Preferences by Northern Grasshopper Mice for Solutions of Sugars, Acids, and Salts in Richter-Type Drinking Tests
Taste preferences, as measured in 48-hour, Richter-type drinking tests (test solution opposite distilled water), were determined for northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster, ssp. breviauritus). The Ss were nine males and nine females which were individually housed within an environmental ch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of general psychology 1976-07, Vol.95 (1), p.85-92 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | The Journal of general psychology |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Harriman, Arthur E. |
description | Taste preferences, as measured in 48-hour, Richter-type drinking tests (test solution opposite distilled water), were determined for northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster, ssp. breviauritus). The Ss were nine males and nine females which were individually housed within an environmental chamber. The test solutions were prepared from five sugars (fructose, glucose, lactose, maltose, sucrose), three salts (magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, sodium chloride), and two acids (citric acid and hydrochloric acid). In randomly assigned order, each sugar and each salt solution was presented at five molar concentrations, and each acid was paired with distilled water at six levels of pH. Strong drinking preferences were shown for all concentrations of the sugars above .05−.10 M, and sugars ranked in order of preference as follows: Maltose = sucrose > glucose = fructose > lactose. Preferences were also shown for hypotonic concentrations of NaCl. The other salts and both acids, however, were indifferently preferred at low concentrations and were rejected at the higher concentrations. Taste preferences by grasshopper mice for these chemicals were similar to those exhibited by Mongolian gerbils tested with the same items. The similar patterns of preference shown by New World cricetid rodents (grasshopper mice) and Old World cricetid rodents (gerbils) suggest that conclusions concerning disparity in taste sensibilities among animal forms may be premature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00221309.1976.9710868 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_956793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290500858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-4a811fca2a7f624ddf7a7bda85482bb5dbce4c2743d8db0c959e5097f5b4db153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi3ELS28AUiWkFh1gj0ex_aOqkCLVC4iYW352rhM7Kk9oypvj0dJWbDo6uic852L_h-AtxgtMeLoA0JtiwkSSyzYailYLa74E7DAokMN4pw_BYuZaWboJTgp5RbNOSMvwHNBV0yQBbj7mZ132UXjCtR7-D3lcetyhJdZlbJNw-Ay_BaMgz5luE79NIYUC0werqcblcsZPDfB1qCihWvVjwWGCH8Fsx1dbjb7wcFPOcQ_Id7AjStjeQWeedUX9_oYT8HvL583F1fN9Y_Lrxfn140hiIxNpzjG3qhWMb9qO2s9U0xbxWnHW62p1cZ1pmUdsdxqZAQVjiLBPNWd1ZiSU_D-sHfI6W6ql-UuFOP6XkWXpiI56UTVj1Xw3X_gbZpyrL9J3ApEEeKUV4oeKJNTKVU0OeSwU3kvMZKzH_LBDzn7IY9-1Lk3x-2T3jn7b-pgQG1_PLRDrALv1H3KvZWj2vcp-6yiCUWSxy_8BftsmiI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290500858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferences by Northern Grasshopper Mice for Solutions of Sugars, Acids, and Salts in Richter-Type Drinking Tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Harriman, Arthur E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harriman, Arthur E.</creatorcontrib><description>Taste preferences, as measured in 48-hour, Richter-type drinking tests (test solution opposite distilled water), were determined for northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster, ssp. breviauritus). The Ss were nine males and nine females which were individually housed within an environmental chamber. The test solutions were prepared from five sugars (fructose, glucose, lactose, maltose, sucrose), three salts (magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, sodium chloride), and two acids (citric acid and hydrochloric acid). In randomly assigned order, each sugar and each salt solution was presented at five molar concentrations, and each acid was paired with distilled water at six levels of pH. Strong drinking preferences were shown for all concentrations of the sugars above .05−.10 M, and sugars ranked in order of preference as follows: Maltose = sucrose > glucose = fructose > lactose. Preferences were also shown for hypotonic concentrations of NaCl. The other salts and both acids, however, were indifferently preferred at low concentrations and were rejected at the higher concentrations. Taste preferences by grasshopper mice for these chemicals were similar to those exhibited by Mongolian gerbils tested with the same items. The similar patterns of preference shown by New World cricetid rodents (grasshopper mice) and Old World cricetid rodents (gerbils) suggest that conclusions concerning disparity in taste sensibilities among animal forms may be premature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1976.9710868</identifier><identifier>PMID: 956793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Acids ; Animals ; Carbohydrates ; Drinking Behavior - physiology ; Female ; Gerbillinae ; Male ; Mice - physiology ; Salts ; Species Specificity ; Taste - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of general psychology, 1976-07, Vol.95 (1), p.85-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1976</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-4a811fca2a7f624ddf7a7bda85482bb5dbce4c2743d8db0c959e5097f5b4db153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-4a811fca2a7f624ddf7a7bda85482bb5dbce4c2743d8db0c959e5097f5b4db153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/956793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harriman, Arthur E.</creatorcontrib><title>Preferences by Northern Grasshopper Mice for Solutions of Sugars, Acids, and Salts in Richter-Type Drinking Tests</title><title>The Journal of general psychology</title><addtitle>J Gen Psychol</addtitle><description>Taste preferences, as measured in 48-hour, Richter-type drinking tests (test solution opposite distilled water), were determined for northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster, ssp. breviauritus). The Ss were nine males and nine females which were individually housed within an environmental chamber. The test solutions were prepared from five sugars (fructose, glucose, lactose, maltose, sucrose), three salts (magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, sodium chloride), and two acids (citric acid and hydrochloric acid). In randomly assigned order, each sugar and each salt solution was presented at five molar concentrations, and each acid was paired with distilled water at six levels of pH. Strong drinking preferences were shown for all concentrations of the sugars above .05−.10 M, and sugars ranked in order of preference as follows: Maltose = sucrose > glucose = fructose > lactose. Preferences were also shown for hypotonic concentrations of NaCl. The other salts and both acids, however, were indifferently preferred at low concentrations and were rejected at the higher concentrations. Taste preferences by grasshopper mice for these chemicals were similar to those exhibited by Mongolian gerbils tested with the same items. The similar patterns of preference shown by New World cricetid rodents (grasshopper mice) and Old World cricetid rodents (gerbils) suggest that conclusions concerning disparity in taste sensibilities among animal forms may be premature.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Drinking Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gerbillinae</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice - physiology</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><issn>0022-1309</issn><issn>1940-0888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi3ELS28AUiWkFh1gj0ex_aOqkCLVC4iYW352rhM7Kk9oypvj0dJWbDo6uic852L_h-AtxgtMeLoA0JtiwkSSyzYailYLa74E7DAokMN4pw_BYuZaWboJTgp5RbNOSMvwHNBV0yQBbj7mZ132UXjCtR7-D3lcetyhJdZlbJNw-Ay_BaMgz5luE79NIYUC0werqcblcsZPDfB1qCihWvVjwWGCH8Fsx1dbjb7wcFPOcQ_Id7AjStjeQWeedUX9_oYT8HvL583F1fN9Y_Lrxfn140hiIxNpzjG3qhWMb9qO2s9U0xbxWnHW62p1cZ1pmUdsdxqZAQVjiLBPNWd1ZiSU_D-sHfI6W6ql-UuFOP6XkWXpiI56UTVj1Xw3X_gbZpyrL9J3ApEEeKUV4oeKJNTKVU0OeSwU3kvMZKzH_LBDzn7IY9-1Lk3x-2T3jn7b-pgQG1_PLRDrALv1H3KvZWj2vcp-6yiCUWSxy_8BftsmiI</recordid><startdate>197607</startdate><enddate>197607</enddate><creator>Harriman, Arthur E.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Journal Press, etc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PN</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197607</creationdate><title>Preferences by Northern Grasshopper Mice for Solutions of Sugars, Acids, and Salts in Richter-Type Drinking Tests</title><author>Harriman, Arthur E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-4a811fca2a7f624ddf7a7bda85482bb5dbce4c2743d8db0c959e5097f5b4db153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Drinking Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gerbillinae</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice - physiology</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harriman, Arthur E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of general psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harriman, Arthur E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferences by Northern Grasshopper Mice for Solutions of Sugars, Acids, and Salts in Richter-Type Drinking Tests</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of general psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Psychol</addtitle><date>1976-07</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>85-92</pages><issn>0022-1309</issn><eissn>1940-0888</eissn><abstract>Taste preferences, as measured in 48-hour, Richter-type drinking tests (test solution opposite distilled water), were determined for northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster, ssp. breviauritus). The Ss were nine males and nine females which were individually housed within an environmental chamber. The test solutions were prepared from five sugars (fructose, glucose, lactose, maltose, sucrose), three salts (magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, sodium chloride), and two acids (citric acid and hydrochloric acid). In randomly assigned order, each sugar and each salt solution was presented at five molar concentrations, and each acid was paired with distilled water at six levels of pH. Strong drinking preferences were shown for all concentrations of the sugars above .05−.10 M, and sugars ranked in order of preference as follows: Maltose = sucrose > glucose = fructose > lactose. Preferences were also shown for hypotonic concentrations of NaCl. The other salts and both acids, however, were indifferently preferred at low concentrations and were rejected at the higher concentrations. Taste preferences by grasshopper mice for these chemicals were similar to those exhibited by Mongolian gerbils tested with the same items. The similar patterns of preference shown by New World cricetid rodents (grasshopper mice) and Old World cricetid rodents (gerbils) suggest that conclusions concerning disparity in taste sensibilities among animal forms may be premature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>956793</pmid><doi>10.1080/00221309.1976.9710868</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1309 |
ispartof | The Journal of general psychology, 1976-07, Vol.95 (1), p.85-92 |
issn | 0022-1309 1940-0888 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_956793 |
source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acids Animals Carbohydrates Drinking Behavior - physiology Female Gerbillinae Male Mice - physiology Salts Species Specificity Taste - physiology |
title | Preferences by Northern Grasshopper Mice for Solutions of Sugars, Acids, and Salts in Richter-Type Drinking Tests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferences%20by%20Northern%20Grasshopper%20Mice%20for%20Solutions%20of%20Sugars,%20Acids,%20and%20Salts%20in%20Richter-Type%20Drinking%20Tests&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20general%20psychology&rft.au=Harriman,%20Arthur%20E.&rft.date=1976-07&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=85-92&rft.issn=0022-1309&rft.eissn=1940-0888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00221309.1976.9710868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1290500858%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290500858&rft_id=info:pmid/956793&rfr_iscdi=true |