Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: failure patterns by cell type in RTOG 88-08/ECOG 4588. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial. Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS > or =70 and weight loss < or =5% were randomized to one of thr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 1997-10, Vol.39 (3), p.537
Hauptverfasser: Komaki, R, Scott, C B, Sause, W T, Johnson, D H, Taylor, 4th, S G, Lee, J S, Emami, B, Byhardt, R W, Curran, Jr, W J, Dar, A R, Cox, J D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 537
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 39
creator Komaki, R
Scott, C B
Sause, W T
Johnson, D H
Taylor, 4th, S G
Lee, J S
Emami, B
Byhardt, R W
Curran, Jr, W J
Dar, A R
Cox, J D
description To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial. Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS > or =70 and weight loss < or =5% were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard radiation therapy with 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (STD RT), induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29 with vinblastine 5 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks followed by 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (CT + RT), or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d. (HFX RT). Of 490 patients enrolled, 458 were evaluable. Minimum and median periods of observation for this analysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively. Pretreatment characteristics were equally distributed. Toxicities were previously reported. Median survival rates were 11.4, 13.6, and 12.3 months for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (log rank p = 0.05, Wilcoxon p = 0.04). Survivals were 20, 31, and 24% at 2 years, and 4, 11, and 9% at 4 years in the STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT groups, respectively. There were no differences in local tumor control rates among the treatments. Patterns of first failure showed less distant metastasis (DM) (other than brain) for CT + RT compared to the RT alone arms (p = 0.04). Within squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), DM (other than brain) rates were 43%, 16%, and 38% in SCC for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (p = 0.0015). Patients with peripheral/chest wall lesions were significantly more likely to fail first in the thorax when treated on STD RT compared to CT + RT and HFX RT (p = 0.009). Survival rates were similar among the treatment arms for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, failure patterns did not differ by treatment group, but survival was significantly better in those who were treated by induction chemotherapy (p = 0.04). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated on the CT + RT arm had a significant reduction of first DM other than brain, but there was difference in survival. Survival favored CT + RT in nonsquamous carcinoma despite similar failure patterns. Reasons for improved survival with CT + RT in NSCLC are not yet available.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_9336129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9336129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p539-aac16654be1630bc9c4c8272c169283602159e003c0841868179e006da432b0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNFKwzAUhnuhzDl9BOG8QLekabvUOylzDgaD0ftxmmYzkqUxaQZ9YZ_Dzg1Br87_Hz7-c_hvojFhOYkZoflddO_9ByGE0nk6ikYFYzlNinH0tTJNEJ1qDQjlrcZOmdlJmVqjH6QENA0o57BR-EOd_PSPVwaCcdJL0WGtJfjPgMc2eBBSa9DBHECgEdI9wx6VDk6Cxa6Tznio-wvV9Vaeg7bVZgmcx4TPFuUg04zzKWx_b1Xv0qHtYWNEq9tDD0vXBjuFxfDrEAhl29qB6NRJ_mMeots9ai8fr3MSVa-LqnyL15vlqnxZxzZjRYwoaJ5naS1pzkgtCpEKnsyTYVskfOgyoVkhCWGC8JTynNP52eYNpiypScMm0dMl1ob6KJuddeqIrt9d62bftPZ9sA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: failure patterns by cell type in RTOG 88-08/ECOG 4588. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Komaki, R ; Scott, C B ; Sause, W T ; Johnson, D H ; Taylor, 4th, S G ; Lee, J S ; Emami, B ; Byhardt, R W ; Curran, Jr, W J ; Dar, A R ; Cox, J D</creator><creatorcontrib>Komaki, R ; Scott, C B ; Sause, W T ; Johnson, D H ; Taylor, 4th, S G ; Lee, J S ; Emami, B ; Byhardt, R W ; Curran, Jr, W J ; Dar, A R ; Cox, J D</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial. Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS &gt; or =70 and weight loss &lt; or =5% were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard radiation therapy with 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (STD RT), induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29 with vinblastine 5 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks followed by 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (CT + RT), or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d. (HFX RT). Of 490 patients enrolled, 458 were evaluable. Minimum and median periods of observation for this analysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively. Pretreatment characteristics were equally distributed. Toxicities were previously reported. Median survival rates were 11.4, 13.6, and 12.3 months for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (log rank p = 0.05, Wilcoxon p = 0.04). Survivals were 20, 31, and 24% at 2 years, and 4, 11, and 9% at 4 years in the STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT groups, respectively. There were no differences in local tumor control rates among the treatments. Patterns of first failure showed less distant metastasis (DM) (other than brain) for CT + RT compared to the RT alone arms (p = 0.04). Within squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), DM (other than brain) rates were 43%, 16%, and 38% in SCC for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (p = 0.0015). Patients with peripheral/chest wall lesions were significantly more likely to fail first in the thorax when treated on STD RT compared to CT + RT and HFX RT (p = 0.009). Survival rates were similar among the treatment arms for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, failure patterns did not differ by treatment group, but survival was significantly better in those who were treated by induction chemotherapy (p = 0.04). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated on the CT + RT arm had a significant reduction of first DM other than brain, but there was difference in survival. Survival favored CT + RT in nonsquamous carcinoma despite similar failure patterns. Reasons for improved survival with CT + RT in NSCLC are not yet available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9336129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy ; Adenocarcinoma - secondary ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Brain Neoplasms - secondary ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prospective Studies ; Remission Induction ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Failure ; Vinblastine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1997-10, Vol.39 (3), p.537</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9336129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Komaki, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, C B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sause, W T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, 4th, S G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emami, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byhardt, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, Jr, W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dar, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, J D</creatorcontrib><title>Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: failure patterns by cell type in RTOG 88-08/ECOG 4588. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial. Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS &gt; or =70 and weight loss &lt; or =5% were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard radiation therapy with 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (STD RT), induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29 with vinblastine 5 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks followed by 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (CT + RT), or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d. (HFX RT). Of 490 patients enrolled, 458 were evaluable. Minimum and median periods of observation for this analysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively. Pretreatment characteristics were equally distributed. Toxicities were previously reported. Median survival rates were 11.4, 13.6, and 12.3 months for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (log rank p = 0.05, Wilcoxon p = 0.04). Survivals were 20, 31, and 24% at 2 years, and 4, 11, and 9% at 4 years in the STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT groups, respectively. There were no differences in local tumor control rates among the treatments. Patterns of first failure showed less distant metastasis (DM) (other than brain) for CT + RT compared to the RT alone arms (p = 0.04). Within squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), DM (other than brain) rates were 43%, 16%, and 38% in SCC for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (p = 0.0015). Patients with peripheral/chest wall lesions were significantly more likely to fail first in the thorax when treated on STD RT compared to CT + RT and HFX RT (p = 0.009). Survival rates were similar among the treatment arms for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, failure patterns did not differ by treatment group, but survival was significantly better in those who were treated by induction chemotherapy (p = 0.04). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated on the CT + RT arm had a significant reduction of first DM other than brain, but there was difference in survival. Survival favored CT + RT in nonsquamous carcinoma despite similar failure patterns. Reasons for improved survival with CT + RT in NSCLC are not yet available.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Vinblastine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNFKwzAUhnuhzDl9BOG8QLekabvUOylzDgaD0ftxmmYzkqUxaQZ9YZ_Dzg1Br87_Hz7-c_hvojFhOYkZoflddO_9ByGE0nk6ikYFYzlNinH0tTJNEJ1qDQjlrcZOmdlJmVqjH6QENA0o57BR-EOd_PSPVwaCcdJL0WGtJfjPgMc2eBBSa9DBHECgEdI9wx6VDk6Cxa6Tznio-wvV9Vaeg7bVZgmcx4TPFuUg04zzKWx_b1Xv0qHtYWNEq9tDD0vXBjuFxfDrEAhl29qB6NRJ_mMeots9ai8fr3MSVa-LqnyL15vlqnxZxzZjRYwoaJ5naS1pzkgtCpEKnsyTYVskfOgyoVkhCWGC8JTynNP52eYNpiypScMm0dMl1ob6KJuddeqIrt9d62bftPZ9sA</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Komaki, R</creator><creator>Scott, C B</creator><creator>Sause, W T</creator><creator>Johnson, D H</creator><creator>Taylor, 4th, S G</creator><creator>Lee, J S</creator><creator>Emami, B</creator><creator>Byhardt, R W</creator><creator>Curran, Jr, W J</creator><creator>Dar, A R</creator><creator>Cox, J D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: failure patterns by cell type in RTOG 88-08/ECOG 4588. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group</title><author>Komaki, R ; Scott, C B ; Sause, W T ; Johnson, D H ; Taylor, 4th, S G ; Lee, J S ; Emami, B ; Byhardt, R W ; Curran, Jr, W J ; Dar, A R ; Cox, J D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p539-aac16654be1630bc9c4c8272c169283602159e003c0841868179e006da432b0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Vinblastine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Komaki, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, C B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sause, W T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, 4th, S G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emami, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byhardt, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, Jr, W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dar, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, J D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Komaki, R</au><au>Scott, C B</au><au>Sause, W T</au><au>Johnson, D H</au><au>Taylor, 4th, S G</au><au>Lee, J S</au><au>Emami, B</au><au>Byhardt, R W</au><au>Curran, Jr, W J</au><au>Dar, A R</au><au>Cox, J D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: failure patterns by cell type in RTOG 88-08/ECOG 4588. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>537</spage><pages>537-</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><abstract>To analyze disease failure patterns by pretreatment characteristics and treatment groups in a prospective randomized trial. Patients with medically inoperable Stage II, unresectable IIIA and IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer with KPS &gt; or =70 and weight loss &lt; or =5% were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard radiation therapy with 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (STD RT), induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 29 with vinblastine 5 mg/m2 weekly for 5 weeks followed by 60 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day (CT + RT), or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d. (HFX RT). Of 490 patients enrolled, 458 were evaluable. Minimum and median periods of observation for this analysis were 4 years and 6 years, respectively. Pretreatment characteristics were equally distributed. Toxicities were previously reported. Median survival rates were 11.4, 13.6, and 12.3 months for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (log rank p = 0.05, Wilcoxon p = 0.04). Survivals were 20, 31, and 24% at 2 years, and 4, 11, and 9% at 4 years in the STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT groups, respectively. There were no differences in local tumor control rates among the treatments. Patterns of first failure showed less distant metastasis (DM) (other than brain) for CT + RT compared to the RT alone arms (p = 0.04). Within squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), DM (other than brain) rates were 43%, 16%, and 38% in SCC for STD RT, CT + RT, and HFX RT, respectively (p = 0.0015). Patients with peripheral/chest wall lesions were significantly more likely to fail first in the thorax when treated on STD RT compared to CT + RT and HFX RT (p = 0.009). Survival rates were similar among the treatment arms for patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Among patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma, failure patterns did not differ by treatment group, but survival was significantly better in those who were treated by induction chemotherapy (p = 0.04). Patients with squamous cell carcinoma treated on the CT + RT arm had a significant reduction of first DM other than brain, but there was difference in survival. Survival favored CT + RT in nonsquamous carcinoma despite similar failure patterns. Reasons for improved survival with CT + RT in NSCLC are not yet available.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9336129</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1997-10, Vol.39 (3), p.537
issn 0360-3016
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_9336129
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - drug therapy
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - radiotherapy
Adenocarcinoma - secondary
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Brain Neoplasms - secondary
Carcinoma, Large Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Large Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Large Cell - radiotherapy
Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - radiotherapy
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary
Cisplatin - administration & dosage
Combined Modality Therapy
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Prospective Studies
Remission Induction
Survival Rate
Treatment Failure
Vinblastine - administration & dosage
title Induction cisplatin/vinblastine and irradiation vs. irradiation in unresectable squamous cell lung cancer: failure patterns by cell type in RTOG 88-08/ECOG 4588. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A17%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Induction%20cisplatin/vinblastine%20and%20irradiation%20vs.%20irradiation%20in%20unresectable%20squamous%20cell%20lung%20cancer:%20failure%20patterns%20by%20cell%20type%20in%20RTOG%2088-08/ECOG%204588.%20Radiation%20Therapy%20Oncology%20Group.%20Eastern%20Cooperative%20Oncology%20Group&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Komaki,%20R&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=537&rft.pages=537-&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E9336129%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9336129&rfr_iscdi=true