical equipment
Calibration
compensator
conformal therapy
Contaminants
dosimetry
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
Drug delivery
Electron scattering
Equipment Design
Humans
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
intensity modulation
Models, Theoretical
Monte Carlo
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo methods
Particle Accelerators
Phantoms, Imaging
Photon scattering
Photons
radiation therapy
Radiation therapy equipment
Radiotherapy - instrumentation
Radiotherapy - methods
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Statistical properties
Surface hardening
Surface scattering
title On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20compensator%20design%20for%20photon%20beam%20intensity-modulated%20conformal%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Jiang,%20Steve%20B.&rft.date=1998-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=668&rft.epage=675&rft.pages=668-675&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79908052%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79908052&rft_id=info:pmid/9608477&rfr_iscdi=true