An initially double-blind controlled 96 week trial of depot methylprednisolone against oral prednisolone in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica

The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate (i.m. MP) with oral prednisolone (OP) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a common steroid-treated illness where prolonged therapy can lead to steroid side-effects. The cumulative dose with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of rheumatology 1998-02, Vol.37 (2), p.189-195
Hauptverfasser: DASGUPTA, B, DOLAN, A. L, PANAYI, G. S, FERNANDES, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 195
container_issue 2
container_start_page 189
container_title British journal of rheumatology
container_volume 37
creator DASGUPTA, B
DOLAN, A. L
PANAYI, G. S
FERNANDES, L
description The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate (i.m. MP) with oral prednisolone (OP) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a common steroid-treated illness where prolonged therapy can lead to steroid side-effects. The cumulative dose with i.m. MP injections given every 3-4 weeks is considerably smaller than that with conventional OP, and may therefore be associated with fewer long-term side-effects. A hybrid design was used with an initial 12 week double-blind placebo-controlled phase followed by an open phase on active treatment up to 96 weeks. The study was multicentre hospital out-patient based and included 60 patients with untreated PMR. In the double-blind phase, either 120 mg 3-weekly i.m. MP or gradually tapering daily OP (initial dose 15 mg) were administered. In the open phase, subjects continued their active treatment with gradual tapering of the steroid dosage. The remission rate at 12, 48 and 96 weeks, and other measures of disease activity, i.e. sedimentation rate, pain and morning stiffness, and percentage of adverse reactions and serious complications such as fractures, were the main outcome measures. Sixty patients entered (30 OP:30 i.m. MP) and 49 (25 OP:24 i.m. MP) completed the study. There were similar remission rates after the double-blind phase (60.6% OP and 66.6% i.m. MP, respectively) and similar disease control in the succeeding open phase. With steroid tapering, the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the entire cohort registered a significant increase in the absence of an increase in symptoms. At 96 weeks, the cumulative mean steroid dose in subjects treated with i.m. MP was equivalent to 56% that of subjects treated with OP. There were eight fractures with OP compared to one on i.m. MP. Mean weight gain was significantly greater with OP than i.m. MP (3.42 vs 0.82 kg, P < 0.005). Minor adverse reactions were similar in both groups apart from slightly increased bruising with i.m. MP. Only patients on OP reported moon face, hypertension, cataracts, back pain and depression, but the numbers were small. It is possible to achieve equivalent long-term disease control in PMR with i.m. MP compared to OP. I.m. MP was associated with far fewer fractures and lesser weight gain, presumably related to lower cumulative dose. These findings may have implications in the steroid treatment of PMR, and other rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9569075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9569075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p150t-b3c6bf5071539e170788edbbfc6f29f0f1c6bd943a5828f22521246a4a01f4ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtKxDAYRoMo4zj6CEIWbgu5NGm7HAZvMOBG18Pf5s9MNE1KmkH6HL6wFQfB1bc4h7P4zsiSl5oVglfinCyZ0LKoOJOX5Goc3xljUnKxIItG6YZVakm-1oG64LID7ydq4rH1WLTeBUO7GHKK3qOhjaafiB80p9mj0VKDQ8y0x3yY_JDQBDdGHwNS2IMLY6YxzeI_4gLNB5wTCLnHkH8yQ_RTP4HfO6DpgMcesuvgmlxY8CPenHZF3h7uXzdPxfbl8Xmz3hYDVywXrex0axWruJIN8opVdY2mbW2nrWgss3zmpiklqFrUVggluCg1lMC4LbGTK3L72x2ObY9mNyTXQ5p2p3NmfnfiMHbgbYLQufFPE7zmTVXLb7excgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An initially double-blind controlled 96 week trial of depot methylprednisolone against oral prednisolone in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>DASGUPTA, B ; DOLAN, A. L ; PANAYI, G. S ; FERNANDES, L</creator><creatorcontrib>DASGUPTA, B ; DOLAN, A. L ; PANAYI, G. S ; FERNANDES, L</creatorcontrib><description>The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate (i.m. MP) with oral prednisolone (OP) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a common steroid-treated illness where prolonged therapy can lead to steroid side-effects. The cumulative dose with i.m. MP injections given every 3-4 weeks is considerably smaller than that with conventional OP, and may therefore be associated with fewer long-term side-effects. A hybrid design was used with an initial 12 week double-blind placebo-controlled phase followed by an open phase on active treatment up to 96 weeks. The study was multicentre hospital out-patient based and included 60 patients with untreated PMR. In the double-blind phase, either 120 mg 3-weekly i.m. MP or gradually tapering daily OP (initial dose 15 mg) were administered. In the open phase, subjects continued their active treatment with gradual tapering of the steroid dosage. The remission rate at 12, 48 and 96 weeks, and other measures of disease activity, i.e. sedimentation rate, pain and morning stiffness, and percentage of adverse reactions and serious complications such as fractures, were the main outcome measures. Sixty patients entered (30 OP:30 i.m. MP) and 49 (25 OP:24 i.m. MP) completed the study. There were similar remission rates after the double-blind phase (60.6% OP and 66.6% i.m. MP, respectively) and similar disease control in the succeeding open phase. With steroid tapering, the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the entire cohort registered a significant increase in the absence of an increase in symptoms. At 96 weeks, the cumulative mean steroid dose in subjects treated with i.m. MP was equivalent to 56% that of subjects treated with OP. There were eight fractures with OP compared to one on i.m. MP. Mean weight gain was significantly greater with OP than i.m. MP (3.42 vs 0.82 kg, P &lt; 0.005). Minor adverse reactions were similar in both groups apart from slightly increased bruising with i.m. MP. Only patients on OP reported moon face, hypertension, cataracts, back pain and depression, but the numbers were small. It is possible to achieve equivalent long-term disease control in PMR with i.m. MP compared to OP. I.m. MP was associated with far fewer fractures and lesser weight gain, presumably related to lower cumulative dose. These findings may have implications in the steroid treatment of PMR, and other rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9569075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJRHDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents - adverse effects ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammatory joint diseases ; Injections, Intramuscular ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methylprednisolone - adverse effects ; Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use ; Polymyalgia Rheumatica - drug therapy ; Polymyalgia Rheumatica - physiopathology ; Prednisolone - adverse effects ; Prednisolone - therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Safety ; Severity of Illness Index ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of rheumatology, 1998-02, Vol.37 (2), p.189-195</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2181978$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9569075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DASGUPTA, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOLAN, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PANAYI, G. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERNANDES, L</creatorcontrib><title>An initially double-blind controlled 96 week trial of depot methylprednisolone against oral prednisolone in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica</title><title>British journal of rheumatology</title><addtitle>Br J Rheumatol</addtitle><description>The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate (i.m. MP) with oral prednisolone (OP) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a common steroid-treated illness where prolonged therapy can lead to steroid side-effects. The cumulative dose with i.m. MP injections given every 3-4 weeks is considerably smaller than that with conventional OP, and may therefore be associated with fewer long-term side-effects. A hybrid design was used with an initial 12 week double-blind placebo-controlled phase followed by an open phase on active treatment up to 96 weeks. The study was multicentre hospital out-patient based and included 60 patients with untreated PMR. In the double-blind phase, either 120 mg 3-weekly i.m. MP or gradually tapering daily OP (initial dose 15 mg) were administered. In the open phase, subjects continued their active treatment with gradual tapering of the steroid dosage. The remission rate at 12, 48 and 96 weeks, and other measures of disease activity, i.e. sedimentation rate, pain and morning stiffness, and percentage of adverse reactions and serious complications such as fractures, were the main outcome measures. Sixty patients entered (30 OP:30 i.m. MP) and 49 (25 OP:24 i.m. MP) completed the study. There were similar remission rates after the double-blind phase (60.6% OP and 66.6% i.m. MP, respectively) and similar disease control in the succeeding open phase. With steroid tapering, the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the entire cohort registered a significant increase in the absence of an increase in symptoms. At 96 weeks, the cumulative mean steroid dose in subjects treated with i.m. MP was equivalent to 56% that of subjects treated with OP. There were eight fractures with OP compared to one on i.m. MP. Mean weight gain was significantly greater with OP than i.m. MP (3.42 vs 0.82 kg, P &lt; 0.005). Minor adverse reactions were similar in both groups apart from slightly increased bruising with i.m. MP. Only patients on OP reported moon face, hypertension, cataracts, back pain and depression, but the numbers were small. It is possible to achieve equivalent long-term disease control in PMR with i.m. MP compared to OP. I.m. MP was associated with far fewer fractures and lesser weight gain, presumably related to lower cumulative dose. These findings may have implications in the steroid treatment of PMR, and other rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammatory joint diseases</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Polymyalgia Rheumatica - drug therapy</subject><subject>Polymyalgia Rheumatica - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prednisolone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prednisolone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0263-7103</issn><issn>1460-2172</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtKxDAYRoMo4zj6CEIWbgu5NGm7HAZvMOBG18Pf5s9MNE1KmkH6HL6wFQfB1bc4h7P4zsiSl5oVglfinCyZ0LKoOJOX5Goc3xljUnKxIItG6YZVakm-1oG64LID7ydq4rH1WLTeBUO7GHKK3qOhjaafiB80p9mj0VKDQ8y0x3yY_JDQBDdGHwNS2IMLY6YxzeI_4gLNB5wTCLnHkH8yQ_RTP4HfO6DpgMcesuvgmlxY8CPenHZF3h7uXzdPxfbl8Xmz3hYDVywXrex0axWruJIN8opVdY2mbW2nrWgss3zmpiklqFrUVggluCg1lMC4LbGTK3L72x2ObY9mNyTXQ5p2p3NmfnfiMHbgbYLQufFPE7zmTVXLb7excgg</recordid><startdate>199802</startdate><enddate>199802</enddate><creator>DASGUPTA, B</creator><creator>DOLAN, A. L</creator><creator>PANAYI, G. S</creator><creator>FERNANDES, L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199802</creationdate><title>An initially double-blind controlled 96 week trial of depot methylprednisolone against oral prednisolone in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica</title><author>DASGUPTA, B ; DOLAN, A. L ; PANAYI, G. S ; FERNANDES, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p150t-b3c6bf5071539e170788edbbfc6f29f0f1c6bd943a5828f22521246a4a01f4ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammatory joint diseases</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Polymyalgia Rheumatica - drug therapy</topic><topic>Polymyalgia Rheumatica - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prednisolone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prednisolone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DASGUPTA, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOLAN, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PANAYI, G. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERNANDES, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>British journal of rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DASGUPTA, B</au><au>DOLAN, A. L</au><au>PANAYI, G. S</au><au>FERNANDES, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An initially double-blind controlled 96 week trial of depot methylprednisolone against oral prednisolone in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica</atitle><jtitle>British journal of rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Rheumatol</addtitle><date>1998-02</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>189-195</pages><issn>0263-7103</issn><eissn>1460-2172</eissn><coden>BJRHDF</coden><abstract>The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate (i.m. MP) with oral prednisolone (OP) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a common steroid-treated illness where prolonged therapy can lead to steroid side-effects. The cumulative dose with i.m. MP injections given every 3-4 weeks is considerably smaller than that with conventional OP, and may therefore be associated with fewer long-term side-effects. A hybrid design was used with an initial 12 week double-blind placebo-controlled phase followed by an open phase on active treatment up to 96 weeks. The study was multicentre hospital out-patient based and included 60 patients with untreated PMR. In the double-blind phase, either 120 mg 3-weekly i.m. MP or gradually tapering daily OP (initial dose 15 mg) were administered. In the open phase, subjects continued their active treatment with gradual tapering of the steroid dosage. The remission rate at 12, 48 and 96 weeks, and other measures of disease activity, i.e. sedimentation rate, pain and morning stiffness, and percentage of adverse reactions and serious complications such as fractures, were the main outcome measures. Sixty patients entered (30 OP:30 i.m. MP) and 49 (25 OP:24 i.m. MP) completed the study. There were similar remission rates after the double-blind phase (60.6% OP and 66.6% i.m. MP, respectively) and similar disease control in the succeeding open phase. With steroid tapering, the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate for the entire cohort registered a significant increase in the absence of an increase in symptoms. At 96 weeks, the cumulative mean steroid dose in subjects treated with i.m. MP was equivalent to 56% that of subjects treated with OP. There were eight fractures with OP compared to one on i.m. MP. Mean weight gain was significantly greater with OP than i.m. MP (3.42 vs 0.82 kg, P &lt; 0.005). Minor adverse reactions were similar in both groups apart from slightly increased bruising with i.m. MP. Only patients on OP reported moon face, hypertension, cataracts, back pain and depression, but the numbers were small. It is possible to achieve equivalent long-term disease control in PMR with i.m. MP compared to OP. I.m. MP was associated with far fewer fractures and lesser weight gain, presumably related to lower cumulative dose. These findings may have implications in the steroid treatment of PMR, and other rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9569075</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-7103
ispartof British journal of rheumatology, 1998-02, Vol.37 (2), p.189-195
issn 0263-7103
1460-2172
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_9569075
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Administration, Oral
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Inflammatory Agents - adverse effects
Anti-Inflammatory Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Inflammatory joint diseases
Injections, Intramuscular
Male
Medical sciences
Methylprednisolone - adverse effects
Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use
Polymyalgia Rheumatica - drug therapy
Polymyalgia Rheumatica - physiopathology
Prednisolone - adverse effects
Prednisolone - therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Safety
Severity of Illness Index
Treatment Outcome
title An initially double-blind controlled 96 week trial of depot methylprednisolone against oral prednisolone in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A38%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20initially%20double-blind%20controlled%2096%20week%20trial%20of%20depot%20methylprednisolone%20against%20oral%20prednisolone%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20polymyalgia%20rheumatica&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20rheumatology&rft.au=DASGUPTA,%20B&rft.date=1998-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=189-195&rft.issn=0263-7103&rft.eissn=1460-2172&rft.coden=BJRHDF&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_pasca%3E9569075%3C/pubmed_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9569075&rfr_iscdi=true