On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy
Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 1998-05, Vol.25 (5), p.668-675 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 675 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 668 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Jiang, Steve B. Ayyangar, Komanduri M. |
description | Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.598250 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9608477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79908052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2430-8ba5ae99afbdd9debd8c01da679a1fcf53b37e63c8be90a84ed425101cff7f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo67oKfgGhJ0Gw60ubtMlRFv_hynrQc0mbxI20SW1Spd_eLrvoSU_zYH4z8AahUwxzjDG7wnPKWUJhD00TkqcxSYDvoykAJ3FCgB6iI-_fASBLKUzQhGfASJ5P0ePKRpVrWmW9CK6LpPLmzUZ6PNu1C85GpRJNZGwYCROGuHGyr0VQcozZEWtEHYW16kQ7HKMDLWqvTnY6Q6-3Ny-L-3i5untYXC_jNiEpxKwUVCjOhS6l5FKVklWApchyLrCuNE3LNFdZWrFScRCMKEkSigFXWuc64-kMnW9728599MqHojG-UnUtrHK9L3LOgQFNRvBsB_Zlo2TRdqYR3VDsvh_9y63_ZWo1_NgYis2oBS62oxZPzxsZ8Yst7isTRDDO_hn5j_103W91K3X6DeUnhcY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79908052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jiang, Steve B. ; Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B. ; Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creatorcontrib><description>Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598250</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9608477</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>87.53.02 ; 87.53.10.h ; 87.54.02 ; biomedical equipment ; Calibration ; compensator ; conformal therapy ; Contaminants ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Drug delivery ; Electron scattering ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; intensity modulation ; Models, Theoretical ; Monte Carlo ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Particle Accelerators ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photon scattering ; Photons ; radiation therapy ; Radiation therapy equipment ; Radiotherapy - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy - methods ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Statistical properties ; Surface hardening ; Surface scattering</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 1998-05, Vol.25 (5), p.668-675</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.598250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.598250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9608477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creatorcontrib><title>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons.</description><subject>87.53.02</subject><subject>87.53.10.h</subject><subject>87.54.02</subject><subject>biomedical equipment</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>compensator</subject><subject>conformal therapy</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Drug delivery</subject><subject>Electron scattering</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>intensity modulation</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photon scattering</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy equipment</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Statistical properties</subject><subject>Surface hardening</subject><subject>Surface scattering</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMo67oKfgGhJ0Gw60ubtMlRFv_hynrQc0mbxI20SW1Spd_eLrvoSU_zYH4z8AahUwxzjDG7wnPKWUJhD00TkqcxSYDvoykAJ3FCgB6iI-_fASBLKUzQhGfASJ5P0ePKRpVrWmW9CK6LpPLmzUZ6PNu1C85GpRJNZGwYCROGuHGyr0VQcozZEWtEHYW16kQ7HKMDLWqvTnY6Q6-3Ny-L-3i5untYXC_jNiEpxKwUVCjOhS6l5FKVklWApchyLrCuNE3LNFdZWrFScRCMKEkSigFXWuc64-kMnW9728599MqHojG-UnUtrHK9L3LOgQFNRvBsB_Zlo2TRdqYR3VDsvh_9y63_ZWo1_NgYis2oBS62oxZPzxsZ8Yst7isTRDDO_hn5j_103W91K3X6DeUnhcY</recordid><startdate>199805</startdate><enddate>199805</enddate><creator>Jiang, Steve B.</creator><creator>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199805</creationdate><title>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</title><author>Jiang, Steve B. ; Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2430-8ba5ae99afbdd9debd8c01da679a1fcf53b37e63c8be90a84ed425101cff7f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>87.53.02</topic><topic>87.53.10.h</topic><topic>87.54.02</topic><topic>biomedical equipment</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>compensator</topic><topic>conformal therapy</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Drug delivery</topic><topic>Electron scattering</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>intensity modulation</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photon scattering</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy equipment</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Statistical properties</topic><topic>Surface hardening</topic><topic>Surface scattering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Steve B.</au><au>Ayyangar, Komanduri M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>1998-05</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>668</spage><epage>675</epage><pages>668-675</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Recently the compensator has been shown to be an inexpensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient’s surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the optimal compensator thickness profile from an optimized primary fluence profile. The change of characteristics of a 6 MV beam caused by the introduction of cerrobend compensators in the beam is investigated using OMEGA Monte Carlo codes. It is found that the compensator significantly changes the energy spectrum and the mean energy of the primary photons at the patient’s surface. However, beam hardening does not have as significant an effect on the percent depth dose as it does on the energy spectrum. We conclude that in most situations the beam hardening effect can be ignored during compensator design and dose calculation. The influence of the compensator on the contaminant electron buildup dose is found to be small and independent of the compensator thickness of interest. Therefore, it can be ignored in the compensator design and included as a correction into the final dose distribution. The scattered photons from the compensator are found to have no effect on the surface dose. These photons produce a uniform low fluence distribution at the patient’s surface, which is independent of compensator shape. This is also true for very large fields and extremely asymmetric and nonuniform compensator thickness profiles. Compared to the primary photons, the scattered photons have much larger angular spread and similar energy spectrum at the patient’s surface. These characteristics allow the compensator thickness profile and the dose distribution to be calculated from the optimized fluence profile of primary photons, without considering the scattered photons.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>9608477</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598250</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 1998-05, Vol.25 (5), p.668-675 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_9608477 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 87.53.02 87.53.10.h 87.54.02 biomedical equipment Calibration compensator conformal therapy Contaminants dosimetry Dosimetry/exposure assessment Drug delivery Electron scattering Equipment Design Humans Intensity modulated radiation therapy intensity modulation Models, Theoretical Monte Carlo Monte Carlo Method Monte Carlo methods Particle Accelerators Phantoms, Imaging Photon scattering Photons radiation therapy Radiation therapy equipment Radiotherapy - instrumentation Radiotherapy - methods Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Statistical properties Surface hardening Surface scattering |
title | On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20compensator%20design%20for%20photon%20beam%20intensity-modulated%20conformal%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Jiang,%20Steve%20B.&rft.date=1998-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=668&rft.epage=675&rft.pages=668-675&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79908052%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79908052&rft_id=info:pmid/9608477&rfr_iscdi=true |